We examined the expression of Glut-4 in a panel of primary NSCLC tumor surgical specimens, comparing expression in the tumor versus matched normal lung tissue obtained from the same individuals. In agreement with previously published immunohistochemistry results [12], Glut-4 mRNA was detected in only two of the NSCLC samples or approximately 10% of samples (data not shown). In contrast, Glut-3 mRNA was detectable in all NSCLC samples, but no significant differences in mRNA levels were observed (data not shown).

Inhibition of histone deacetylases by the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) led to the induction of Glut-4 in the NSCLC cell lines A549, SK-MES-1 and H460 (Figure 1). In contrast, no major change in Glut-4 expression was observed in the normal bronchial epithelial cell line HBEC4 when exposed to TSA.

Subsequently we examined the response of Glut-4 to TSA with two other histone deacetylase inhibitors, Phenylbutyrate (PB), and the FDA approved HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA –Vorinostat) (Figure 1). We confirmed the initial observation that Glut-4 expression can be induced or increased following inhibition of histone deacetylases (Figure 1).

We examined the expression of various other Glut family members in the A549 and SK-MES-1cell lines for responses to HDACi. Glut1 was expressed in both cell lines but was not induced by SAHA (Figure 2a, and data not shown). Of the other Glut family members screened, Glut-3 was also found to be increased in these cell lines in response to HDAC inhibition (Figure 2b).

As both tissue and inhibitor specific responses have been demonstrated to occur for HDACi [17], we examined the effect of TSA on Glut-4 expression in cell lines from organs important for insulin-mediated responses. Glut-4 was induced in cells derived from liver, pre-adipocytes, kidney, but was not induced in cells derived from skeletal muscle (Figure 3).

To see if the induction/upregulation of Glut-4 was a direct consequence of HDAC inhibition, cells were exposed to cycloheximide prior to TSA treatments. Pretreatment with cycloheximide did not prevent the induction of Glut-4 mRNA (Figure 4a), suggesting that de novo protein synthesis was not required for the upregulation of Glut-4, and that direct chromatin remodeling of the Glut-4 promoter was occurring. To confirm that the observed effects of HDAC inhibition were due to increased histone hyperacetylation at the promoter of Glut-4, we carried out chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis at the Glut-4 promoter in A549 cells treated with TSA. A no-antibody control was included to test for non-specific carriage of DNA with histones. As can be seen in Figure 4b, treatment with TSA results in an increase in the amount of PCR product for Glut-4 indicating an increase in histone hyperacetylation around its promoter. Using specific antibodies we show that lysine 9 and lysine 14 are hyperacetylated in this region following treatment with TSA, and clearly demonstrate that chromatin remodeling is directly involved with the activation of Glut-4. Interestingly, no enhancement of histone trimethylation on lysine 4 of histone H3 was observed in response to promoter activation. H3K4me3 is considered to be a mark for transcriptionally active chromatin [18], and recent findings suggest that methylated H3K4 acts to facilitate the competency of pre-mRNA maturation through the bridging of spliceosomal components to H3K4me3 via CHD1 [19]. Unusually, we observe a strong increase in the levels of histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation (H3K4me2) a modification generally perceived to be associated with repressive chromatin [20], at the Glut-4 promoter following activation of transcription via HDACi (Figure 4). However, this mark has also been found to be enriched in the cis-regulatory regions of active promoters as well as at developmentally poised genes [21]. We also observe a loss of an activating mark for transcription, histone lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me) [22], following activation of Glut-4 in our cells. In agreement with the current literature, we observe the presence of a repressive mark H3K9Me2 at the Glut-4 promoter prior to activation via HDACi, and levels of this histone modification are lost following activation [20,22]. This would therefore indicate that much more detailed studies of the histone post-translational modifications will be required to functionally elucidate the “histone code” regulating this promoter region.

To determine if the induction of Glut-4 mRNA in response to histone deacetylase inhibition is sustained, cells were treated with SAHA for 24 hours and either processed directly or the media replaced and the cells allowed to recover for a further 24 hours. In A549 cells Glut-4 mRNA returned to basal levels within 24 hours (Figure 5a), while in SK-MES-1 a sustained elevation in Glut-4 mRNA is observed 24 hours following drug removal (Figure 5b).

Bioinformatic analysis of the Glut-4 promoter revealed the presence of several consensus sites for proteins associated with chromatin remodeling including the lysine methyltransferase SMYD3A [OMIM: 608783], MEF2A [OMIM: 600660], Sp1 [OMIM: 189906] and CTCF [OMIM: 604167] (Figure 6a). To test whether Glut-4 may be regulated via CTCF, a luciferase construct fused to the Glut-4 promoter (pHGT4−2031/+61) was transfected into A549 cells in conjunction with either a CTCF overexpression vector (pCI-CTCF), or its corresponding empty vector (pCI), and luciferase activity measured 48 hours post transfection. The CTCF overexpression vector was found to enhance luciferase activity from the Glut-4 promoter (Figure 6b). CTCF is a highly conserved zinc finger protein that regulates gene transcription through the formation of higher order chromatin structures [23]. It has been postulated that CTCF may act as a transcription factor for context-dependent promoter activation/repression [23], and our results would seem to indicate that CTCF may be able to activate transcription of Glut-4. Support for this observation comes from a study of CTCF binding sites using high-resolution mapping of CTCF sites that identified a CTCF binding site within the Glut-4 promoter [24].

It is also well established that MEF2A regulates Glut-4 [25] in a process involving histone acetylation [26]. Indeed, in adipocytes it has been shown that MEF2A associates with histone deacetylase 5 to regulate Glut-4 expression [27]; further supporting our data that Glut-4 is regulated through dynamic chromatin remodeling.

The insulin/IGF signaling pathways are key regulators of energy metabolism and growth and considerable evidence now exists that these hormones and the signal transduction networks they regulate have important roles in cancer [28,29]. Overexpression of the insulin receptor is associated with increased risk of metastasis and decreased survival in NSCLC [13], while the IGF1R is also emerging as an exciting candidate therapeutic target in this disease [30]. There is increasing evidence that regulation of the insulin signaling pathway is dynamically controlled using chromatin remodeling [31–33]. Glucose transporters, key regulators of cellular bioenergetics, are regulated by insulin/IGF signaling. Further evidence for this has come from studies linking histone acetylation and histone methylation with regulation of Glut-5 in colon cells [34].

The potential for using histone deacetylase inhibitors to target tumor bioenergetics through modulating glucose metabolism has recently been postulated for multiple myeloma, where cells treated with such inhibitors downregulated Glut-1 and inhibited hexokinase activity [35]. We were unable to detect any changes in Glut-1 expression in NSCLC cell lines, and as such directly targeting glucose metabolism through downregulating Glut-1 is not feasible in lung cancer. However, the data presented by us in this article clearly demonstrates that both Glut-3 and Glut-4 are dynamically regulated by histone post-translational modifications including histone acetylation. Conceivably, the ability of HDAC inhibitors to upregulate glucose transporters represents a potential mechanism for targeting solid tumors such as NSCLC through the Warburg effect. Metabolic targeting drugs based on glucose have been developed such as 2-deoxyglucose which show promise in targeting solid tumors [36]. Intriguingly this drug has been shown to enhance radiation- and chemotherapeutic drug-induced damage in a number of cancer cells under in vitro and in vivo conditions while sparing or protecting normal cells [37]. This raises the possibility that by inducing Glut isoforms in lung cancer patients and thus enhancing metabolic targeting, may also allow more aggressive radiation- and chemotherapeutic approaches to be considered.

We have demonstrated the induction of both Glut-3 and Glut-4 in NSCLC cell lines in response to HDAC inhibition. Glut-3 generally considered to be confined to tissues that exhibit a high glucose demand [38], while Glut-4 is an insulin dependent glucose transporter. This raises the exciting possibility of combining metabolic targeting drugs such as 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG), epigenetic targeting therapies such as histone deacetylases and inhaled insulin to harness the potential of the Warburg effect in NSCLC. Our data showing that the induction of Glut-4 can be sustained after removal of HDACi raises the possibility of using staggered treatments to gain maximum benefit. Furthermore such therapies could conceivably also allow for more aggressive modalities to be used.

Inhaled insulin has been suggested as a potential means to detect early lung cancer [14]. Our data could potentially be utilized in this regard to enhance FDG-PET imaging for the early detection of lung cancer. Prior to imaging patients with suspected lung cancer could be treated with a histone deacetylase inhibitor to upregulate expression of GLUT transporters. One candidate HDACi which may be suitable is Phenylbutyrate (triButyrate®). This drug is currently FDA approved for the treatment of urea cycle disorders, and currently recommended dosage is in the order of 450 to 500 mg/kg bodyweight per day. Once in the body it is quickly metabolized to a naturally occurring metabolite of phenylalanine, one of the main reasons for its low toxicity.

On a more cautious note, both insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 have recently been shown to have potent mitogenic effects on lung fibroblasts [39], and as such the development of therapies utilizing inhaled insulin should be essentially for short durations. It must be noted that this finding remains controversial as other studies have also shown that inhaled insulin does not trigger lung inflammation and airway remodeling [40].

NSCLC cell lines A549 (adenocarcinoma, ADC), and SK-MES-1 (squamous cell carcinoma, SCC) and H460 (large cell), were purchased from the ATCC (LGC Promochem). The Hep3B (Hepatocellular Carcinoma, HCC) cell line was a kind gift from Professor Pierre De Meyts (Hagedorn Research Institute, Copenhagen). HepG2 (HCC) and HEK-293 (human embryonic kidney) were a gift from Dr Matthew Lawless (UCD). H9C2 (muscle) were a kind gift from Dr Anthony Edwards (IMM, TCD). HK-2 cells were a kind gift from Dr Martin Leonard (Conway Institute, UCD). SGBS cells (human pre-adipocyte) [41] were a kind gift of Professor Martin Wabitsch.

All cell lines were maintained at a constant temperature of 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in their appropriate cell culture media.

Twenty tumor specimens from patients presenting with Stages I and II resectable NSCLC at St. James's Hospital, Dublin were used. Matched normal tissue was taken in parallel for each patient and samples were evaluated by a pathologist immediately following dissection. Informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the study was conducted after formal approval from the Hospital ethics committee.

Trichostatin A was purchased from Invivogen and dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 250 mg/mL. Cell cultures were treated for 24 hours with Trichostatin A, at a final concentration of 250 ng/mL. Phenylbutyrate/Tributyrate™ (PB) was a generous gift from Triple Crown America. Cell cultures were treated with PB at a final concentration of 10 mM for 24 hours. SAHA (Zolinza/Vorinostat®) was purchased from Cayman Chemicals and dissolved in methanol. Cell cultures were treated for 24 hours at a final concentration of 5 μM. 5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine (Decitabine/Dacogen®) was purchased from Merck, and dissolved in ethanol. Cell cultures were treated for 48 h at a final concentration of 5 μM, with the media and drug replaced every 24 hours.

Total RNA was isolated using Tri-Reagent (MRC Gene) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

1st strand cDNA was prepared from total RNA using Superscript II according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Expression of Gluts1-4 and Beta-Actin in A549 and SK-MES-1 cells was examined by RT-PCR using the primers and annealing conditions outlined using the following primers:

PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 minutes followed by 30 cycles of (1 minute at 94 °C, 1 minute at 56 °C, 1 minute at 72 °C) with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes. 10 μL of the Glut RT-PCR product and 2 μL of the Beta-Actin RT-PCR product were loaded onto a 1.2% agarose gel. Quantification of the RT-PCR results were obtained by scanning the gel images and importing the data into TINA 2.09c (Raytest, Isotopenmeβgeräte GmbH, Germany) with Beta-Actin levels utilized as the internal control in each case as appropriate. The values for the gene under scrutiny were then normalized to the internal control.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as follows: Following treatments, cells were fixed with formaldehyde (final concentration 1%), suspended in SDS lysis buffer (Millipore) and sonicated until DNA was fragmented into lengths of between 200-1000. Aliquots of this sheared DNA were subsequently immunoprecipitated using the OneDay ChIP Kit™ (Diagenode) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The antibodies used for immunoprecipitations were as follows: pan acetyl-histone H3 (Millipore Cat#06-599), pan acetyl histone H4 (Millipore Cat# 06-598), histone H3K9/14ac (Diagenode Cat# pAb-ACHBHS-044), histone H3K9ac (Diagenode Cat# pAb-ACHAHS-044). histone H3K4Me3 (Diagenode Cat# pAb-003-050), histone H3K4Me2 (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# D5692), histone H3K4Me (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# M4819) and histone H3K9Me2 (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# D5567). 1 μg of antibody was used per immunoprecipitation as recommended by the manufacturers for the OneDay ChIP Kit™ (Diagenode). A no-antibody control was included to test for non-specific carriage of DNA with histones.

PCR primers for studying Glut-4 by ChIP were designed from the Glut-4 promoter sequence taken from TRED (ID: 113625) [42]. The primers used were as follows:

PCR conditions are the same as described in Section 3.4

The plasmids pCI (empty vector) and pCI-CTCF were a gift from Dr. Elena Klenova (University of Essex, Essex, United Kingdom). The Glut-4 promoter luciferase construct (pHGT4-2031/+61) was generously provided by Dr Yong-Ho Ahn (Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea). Transient transfections of pCI and pHGT4−2031/+61, or pCI-CTCF and pHGT4−2031/+61 were performed using Fugene 6 reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 48 hours, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in 150 μL of reporter lysis buffer (Promega). Luciferase activities were measured using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega).