Next Article in Journal
Mastic Oil Inhibits the Metastatic Phenotype of Mouse Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Protein Kinase A in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Recently Identified Biomarkers That Promote Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
NF-κB in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Oncogenic Functions in Leukemic and in Microenvironmental Cells
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Cancers 2011, 3(1), 773-788; doi:10.3390/cancers3010773

A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Evidence for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Cancer

1
Psychooncology Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, and Department of Psychology, University of Aarhus, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 4, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
2
Research Unit Health, Man & Society, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 January 2011 / Revised: 5 February 2011 / Accepted: 21 February 2011 / Published: 23 February 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [164 KB, uploaded 23 February 2011]

Abstract

In spite of lacking evidence for effects on cancer progression itself, an increasing number of cancer patients use various types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). There is disagreement between CAM practitioners, researchers and clinical oncologists, as to how evidence concerning effects of CAM can and should be produced, and how the existing evidence should be interpreted. This represents a considerable challenge for oncologists; both in terms of patient needs for an informed dialogue regarding CAM, and because some types of CAM may interact with standard treatments. There is a need for insight into which kinds of CAM may work, for whom they work, what the possible effects and side-effects are, and in what ways such effects may come about. The present article presents a framework for evaluating effects of CAM by suggesting a taxonomy of different levels of evidence related to different types of research questions and discussing the relevance of different research methodologies for different types of effects.
Keywords: complementary and alternative medicine; evaluation; effects; research methodology complementary and alternative medicine; evaluation; effects; research methodology
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zachariae, R.; Johannessen, H. A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Evidence for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Cancer. Cancers 2011, 3, 773-788.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Cancers EISSN 2072-6694 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top