Next Article in Journal
The Design, Fabrication, and Testing of an Electromagnetic Micropump with a Matrix-Patterned Magnetic Polymer Composite Actuator Membrane
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of Microscale Magnetic Tumbling Robots for Locomotion in Multiple Environments and Complex Terrains
Previous Article in Journal
New MEMS Tweezers for the Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Materials at the Microscale
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pick-and-Place Operation of Single Cell Using Optical and Electrical Measurements for Robust Manipulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Towards Miniaturization of Magnetic Gears: Torque Performance Assessment

by
Efren Diez-Jimenez
*,
Rocio Sanchez-Montero
and
Miriam Martinez-Muñoz
Departamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones, Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, Km 33,66, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2018, 9(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9010016
Submission received: 5 December 2017 / Revised: 20 December 2017 / Accepted: 30 December 2017 / Published: 31 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro/Nano Robotics, Volume II)

Abstract

:
Magnetomechanical components can be a good solution in order to reduce, or even completely avoid, friction phenomena in micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) since they can transmit forces through magnetic fields without contacts. In this communication, electromagnetic simulations of the expected specific torque of a coaxial magnetic gear are given. The results show that micromagnetic gears (3 mm of diameter) could provide a specific torque up to 8.98 Nm/kg, several times larger than the specific torque that microgears (<9 mm of diameter) can provide. This implies that micromagnetic gears could provide speed conversion without contact in the teeth, avoiding corresponding friction, but also that it would even improve the specific torque transmission with respect to contact microgears.

1. Introduction

Most micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) typically contain moving elements that are susceptible of suffering from friction, wear, and fatigue. In general, for any machine, friction and wear are undesired phenomena because they limit their efficiency and reduce their lifetime. Friction and wear phenomena in microscale are primarily controlled by surface forces (such as capillary, van der Waals, electrostatic, or frictional forces) and surface properties (i.e., surface roughness and adhesion) [1].
For macroscale mechanical elements, friction forces are much smaller than inertia ones and therefore conventional lubrication methods are good enough for a high efficiency and long lifetime of gears. However, as long as the size is reduced, friction forces become more significant and the efficiency decreases abruptly.
Wear issues are also increased in the microscale. Material chips coming from the contact pairs and from solid lubricants. The accumulation of this debris may cause galling [2]. High levels of friction and wear are problems which currently limit the development of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) [3].
Many MEMS surfaces are impossible or impractical to protect from their operating environment. As a result, not only water vapor, but also other contaminants inevitably interact and stick. Friction and wear determines reliability of MEMS which is a crucial aspect [4,5,6]
The problem of wear and friction in MEMS/NEMS has been faced mostly with techniques from the surface engineering field [7]. Scale, coating, surface roughness, and lubricant influence on the friction and wear device properties. Several works have analyzed those effects [8] explaining the differences in tribological behavior from micro to nanoscale [9,10]. Although, these studies conclude with very interesting enhancements, friction and wear always appears since contact is never avoided.
Magnetomechanical components could be a good solution in order to reduce, or even completely avoid, friction phenomena in MEMS. They transmit forces using magnets and magnetic materials that exert force without contact between moving parts. Any kind of kinematic pair or mechanism is susceptible of conversion to its magneto-mechanical equivalent. Spur gears [11], planetary [12], harmonic-drives [13,14,15,16], couplings [17], bevel gear [18], cycloidal gear [19,20] can be converted to its magnetic equivalent. Not only gears can be converted but also bearings, (both rotary and linear), springs [21], suspensions, and even structures can be created with this technology.
Most of these components have been already tested demonstrating their feasibility in macroscale [22,23,24,25] avoiding friction in the teeth transmission or in the bearings. Furthermore, they can be/have been combined (bearings, gear, and coupling) as demonstrated in the first contactless machine ever built [26]. All these components are completely passive, no control or currents are involved: they behave as conventional mechanical elements but with additional advantages: no friction on teeth contacts, no lubrication is needed, wider operational temperature ranges, overload protection, and through-wall coupling connection.
All these advantages are inherent to any kind of magneto-mechanical system. Nevertheless, for the macroscale, the main drawback for their wide adoption has always been their lower specific capacity for torque/force transmission with respect to conventional ones [27]. Some macroscale developments use hybrid mechanisms, as the magnetic gears recently developed for space [28], replacing the most critical element by the magnetic equivalent and keeping other conventional elements like bearings. In this case, friction is not completely eliminated but greatly reduced while keeping a high specific torque (Nm/kg).
In the microscale, research on magneto-mechanisms are scant. Besides magnetic couplings [29] which do not really eliminate friction, there can be found only one work related to magnetomechanical components in the microscale [30]. In that work, a low specific torque spur micromagnetic gear is designed and built adequately. However, there is not any research related to coaxial magnetic gears in the microscale, although they reach the best performance at macro.
In this letter, a specific case in where a magnetomechanical component improve the performance of current micromechanical gears is explored. The design and the torque simulation of a coaxial micromagnetic gear (CMG) is provided and compared with conventional gear and microgear torque performance.

2. Micromagnetic Gear Design

CMG has been selected because it has demonstrated good torque performance in the macroscale and also, because its stack topology is convenient to typical epitaxial MEMS fabrication processes.
CMG consists of an input or fast rotary element made by several permanent magnets (PM), an intermediate element, typically static, made of soft magnetic material and a third element acting as output or slow rotary element made again of a set of PM.
The PMs of the design shown in Figure 1 are polarized in alternative orientations indicated with the colors blue and red. All the polarizations of the PM are in the vertical direction pointing upwards (blue—north pole) or downwards (red—south pole). This type of polarization has been demonstrated feasible by previous authors [31]. However, their application to this specific design remains open research question. The number of dipole-pairs in low speed rotor is Noutput = 29; the number of stationary steel pole-pieces is Nstator = 30; and the number of dipole-pairs in high speed rotor is Ninput = 1.
The gear ratio (Gr) is given by the relation between the different elements according to the equation
G r = N o u t p u t   N s t a t o r   N o u t p u t
This expression is valid provided that the number of dipole pairs in the input is equal to the difference between Noutput and Nstator, i.e., Nstator = 1. In this case, Gr = −1/29. As soft magnetic material Vacoflux 49 (Vacuumschmelze, Hanau, Germany) (Bsat = 2.35 T) has been considered and NdFeB as PM.
Best NdFeB magnetic properties are Br = 1.4 T and Hc = 1030 kA/m. These values can be achieved in macroscale magnets (larger than 1000 micron side) and in thin layers not thicker than 150 microns [32] even in alternative polarizations as needed. However, it has not been demonstrated such a high magnetic product for PM with 200–1000 microns thickness [33]. In this gap, only half of this magnetic product has been achieved. Thus, improving the quality of the PM in this gap also remains as an open research topic.

3. Simulation Results

Two simulations have been done: the first considering best NdFeB magnetic properties and the second one considering currently achievable ones. Electromagnetic FEM software (MaxFEM open source 3D, v 0.3.5, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain) has been used for the parametric simulation. This parametric simulation has been done under static assumption with output and stator element fixed and input element rotating from 0 to 180 degrees (half turn—symmetrical).
The results, depicted in Figure 2, for the best NdFeB show a maximum peak torque in the output element of 820 μNm. The total weight of the magnetic parts is calculated in 73 mg, therefore the specific torque of the gear for a reduction ratio of −1/29 is 11.23 Nm/kg. For the case of currently achievable ones, the output element only reached 385 μNm, thus 5.27 Nm/kg.
In this preliminary design, bearings loads and design have not taken into consideration. It will certainly be necessary to add mechanical bearings, with their corresponding friction. In any case, bearings are not the most critical part in a mechanical transmission. Additionally, specific magnetic designs can be considered in order to balance bearings loads [24].
Bearings, axles, and frames will contribute with extra weight. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate final corrected specific torque values. From previous magnetic gear developments, a correction factor of 1.25 is reasonable for the final device weight [34,35]. This leads to specific torques of 8.98 and 4.21 Nm/kg.

4. Micromagnetic Gears vs. Conventional Gears and Microgears

The transmitted force/torque, in first term, depends directly on the amount of magnetic material bulk that the magneto-mechanism has. This implies that the specific force/torque remains constant for any size. On the contrary, for conventional mechanical elements the miniaturization increases friction/inertia force ratio, thus specific force/torque decreases when reducing size.
Specific torques calculated for the CMG have been compared with those from different gears and microgears (Figure 3).
The values for the comparison have been obtained from Harmonic Drive, Phytron, Faulhaber and Micromotion catalogues and also from references [36,37,38]. More than 150 commercial and research mechanical components have been scouted and considered for the comparison. Micromagnetic gears values are both for the best theoretical material properties (full line) and for the currently achievable properties (dashed line).
The tendency of the mechanical gear-specific torque values decreases quadratically with size, while those for the micromagnetic gears remain constant. This can establish a frontier wherein micromagnetic gears also would perform better in terms of specific torque. This frontier has been found around 2 mm diameter with currently achievable material properties and around 9 mm if the best material properties were achieved.
From those dimensions, a micromagnetic gear would show better performance than a conventional microgear also in terms of mechanical torque transmission altogether with the lack of friction in the teeth meshing. This lack of friction would also allow larger operational speeds provided that, in the complete design, eddy current generation is properly mitigated. Higher specific torque transmission and their inherent advantages due to the contactless motion give micromagnetic gears enough interest to be explored for their application in MEMS. However, improvements on NdFeB magnet quality and polarization techniques are needed for the miniaturization of coaxial magnetic gears.

5. Conclusions

Magnetomechanical components can be a good solution in order to reduce, even completely avoid, friction phenomena in MEMS since they can transmit forces through magnetic fields without contacts. However, studies on such mechanisms are scant in the microscale.
In this letter, it has been studied the specific case of a coaxial magnetic gear. The design and the performance simulation of a micromagnetic gear are provided. The results show that micromagnetic gears could provide a specific torque up to 8.98 Nm/kg, several times larger the specific torque that previous microgears (smaller than 9 mm of diameter) can provide.
Higher specific torque transmission and their inherent advantages due to the contactless motion give micromagnetic gears enough interest to be explored for their application in MEMS. Nevertheless, developments on micromagnet quality and polarization patterning are still needed for micro magnetic gears to become a reality. This letter tries to open or to boost some research paths that could enable novel MEMS applications using micromagnetic gears.

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by Universidad de Alcalá, under Grant No.CCGP2017-EXP/011.

Author Contributions

Efren Díez-Jiménez contributed as expert on magnetic gears in the idea and simulation of the microgear and Miriam Martinez-Muñoz helped in the research of current gears torque performance. Rocio Sánchez-Montero helped with simulations and also in paper re-writing and corrections during revision phase.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Subhash, G.; Corwin, A.D.; de Boer, M.P. Evolution of wear characteristics and frictional behavior in MEMS devices. Tribol. Lett. 2011, 41, 177–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dugger, M.T. Wear mechanisms in a reliability methodology. In Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Reliability, Testing, and Characterization of MEMS/MOEMS, San Jose, CA, USA, 25–31 January 2003; Volume 4980, pp. 22–40. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ku, I.S.Y.; Reddyhoff, T.; Holmes, A.S.; Spikes, H.A. Wear of silicon surfaces in MEMS. Wear 2011, 271, 1050–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iannacci, J. Reliability of MEMS: A perspective on failure mechanisms, improvement solutions and best practices at development level. Displays 2015, 37, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, H.-W.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Horng, J.-H. The analysis of three-body contact temperature under the different third particle size, density, and value of friction. Micromachines 2017, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Penkov, O.; Khadem, M.; Nieto, A.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, D.-E. Design and Construction of a Micro-Tribotester for Precise In-Situ Wear Measurements. Micromachines 2017, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Pasquale, G.; Soma, A.; Barbato, M.; Meneghesso, G. Impact wear and other contact effects on the electro-mechanical reliability of MEMS. In Proceedings of the 2014 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP), Cannes, France, 1–4 April 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tambe, N.S.; Bhushan, B. Scale dependence of micro/nano-friction and adhesion of MEMS/NEMS materials, coatings and lubricants. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1561–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tauviqirrahman, M.; Ismail, R.; Jamari, J.; Schipper, D.J. Friction reduction in lubricated-MEMS with complex slip surface pattern. Procedia Eng. 2013, 68, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carpick, R.W.; Flater, E.E.; VanLangendon, J.R.; de Boer, M.P. Friction in MEMS: From single to multiple asperity contact. In Proceedings of the SEM VIII Intermational Congress & Exposition on Experimental & Applied Mechanics, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 10–12 June 2002; pp. 282–3287. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jorgensen, F.; Andersen, T. Two dimmensional model of a permanent magnet spur gear. In Proceedings of the Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting Industry Applications Conference, Hong Kong, China, 2–6 October 2005; Volume 1–4, pp. 261–265. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang, C.-C.H.C.-C.; Tsai, M.-C.T.M.-C.; Dorrell, D.G.; Lin, B.-J.L.B.-J. Development of a magnetic planetary gearbox. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2008, 44, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rens, J.; Atallah, K.; Calverley, S. A novel magnetic harmonic gear. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2010, 46, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Niguchi, N.; Hirata, K. Cogging torque analysis of magnetic gear. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2012, 59, 2189–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Holehouse, R.C.; Atallah, K.; Wang, J. A linear magnetic gear. In Proceedings of the 2012 XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Marseille, France, 2–5 September 2012; pp. 563–569. [Google Scholar]
  16. Atallah, K.; Wang, J.; Howe, D. A high-performance linear magnetic gear. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yao, Y.D.; Huang, D.R.; Lee, C.M.; Wang, S.J.; Chiang, D.Y.; Ying, T.F. Magnetic coupling studies between radial magnetic gears. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1997, 33, 4236–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tlali, P.M.; Wang, D.R.J.; Gerber, S. Magnetic Gear Technologies: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Berlin, Germany, 2–5 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Davey, K.; McDonald, L.; Hutson, T. Axial flux cycloidal magnetic gears. Magn. IEEE Trans. 2014, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jørgensen, F.T.; Andersen, T.O.; Rasmussen, P.O. The cycloid permanent magnetic gear. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2008, 44, 1659–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Diez-Jimenez, E.; Musolino, A.; Rizzo, R.; Tripodi, E. Analysis of the static and dynamic behavior of a non hysteretic superconductive passive magnetic linear bearing by using an electromagnetic integral formulation. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2016, 50, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Diez-Jimenez, E.; Perez-Diaz, J.-L.; Garcia-Prada, J.C. Local model for magnet–superconductor mechanical interaction: Experimental verification. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 063901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Afsari, S.A.; Heydari, H.; Dianati, B. Cogging torque mitigation in axial flux magnetic gear system based on skew effects using an improved quasi 3-D analytical method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cristache, C.; Diez-Jimenez, E.; Valiente-Blanco, I.; Sanchez-Garcia-Casarrubios, J.; Perez-Diaz, J.L. Aeronautical magnetic torque limiter for passive protection against overloads. Machines 2016, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Diez-Jimenez, E. Design and analysis of a non-hysteretic passive magnetic linear bearing for cryogenic environments. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2014, 228, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Perez-Diaz, J.L.; Diez-Jimenez, E. Performance of magnetic-superconductor non-contact harmonic drive for cryogenic space applications. Machines 2015, 3, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, X.; Chau, K.T.; Cheng, M.; Hua, W. Comparison of magnetic-geared permanent magnet machines. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2013, 133, 177–198. [Google Scholar]
  28. MAGSOAR SL. 2017. Available online: www.magsoar.com (accessed on 1 September 2017).
  29. Zheng, P. Magnetic MEMS and Its Applications; Florida State University: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  30. Makita, S.; Science, C.; Ikuta, K.; Arimoto, S. Non-contact magnetic gear for micro transmission mechanism. In Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots, Nara, Japan, 30 December–2 January 1991; pp. 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  31. Garraud, A.; Dempsey, N.M.; Arnold, D.P. Microscale magnetic patterning of hard magnetic films using microfabricated magnetizing masks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on MEMS, San Francisco, CA, USA, 26–30 January 2014; pp. 520–523. [Google Scholar]
  32. Arnold, D.P.; Wang, N. Permanent magnets for MEMS. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2009, 18, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dempsey, N.M.; Le Roy, D.; Marelli-Mathevon, H.; Shaw, G.; Dias, A.; Al, E. Micro-magnetic imprinting of high field gradient magnetic flux sources. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 262401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Esnoz-Larraya, J.; Valiente-Blanco, I.; Cristache, C.; Sanchez-Garcia-Casarrubios, J.; Rodriguez-Celis, F.; Diez-Jimenez, E.; Perez-Diaz, J.L. Optimagdrive: High-performance magnetic gears development for space applications. In Proceedings of the ESMATS 2017, Hatfield, UK, 20–22 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  35. Diez-Jimenez, E.; Esnoz-Larraya, J.; Valiente-Blanco, I.; Cristache, C. Lubrication free magnetic harmonic drives for harsh space environments. In Proceedings of the Space Robotics Symposium, Glasgow, UK, 29–30 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Degen, R.; Slatter, R. High Speed and Low Weight Micro Actuators for High Precision Assembly. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC5 WG5.5 Third International Precision Assembly Seminar (IPAS ’2006), Bad Hofgastein, Austria, 19–21 February 2006. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ishida, M.; Takeda, H. Wear resistivity of super-precision microgear made of Ni-based metallic glass. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 449–451, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, J.H.; Jung, I.S.; Sung, H.G. Design and manufacturing of ultra small actuator. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM 2006), Budapest, Hungary, 3–5 July 2006; pp. 23–26. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Micromagnetic gear design (dimensions in mm).
Figure 1. Micromagnetic gear design (dimensions in mm).
Micromachines 09 00016 g001
Figure 2. Input and transmitted torque simulation results for the best properties case.
Figure 2. Input and transmitted torque simulation results for the best properties case.
Micromachines 09 00016 g002
Figure 3. Specific torque vs. diameter of different gearsets.
Figure 3. Specific torque vs. diameter of different gearsets.
Micromachines 09 00016 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diez-Jimenez, E.; Sanchez-Montero, R.; Martinez-Muñoz, M. Towards Miniaturization of Magnetic Gears: Torque Performance Assessment. Micromachines 2018, 9, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9010016

AMA Style

Diez-Jimenez E, Sanchez-Montero R, Martinez-Muñoz M. Towards Miniaturization of Magnetic Gears: Torque Performance Assessment. Micromachines. 2018; 9(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diez-Jimenez, Efren, Rocio Sanchez-Montero, and Miriam Martinez-Muñoz. 2018. "Towards Miniaturization of Magnetic Gears: Torque Performance Assessment" Micromachines 9, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9010016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop