- freely available
Micromachines 2013, 4(2), 243-256; doi:10.3390/mi4020243
Published: 7 June 2013
Abstract: Analysis of electric fields generated inside the microchannels of a microfluidic device for electrical lysis of biological cells along with experimental verification are presented. Electrical lysis is the complete disintegration of cell membranes, due to a critical level of electric fields applied for a critical duration on a biological cell. Generating an electric field inside a microchannel of a microfluidic device has many advantages, including the efficient utilization of energy and low-current requirement. An ideal microchannel model was compared with a practical microchannel model using a finite element analysis tool that suggests that the overestimation error can be over 10%, from 2.5 mm or smaller, in the length of a microchannel. Two analytical forms are proposed to reduce this overestimation error. Experimental results showed that the high electric field is confined only inside the microchannel that is in agreement with the simulation results. Single cell electrical lysis was conducted with a fabricated microfluidic device. An average of 800 V for seven seconds across an 8 mm-long microchannel with the dimension of 100 μm × 20 μm was required for lysis, with electric fields exceeding 100 kV/m and consuming 300 mW.
Generating high electric fields inside microchannels are needed for many microfluidic applications, such as lab-on-a-chip (LOC), micro-total-analysis-system (μTAS) and biomedical microelectromechanical systems (bioMEMS) [1,2]. Uniform or non-uniform distribution of the electric fields can be utilized to process biological elements, like cell lysis, electroporation, electrophoresis separation, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detection and separation and electro-osmotic flow generation for electrokinetic (EK) microfluidic pumps [3,4,5]. Electrical lysis on a portable microfluidic device is critical for point-of-care (POC) devices requiring access to internal contents of the cell. We are motivated to develop a POC device that performs DNA detection within few seconds. Such a development will be valuable for emergency responders, criminal investigators and forensic identification. In this work, electrical lysis of biological cells is investigated with a commonly used microchannel structure, where the electrode with excitation potential is positioned at one end of the microchannel, whereas the electrode at the other end of the microchannel is grounded [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The novelty of this work is the analysis of the estimation errors of electric fields of typical microfluidic devices used in such experiments and the models to reduce such estimation errors to achieve a high yield, which is critical for single-cell analysis.
The electric potential across the channel caused by the external electrical field can be evaluated with the Laplace equation, , where is the external electrical potential . The Poisson-Boltzmann equation is employed to govern the electric potential near the channel wall and in the bulk:
This is the most commonly used expression to estimate the electric field strengths inside the microchannels of microfluidic devices [5,6,7,8,9], even though the assumptions involving dielectric constant, fringe field and parallel electrode surface are invalidated. Furthermore, solid-liquid interface develops an electrical double layer (EDL) with the characteristic thickness of the Debye length, which has significant influence on the behavior of ionic conductors. These factors lead to a significant estimation error when Expression (2) is used, which is increasingly critical as the dimensions of the microchannel become smaller––the general trend in microfluidics and nanofluidics.
To accurately determine the electric field distribution, the finite element method (FEM) is more acceptable, as results with higher confidence can be produced through incorporating proper simulation setup, such as boundary conditions and refining of mesh sizes at regions of non-uniformity [8,12]. Using this technique, the analytical expressions developed are design-specific [12,13,14]. The microchannel structure under consideration has a uniform cross-section throughout its length, and the electrodes are placed at both terminals of the microchannel. There are a number of reports that share this topology [5,6,7,8,9,10,15]. This work attempts to analyze the estimation error stemming from Expression (2) and proposes two analytical expressions to reduce the error. The findings are applicable for microchannels with uniform electric fields containing physiological solution—a practical scenario.
Single cell electrical lysis experiments were conducted using biological cells with applied electrical excitation. Electrical lysis is a phenomenon of complete cell membrane breakdown under a high electric field of a critical period [8,16,17,18]. Reports of various types of cell lysis using an electrical field are available, including yeast cells, E. coli , cancer cells [20,21,22], mammalian cells , leukocytes , erythrocyte , red blood cells [8,26] and Chinese hamster ovary cells [6,27]. In this work, non-invasively collected cell debris, i.e., shredded cells, of epidermal tissue from human fingerprints are used as cell-samples.
2. Simulation of Electric Fields inside Microchannels
Before proceeding to a comprehensive analysis of electric fields inside microchannels, a qualitative comparison is depicted through electric field distribution without any microchannel structure (Figure 1a) and with a microchannel structure (Figure 1b). Maxwell3D simulator (Ansoft Corp. acquired by ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA) was used as the FEM tool. Isothermal boundary conditions were applied for the simulation box, whose size was determined iteratively by doubling each dimension until there was no significant change due to the box size in subsequent iterations. The mesh size was manually increased at the corners and inside small features to increase simulation accuracy at locations where a higher gradient is expected. Figure 1a depicts that the electric field distribution without the microchannel was more pronounced around the electrodes, whereas for the case of a microchannel, as depicted in Figure 1b, the higher electric field distribution was concentrated inside the microchannels. Evidently, an advantage of the microchannel structure is that the cell samples placed inside the microchannels away from the electrodes are exposed to high electric fields, thus reducing the possibility of the cell samples being effected by the electrolysis of water that occurs at the interface of the electrodes when a potential is applied. In addition, the use of microchannels lowers the current flow, power dissipation and energy consumption to produce a certain electric field inside the microchannel, due to the confinement of the electron flow-path.
2.1. Modeling of an Ideal Microchannel
To begin electric field analysis of the microfluidic device, an ideal model of a microchannel structure is considered, where the microchannel is a “rectangular box” with length, width and height of lch, wch and hch, respectively. Both electrodes are in contact with the complete cross-sectional areas on both terminals of the microchannel. The microchannel contains physiological buffer fluid (e.g., D-PBS) with the relative permittivity (εr) and conductivity (σch) used in the literature (80 and 1.6 S/m, respectively) . The microchannel structure along with the electrodes is enclosed within a large glass substrate. An electric field, Ech, develops inside the microchannel as an excitation voltage, Vapp, is applied across the electrode-pair. In this ideal case, the voltage across the microchannel, Vch, is the same as Vapp.
For this ideal model of the microchannel, electric flux generated inside the microchannel can be approximated as uniform. Thus, Ech can be expressed using the electric field expression between two parallel electrodes , given as:
Due to the current flow through the buffer fluid, the Columbic power dissipation, Pd, inside the microchannel can be expressed as :
The energy density, uch, inside the microchannel due to the electric field can be expressed as :
Here, ε (=ε0εr) is the permittivity of the buffer fluid, where ε0 is the permittivity of the free space and εr is the relative permittivity of the buffer fluid. The total energy stored, Uch, can be obtained by integrating uch over Λch . For this ideal microchannel model, Uch can be expressed by:
Hence, for a given electric field and buffer fluid, Uch is proportional to Λch. Furthermore, Uch is also proportional to Pd with a proportionality constant of ερch/2.
2.2. Modeling a Microchannel of the Microfluidic Device
The microfluidic device contains a microchannel that fluidically connects two access holes (reservoirs). To develop an electric field inside the microchannel, electrodes are inserted inside these access holes. Both the microchannel and the access holes contain the physiological buffer fluid (D-PBS) modeled by assigning proper conductivity and permittivity values, as mentioned above. The electrodes were excited with the applied voltage, Vapp. Notice that in this case, Vch is always smaller than Vapp. The microfluidic device was fabricated with two glass slides: top and bottom. The microchannel was created by an etching technique (wet etching with Hydrofluoric acid, HF) on the top surface of the bottom slide. This also created an etch pad at the bottom of the access hole. The two glass slides were thermally fused together, which produces great modification of microchannel height, as compared to other bonding techniques, such as adhesive.
2.3. Electric Field Simulations
Both models were simulated for a wide range of microchannel dimensions by using the FEM analysis tool. A script file was written that generated 175 different combinations of microchannel dimensions (lch, wch and hch). The ranges of lch, wch and hch were from 100 to 10,000 μm, from 1 to 1000 μm and from 10 to 1000 μm, respectively. The electrodes of 1 mm diameter were positioned at the middle of the access hole, 0.1 mm above the bottom plate in the practical model, and the dimensions of the access holes, electrodes and etch-holes were kept constant for all combinations. Each structure was simulated for a number of excitation voltages ranging from 1 V to 1000 V. The permittivity and conductivity of the buffer fluid were set to εr = 80 and σch = 1.6 S m−1, respectively, to match those of the physiological solution.
The resultant data shows that the mean values of the practical microchannel significantly deviate from those of the ideal model as lch becomes smaller or Ach becomes larger. These deviations, resulting in estimation errors if the expressions were derived in the last section for an ideal microchannel are applied for practical microchannels, should be taken under consideration for microfluidic devices involving generation of non-uniform electric fields. This is especially important for small lengths of microchannels, as reported in recent literature [6,8,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,30]. Thus, the deviation of the mean values between the ideal and the practical model are of particular interest. To quantify across a range of analysis domain, a metric denoting normalized error (δdev) is introduced. Subtracting the mean values from the practical model from the ideal model and dividing it by the mean value of the ideal model, the δdev is calculated. Mathematically:
From the simulation results, the values of δdev are always positive, which indicates that the expressions of the ideal model are overestimated. This can be rationalized, due to the fact that Vch is always smaller than Vapp in practical microchannels, due to parasitics in the reservoir, and the electric field distribution is not uniform throughout the microchannel. As microchannel lengths become smaller, this non-uniformity increases, resulting in the higher value of δdev. Table 1 lists the range for 10% and 50% overestimations for various parameters and dimension of the practical microchannels. Estimation errors are critical to achieve high yields of lysate from minute cell samples. In practical applications with minute cell samples, low yield might lead to the inability to obtain DNA fragments required for downstream analysis, which is critical for single-cell analysis.
|Table 1. The overestimation error ranges for a practical microchannels when the expressions for an ideal microchannel are applied.|
|Parameter||10% overestimation range||50% overestimation range|
|Ech||lch < 2300 μm||lch < 175 μm|
|Pd||Ach/lch < 0.7 μm2/μm||Ach/lch < 100 μm2/μm|
|uch||lch < 5000 μm||lch < 400 μm|
|Uch||Ach/lch < 0.7 μm2/μm||Ach/lch < 100 μm2/μm|
2.4. Expressions for Error Reduction in Practical Microchannels
An approach to reduce the estimation errors is to determine Vch for the practical microchannel. To calculate Vch, one has to determine the resistance introduced by the access holes that are in series with the microchannel resistance. In this section, two analytical expressions are derived to reduce estimation errors for the electric field. In this analysis, non-uniformity of the electric field distribution inside the microchannel and the capacitive component of the microchannel are neglected, assuming a DC excitation condition and steady state operation.
In this approach, the microchannel resistance (Rch) is in series with the two resistances of the access holes external to the microchannel (Rext). Ideal microchannel expressions can be applied for Vch and Ech; thus:
A second approach to reduce the estimation errors is to compensate for δdev. To apply this approach, the δdev can be approximated as a linear relationship between log(δdev) and log(lch), which is motivated through careful observation of the data. Thus:
3. Experimental Results
As an experimental platform, a microfluidic device was developed to induce electric lysis of biological cells. The experiments were conducted at the Cardiovascular Devices Division, the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
3.1. Device Design and Fabrication
The device was designed using the L-edit layout tool (Tanner EDA, CA) and fabricated using the Protolyne fabrication process from Micralyne Inc. (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). Briefly, the fabricated device consisted of two fused glass slides, with dimensions of 95 mm × 16 mm × 1.1 mm each. Eight predefined access holes (reservoirs) of 2 mm diameter were through-drilled in the top slide. Eight etch-pads of 1.5 mm diameter were etched on the top surface of the bottom slide, such that they align with the access holes. Trenches were also etched on the top surface of the bottom slide, which formed microchannels when both glass slides were fused together. Seven trenches were designed of various lengths ranging from 8 to 17 mm. Here, the length of a microchannel was defined as the intersection of a trench and an access hole. The etch depth, which defined the height of a microchannel, is 20 μm based on fabrication process constraints. The widths of microchannels were 100 μm, a trade-off between free transport of cells and minimized power dissipation. Platinum (Pt) electrodes were inserted inside the access holes for electrical excitation.
3.2. Cell-Sample Preparation
Due to the lack of access to proper cell-lines, human fingerprint samples were used as the cell-sample source. Each fingerprint sample was collected from a finger of an individual on a sterile Petri dish. The fingerprint samples contain dead and damaged cells shredded from the epidermal tissue. To collect these cells from the surface of Petri dishes, 20 μL of physiological solution (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, D-PBS) was applied. The D-PBS fluid maintains a pH of 7, required to preserve cell samples from osmotic pressure. The micropipette tip was rubbed on the surface of the Petri dish to detach the cell debris from the surface of the dish and to suspend them into the fluid, which was then collected by the micropipette. Average numbers of debris were calculated by overlapping the Petri dish on a 1 mm-square grid under an optical microscope to count the number of debris under each square, then calculating the average of 25 grids. The average number of debris on the surface for a wet fingerprint before the collection was 41.5 per mm2 and after the collection procedure was 21 per mm2, a collection efficiency of about 50%.
3.3. Experimental Procedure
Before each experiment, the microfluidic device was washed with deionized water and dried by blowing warm air. Four microliters of the sample solution were introduced in one access hole, while 4 μL of D-PBS buffer fluid was introduced in an adjacent access hole. A pair of platinum electrodes were introduced in the access holes, and the device was positioned on the stage of an optical microscope (CKX41, Olympus Corp, Westmont, IL, USA) equipped with a CCD (charge-coupled device) camera (Infinity, Lumenera, Ottawa, Canada). The electrode-pair was then connected to a high voltage power supply (FB600, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and an oscilloscope (Tektronix 2430A, Beaverton, OR, USA) to the electrodes (Channel 1) and across a series resistance, Rs, (Channel 2), as schematically shown Figure 2a. Cells migrated through the microchannel when a constant low-electric field gradient was created by applying a voltage of below 200 V through the electrode-pair. When cells were positioned inside the microchannel, the flow was stopped, and a brief high-voltage DC pulse (700 V to 900 V) with a duration up to 9 s was applied through the electrode-pair to lyse the cells. Photographs and video clips (2 fps) were captured through the CCD camera of the optical microscope in phase contrast mode. A photograph of the microfluidic device with electrical connectivity is shown in Figure 2b.
3.4. Fluorescence Imaging
Some cell-samples were stained to verify the structures of cells in the samples. Figure 3 shows images of cell debris from a fingerprint sample under optical microscope in phase-contrast mode (a–b) and with staining in bright-field mode (c). The presence of haematoxylin stain indicates the existence of basophilic structures, such as histones, which are present in chromosomes inside the cell nucleus.
Cells were transported from the source reservoir (access hole) towards the waste reservoir through the microchannel by applying a low electric field created with the application of 100 to 200 V across the microchannel, generating a low electric field of a strength below 25 kV/m. As cells are negatively charged, they experience a force pulling them towards the positive electrodes, due to the combined effect of electrophoresis and electro-osmosis phenomena [31,32]. As cells moved inside the microchannel, the applied voltage was withdrawn to position cells inside the microchannel. Such positioning was verified with fluorescent cell marker (Alexa Flour 488 V) and observed under fluorescence microscope. The illuminated cell inside the microchannel, as seen in Figure 4, verified that the cell was positioned inside the microchannel.
The electrophoretic movement of cells inside the microchannel was not uniform. It was observed that cells tend to adhere to the channel walls while migrating through the microchannel. Two factors might contribute to this type of behavior. Firstly, the surface of the microchannel contained irregularity at the micrometer scale. These irregularities of the channel surfaces were observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) images, as shown in Figure 5. The irregularities might stem from the chemical etching process of the fabrication technology and the orientation of the crystals. Surface irregularities of the channel walls were more pronounced compared to the channel bed. Secondly, the force developed due to the zeta potential, defined as the electrostatic potential generated by accumulation of surface charges along the silica-based channel surfaces , might also contribute to the adherence tendency of the cells. This potential is due to the surface material of the microchannel (silica) and can be alleviated by surface treatment of the microchannel before experiments .
3.5. Single Cell Electrical Lysis Experiments
A high voltage (700 V to 900 V) was applied to induce electrical lysis of biological cells. The developed electric field was higher than 100 kV/m, a typical electric field for electrical lysis of cells [18,19,25]. Figure 6 shows a temporal sequence of microscopic images captured using the CCD camera of the microscope during an electrical lysis experiment. The sample cell inside the microchannel experienced a high electric field (>100 kV/m) and was lysed in about 6.5 s. The cell marked as “a” is completely lysed, whereas the cell marked as “b” is intact, due to the fact that the electric field developed inside the microchannel is high compared to that inside the reservoir. This experiment clearly demonstrates the difference of electric field inside and outside of the microchannel, which cannot be simply calculated using the electric field Expression (2).
Careful observation of the temporal sequence of photographs in Figure 6 indicates that there was a gradual decrease of the contrast in the images of the sample cell “a” between 5 to 6 s. A logical deduction and explanation is that the electroporation phenomenon [31,32], expected to occur just prior to cell lysis, had caused a reduction of the refractive index difference inside and outside of the cell. The duration of the electroporation was less than 1 s. A very high-applied voltage (>1500 V) resulted in bubble formation through breakdown of the water molecules and produced electric arcs that etched the inner surface of the microchannel, as can be observed in Figure 7. The summaries of data obtained from the experiments of various related parameters are given in Table 2, Table 3.
|Table 2. Key observations with various electric field strengths.|
|Electric field ranges||Observations|
|Below 100 kV/m||Cell movement observed|
|Between 100 to 200 kV/m||Electrical lysis observed|
|Above 200 kV/m||Bubble formation and electric arcs inside microchannels|
|Table 3. Results from electrical lysis experiments.|
|Applied potential||Between 700 to 900 V|
|Pulse duration||7 ± 2 s|
|Current flow||~0.5 mA|
|Power dissipation||<300 mW|
Electric fields are commonly used in microfluidic devices and LOCs to stimulate, manipulate and analyze biological elements. The macro-scale approximation of electric field expression is still in use. Microscale electric field distribution, however, deviates from this estimation, due to the highly non-linear nature of the distribution pattern. In this work, we have conducted an analysis of electric fields inside the microchannels of an ideal and a practical model. Furthermore, analytical expressions were developed for the practical model to reduce the estimation error. FEM simulations, however, do not account for various factors, such as EDL, localized fluidic flow and vortex due to electrophoresis, thermal and electrical resistivity change due to Joule heating; these lead to new scopes of the refinement of this work.
The experiment shows a mechanism for single cell lysis with electric fields. A sample cell was lysed inside the microchannel of the microfluidic device by applying a high voltage (700 V to 900 V). The time required for lysis and corresponding power consumption were 7 ± 2 s and <300 mW, respectively. These results show promise for biological studies and experimentation of single cells with microfluidics and LOC technology that uses electrical lysis inside the microchannel environment to analyze single cell contents or sample preparation that combines with other on-chip biological processes downstream.
This research was conducted at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and at Carleton University. The authors gratefully acknowledge Canadian Microelectronics Corporation (CMC) towards fabrication of the microfluidic device. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments, suggestions and insights to improve the quality of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Saliterman, S. Fundamentals of BioMEMS and Medical Microdevices; Wiley-Interscience: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Urban, G.A. BioMEMS; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Morshed, B.I.; Shams, M.; Mussivand, T. Identifying severity of electroporation through quantitative image analysis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 143704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lian, M.; Wu, J. Ultrafast micropumping by biased alternating current electrokinetics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 064101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, N.; Lu, C. A microfluidic device for physical trapping and electrical lysis of bacterial cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 214103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Bhunia, A.K.; Lu, C. A microfluidic flow-through device for high throughput electrical lysis of bacterial cells based on continuous DC voltage. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 22, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhagat, A.S.; Dasgupta, S.; Banerjee, R.K.; Papautsky, I. Effects of microchannel cross-section and applied electric field on electroosmotic mobility. In Proceedings of Conference Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Lyon, France, 10–14 June 2007; pp. 1853–1856.
- Lee, D.W.; Cho, Y.H. A continuous electrical cell lysis device using a low DC voltage for a cell transport and rupture. Sens. Actuators B 2007, B 124, 84–89. [Google Scholar]
- Legendre, L.A.; Bienvenue, J.M.; Roper, M.G.; Ferrance, J.P.; Landers, J.P. A simple, valveless microfluidic sample preparation device for extraction and amplification of DNA from nanoliter-volume samples. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 1444–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.W.; Hagiwara, H.; Fujii, T.; Machida, H.; Inoue, M.; Seki, M.; Endo, I. Separation and Collection of a Specified DNA Fragment by Chip-based CE System. In Micro Total Analysis Systems 2001; Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 113–114. [Google Scholar]
- Ulaby, F.T.; Michielssen, E.; Ravaioli, U. Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins, A.; Chen, C.P.; Spearing, S.; Monaco, L.A.; Steele, A.; Flores, G. Design and modelling of a microfluidic electro-lysis device with controlling plates. In Proceedings of 2006 International MEMS Conference, Singapore, 9–12 May 2006; pp. 620–625.
- Linderholm, P.; Seger, U.; Renaud, P. Analytical expression for electrical field between two facing strip electrodes in microchannel. Electron. Lett. 2006, 42, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, A.N.; Aluru, N.R. Combined circuit/device modeling and simulation of integrated microfluidic system. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2005, 14, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, C.G.; Tan, W.; Zhao, M.; Ricco, A.J.; Fan, Z.H. Integrating polymerase chain reaction, valving, and electrophoresis in a plastic device for bacterial detection. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4591–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lodish, H.; Berk, A.; Zipursky, S.L.; Matsudaira, P.; Baltimore, D.; Darnell, J. Molecular Cell Biology; W. H. Freeman and Co.: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Malacinski, G.M. Essentials of Molecular Biology; Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Burlington, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda, N.; Tanaka, N.; Yangida, Y.; Hatsuzawa, T. On-chip single-cell lysis for extracting intracellular material. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 46, 6410–6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.W.; Tai, Y. A micro cell lysis device. Sens. Actuators A 1999, 73, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Rubinsky, B. Microfabricated electroporation chip for single cell membrane permeabilization. Sens. Actuators A 2001, 89, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Rubinsky, B. Micro-electroporation: Improving the efficiency and understanding of electrical permeabilization of cells. Biomed. Microdevices 1999, 2, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Rubinsky, B. Flow-through micro-electroporation chip for high efficiency single-cell manipulation. Sens. Actuators A 2003, 104, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, F.; Wang, Y.; Sims, C.E.; Bachman, M.; Chang, R.; Li, G.P.; Allbritton, N.L. Fast electrical lysis of cells for capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 3688–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, K.; Wo, A.M.; Lo, Y.; Chen, K.; Lin, C.; Yang, C. Three dimensional electrode array for cell lysis via electroporation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 28, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, J.; Yin, X.; Fang, Z. Integration of single cell injection, cell lysis, separation and detection of intercellular constituents on a microfluidic chip. Lab Chip 2004, 4, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.W.; Cho, Y. A continuous cell lysis device using focused high electric field and self-generated electroosmotic flow. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Istanbul, Turkey, 22–26 January 2006; pp. 426–429.
- Wang, H.; Lu, C. High-throughput and real-time study of single cell electroporation using microfluidic: Effects of medium osmolarity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95, 1116–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, R.P.; Schoenbach, K.H. Electroporation dynamics in biological cells subjected to ultrafast electrical pulses: A numerical simulation study. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilsson, J.W.; Riedel, S.A. Electric Circuits; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Bhagat, A.S.; Dasgupta, S.; Banerjee, R.K.; Papautsky, I. Effects of microchannel cross-section and applied electric field on electroosmotic mobility. In Proceedings of 2007 International Solid-State SensorsActuators and Microsystems Conference, Lyon, France, 10–14 June 2007; pp. 1853–1856.
- Weaver, J.C. Electroporation of cells and tissues. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2000, 28, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dev, S.B.; Rabussay, D.P.; Widera, G.; Hofmann, G.A. Medical applications of electroporation. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2000, 28, 206–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).