Next Article in Journal
Botulinum Toxin A for Controlling Obesity
Next Article in Special Issue
The Possible Mechanisms Involved in Degradation of Patulin by Pichia caribbica
Previous Article in Journal
Aerobic De-Epoxydation of Trichothecene Mycotoxins by a Soil Bacterial Consortium Isolated Using In Situ Soil Enrichment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond Ribosomal Binding: The Increased Polarity and Aberrant Molecular Interactions of 3-epi-deoxynivalenol
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/toxins8100278
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protective Effects of Sporoderm-Broken Spores of Ganderma lucidum on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Function of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of Aflatoxin B1

by
Tao Liu
1,
Qiugang Ma
1,*,
Lihong Zhao
1,
Ru Jia
2,
Jianyun Zhang
1,
Cheng Ji
1 and
Xinyue Wang
1
1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2016, 8(10), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8100278
Submission received: 16 August 2016 / Revised: 14 September 2016 / Accepted: 21 September 2016 / Published: 24 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Promising Detoxification Strategies to Mitigate Mycotoxins in Food and Feed)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to investigate the toxic effects of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and evaluate the effects of sporoderm-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum (SSGL) in relieving aflatoxicosis in broilers. A total of 300 one-day-old male Arbor Acre broiler chickens were randomly divided into four dietary treatments; the treatment diets were: Control (a basal diet containing normal peanut meal); AFB1 (the basal diet containing AFB1-contaminated peanut meal); SSGL (basal diet with 200 mg/kg of SSGL); AFB1+SSGL (supplementation of 200 mg/kg of SSGL in AFB1 diet). The contents of AFB1 in AFB1 and AFB1+SSGL diets were 25.0 μg/kg in the starter period and 22.5 μg/kg in the finisher period. The results showed that diet contaminated with a low level of AFB1 significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the average daily feed intake and average daily gain during the entire experiment and reduced (p < 0.05) serum contents of total protein IgA and IgG. Furthermore, a dietary low level of AFB1 not only increased (p < 0.05) levels of hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation, but also decreased (p < 0.05) total antioxidant capability, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and hydroxyl radical scavenger activity in the liver and spleen of broilers. Moreover, the addition of SSGL to AFB1-contaminated diet counteracted these negative effects, indicating that SSGL has a protective effect against aflatoxicosis.

1. Introduction

Aflatoxins (AFBs) are the most common mycotoxins and are mainly produced by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus [1]. Among all the AFBs, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is the most highly toxic contaminant in foods and feedstuffs, and is classified by the International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC) as a Group 1 carcinogen. In poultry, consumption of AFB1 can cause huge economic losses by retarding animal growth, increasing feed efficiency and the incidence of disease, and inducing damage to organs such as the liver and spleen [2,3]. Moreover, the carry-over of AFB1 through animal-derived products into the human food chain is a potential threat to human health due to its hepatotoxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, and immunosuppression [4,5]. AFB1 is the most widespread oxidative agent of the AFBs [6], and it was reported that the toxic effects of AFB1 were intimately linked with its pro-oxidant which could induce the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lead to the impairment of DNA, RNA, proteins, lipids, and other molecules [7,8]. Therefore, some studies suggested that the addition of antioxidants to diets could protect animals against AFB1-induced toxicity by enhancing the antioxidant system and immunity [9,10].
Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum), a traditional folk medicinal mushroom, has been used as an important longevity and health-promoting herb for more than 2000 years in China [11]. The spores of Ganoderma lucidum (SGL), ejected from the pileus of G. lucidum in the mature phase, are tiny and mist-like particles of about 6.5–8.0 × 9.6–12.6 μm enwrapped with an outer bilayer of sporoderm [12]. During the past two decades, because the spores could be collected on a large scale, SGL has attracted extensive interest as studies revealed that the spores possess many bioactive substances, including polysaccharides, unsaturated fatty acids, triterpenoids, nucleotides, ergostero and other bioactive ingredients [13,14]. In vitro, the polysaccharides of SGL had strong bioactivity in scavenging 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl and oxygen radicals [15]. In addition, antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from SGL were also demonstrated in rats [16]. Furthermore, the polysaccharides from SGL had potent stimulating effects on spleen mass, lymphocyte proliferation and antibody production in mice [17,18]. Fatty acids are another kind of potential active ingredient of SGL, which showed high bioactivities in antitumor and immunomodulation in rats [19,20]. However, the bioactivities of spores are closely related to the status of the sporoderm; the intact sporoderm can inhibit the release and absorption of bioactive substances in the spores [21]. Yue et al. [22] observed that dietary sporoderm-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum (SSGL) were more effective in stimulating the production of interferon-γ, interleukin-2, interleukin-4 and interleukin-6 in mice than dietary sporoderm-unbroken spores of G. lucidum. Therefore, we speculated that supplementation of SSGL to AFB1-contaminated diets might alleviate aflatoxicosis through decreasing the oxidative status and elevating the antioxidant defense system.
Our previous study showed that different levels of SSGL (100, 200 and 500 mg/kg) improved the average daily gain, decreased the feed:gain ratio, and enhanced the antioxidant capacity in the liver and spleen of broilers. In this study, SSGL was chosen to evaluate its protective effects on growth performance, antioxidant function and serum immunoglobulins of male Arbor Acre broilers exposed to a low level of AFB1.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of SSGL on Growth Performance of Male Arbor Acre Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of AFB1

In 0–21 d, broilers fed a diet contaminated with AFB1 resulted in a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in average daily feed intake (ADFI) as compared to the control group (Table 1). The addition of SSGL into the diet contaminated with AFB1 significantly increased (p < 0.05) the ADFI of broilers as compared to the AFB1 group. The ADFI of broilers among control, SSGL and AFB1+SSGL groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). The average daily gain (ADG) and feed:gain ratio (F:G) were not significantly affected (p > 0.05) by a low level of AFB1 or dietary SSGL in broilers.
In 22–44 d, broilers in the AFB1 group had significantly lower (p < 0.05) ADFI and ADG than those in the control group. However, supplementation of SSGL to the AFB1-contaminated diet obviously increased (p < 0.05) ADFI, ADG and decreased (p < 0.05) F:G as compared with the AFB1 group. In addition, broilers in the SSGL and AFB1+SSGL groups had significantly higher (p < 0.05) ADG than those in the control group, but ADFI, ADG and F:G between the SSGL and AFB1+SSGL groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Similar effects of SSGL on the growth performance (ADG, ADFI and F:G) of broilers exposed to a low level of AFB1 were also observed during the entire experiment (0–44 d).

2.2. Effects of SSGL on Oxidative Status in Liver and Spleen of Male Arbor Acre Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of AFB1

The data in Table 2 showed that the hepatic levels of H2O2, MDA and LPO of broilers in the AFB1 group were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the control group, but these indexes were markedly decreased (p < 0.05) by the supplementation of SSGL into the diet contaminated with AFB1. Moreover, broilers in the SSGL group had significantly lower (p < 0.05) hepatic levels of H2O2 and MDA than those in the control group. A higher (p < 0.05) hepatic H2O2 level and lower (p < 0.05) hepatic MDA level of broilers were observed in the AFB1 group as compared to the control group, but the hepatic LPO level of broilers showed no difference (p > 0.05) among the control, SSGL and AFB1+SSGL groups.
Similar to the liver, the splenic levels of H2O2 and LPO of broilers in the AFB1 group were significantly increased (p < 0.05) as compared with those in the control group (Table 2). However, the addition of SSGL in the diet contaminated with AFB1 significantly reduced (p < 0.05) H2O2 and LPO levels in the spleen compared with the AFB1 group. In addition, the splenic level of LPO in the SSGL and AFB1+SSGL groups was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that in the control group, and broilers in the SSGL group had a lower (p < 0.05) MDA level than those in AFB1 group. These results showed that diets contaminated with AFB1 could aggravate the oxidative status of broilers, which could be relieved by the supplementation of SSGL.

2.3. Effects of SSGL on Antioxidant Defense System in Liver and Spleen of Male Arbor Acre Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of AFB

Broilers fed a diet contaminated with AFB1 had significantly decreased (p < 0.05) T-AOC, CAT, GR, GSH-Px and HRSA levels in the liver as compared with those in the control group (Table 3), while the addition of SSGL into the diet contaminated AFB1 significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) the levels of T-AOC, CAT, GR, HRSA and GSH in the liver. When compared to the control group, hepatic enzyme activities (T-AOC, CAT, GR) and the GSH level of broilers were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the SSGL group, whereas a significantly lower (p < 0.05) hepatic activity of GSH-Px and a higher (p < 0.05) level of GSH were observed in broilers in the AFB1+SSGL group. The hepatic activity of T-SOD of broilers exposed to AFB1 was not significantly affected (p > 0.05) by dietary supplementation with SSGL.
Similar negative effects of AFB1 and ameliorative effects of dietary SSGL on the antioxidant defense system were also found in the spleen (Table 3). The splenic levels of T-AOC, CAT, T-SOD, GSH-Px, HRSA and GSH of broilers in the AFB1 group were lower (p < 0.05) than those in the control group. However, supplementation of SSGL to the AFB1-contaminated diet significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) splenic levels of T-AOC, T-SOD, GR, HRSA and GSH as compared to the AFB1 group. In addition, broilers in the SSGL group had significantly higher T-AOC, GR, GSH, HRSA levels than those in the control group, and significantly lower (p < 0.05) activities of CAT, GSH-Px, and higher (p < 0.05) activities of GR, HRSA and GSH were observed in the AFB1+SSGL group as compared to the control group. The splenic activities of T-AOC, CAT, GR, GSH-Px, HRSA in the SSGL group were higher (p < 0.05) than those in the AFB1+SSGL group.

2.4. Effects of SSGL on Serum Total Protein and Immunoglobulins of Male Arbor Acre Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of AFB1

The contents of serum TP, IgA and IgG of broilers exposed to a low level of AFB1 were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those in the control group (Table 4), while these indexes were significantly improved by the addition of SSGL to the diet contaminated with AFB1. However, the contents of serum TP, IgA and IgG of broilers among the control, SSCL and AFB1+SSGL groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the serum IgM of broilers among all the groups.

3. Discussion

3.1. Toxicity of AFB1 on Growth Performance

Feedstuffs are easily contaminated with AFB1 during harvesting, transportation and storage, and it was reported that the detection rates of AFB1 were 50% in corn, 36% in soybean meal, 94% in DDGS, respectively, in the Beijing region [23], and 15.39% in peanuts in the south of China [24]. Therefore, the presence of AFB1 in animals’ diets is hard to avoid, and it is increasingly recognized that the long-term consumption of low levels of AFBs is detrimental to animals’ growth and health. In this study, diet contaminated with AFB1 caused a significant decrease in the ADFI of broilers during the starter period (0–21 d), and not only the ADFI but also the ADG of broilers during the finisher period (22–44 d) were significantly reduced by dietary AFB1. Similar results had been observed in the previous studies, in which an AFB1-containing diet (50–100 μg/kg) could significantly decrease the body weight gain and feed consumption of broilers, causing economic loss [2,25]. Ducks fed diets containing 20 μg/kg of AFB1 had a significantly lower ADG, ADF, and higher F:G [26]. These results indicated that diets containing a low level of AFB1 (22.5–25.0 μg/kg) could inhibit broiler growth and cause great financial losses.

3.2. Toxicity of AFB1 on Oxidative Stress of Broilers

Liver and immune system organs such as the spleen are considered to be sensitive to AFB1 [27,28]. It had been reported that the toxic effect elicited by AFB1 could be closely related to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), mainly including superoxide (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl (OH·) [29]. H2O2 is released from the mitochondria; hydroxyl radicals (OH·) are also an extremely reactive free radical. Biosynthesis and accumulation of ROS are central to oxidative stress-related metabolism [30]. The exceeded ROS could enhance lipid peroxidation, which will impair membrane function by decreasing membrane fluidity and changing the activities of membrane-bound enzymes and receptors [31]. MDA is formed at the end of lipid peroxidation, and reflects the degree of the whole lipid oxidation in the body. In this study, the contents of H2O2, MDA and LPO in the liver and spleen of broilers were significantly increased by dietary AFB1, indicating that a low level of AFB1 (22.5–25.0 μg/kg) could increase the oxidative status in the liver and spleen of broilers. Similar toxic effects of AFB1 on oxidative status were observed in the liver and spleen of rats [32], and broilers [33,34].
The levels of free radical molecules and lipid peroxidation are controlled by an antioxidant defense system, consisting of enzymatic components such as SOD, CAT, and GR, and non-enzymatic components such as GSH and vitamin E [35]. When oxidative stress arises as a pathologic event, the defense system will promote the regulation and expression of enzymatic and non-enzymatic components [36]. SOD can detoxicate O2− to H2O2, and then GSH-Px and CAT catalyze H2O2 directly to water and oxygen at the expense of GSH [37,38]. Many studies observed that dietary AFB1 could decrease the activities of antioxidant enzymes and levels of non-enzymatic antioxidants in broilers [9,39,40]. In the present study, the antioxidant enzyme activities and GSH level in the liver and spleen of broilers fed a diet contaminated with AFB1 were significantly lower than those in the control group, suggesting that the diet contaminated with a low level of AFB1 (22.5–25.0 μg/kg) could suppress the antioxidant capacity of broilers.

3.3. Toxicity of AFB1 on Serum Total Protein and Immunoglobulins of Broilers

Except for the toxic effects of AFB1 on the liver and spleen, the immunosuppression in animals is also a matter of concern, because it may predispose farm animals to infectious diseases and result in economic losses [41]. Immunoglobulins, secreted by B cells, are the main antibody isotypes of the serum and extracellular fluid immune system, thereby allowing them to control the infection of body tissues. AFB1 is known to be immunosuppressive in birds, and it has been reported that diets containing 300 μg/kg of AFB1 significantly reduced the serum IgA, IgG and IgM of broilers [42]. In addition, chickens fed aflatoxin at a concentration of 2500 μg/kg had lower serum total protein (TP), albumin and IgG, but serum IgM was not affected by AFBs [43]. Serum TP is the indicator of protein synthesis, and the decreased serum TP induced by dietary AFB1 may contribute to the decreased contents of immunoglobulins [44,45]. In the present study, broilers fed diets contaminated with a low level of AFB1 (22.5–25.0 μg/kg) had significantly lower serum TP, IgA and IgG, while serum IgM was not significantly affected by dietary AFB1. One mechanism of action of AFBs is related to the inhibition of protein synthesis, which may be responsible for the decrease in serum IgA and IgG in this study.

3.4. Effects of SSGL

Seeking effective ways to alleviate the negative effects of AFB1 has attracted more and more attention. Nowadays, researchers found that different feed additives had the ability to relieve aflatoxicosis. Alpha-lipoic acid, known as an “ideal antioxidant”, could prevent hepatic oxidative stress and down-regulate the expression of hepatic pro-inflammatory cytokines of broilers exposed to a low level of AFB1 [46]. Selenium, playing important roles in immune function, could protect chickens from AFB1-induced impairment of humoral and cellular immune function by reducing bursal histopathological lesions and percentages of apoptotic bursal cells [47]. Vitamin E, as an antioxidant, could ameliorate AFB1-induced toxicity in rats [9] and in ducks [48]. Moreover, some plants or their extracts, such as Chinese cabbage powder [49] and tinospora cordifolia root extract [50], were demonstrated to counteract the detrimental toxic effects of AFBs. Although SGL, as a traditional Chinese herb, is characterized as having antioxidation, immunomodulation and hepatoprotection activities, there is no study to assess the protective effects of SGL or its extracts on AFB1-induced toxins in broiler chickens. In the present study, the results showed that the addition of SSGL to an AFB1-contaminated diet relieved the negative effects of AFB1 on the growth performance of broilers.
SGL has strong bioactivities in antioxidation, and polysaccharides from SGL had been reported to have the ability to scavenge DPPH radicals, increase reducing power and inhibit lipid peroxidation in vitro [51]. Moreover, SGL was effective in protection against Cd(II)-induced hepatotoxicity through reducing the increase in serum AST, ALT and hepatic MDA of mice [52]. Supplementation with 4 or 8 g/kg of SGL significantly increased the activities of GSH and GR, and decreased the MDA content in the hippocampus of rats [15]. In type 2 diabetic rats, the serum level of MDA was 13.9% lower, and serum levels of GSH-Px and SOD were 25.9% and 38.0% higher at four weeks in the SGL group [53]. Some antioxidants such as vitamin E and alpha-lipoic acid are reported to be effective in protecting animals from oxidative damage induced by AFB1, so SSGL may have similar abilities. Indeed, lower oxidative status and higher antioxidant capacity were observed in broilers fed on a diet supplemented with SSGL in the present study, indicating that dietary SSGL could protect broilers from oxidative damage induced by AFB1.
In the present study, the results showed that dietary SSGL significantly increased the contents of serum TP, IgA and IgG, and decreased the AFB1-induced toxins to serum immunity. Mohan et al. [54] observed that dietary polysaccharides of G. lucidum significantly increased the muscle TP of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Finisher pigs fed diets that received polysaccharides of G. lucidum had higher contents of serum TP, globulin and IgG [55]. These results suggested that G. lucidum may have the ability to increase the protein synthesis of animals. Di et al. [56] found that the high-performance thin-layer chromatography fingerprint profiles of carbohydrate and acid hydrolyzates of polysaccharides from G. lucidum and the spores were quite similar, indicating that they may have similar bioactivities. The (1 → 3)-α-d-glucan of SGL enhanced the T and B lymphocyte proliferation and antibody production of rats [17]. Thus, the mechanism of SSGL improving serum IgA and IgG in this study could be partially due to the decrease in the inhibition of protein synthesis induced by AFB1.

4. Conclusions

The results from this study demonstrated that diets contaminated with AFB1 (22.5–25.0 μg/kg) suppressed the growth performance, antioxidant capacity and immune action of broilers. However, the addition of SSGL significantly counteracted the adverse effects of AFB1, effectively improving growth performance and reducing the oxidative stress and immunosuppression of broilers; so SSGL, as a feed additive for inhibiting aflatoxicosis, may have promising potential in feed industrial applications.

5. Materials and Method

5.1. Sporoderm-Broken Spores of Ganoderma lucidum

SGL in present study was supplied by Riverside Ganoderma Lucidum Planting Co. Ltd. (Xiuyan Manchu Autonomous County, Anshan, Liaoning Province, China). The spores was dried at 55 °C for 24 h, and then broken by supercritical fluid extraction device (Nantong Hua′an Co. Ltd., Nantong, China). Briefly, approximately 150 g of spores was loaded into a steel cylinder equipped with mesh filters (6.5 μm) on both ends. Liquefied CO2 was pumped into the vessel and the pressure was raised to 35 MPa consequently. The process was last for 4 h and the temperature was set at 25 °C by the temperature controller. At the end of process, the pressure was quickly released within 1 min, and the spores was broken due to rapid depressurization. The SSGL were removed and stored at −20 °C before adding into the diets [12,57].

5.2. Birds, Diets and Management

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the China Agricultural University (ethical approval code: CAU20151028-2; Date: 28 October 2015). A total of 300 one-day-old male Arbor Acre broiler chickens were obtained from a commercial company (Beijing Huadu Yukou Poultry Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Birds with similar body weights (40.0 ± 1.0 g) were randomly assigned to four treatments with five replicate pens of 15 birds per pen. The diets for treatments were: Control (the basal diets containing 20% normal peanut meal in the starter and 18% in the finisher period, without any mycotoxins); AFB1 (moldy peanut meal naturally contaminated with 121.7 μg/kg AFB1 substituting for all the normal peanut meal in the basal diet); SSGL (basal diet received 200 mg/kg of SSGL); AFB1+SSGL (AFB1 diet supplemented with 200 mg/kg of SSGL). The contents of mycotoxins (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2, deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEA) and ochratoxin (OTA)) in basal diet and AFB1-contaiminated diets were tested with HPLC (Shimadzu LC-10 AT, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) method [25,58]. Briefly, 25 g of the milled samples were mixed with 80 mL of methanol-water (80:20 v/v) for aflatoxins; water for DON; acetonitrile-water (70:30 v/v) for ZEA; methanol-water (60:40 v/v) for OTA, the mixtures were shaken for 2 h. The extracts were filtered, and the filtrate was cleaned up through an immunoaffinity column (Vicam, Milford, MA, USA) before HPLC determination. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were: 0.10 and 0.50 μg/kg for AFB1; 0.08 and 0.25 μg/kg for AFB2; 0.15 and 0.50 μg/kg for AFG1; 0.10 and 0.50 μg/kg for AFG2; 1.00 and 5.00 μg/kg for ZEA; 10.00 and 50.00 μg/kg for DON; 0.21 and 0.60 μg/kg for OTA, respectively. The final contents of AFB1 in diets received moldy peanut meal (AFB1 and AFB1+SSGL groups) were 25.0 ± 1.2 μg/kg in starter period and 22.5 ± 1.1 μg/kg in finisher period; the other mycotoxins were determined to be at concentrations below detection limits. Hardly any aflatoxins or other mycotoxins were found (below detection limits) in basal diets.
The formulation of the basal diets are presented in Table 5, all essential nutrients in the basal diet met NRC (1994) [59]. The feeding trial period lasted for 44 days.
The trial was conducted in two periods consisting of a starter period from day 1 to 21 and a finisher period from day 22 to 44. The rearing system was designed as flooring rearing. All birds were raised in weird-floored pens (100 × 100 × 60 cm) in an environmentally controlled room with continuous light. The temperature was maintained at 35–37 °C (65% relative humidity) for the first two days, and 33–35 °C for day 3–7. The room temperature was gradually decreased by 2 °C per week until to 24 °C, and then maintained unchanged. Water and diets were provided ad libitum. All birds were inoculated with Newcastle disease vaccine on day 7 and day 21 and inoculated with infectious bursa disease vaccine on day 14 and day 21.

5.3. Sample Collection

At 44 days of age, one bird close to the average weight was selected from each pen. After the birds were fasted for 12 h, blood sample was collected in tubes (without anticoagulant) from a wing vein with a 5 mL syringe. The samples were centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min, and the serum was separated and then stored at −20 °C until analysis. The chickens were then sacrificed; the liver and spleen were removed immediately. A portion of the liver and the whole spleen were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C.

5.4. Oxidative Stress Indices in Liver and Spleen

Liver and spleen tissues (about 1 g) were cut into small pieces and homogenized in ice-cold saline buffer (1:9, wt/v) using an Ultra-turrax (T8, IKA-labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) to form homogenate at a concentration of 0.1 g/mL for further analysis. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected and stored in freezer for assays of T-AOC, CAT, GR, GSH-PX, GSH, MDA, LPO, H2O2, hydroxyl radical scavenger activity (HRSA) and TP. All the assays were measured with commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) and the procedures accordingly.

5.5. Serum Concentrations of Total Protein and Immunoglobulins

The contents of serum TP, IgA, IgM and IgG were measured using commercial kits from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute. The measurements were performed according to the detection kit instructions.

5.6. Statistical Analyses

All data were subjected to analysis by one-way ANOVA using SAS (Version 8e, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Duncan’s multiple range test was used for multiple comparisons when a significant difference was detected. Means were considered significantly different at p < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the support of the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in the University (NCET-13-0558), the Public sector (Agriculture) scientific research of China (Grant No. 201403047), and the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2012BAD39B00 and Grant No. 2011BAD26B04).

Author Contributions

Qiugang Ma and Lihong Zhao conceived and designed the experiments; Tao Liu, and Xinyue Wang performed the experiments; Tao Liu and Ru Jia analyzed the data; Jianyun Zhang and Cheng Ji contributed reagents and materials; Tao Liu and Lihong Zhao wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diener, U.L.; Cole, R.J.; Sanders, T.H.; Payne, G.A.; Lee, L.S.; Klich, M.A. Epidemiology of aflatoxin formation by Aspergillus flavus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1987, 25, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bintvihok, A.; Kositcharoenkul, S. Effect of dietary calcium propionate on performance, hepatic enzyme activities and aflatoxin residues in broilers fed a diet containing low levels of aflatoxin B1. Toxicon 2006, 47, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ortatatli, M.; Oguz, H.; Hatipoğlu, F.; Karaman, M. Evaluation of pathological changes in broilers during chronic aflatoxin (50 and 100 ppb) and clinoptilolite exposure. Res. Vet. Sci. 2005, 78, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meissonnier, G.M.; Pinton, P.; Laffitte, J.; Cossalter, A.M.; Gong, Y.Y.; Wild, C.P.; Bertin, G.; Galtier, P.; Oswald, I.P. Immunotoxicity of aflatoxin B1: Impairment of the cell-mediated response to vaccine antigen and modulation of cytokine expression. Toxicol. App. Pharm. 2008, 231, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zimmermann, C.E.P.; Cruz, I.B.M.; Cadoná, F.C.; Machado, A.K.; Assmann, C.; Schlemmer, K.B.; Zanette, R.A.; Leal, D.B.R.; Santurio, J.M. Cytoprotective and genoprotective effects of b-glucans against aflatoxin B1-induced DNA damage in broiler chicken lymphocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro 2015, 29, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alpsoy, L.; Yalvac, M.E.; Litwack, G. Key Roles of Vitamins A, C, and E in Aflatoxin B1-Induced Oxidative Stress. Vitam. Horm. 2011, 86, 287–305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Kezis, K.A.G.; Mulder, J.E.; Massey, T.E. In vivo treatment with aflatoxin B1 increases DNA oxidation, base excision repair activity and 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 levels in mouse lung. Toxicology 2014, 321, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mary, V.S.; Theumer, M.G.; Arias, S.L.; Rubinstein, H.R. Reactive oxygen species sources and biomolecular oxidative damage induced by aflatoxin B1 and fumonisin B1 in rat spleen mononuclear cells. Toxicology 2012, 302, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, Y.; Ma, Q.G.; Zhao, L.H.; Guo, Y.Q.; Duan, G.X.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ji, C. Protective Efficacy of Alpha-lipoic Acid against AflatoxinB1-induced Oxidative Damage in the Liver. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 907–915. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ahmed, A.M.; Hamid, A.; Firgany, A.E.D.L. Vitamin E supplementation ameliorates aflatoxin B1-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Acta. Histochemica. 2015, 117, 767–779. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bishop, K.S.; Kao, C.H.J.; Xu, Y.Y.; Glucina, M.P.; Paterson, R.R.M.; Ferguson, L.R. From 2000 years of Ganoderma lucidum to recent developments in nutraceuticals. Phytochemistry 2015, 114, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Fu, Y.J.; Liu, W.; Zu, Y.G.; Shi, X.G.; Liu, Z.G.; Schwarz, G.; Efferth, T. Breaking the spores of the fungus Ganoderma lucidum by supercritical CO2. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fukuzawa, M.; Yamaguchi, R.; Hide, I.; Chen, Z.; Hirai, Y.; Sugimoto, A.; Yasuhara, T.; Nakata, Y. Possible involvement of long chain fatty acids in the spores of Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi Houshi) to its anti-tumor activity. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 1933–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, S.Q.; Li, X.J.; Zhou, S.B.; Sun, D.X.; Wang, H.; Cheng, P.F.; Ma, X.R.; Liu, L.; Liu, J.X.; Wang, F.F.; et al. Intervention Effects of Spores of Ganoderma lucidum on Epileptiform Discharge Hippocampal Neurons and Expression of Neurotrophin-4 and N-Cadherin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Heleno, S.A.; Barros, L.; Martins, A.; Queiroz, M.J.T.P.; Celestino, S.B.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Fruiting body, spores and in vitro produced mycelium of Ganoderma lucidum from Northeast Portugal: A comparative study of the antioxidant potential of phenolic and polysaccharidic extracts. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhou, Y.; Qu, Z.Q.; Zeng, Y.S.; Lin, Y.K.; Li, Y.; Chung, P.; Wong, R.; Hägg, U. Neuroprotective effect of preadministration with Ganoderma lucidum spore on rat hippocampus. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2012, 64, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bao, X.F.; Duan, J.Y.; Fang, X.Y.; Fang, J.N. Chemical modifications of the (1 → 3)-α-d-glucan from spores of Ganoderma lucidum and investigation of their physicochemical properties and immunological activity. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 336, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bao, X.F.; Liu, C.P.; Fang, J.N.; Li, X.L. Structural and immunological studies of a major polysaccharide from spores of Ganoderma lucidum (Fr.) Karst. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 332, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, P.; Hirano, T.; Chen, Z.Q.; Tadashi, Y.; Yoshihiro, N.; Akiko, S. Isolation and identifi cation of C-19 fatty acids with anti-tumor activity from the spores of Ganoderma lucidum (reishi mushroom). Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, X.; Yuan, J.P.; Chung, C.K.; Chen, X.J. Antitumor activity of the sporoderm-broken germinating spores of Ganoderma lucidum. Cancer Lett. 2002, 182, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, H.S.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, L.B.; Zhao, D.X.; Chen, L. Effects of extracts from sporoderm-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum on HeLa cells. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2000, 16, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yue, G.G.L.; Fung, K.P.; Leung, P.C.; Lau, C.B.S. Comparative studies on the immunomodulatory and antitumor activities of the different parts of fruiting body of Ganoderma lucidum and Ganoderma spores. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 1282–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, X.Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Fan, Y.; Jia, Y.X.; Sun, L.; Ma, S.S.; Ji, C.; Ma, Q.G.; Zhang, J.Y. Occurrence of mycotoxins in feed ingredients and complete feeds obtained from the Beijing region of China. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 37, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, L.X.; Ding, X.X.; Li, P.W.; Du, X.H.; Zhou, H.Y.; Bai, Y.Z.; Zhang, L.X. Aflatoxin contamination of peanuts at harvest in China from 2010 to 2013 and its relationship with climatic conditions. Food Control 2016, 60, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fan, Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Ma, Q.G.; Li, X.Y.; Shi, H.Q.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ji, C. Effects of Bacillus subtilis ANSB060 on growth performance, meat quality and aflatoxin residues in broilers fed moldy peanut meal naturally contaminated with aflatoxins. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 59, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Han, X.Y.; Huang, Q.C.; Li, W.F.; Jiang, J.F.; Xu, Z.R. Changes in growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and nutrient digestibility of cherry valley ducks in response to aflatoxin B1 levels. Livest. Sci. 2008, 119, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fowler, J.; Li, W.; Bailey, C. Effects of a Calcium Bentonite Clay in Diets Containing Aflatoxin when Measuring Liver residues of Aflatoxin B 1 in Starter Broiler Chicks. Toxins 2015, 7, 3455–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huff, W.E.; Kubena, L.F.; Harvey, R.B.; Corrier, D.E.; Mollenhauer, H.H. Progression of aflatoxicosis in broiler chickens. Plout. Sci. 1986, 65, 1981–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mehrzad, J.; Klein, G.; Kamphues, J.; Wolf, P.; Grabowski, N.; Schuberth, H.J. In vitro effects of very low levels of aflatoxin B1 on free radicals production and bactericidal activity of bovine blood neutrophils. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 141, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Arulselvan, P.; Subramanian, S.P. Beneficial effects of Murraya koenigii leaves on antioxidant defense system and ultrastructural changes of pancreatic b-cells in experimental diabetes in rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2007, 165, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Karabacak, M.; Eraslan, G.; Kanbur, M.; Sarica, Z.S. Effects of Tarantula cubensis D6 on aflatoxin-induced injury in biochemical parameters in rats. Homeopathy 2015, 104, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shi, Y.H.; Xu, Z.R.; Feng, J.L.; Wang, C.Z. Efficacy of modified montmorillonite nanocomposite to reduce the toxicity of aflatoxin in broiler chicks. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 129, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Y.; Ma, Q.G.; Zhao, L.H.; Wei, H.; Duan, G.X.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ji, C. Effects of Lipoic Acid on Immune Function, the Antioxidant Defense System, and Inflammation-related Genes Expression of Broiler Chickens Fed Aflatoxin Contaminated Diets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 5649–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Delles, R.M.; Xiong, Y.L.; Ture, A.D.; Ao, T.; Dawson, K.A. Dietary antioxidant supplementation enhances lipid and protein oxidative stability of chicken broiler meat through promotion of antioxidant enzyme activity. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 1561–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mceligot, A.J.; Yang, S.; Meyskens, F.L. Redox regulation by intrinsic species and extrinsic nutrients in normal and cancer cells (abstract). Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2005, 25, 261–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jaeschke, H. Mechanisms of oxidant stress-induced acute tissue injury. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1995, 209, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kinnula, V.L.; Crapo, J.D. Superoxide dismutase in malignant cells and human tumors. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 36, 718–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zuo, R.Y.; Chang, J.; Yin, Q.Q.; Wang, P.; Yang, Y.R.; Wang, X.; Wang, G.Q.; Zheng, Q.H. Effect of the combined probiotics with aflatoxin B1-degrading enzyme on aflatoxin detoxification, broiler production performance and hepatic enzyme gene expression. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 59, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fan, Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Ji, C.; Li, X.Y.; Jia, R.; Xi, L.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ma, Q.G. Protective Effects of Bacillus subtilis ANSB060 on Serum Biochemistry, Histopathological Changes and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Broilers. Fed Moldy Peanut Meal Naturally Contaminated with Aflatoxins. Toxins 2015, 7, 3330–3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Gremmels, F.J. The role of mycotoxins in the health and performance of dairy cows. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, K.J.; Fang, J.; Peng, X.; Cui, H.M.; Chen, J.; Wang, F.Y.; Chen, Z.L.; Zuo, Z.C.; Deng, J.L.; Lai, W.M.; et al. Effect of selenium supplementation on aflatoxin B1–induced histopathological lesions and apoptosis in bursa of Fabricius in broiler. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 74, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tung, H.T.; Wyatt, R.D.; Thaxon, P.; Hamilton, P.B. Concentrations of Serum Proteins during Aflatoxicosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1975, 34, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Allameh, A.; Safamehr, A.; Mirhadi, S.A.; Shivazad, M.; Mehdi, R.A.; Azam, A.N. Evaluation of biochemical and production parameters of broiler chicks fed ammonia treated aflatoxin contaminated maize grains. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 122, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Quezada, T.; Cuellar, H.; Jaramillo, J.F.; Valdivia, A.G.; Reyes, J.L. Effects of aflatoxin B1 on the liver and kidney of broiler chickens during development. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 2000, 125, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, Q.G.; Li, Y.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Wei, H.; Ji, C.; Zhang, J.Y. Molecular Mechanisms of Lipoic Acid Protection against Aflatoxin B 1 -Induced Liver Oxidative Damage and Inflammatory Responses in Broilers. Toxins 2015, 7, 5435–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, K.J.; Yuan, S.H.; Chen, J.; Peng, X.; Wang, F.Y.; Cui, H.M.; Fang, J. Effects of sodium selenite on the decreased percentage of T cell subsets, contents of serum IL-2 and IFN-γ induced by aflatoxin B 1 in broilers. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. He, J.; Zhang, K.Y.; Chen, D.W.; Ding, X.M.; Feng, G.D.; Ao, X. Effects of vitamin E and selenium yeast on growth performance and immune function in ducks fed maize naturally contaminated with aflatoxin B1. Livest. Sci. 2013, 152, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, T.Y.; Li, C.Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, T.Z.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.H. Inhibition effects of Chinese cabbage powder on aflatoxin B1-induced liver cancer. Food Chem. 2015, 186, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gupta, R.; Sharma, V. Ameliorative effects of Tinospora cordifolia root extract on histopathological and biochemical changes induced by aflatoxin B1 in mice kidney. Toxicol. Int. 2011, 18, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Kozarski, M.; Klausa, A.; Niksic, M.; Jakovljevic, D.; Helsperc, J.P.F.G.; Van Griensven, L.J.L.D. Antioxidative and immunomodulating activities of polysaccharide extracts of the medicinal mushrooms Agaricus bisporus, Agaricus brasiliensis, Ganoderma lucidum and Phellinus linteus. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1667–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jin, H.; Jin, F.; Jin, J.X.; Xu, J.; Tao, T.T.; Liu, J.; Huang, H.J. Protective effects of Ganoderma lucidum spore on cadmium hepatotoxicity in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 52, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, F.; Zhou, Z.K.; Ren, X.C.; Wang, Y.Y.; Yang, R.; Luo, J.H.; Strappe, P. Effect of Ganoderma lucidum spores intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism gene expression profiles in type 2 diabetic rats. Lipids Health 2015, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mohan, K.; Padmanaban, A.M.; Uthayakumar, V.; Chandirasekar, R.; Muralisankar, T.; Santhanam, P. Effect of dietary Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides on biological and physiological responses of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture 2016, 464, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, X.L.; He, L.P.; Yang, Y.; Liu, F.J.; Gao, Y.; Zuo, J.J. Effects of extracellular polysaccharides of Ganoderma lucidum supplementation on the growth performance, blood profile, and meat quality in finisher pigs. Livest. Sci. 2015, 178, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Di, X.; Chan, K.K.C.; Leung, H.W.; Huie, C.W. Fingerprint profiling of acid hydrolyzates of polysaccharides extracted from the fruiting bodies and spores of Lingzhi by high-performance thin-layer chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1018, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, G.L.; Shi, J.Y.; Suo, Y.R.; Sun, Z.W.; Xia, L.; Zheng, J.; You, J.M.; Liu, Y.J. Supercritical CO2 cell breaking extraction of Lycium barbarum seed oil and determination of its chemical composition by HPLC/APCI/MS and antioxidant activity. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1172–1178. [Google Scholar]
  58. Binder, E.M.; Tan, L.M.; Chin, L.J.; Handl, J.; Richard, J. Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 137, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th ed.; Natl. Acad. Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Effects of SSGL on growth performance of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Table 1. Effects of SSGL on growth performance of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Index 1ControlAFB1SSGLAFB1+SSGLSEMp-Value
0–21 d
ADFI (g/d)53.0 a51.0 b52.2 ab53.0 a0.2960.039
ADG (g/d)33.532.933.333.10.1410.441
F:G1.581.551.571.600.0110.425
22–44 d
ADFI (g/d)135.7 a132.0 b138.0 a137.9 a0.7760.008
ADG (g/d)70.4 b67.8 c74.0 a73.8 a0.632<0.001
F:G1.93 ab1.95 a1.87 b1.87 b0.0120.011
0–44 d
ADFI (g/d)98.1 a95.2 b99.0 a99.4 a0.5150.006
ADG (g/d)53.6 b51.9 c55.5 a55.3 a0.360<0.001
F:G1.83 a1.84 a1.78 b1.80 ab0.0080.069
1 Data are expressed as group mean values; ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; F:G, feed:gain ratio, equal to ADFI/ ADG; SEM, standard error of the mean; a–c Means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Effects of SSGL on oxidative status in liver and spleen of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Table 2. Effects of SSGL on oxidative status in liver and spleen of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Index 1ControlAFB1SSGLAFB1+SSGLSEMp-Value
Liver
H2O2 (mmol/g prot)10.74 c15.06 a9.60 d12.38 b0.540<0.001
MDA (nmol/g prot)2.57 b3.10 a2.07 d2.26 c0.102<0.001
LPO (μmol/g prot)0.82 b1.02 a0.82 b0.85 b0.024<0.001
Spleen
H2O2 (mmol/g prot)14.38 b16.19 a14.18 b14.23 b0.2520.001
MDA (nmol/g prot)1.87 ab1.95 a1.80 b1.84 ab0.0190.046
LPO (μmol/g prot)4.20 b5.08 a3.34 c3.04 d0.207<0.001
1 Data are expressed as group mean values; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; MDA, malondiadehyde; LPO, lipid peroxidation. SEM, standard error of the mean; a–d Means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Effects of SSGL on antioxidant defense system in liver and spleen of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Table 3. Effects of SSGL on antioxidant defense system in liver and spleen of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Index 1ControlAFB1SSGLAFB1+SSGLSEMp-Value
Liver
T-AOC (U/mgprot)2.19 b2.04 c2.32 a2.28 ab0.032<0.001
CAT U/mgprot)8.13 b7.35 c9.43 a8.05 b0.205<0.001
T-SOD (U/mgprot)16.9516.7816.1216.580.2270.647
GR (U/gprot)4.47 b3.74 c6.74 a4.84 b0.297<0.001
GSH-Px (U)43.25 a37.50 b43.49 a36.63 b0.853<0.001
GSH (mg/gprot)2.03 b2.07 b2.43 a2.44 a0.0580.001
HRSA (U/g prot)2.42 a1.98 b2.58 a2.45 a0.062<0.001
Spleen
T-AOC (U/mgprot)2.46 b1.78 c3.28 a2.52 b0.139<0.001
CAT (U/mgprot)5.35 a4.33 b5.42 a4.48 b0.131<0.001
T-SOD (U/mgprot)22.22 a19.27 b22.11 a21.64 a0.3630.001
GR (U/gprot)6.34 c6.02 c9.25 a7.52 b0.346<0.001
GSH-Px (U)47.73 a43.39 b47.59 a44.94 b0.542<0.001
GSH (mg/gprot)3.92 b3.64 c4.32 a4.36 a0.079<0.001
HRSA (U/g prot)1.87 c1.61 d2.48 a2.06 b0.084<0.001
1 Data are expressed as group mean values; T-AOC, total antioxidant capability; CAT, catalase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, reduced glutathione; HRSA, Hydroxyl radical scavenger activity; SEM, standard error of the mean. a–d Means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Effects of SSGL serum immunoglobulins of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Table 4. Effects of SSGL serum immunoglobulins of male Arbor Acre broiler chickens exposed to a low level of AFB1.
Index 1ControlAFB1SSGLAFB1+SSGLSEMp-Value
TP (g/L)24.82 a22.73 b25.94 a25.07 a0.3740.007
IgA (g/L)0.291 a0.284 b0.298 a0.295 a0.0020.003
IgG (g/L)0.266 a0.232 b0.273 a0.257 a0.005<0.001
IgM (g/L)0.2240.2250.2290.2360.0020.288
1 Data are expressed as group mean values; TP, total protein; SEM, standard error of the mean; a,b Means within the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet.
Table 5. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet.
Ingredient (%)Starter Period (0–21 d)Finisher Period (22–44 d)
Corn57.9560.79
Soybean meal14.2013.30
Peanut meal20.0018.00
Limestone1.301.00
Dicalcium phosphate1.801.50
Salt0.300.30
Soybean oil3.004.00
Lysine [98.5%]0.460.34
DL-Methionine0.370.20
Threonine0.190.14
Choline chloride0.100.10
Vitamin premix 10.030.03
Mineral premix 20.300.30
Total100.000100.00
Nutrition componen
CP21.4820.03
ME(Mcal/kg)2.993.09
Ca1.010.82
Total phosphorus0.670.61
Lys1.151.01
Met0.630.45
1 Provided per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 15,000 IU; cholecalciferol, 3000 IU; vitamin E, 20 IU; vitamin K 3, 2.18 mg; thiamine, 2.15 mg; riboflavin, 8.00 mg; pyridoxine, 4.40 mg; vitamin B 12, 0.02 mg; Calcium pantothenate, 25.60 mg; nicotinic acid, 65.80 mg; folic acid, 0.96 mg; biotin, 0.20 mg. 2 Provided per kilogram of diet: Fe, 100.0 mg; Cu, 8.0 mg; Zn, 78.0 mg; Mn, 105.0 mg; I, 0.5 mg; Se, 0.3 mg.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, T.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, L.; Jia, R.; Zhang, J.; Ji, C.; Wang, X. Protective Effects of Sporoderm-Broken Spores of Ganderma lucidum on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Function of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of Aflatoxin B1. Toxins 2016, 8, 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8100278

AMA Style

Liu T, Ma Q, Zhao L, Jia R, Zhang J, Ji C, Wang X. Protective Effects of Sporoderm-Broken Spores of Ganderma lucidum on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Function of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of Aflatoxin B1. Toxins. 2016; 8(10):278. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8100278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Tao, Qiugang Ma, Lihong Zhao, Ru Jia, Jianyun Zhang, Cheng Ji, and Xinyue Wang. 2016. "Protective Effects of Sporoderm-Broken Spores of Ganderma lucidum on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Function of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of Aflatoxin B1" Toxins 8, no. 10: 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8100278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop