Next Article in Journal
Reporter Assay for Endo/Lysosomal Escape of Toxin-Based Therapeutics
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Analysis of Deoxynivalenol in Durum Wheat by FT-NIR Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Requirement of Simultaneous Assessment of Crystal- and Supernatant-Related Entomotoxic Activities of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains for Biocontrol-Product Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deoxynivalenol in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Immature Gilts under per os Toxin Application

Toxins 2014, 6(5), 1615-1643; doi:10.3390/toxins6051615

Review
Effect of Deoxynivalenol and Other Type B Trichothecenes on the Intestine: A Review
Philippe Pinton 1,2 and Isabelle P. Oswald 1,2,*
1
INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), UMR1331, Toxalim, Research Centre in Food Toxicology, Toulouse F-31027, France; E-Mail: Philippe.Pinton @toulouse.inra.fr
2
Université de Toulouse, Institut National Polytechnique, UMR1331, Toxalim, Toulouse F-31000, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: Isabelle.Oswald@toulouse.inra.fr; Tel.: +33-561-285-480; Fax: +33-561-285-145.
Received: 20 December 2013; in revised form: 28 March 2014 / Accepted: 9 May 2014 /
Published: 21 May 2014

Abstract

: The natural food contaminants, mycotoxins, are regarded as an important risk factor for human and animal health, as up to 25% of the world’s crop production may be contaminated. The Fusarium genus produces large quantities of fusariotoxins, among which the trichothecenes are considered as a ubiquitous problem worldwide. The gastrointestinal tract is the first physiological barrier against food contaminants, as well as the first target for these toxicants. An increasing number of studies suggest that intestinal epithelial cells are targets for deoxynivalenol (DON) and other Type B trichothecenes (TCTB). In humans, various adverse digestive symptoms are observed on acute exposure, and in animals, these toxins induce pathological lesions, including necrosis of the intestinal epithelium. They affect the integrity of the intestinal epithelium through alterations in cell morphology and differentiation and in the barrier function. Moreover, DON and TCTB modulate the activity of intestinal epithelium in its role in immune responsiveness. TCTB affect cytokine production by intestinal or immune cells and are supposed to interfere with the cross-talk between epithelial cells and other intestinal immune cells. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the effects of DON and other TCTB on the intestine.
Keywords:
barrier function; food-contaminant; immune response; intestinal lesions; mycotoxins

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins are structurally diverse fungal metabolites that can contaminate a variety of dietary components consumed by animals and humans. It is estimated that 25% of the world’s crop production is contaminated by mycotoxins during the pre-harvest period, transport, processing or storage [1]. The major mycotoxin-producing fungal genera are Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium, mainly producing aflatoxins, zearalenone, trichothecenes, fumonisins, ochratoxins and ergot alkaloids.

Among the mycotoxins produced by the Fusarium genus, the broad family of trichothecenes (TCT) is extremely prevalent. They represent the most diverse chemical group of all the mycotoxins, and their molecular weights range between 200 and 500 Da. All TCT possess a sesquiterpenoid structure with or without a macrocyclic ester or an ester-ether bridge between C-4 and C-15. They contain a common 12,13-epoxytrichothecene group responsible for their cytotoxicity and a 9,10-double bond with various side chain substitutions. The non-macrocyclic TCT constitute two groups: Type A, including T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, neosolaniol and diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), while the Type B group contains a ketone and includes fusarenon-X (FUS-X), nivalenol (NIV) and deoxynivalenol (DON) and its 3-acetyl and 15-acetyl derivatives (3- and 15-ADON) (Figure 1). The number and position of the hydroxyl and acetyl-ester groups can influence the relative toxicity within eukaryotic cells. Their relative capacity to interfere with protein synthesis has been attributed to a combination of different factors: the rate of transport into cells, metabolism by cytosol enzymes, changes in affinity for the active binding site or the ability to interfere with protein synthesis [2].

Toxins 06 01615 g001 1024
Figure 1. Chemical structure of Type B trichothecenes. TCTB, Type B trichothecenes.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Chemical structure of Type B trichothecenes. TCTB, Type B trichothecenes.
Toxins 06 01615 g001 1024

Deoxynivalenol and other Type B TCT (TCTB) are commonly found in cereals, such as wheat, rye, barley, oats and corn, all over the world [2,3,4]. These toxins are resistant to milling, processing and heating and, therefore, readily enter the food chain [5]. The total intake of DON in microgram per kilogram of body weight per day has been estimated to reach from 0.78 in an African diet to 2.4 in a Middle Eastern diet [6]. Intoxications following the consumption of foodstuffs contaminated with TCT have occurred in both humans and animals, with large numbers of people and livestock being affected [4]. Many outbreaks of acute human disease involving nausea, vomiting, gastro-intestinal upset, dizziness, diarrhea and headache have been reported in Asia [7,8]. These outbreaks have been attributed to the consumption of Fusarium-contaminated grains and, more recently, to the presence of DON at reported concentrations of 3–93 mg/kg in grain for human consumption [6].

More than 40 countries have introduced regulatory or guideline levels for DON in food and feed. In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established an advisory level of 1 ppm of DON for bran, flour and germ targeted for human consumption [9]. The European Commission decided to limit the level of DON in food from 0.2 to 1.75 mg/kg for cereals and derived products, depending on the exposed population, and in feed from 0.9 to 5 mg/kg for complementary and complete feedstuffs, depending on the species [10,11].

Following the ingestion of contaminated food or feed, intestinal epithelial cells may be exposed to high concentrations of toxicants, potentially affecting intestinal functions [12]. The intestinal epithelium is a single layer of cells lining the gut lumen that acts as a selective filter, allowing the translocation of essential dietary nutrients, electrolytes and water from the intestinal lumen into the circulation. It also constitutes the largest and most important barrier to prevent the passage from the external environment into the organism of harmful intraluminal substances, including foreign antigens, microorganisms and their toxins [13]. The establishment of the epithelial monolayer by intestinal epithelial cells is dependent upon a considerably high degree of intracellular and intercellular organization. Within each epithelial cell, structural integrity is maintained by the presence of a complex cytoskeletal network of microfilaments playing a crucial role in maintaining cellular polarity and in supporting points of cell-cell contact. The interaction and contact between adjacent intestinal epithelial cells of the monolayer is mediated by distinct junctions, including tight junctions, desmosomes and adherens junctions [14]. The function as a selective permeable barrier places the mucosal epithelium at the center of interactions between the mucosal immune system and luminal contents, which includes dietary antigens and microbial products [15]. The intestine is a privileged immune site, where immunoregulatory mechanisms simultaneously defend the body against pathogens, but also preserve tissue homeostasis to avoid immune-mediated pathology in response to environmental challenges.

This review summarizes the consequences of exposure to DON and other TCTB on histopathological intestinal lesions, on the potential disruption of the intestinal barrier function and on the active role of the intestinal mucosa in immune responsiveness. We will focus on the data obtained in humans, laboratory animals, poultry and pigs, as this latter species can be regarded as a good model for man [16,17].

2. DON and Other TCTB Reduce Growth

The reduction in weight gain as a consequence of reduced feed consumption is strongly associated with the exposure of farm animals to DON, with pigs being one of the most sensitive species. Current regulatory standards for DON in foods are based on its ability to cause growth suppression [18]. While DON is considered one of the least lethal TCT, its anorexic and emetic potencies are equal to, or greater than, those reported from the more acutely toxic TCT, such as T2-toxin [19]. Recently, the anorectic potencies of TCTB were compared in mice, following intraperitoneal or oral exposure: NIV and FUS-X were shown to have greater effects than DON, which had similar effects as 3- and 15-ADON [20]. The ability of DON to induce anorexia may be the consequence of the dysregulation of various signaling pathways. DON may act at different levels to induce impaired growth and weight gain, including on neuroendocrine signaling, immune responses, growth hormone or a central neuronal network. The involvement of neuroendocrine factors, such as serotonin, has been proposed [21,22]. Serotonin is produced and released by the enterochromaffin cells in the gut, acts as a paracrine on the enteric nervous system [23] and can affect the secretion of both anorexigenic or orexigenic hormones [24]. The impact of DON on immune responses can also affect feed consumption, because the activation of proinflammatory cytokines is recognized as a cause of anorexia [24]. Indeed, these toxins induce several suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) [25] that impair growth hormone signaling by suppressing two growth-related proteins, the hepatic insulin-like growth factor acid-labile subunit (IGFALS) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), as demonstrated in mice [25]. In this species, DON also induces the release of the satiety hormones, peptide YY (PYY) and cholecystokinin (CCK), proposed as critical mediators of DON-induced anorexia [26]. The impact of DON exposure on the central regulation of energy balance has been studied in mice and pigs [27,28,29]. Recently, Girardet et al. [29] showed that in addition to its peripheral action, DON can reach the brain after per os administration and act centrally on the anorexigenic/orexigenic balance.

In conclusion, most data describing the effects of DON on food intake were obtained in mice or in pig, and they point out both central and peripheral neuroendocrine control mechanisms. Neuroendocrine factors and proinflammatory cytokines drive the anorexigenic effect of DON. Recent experiments obtained only in rodent demonstrated that anorexia is induced rapidly within a few minutes following DON ingestion. Complementary studies are needed to evaluate if the mechanisms involved in anorexia are similar in rodents and other species.

3. DON and Other TCTB Affect Nutrient Absorption

The intestinal epithelium mediates the selective permeability from the intestinal lumen into the circulation of essential dietary nutrients, electrolytes and water through two major routes: transcellular permeability, generally associated with solute transport through the epithelial cells and predominantly regulated by selective transporters for amino acids, electrolytes, short-chain fatty acids and sugars; paracellular permeability, associated with transport via the space between epithelial cells and regulated by intercellular membrane junctional complexes [13]. The intestinal epithelium is a recognized target for NIV and FUS-X with acute effects, such as impaired sugar and electrolyte absorption [30]. The impaired absorption of nutrients may participate in the effect of TCT on animal growth [31]. The impacts of DON and other TCTB on nutrient absorption or transport at the intestinal level are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Humans

In the human intestinal epithelial cell line, HT-29-clone D4, exposure to 10 µM of DON affects the activities of intestinal transporters: inhibition of the D-glucose/D-galactose sodium-dependent transporter (SGLT1), of the D-fructose transporter, glucose transporter-5 (GLUT5), and of active and passive L-serine transporters has been observed. The transport of palmitate was increased, whereas the uptake of cholesterol was not affected by the mycotoxin. At high concentrations (100 µM), SGLT1 activity was inhibited, whereas the activities of all the other transporters were increased [32].

3.2. Rodents

Exposure of mice to DON at 10 mg/kg for six weeks did not modulate the absorption of water, L-leucine, L-tryptophan, iron or D-glucose. However, a slight, but significantly reduced, transfer of glucose was observed. Furthermore, a significant decrease (up to 50%) in the transfer, as well as tissue accumulation of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid in the jejunal segment was observed. These findings indicate that subchronic ingestion of DON can impair the intestinal transfer and uptake of nutrients [33].

Table Table 1. Effect of TCTB exposure on nutrient absorption. DON, deoxynivalenol; NIV, nivalenol; 15-ADON, 15-acetyl derivative of DON; FUS-X, fusarenon-X.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Effect of TCTB exposure on nutrient absorption. DON, deoxynivalenol; NIV, nivalenol; 15-ADON, 15-acetyl derivative of DON; FUS-X, fusarenon-X.
ToxinAnimal speciesConcentration and duration of exposureEffects on nutrients absorptionReferences
DONHuman HT-29 cell line (in vitro)10 µM 48 hInhibition of D glucose/D galactose transporters[32]
Inhibition of D-fructose transporter
Inhibition of the active
L-serine transporter
Inhibition of active and passive
L-serine transport
Increase in palmitate transport
DONMouse (in vivo)10 mg/kg feed 6- weeksReduced weight gain[33]
Decreased transfer of glucose
Decreased jejunal transfer and tissue accumulation of 5-methyltetrahydro folic acid
Poultry (ex vivo)33 µM 30 minInhibition of jejunal
Na+-amino acid co-transport
[34]
Poultry (ex vivo)33 µM 30 and 45 minDecrease in jejunal glucose uptake[35]
NIVPoultry (ex vivo)33 µM 30 minDecrease in jejunal glucose uptake[31]
15-ADONPoultry (ex vivo)33 µM 30 minDecrease in jejunal glucose uptake[31]
FUS-XPoultry (ex vivo)33 µM 30 minNo obvious effect[31]

3.3. Farm Animals

Several studies have investigated the effects of DON on farm animals, with most of the data obtained in chickens. The electrophysiological properties of chicken intestinal mucosa exposed to DON were evaluated using isolated jejunum fragments in Ussing chambers [34]. Intestinal transport was determined by changes in the short-circuit current (Isc), as a measure of ion transmembrane flux, in the middle segment of the jejunum of broilers. The addition of D-glucose produced an increase in the Isc, and this was reversed by different TCTB, including DON [31].

The Isc was decreased by the addition of L-proline on the luminal side of the isolated mucosa after DON treatment, an effect that could be attributed to a strong inhibition of the L-proline/sodium-dependent transporter by DON [34].

Cotransporters are specialized membrane proteins using electrochemical gradients across the membrane for transporting sugars, amino acids and ions. The inhibition of Na+ transport and Na+-D-glucose co-transport are important mechanisms of DON toxicity in the intestine of chickens [34,36,37]. Indeed, DON treatment (33.7 µM) decreased glucose uptake almost as efficiently as phlorizin, a specific inhibitor of the sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter, SGLT-1 [35].

When comparing the different TCTB, the activity of the glucose co-transporter appears to be more sensitive to DON, NIV and 15-ADON than to FUS-X in the jejunum of broilers [31].

In Ross broilers fed either a basal, low DON or high DON diet (0.26, 1.68 and 12.21 mg/kg of DON, respectively), a progressive decrease in the relative density (weight:length) of the small intestine with increasing time of exposure was observed, which could be correlated with a decrease in villus height in the small intestine. The Isc of the jejunal epithelium was reduced in birds fed the high DON diet [38]. Recently, morphometric analysis of duodenal sections of hybrid turkey poults, fed for three weeks with DON at 5.2 mg/kg demonstrated a significant reduction in villus height and apparent villus surface area [39]. Using a global transcriptomic approach, Dietrich et al. [40] identified, in the jejunum of broilers fed for 23 days with DON at 2.5 or 5 mg/kg, a downregulation of genes involved in the nutrient uptake into jejunal cells: SLC2A5, which facilitates glucose and fructose transport, SLC27A4, involved in the palmitate transport and SLC16A1, involved in monocarboxylate uptake.

In conclusion, the data obtained by in vitro and ex vivo experiments performed in different species (human, mouse and poultry) show that DON affects the absorption of amino acids and sugars in intestinal epithelial cells. These studies indicate that DON affects key nutrients transporters. The precise mechanisms of action of DON and other TCT is still unknown, but these toxicants could act on the transporter proteins themselves and also on other constituents of the “transportsome”, such as regulatory molecules or scaffold proteins.

4. DON and Other TCTB Induce Intestinal Lesions

Chronic exposure to TCTB induces digestive problems, reduced food intake and food refusal. The most striking clinical sign is the alteration of growth performance, most often related to decreased feed intake and decreased weight gain (Table 2). The reporting of intestinal lesions has been inconsistent and not systematically correlated with the clinical signs. Animal species differ in their susceptibility to these toxins. For example, as far as DON is concerned, the animal species can be ranked in the following order: pigs > mice > rats > poultry ≈ ruminants [2].

Among different hypotheses, the interaction of mycotoxin-microbiota can be proposed to explain, at least in part, the differences between species. The microbiota is thought to play important roles in the maturation of the intestinal and immune systems, in the nutrition of the host and, finally, in its protection against pathogenic micro-organisms and hazardous chemicals/xenobiotics, including TCTB. Differences in the localization of the gut bacteria able to convert toxic DON into its non-toxic de-epoxide metabolite, DOM-1, prior to or after the small intestine can have a major effect on the bioavailability of ingested TCTB. On this basis, animals can be divided into two groups: polygastric animals and birds with a high bacterial content located both before and after the small intestine; and monogastric species (including humans, pigs and rodents) with a high bacterial content located only after the small intestine, i.e., in their colon [41].

Table Table 2. Intestinal lesions reported after TCTB exposure.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Intestinal lesions reported after TCTB exposure.
ToxinAnimal speciesConcentration and duration of exposureIntestinal LesionsReferences
Repeated exposure to TCTB (dietary or gavage)
DONPig0.75–4.2 mg/kg
3–5 weeks
Edema and congestion[42,43,44]
0.7–5.8 mg/kg
4 weeks
Slight to moderate inflammation and congestion of intestinal mucosa. Slight to moderate degeneration of lymphoid cells in Peyer’s patches and in lymph nodes[45]
4 mg/kgCorrugations in the fundic region (stomach)[46]
2–3 mg/kg
4 weeks
Corrugations in jejunum[47]
2.8 mg/kgMultifocal atrophy and villus fusion,
Apical necrosis of villi,
[48,49]
5 weeksCytoplasmatic vacuolation of enterocytes,
Edema of lamina propria
Decrease in villus height
Decrease in the number of goblet cells in the jejunum and the ileum
Rat10 mg/kg
4 weeks
Alteration in villus architecture of the jejunum (increased villus fusion and shorter villus length).
Increased apoptosis score in jejunal epithelial cells in association with higher number of mitotic cells and crypt fission
[50]
DON 15-ADONPigDON 2.3 mg/kgReduction in villus height greater in presence of DON + 15-ADON compared to DON[51]
DON 1.2 mg/kg+
15-ADON 0.9 mg/kg
4 weeks
Histological scores of the jejunum
lower in animals fed DON + 15-ADON compared to DON
Ex vivo short-term exposure to TCTB
DON
3-ADON
15-ADON
Pig explants10 µM
4 h
Flattened and coalescent villi
Lyses of enterocytes
Interstitial edema and apoptosis
15-ADON >> DON = 3-ADON
[51]

The gut is identified as one of the target organs for TCTB, but no particular intestinal segment appears more sensitive than others [52,53]. The difference in sensitivity between species may be explained by differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of DON [2]. The exact mechanism of the cellular entry of TCTB is not well characterized, and one can speculate that differences exist between species, leading to a differential sensitivity to these compounds. Moreover, the biotransformation of TCT by the detoxifying enzymes in the liver is highly variable between species. In the rat or pig liver, there is no de-epoxidation of DON, while these species are able to carry out glucurono-conjugation.

4.1. Humans

Long-term exposure to Fusarium toxins has been associated with an increased incidence of esophageal cancer in China. DON and also Fumonisin B1 were suspected to be a risk factor [54,55], though the role of these toxins needs to be clarified [2].

4.2. Rodents

In mice, after two years of exposure to NIV at a 30 mg/kg dietary concentration, the survival rate was generally higher in the NIV- treated animals than in the controls, where naturally occurring tumors, mostly lymphomas, were observed. No intestinal lesions were observed after two years of NIV exposure [56].

In weaning rats, after 28 days of exposure to DON-contaminated feed at 10 mg/kg, a decreased feed intake was observed, associated with a reduced weight gain. Lesions were observed in the jejunum: the villus architecture was altered, with an increase in villus fusion and a shorter villus length. The apoptotic score was increased in jejunal epithelial cells and associated with a greater number of mitotic cells and crypt fission [50].

4.3. Pigs

Congestion and erosions of the gastric and intestinal mucosae have been described following chronic DON exposure in pigs [42,43,44,45]. At 4 mg/kg of diet, DON may cause corrugations in the fundic region of the stomach [46], which were also observed at the jejunal level with lower doses of toxin (2–3 mg/kg diet) [47]. After five weeks of exposure to DON at 2.8 mg/kg of the diet, in the absence of changes in the pigs’ body weight, significant histological changes were observed. Indeed, multifocal atrophy and villus fusion, apical necrosis of villi, cytoplasmatic vacuolation of enterocytes and edema of lamina propria were detected in the jejunum and ileum of DON-treated pigs [48]. A significant decrease in villus height was observed in the jejunum, probably reflecting a change in the balance between epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis [49], while no difference in crypt depth was observed in any intestinal region. The number of goblet cells that synthesize and secrete mucin, involved in gut barrier function, decreased significantly in the jejunum and the ileum of piglets fed DON [49]. Similarly, a significant reduction in villus height and in the number of goblet cells was observed in pig jejunal explants exposed to 10 µM DON for four hours [57]. When comparing the effects of DON and its acetylated derivatives, Pinton et al. [51] observed that the reduction in villus height was greater in animals receiving DON + 15-ADON than in the animals receiving feed contaminated only with DON. The histological scores of the jejunum reflecting the main histological changes were lower in animals fed with DON + 15-ADON compared with animals fed DON.

To conclude, comparable macroscopic lesions of the intestinal epithelium are observed in rodents and pig exposed to TCTB. The exact mechanisms leading to these lesions are not characterized; it is especially important to delineate the effect of DON on: (i) the alteration of intestinal epithelial cells; (ii) the repair of these cells; and (iii) the coalescence and shortening of villi. Future research should focus on the differential effects of TCT on the potential target cells in the intestinal epithelium (crypts and stem cells vs. villus and differentiated cells). The effect of TCT on the factors that control the balance between cell proliferation, differentiation and cell death should also be analyzed.

5. DON and Other TCTB Alter Intestinal Barrier Function

The toxicity of DON and other TCTB is partially explained by the ability of these compounds to bind to eukaryotic ribosomes [58] and to rapidly activate the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) via a process termed the “ribotoxic stress response”. The MAPK cascades are central signaling pathways that regulate a wide variety of stimulated cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and stress response [59].

At present, the four different MAPK cascades identified are named according to their MAPK components: extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 and ERK5. Two possible upstream signal transducers for the DON-induced MAPK activation are the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) and the hematopoietic cell kinase (Hck), a Src-family tyrosine kinase [24]. The consequence of this activation is an increase in proinflammatory gene expression, and the downstream effects include anorexia, reduced weight gain, immune stimulation, tissue injury and apoptosis. DON modulates cytokine and chemokine gene expression [60]. Highly dividing cells, such as intestinal epithelial cells or immune cells, are especially sensitive to TCTB, and the exposure of intestinal epithelial cells to these toxins may alter their ability to proliferate and to ensure a proper barrier function.

5.1. Effects on Cell Proliferation and Differentiation

In order to maintain an effective barrier function, the intestinal epithelium rapidly regenerates entirely in approximately one week, throughout life. Mature cells derived from intestinal stem cells migrate upwards along the crypt-villus axis towards the tip of the villus, gradually differentiating as they come closer to the tip [61]. Several studies have investigated the effects of mycotoxins on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and on intestinal morphology (Table 3).

5.1.1. Effects on Cell Growth

The effect of TCT on intestinal epithelial cell growth has mainly been studied in the two human cell lines, Caco-2 and HT-29 [32,62,63]. When treated with a range of concentrations of DON (84 nM to 84 µM), Caco-2 cells showed a reduction in protein synthesis, proliferation and survival [64]. Dividing Caco-2 cells were found to be more sensitive compared to differentiated cells [65]. The greater sensitivity of proliferating cells is probably due to the capacity of the toxin to inhibit protein synthesis and, subsequently, nucleic acid synthesis [66]. DON was also demonstrated to decrease the cell proliferation in the porcine intestinal epithelial cell line, IPEC-1, whereas the acetylated derivatives exhibited differential effects. Indeed, 3-ADON was less toxic and 15-ADON was equally toxic as DON [51]. In the IPEC-J2 porcine intestinal epithelial cell line, the cytotoxicity of DON was correlated with an increase in lactate dehydrogenase release and decrease in ATP content [67]. In the human intestinal cell line HT-29, the cytotoxic effect of DON was not correlated with the induction of the heat shock protein, Hsp 70, or with the generation of reactive oxygen species, but was associated with a fragmentation of DNA and the activation of the apoptotic molecules, p53 and caspase-3 [68]. In intestinal cells from rat species (IEC-6 cell line), DON at 10 µM reduced the viability and induced apoptosis, independently of any cell cycle arrest, but involving caspase-3 activation [69].

Table Table 3. Effect of TCTB exposure on intestinal barrier function.

Click here to display table

Table 3. Effect of TCTB exposure on intestinal barrier function.
ToxinAnimal speciesConcentration and duration of exposureEffects on barrier functionReferences
In vivo approach
DONMouse acute exposure
25 mg/kg bw
(one gavage)
Increase in 4 kDa dextran permeability
Effect on the distribution pattern of claudin 1, 3 and 3 tight junction proteins in small intestine
[70]
Rat chronic exposure
2 mg/kg feed
28 days
Decrease in transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER)
Increase in 4 kDa dextran permeability
[50]
In vitro approach: intestinal epithelial cell lines
DONHuman HT-29
cell line
2 to 50 µM
24 h
10 µM
0–24 h
Dose dependent inhibition of cell viability (IC50 = 10 µmol/L)
Time dependent:
Increase in total DNA damage
Increase in p53 protein level
Increase in caspase-3 activity
[68]
Human Caco-2
cell line
84 µM
24 h
Decreased survival rate of 40%[64]
Human HT-29
cell line
0.13 to 0.7 µM
6 to 15 d
Decrease in brush border enzyme activity
Decrease in protein content
Decrease in transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER)
Increase in lucifer yellow permeability
[62]
Human Caco-2
cell line
30 µM
48 h
Decrease in TEER
Decrease in claudin-4 tight junction proteins
Increase in 4 kDa dextran permeability
[71]
Human Caco-2
cell line
10 µM
12 h
Increase in E coli K12 translocation[72]
Human Caco-2
cell line
1.7 to 17 µM
24 h
Decrease in claudin-4 tight junction proteins[73]
DONPorcine IPEC-1
cell line
10 to 50 µM
48 h
Decrease in TEER
Decrease in claudin-3 and 4 tight junction proteins
Increase in 4 kDa dextran permeability
Increase in E coli 28C translocation
[71]
DON
3-ADON
15-ADON
Porcine IPEC-1
cell line
10 to 30 µMDecrease in TEER and increase in 4 kDa dextran permeability
15-ADON >> DON > 3-ADON
[51]
24 to 48 hDecrease in claudin-3 and -4 tight junction proteins expression
15-ADON >> DON = 3-ADON
DONPorcine IPEC-J2
cell line
2.5 to 10 µM 24 hDecrease in cell viability
Increase of lactate dehydrogenase release
Decrease in ATP content
[67]
Ex vivo approaches
DONPorcine tissue (Ussing chamber)20 to 50 µM 2 hIncrease in 4 kDa dextran permeability[71]
Porcine tissue (jejunal explants)1 to 10 µM 4 hShortened and coalescent villi, lysis of enterocytes, edema[48]

As the intestine is potentially exposed to mixtures of mycotoxins [74,75], Alassane-Kpembi et al. evaluated interactions caused by co-exposure to TCTB on proliferating Caco-2 cells [76]. Using the MTT test and neutral red uptake, the authors observed that binary or ternary mixtures show synergistic effects when toxins were at low concentrations (cytotoxic effect between 10% and 40%) and additive or nearly additive effects at higher concentrations (cytotoxic effect around 50%).

5.1.2. Effects on Cell Differentiation

Using scanning electron microscopy, Kasuga et al. [62] demonstrated on differentiated Caco-2 cells that the formation of the brush border and the expression of two membrane-associated hydrolases related to enterocyte differentiation were affected by DON in a dose-dependent manner [62].

In broiler chicks, the ingestion of DON-contaminated feed produced an alteration in the small intestinal morphology, especially in the duodenum and jejunum, where the villi were shorter and thinner [77].

5.2. Effects on Barrier Functions

Polarized cells form strong barriers through the development of tight junctions between them. The intercellular tight junction is the rate-limiting barrier in the paracellular pathway for permeation by ions and larger solutes [78]. The investigations concerning the effects of TCTB on the intestinal barrier functions are only just beginning.

5.2.1. Effects on TEER

The transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of cell monolayers can be considered a good indicator of the degree of organization of the tight junctions within the cell monolayer and epithelial integrity [79]. Several studies have investigated the effect of TCTB on the TEER of intestinal epithelial cell lines (Table 3). In three different human intestinal epithelial cell lines, HT-29, Caco-2 and T84, DON was found to induce a dose-dependent decrease in the TEER [32,62,63,71,72,80]. The same effect was observed in the porcine intestinal epithelial cell lines IPEC-1 and IPEC-J2 [71,81]. Interestingly, IPEC-1 cells showed greater sensitivity to DON compared with Caco-2 [71]. Several hypotheses can explain this higher sensitivity of IPEC-1 cells [71]. Firstly, Caco-2 cells were obtained from an adenocarcinoma, whereas IPEC-1 cells were derived from normal newborn piglets [82]. Secondly, even if Caco-2 cells express many morphological and biochemical characteristics of small intestine [83], they are derived from the colon. By contrast, IPEC-1 cells were obtained from jejunum and ileum. Thirdly, these two cell lines are from different species (pig versus human), and among animal species, pig is the species most sensitive to DON. However, it is difficult to assess the susceptibility of humans [2]. Interestingly, a differential sensitivity to DON of the TEER of intestinal cells from the IPEC-J2 cell line has been observed depending on the route of application. Indeed, following basolateral exposure, the TEER was significantly decreased compared to apical exposure [81].

Differential effects were observed in the decrease of the TEER of IPEC-1 cells after a 24-h exposure to 10 µM of DON or acetylated derivatives, and the toxins were ranked in the following order of toxicity: 15-ADON >> DON > 3-ADON [51]. Similar data were obtained using human Caco-2 cells, confirming the differential effects of toxins of a close chemical structure [84].

5.2.2. Effects on Intestinal Permeability

The observed reduction in the TEER induced by trichothecenes can be due to an alteration of the tight junction barrier properties, but also to an effect on the plasma membrane, such as alterations in transcellular ion transport [85]. It is thus of interest to determine the effect of these toxins on the paracellular permeability of a tracer, such as lucifer yellow or dextran (Table 3).

Kasuga et al. [62] demonstrated a significant increase in the permeability of lucifer yellow in human Caco-2 and human T84 cells treated with DON. Similarly, we observed that DON increased the paracellular permeability of human Caco-2 cells and porcine IPEC-1 cells to 4 kDa dextran in a time and dose-dependent manner [71]. Akbari et al. [70] observed during 24 h that DON induced the dysfunction of the epithelial barrier of a Caco-2 cells by measuring the decline in impedance values. DON and its acetylated derivatives exhibit differential effects on 4 kDa dextran permeability of IPEC-1 cells, and after a 24 h exposure to 10 µM of toxin, they were ranked in the following order of toxicity: 15-ADON >> DON > 3-ADON [51].

This effect of DON on paracellular permeability was confirmed in rats chronically exposed to DON at 2 mg/kg of feed during 28 days. Pieces of jejunum mounted in an Ussing chamber showed a decrease of the TEER associated with an increase of permeability to 4 kDa dextran [50]. In pig explants mounted in Ussing chambers and exposed to DON ex vivo, we observed a two-fold increase in the paracellular passage of FITC-dextran across intestinal tissue treated with 20 µM and 50 µM of DON, when compared to untreated ones [71].

The numerous pores present in the basement membrane of the intestinal villi are essential for the communication of enterocytes with cells in the lamina propria. An 11-week exposure of pigs to DON at 2.2 to 2.9 mg/kg of feed led to an increase in the pore number in jejunum and potentially improved the antigen sampling in the intestinal epithelium [86].

5.2.3. Effects on Bacterial Translocation

The impaired intestinal integrity could lead to the entry of luminal antigens and bacteria that are normally restricted to the gut lumen by the intestinal barrier function (Table 3). We observed that DON induces a dose-dependent translocation of a pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli across the porcine IPEC-1 epithelial cell monolayers [71]. An increased translocation of Salmonella typhimurium was observed in porcine IPEC-J2 exposed to low doses of DON, with undifferentiated cells being more sensitive than the differentiated ones [87]. Maresca et al. [72] demonstrated that among other mycotoxins, DON allowed the transepithelial passage of apically added non-invasive commensal bacteria across human Caco-2 cell monolayers. However, in this case, no modification of paracellular permeability evaluated by the TEER measurement or tracer flux was observed. Such an increase in the bacterial passage through intestinal epithelial cells after DON treatment could have major implications for human health in terms of sepsis and inflammation. In mice, DON-contaminated diet accelerates S. enteritidis infection [88] and transiently increases the severity of reovirus infection [89].

5.2.4. Mode of Action

The mechanism underlying the trichothecene-induced impairment of the intestinal barrier function has been poorly investigated. The effect of DON on bacterial translocation could be related to the ability of this toxin to specifically decrease the expression of claudin proteins. Indeed, we have observed that, in porcine intestinal epithelial cell monolayers, the increased permeability was accompanied by a specific reduction in the expression of claudins. This increased permeability was also noted in pig explants treated with DON, and a reduction of claudin expression was described in the jejunum of piglets exposed to DON-contaminated feed [71]. This reduction of epithelial integrity through inhibition of the claudin-4 protein synthesis was observed in DON-exposed Caco-2 cells [73]. This decrease was not due to diminished transcription or increased degradation and was also observed for a tight junction-independent protein, i.e., intestinal alkaline phosphatase [73]. As well as claudins, E-cadherin also plays a fundamental role in maintaining the epithelial architecture, and its expression is decreased in pig jejunal explants exposed to 10 µM of DON for 4 h [57]. The MAPK signaling pathway could be involved in the regulation of tight junction protein expression. Indeed, the ribotoxic stress induced by trichothecenes leads to the activation of members of the family of Src tyrosine kinases implicated as upstream regulators of a large number of intracellular signaling pathways [90]. They most likely represent critical signals that precede MAPK activation and the induction of resultant downstream responses [91]. In our study, we observed that the MAPK p44/42 ERK activation, induced by DON treatment, decreased the expression of claudin in correlation with a reduction in the barrier function of the intestine evaluated by TEER and paracellular permeability [92]. A recent study indicates that 6 h following the exposure of mice to 25 mg DON/kg bw, the distribution pattern of claudins 1, 2 and 3 was affected. In addition, the increase in the paracellular permeability, evaluated by the measure of FITC-dextran in the serum of mice, strengthened the hypothesis that the tight junction protein network is a target of DON [70]. We proposed a potential mechanism to explain the loss of the barrier function of intestinal epithelial cells following DON exposure, mediated by MAPK and claudin. The correlation between claudin 4 decreased expression and the MAPK activation was not observed in Caco-2 cells [73], suggesting a differential mechanism of action between porcine untransformed and human transformed intestinal epithelial cell lines.

Recently, we showed that the differential effects of DON and its acetylated derivatives on the intestinal barrier function were correlated, at the molecular level, with the exacerbated capacity of 15-ADON to activate MAPK ERK1/2, p38 and JNK, both in the intestinal cell line, explants and the jejunum from exposed animals, at a lower dose than DON and 3-ADON, and to decrease the expression of the tight junction proteins, claudin 3 and 4 [51].

DON cannot only interact with epithelial cells on the apical side during intestinal passage and absorption, but following absorption in the stomach and upper small intestine, detectable concentrations of DON can be found in blood serum, potentially exposing epithelial cells from their basolateral side. Diesing et al. [81] demonstrated a differential decrease in the tight junction protein, claudin 3, in the IPEC-J2 cell line, depending on the route of application, whereas the protein, ZO-1, was unaffected by the treatment. In addition, using a comparative global genomic approach, they showed that the apical and basolateral challenges to epithelial cell layers trigger different gene response profiles paralleled with a higher susceptibility towards basolateral challenge. The genes regulated were involved in metabolism, genetic or environment information processing and cellular processes [93].

The data summarized in this paragraph, obtained in different species (mouse, pig, human) and using different models (cell cultures, explants, in vivo experiments) confirm that one of the main target of DON in the intestine is the tight junction protein network. The modulation of claudin proteins by DON correlated with the increased intestinal permeability observed in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. In terms of human or animal health, the consequences of the DON-induced increase in intestinal permeability still have to be determined.

6. Genotoxic Effects of DON and Other TCTB

The data on the genotoxic effects of trichothecenes are scarce, and these toxins are classified in Group 3 (inadequate evidence) by the International Agency on Cancer Research [94]. As far as the intestine is concerned, the genotoxic potential of NIV and FUS-X were evaluated in vitro on the human intestinal epithelial cell line, Caco-2. In differentiated post-confluent cells, a short exposure (3 h) to NIV or FUS-X did not cause any DNA damage, whereas DNA damage was observed after 24 h or 72 h [66]. In HT-29 cells exposed to DON, Bensassi et al. [68] demonstrated that the increase in DNA damage was induced in a time-dependent manner. Interestingly, in mice exposed orally and intraperitoneally to NIV (50% of the LD50), Tsuda et al. [95] observed that NIV was genotoxic in the gastrointestinal tract, with the colon mucosa being preferentially damaged.

7. DON and Other TCTB Modulate the Intestinal Immune Response

The intestinal immune response involves the coordinated action of both immune (dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes) and non-immune cells, including epithelial cells. Monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, as well as T- and B-lymphocytes can be cellular targets of DON and other TCT. Low to moderate toxin concentrations upregulate the expression of cytokines, chemokines and genes, inducing an inflammatory response, both transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally [60]. Not only immune cells, but also intestinal epithelial cells produce cytokines, crucial for the recruitment and activation of the immune system, including TGF-α, IL-1, IL-10, IL-15 and IL-18 [96]. Other cytokines, such as IL-1-α or β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MCP-1, CCL20 and GM-CSF, are also expressed by normal epithelial cells and are markedly upregulated in response to microbial infections. Intestinal epithelial cells also drive the development of dendritic cells: they release thymic stromal lymphopoietin that inhibits IL-12 production by dendritic cells and TGF-β and retinoic acid involved in the development of tolerogenic dendritic cells. In addition, thymic stromal lymphopoietin favors the release of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) and the B-cell activation factor of the TNF family (BAFF) by intestinal epithelial cell-conditioned dendritic cells and supports IgA class switching directly in the lamina propria [97,98].

7.1. DON and Other TCTB Induce Intestinal Inflammation

7.1.1. Modulation of the Cytokine Production in Intestinal Tissue by TCTB

The effect of DON or TCTB on cytokine production in intestinal tissue has been evaluated in different studies (Table 4). The increase in the expression of IL-1β, IL-8, MCP1 and IL-6 in pig intestinal loops exposed to Salmonella typhimurium was potentiated when DON was co-exposed with the bacteria [87]. The consequence of the DON intake could be an increase in the susceptibility to Salmonella typhimurium, with a subsequent potentiation of the inflammatory response in the gut.

Table Table 4. DON modulates cytokine production by intestinal epithelial cells.

Click here to display table

Table 4. DON modulates cytokine production by intestinal epithelial cells.
ToxinSpecies/modelConcentration and duration exposureCytokine modulationReferences
In vitro approach: intestinal epithelial cell lines
DONHuman intestine 407 and Caco-2 cell lines0–3.3 µM 12 h [94]↗ IL-8[72,80,99]
0–10 µM, 12 h [64]
0–16.9 µM, 48 h [66]
Porcine IPEC-J2 cell line0.5 µM, 48 h↗ IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8,[100]
2 µM, 48 h↘ IL-1a, MCP1
↗ IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, TNFa, MCP1
Human intestine 407 cell line24 h pre-exposure to LPS endotoxin↘ IL-8[101]
1.7 µM, 12 h
Ex vivo and in vivo approaches
DONPorcine jejunal explants (ex vivo)10 µM, 24 h↗ IL-21, IL-22, IL-23[102]
↘ FoxP3, RALDH1
Porcine intestinal loops (in vivo)0–3.3 µM, 6 h↗ IL-1b, IL-8, MCP1, IL-6[87]
Broiler chickens (in vivo)10 mg DON/kg, 35 d↘ IL-1β, IFN-g, TGFBR1[103]
→ TNF-α, IL-8, NF-κβ,

In porcine jejunal explants, 10 µM of DON led to an increase in the expression of IL-6, IL-23 and IL-1β, but did not affect the expression of TGF-β and strongly repressed FoxP3 and RALDH1. These data suggest that in this model, DON mainly drives the intestinal immune system towards a Th17 response elicited by the Th17 helper lymphocytes, recently described as important mediators of the mucosal immunity, the defense against extracellular pathogens and autoimmunity [102]. Besides these direct effects, DON also potentiates the effects of pro-inflammatory stimuli, such as TLR-4 ligands, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and bacteria on immune cells [104,105,106]. Exposure to LPS is common and can occur through infections, via gastrointestinal translocation of gut microflora, due to inflammatory bowel diseases, or gut injury [107]. In mice, simultaneous exposure of subtoxic intravenous doses of LPS and dietary DON caused a sequential elevation of IL1-β overexpression and severe apoptotic depletion of lymphoid tissue [108,109]. However, such a mechanism needs to be demonstrated in intestinal lymphocytes during dietary exposure to LPS and TCT.

A recent study demonstrated a downregulation of the expression of IL-1β, IFN-g and transforming growth factor beta receptor I (TGFBR1) in broiler chickens fed for 35 days with DON at 10 mg/kg feed, but no changes in TNF-α, IL-8 and NF-κB in the jejunum of the animals [103].

7.1.2. Modulation of the Cytokine Production in Intestinal Epithelial Cells by TCTB

DON provokes intestinal inflammation in vivo [110], which results from a direct effect on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-8, by intestinal epithelial cells. IL-8 is an early marker of the inflammatory process and is a potent chemo-attractant for leukocytes and T-lymphocytes underlying gut epithelial cells. IL-8 also enhances cell proliferation and controls the repair processes during injury of the intestinal mucosa or cytotoxic stress [111]. Several studies have shown that DON stimulates the secretion of IL-8 in various human intestinal epithelial cell lines [72,80,99]. Indeed, after exposure of Caco-2 cells to DON, a dose-dependent increase in IL-8 secretion through an NF-kB activity mechanism was observed. This effect was amplified upon pro-inflammatory stimulation, showing that DON exposure could cause or exacerbate intestinal inflammation. Moreover, Maresca et al. [72] have shown that direct IL-8 secretion from differentiated Caco-2 cells in response to DON is dependent on the ribotoxic-associated activation of PKR, NF-kB and p38. By contrast, DON-induced IL-8 secretion in human embryonic epithelial intestine 407 cells (Int407) was dependent on the activation of MAPK ERK1/2, but not on the activation of p38. This difference is probably due to the maturation status of the cells: differentiated mature Caco-2 cells vs. undifferentiated Int407 cells [99]. Moreover, DON modulates the production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines following a 48-h treatment of IPEC-J2 cells. A 2-µM exposure upregulates IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα and MCP1, whereas a 0.5-µM exposure upregulates IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and downregulates IL-1 and MCP1 [100]. The consequence of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines is the modulation of the intestinal tight junction barrier, potentially favoring an increased translocation of luminal antigens [112].

The detection of bacteria by intestinal epithelial cells, which induces IL-8 secretion, is known to be mediated through the interaction of bacteria flagella with the cellular Toll-like receptor 5 [113]. An indirect pro-inflammatory effect of mycotoxins could result from an alteration of the intestinal barrier function, allowing the transepithelial passage of non-invasive commensal bacteria. Indeed, high doses of DON (around 100 µM) compromise tight junctions and allow the transepithelial passage of apically added non-invasive commensal bacteria [72]. In the same study, the authors showed that DON at 1 and 10 µM potentiates the effects of basolaterally added bacteria on the secretion of IL-8 by human intestinal epithelial cells.

The inflammation processes act to maintain tissue homeostasis, but as some cytokines are potent mediators of potentially damaging tissue responses, several mechanisms exist to ensure that the effects of these cytokines are restricted [114]. Recently, DON exposure was demonstrated to suppress BAFF gene expression via the induction of SOCS3 in human enterocytes. As TCT are ribosomal stress agents, their ingestion could exert adverse effects on the regulation of BAFF, a vital cytokine for B-cell development [115].

Moon et al. [101] showed that human epithelial cells are less responsive to DON-induced IL-8 production after pre-exposure to the endotoxin LPS. As the intestine of newborn infants becomes established with the normal microflora, their epithelium can recognize the external bacteria components. After further constitutive experience of the commensals and their endotoxins, the epithelium becomes hypo-responsive to the normal microflora and controls its associated physiological inflammation [116]. The mechanism of the hypo-production of IL-8 in intestinal epithelial cells is the extended production of the DON-induced proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) after pre-exposure to endotoxin. DON increased PPAR-γ gene expression, which was transiently maintained, but endotoxin pre-exposure extends the duration of DON-induced PPAR-γ expression, thus sensitizing cells to induce an extended PPAR-γ in response to DON treatment. Constitutively-expressed PPAR-γ on the intestinal epithelial surface may trigger the tolerance to the normal microflora and its associated inflammation [117]. For example, the impaired expression of PPAR-γ has been observed in inflammatory bowel diseases. The results demonstrated by Moon et al. [101] suggest that there is a potential risk of mucosal inflammation after DON exposure in young infants compared with endotoxin-tolerant adults.

7.2. DON and TCTB May Interfere with the Intestinal Homeostasis

As described previously, epithelial cells act as initiators, mediators and regulators in innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as in the transition from innate immunity to adaptive immunity. Dendritic cells collaborate as sentinels against foreign particulate antigens by building a transepithelial interacting cellular network. During inflammatory and immune responses, epithelial cells express pattern-recognition receptors to trigger a host defense response and interact with dendritic cells to regulate antigen sensitization and release cytokines to recruit effector cells [118]. Moreover, macrophages and T-cells are also able to modulate dendritic cell functions [119]. The effects of TCTB on the different cell types involved in gut homeostasis can explain various pathologies associated with the ingestion of mycotoxin contaminated food.

Firstly, DON can potentiate the effect of IL1-β on IL-8 secretion and increase the transepithelial passage of commensal bacteria [71,72]. IL-8 has been implicated in many chronic diseases, ranging from inflammatory bowel disease [120,121] to rheumatoid arthritis [122]. Then, in addition to potentially exacerbating established intestinal inflammation, this mycotoxin may thus participate in the induction of sepsis and intestinal inflammation in vivo [72]. Indeed, inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn’s disease, are generally associated with the presence of adherent-invasive bacteria [123]. A hypothesis would be that at least in some cases, the ingestion of food contaminated with mycotoxins could be involved in inducing inflammatory bowel diseases [63,71,72].

The induction of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 by macrophages, plays a pivotal role, as they are directly linked to the differentiation of B-cells and to the stimulation of IgA secretion [124]. Prolonged feeding of DON causes a dramatic elevation in total serum IgA in mice. Moreover, dietary exposure to DON or NIV selectively upregulates membrane IgA-bearing cells in mouse Peyer’s patches [124]. IL-6 is critical to mucosal IgA immunity based both on its differentiative effects on IgA-committed B-cells and its production in the gut by macrophages and T-cells [125]. In vivo and in vitro, DON upregulates the IL-6 expression that drives the differentiation of IgA-committed B-cells to IgA secretion [126,127,128], mimicking the early stage of human IgA nephropathy. It will be interesting to study the implication of TCT on the release of soluble molecules, such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), retinoic acid and TNF-β by intestinal epithelial cells. Indeed, TSLP is shown to favor the release of BAFF and APRIL by conditioned dendritic cells and induces IgA switching directly in the lamina propria. The disruption of gut homeostasis induced by TCT could explain the modification of mucosal IgA responses, as well as the diverse immune-mediated pathology observed in response to these fungal toxins.

8. Conclusions

The intestinal mucosa is the first biological barrier encountered by natural toxins, and consequently, it could be exposed to high amounts of dietary toxins. An increasing number of studies demonstrate that intestinal epithelial cells are targets for food contaminants, including mycotoxins [129,130,131].

In this review, we summarize the data concerning the ingestion of DON and other TCTB. These toxins induce intestinal pathologies in humans and animals, including necrosis of the intestinal epithelium. They also disturb the barrier function, potentially leading to the increased translocation of pathogens and an increased susceptibility to enteric infectious diseases. DON modulates the immune responsiveness of the intestinal mucosa, may interact in the cross-talk between epithelial cells and intestinal immune cells and could represent a predisposing factor to inflammatory diseases [102,132]. In farm and laboratory animals, dietary exposure to DON decreases growth performances. This is due to a local effect of the toxin altering the structure of the epithelium, reducing nutrient absorption by the enterocytes and modulating hormone production by enterochromaffin cells. A central effect of DON has also been described, involving the regulation of growth hormone production by inhibitors of cytokine signaling and the direct action of the toxin on the central neuronal network.

One important research field for the future will concern the impact of DON and other TCTB on the intestinal microbiota. Indeed, these toxins may directly target the microbiota [133]. In addition, the mucosal exposure to ribotoxic stress and the subsequent inflammatory responses may alter bacterial composition and, thus, reduce the microbial diversity.

As mentioned in this review, the effects of DON and other TCTB have been investigated in different species, including man, laboratory animals, poultry and pigs. Among these species, pigs are of particular concern for at least two reasons: (i) due to the cereal-rich diet, pigs can be exposed to a high level of toxins; and (ii) the pig is one of the most sensitive species. In addition, because of the similarities in the intestinal tract, pigs can be considered as a good model for humans. In this species, several complementary approaches have been developed to investigate the effects of DON and other TCTB on the intestine. In vivo trials and cell culture models were used to study the long-term exposure to mycotoxins. Intestinal loops and explants enable multiple exposure conditions of the entire intestinal tissue to be investigated, but these models are limited to short-term exposure. The data obtained using these complementary approaches all show an impact of DON and other TCTB on the intestine, confirming the validity of the pig to investigate the effect of these toxins. Surprisingly, despite the available tool of this animal species, very few data have been obtained on the effect of DON on the intestine of rodents. This might be due to the fact that they are not very sensitive to this toxin.

The concentrations of toxins used in the in vivo trials presented in this review are, most of the time, in accordance with plausible levels of contamination. Similarly, in the different models of study of the intestine, cell culture or explants, the range of concentration used (generally 5–30 μM) is in accordance with these plausible levels [63]. Under these conditions of realistic exposure, TCTB produce deleterious effects on intestinal morphology and/or function. As highlighted recently by Maresca [41], the differences between the doses of DON affecting cell functions and the doses of DON susceptible to being present [134] in relation to the actual provisional maximum tolerable daily intake represent a low safety factor. Thus, DON can represent a risk to human health, mainly because of its effect on the intestinal and immune systems.

The data presented in this review focused on the effects of DON on the intestine. Fusarium species are able to synthesize, in addition to DON, other related toxins, among them the acetylated derivatives, the toxicity of which has been mainly investigated through in vitro experiments. Masked forms of mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol-3-β-d-glucoside (DON-3G), that result from the detoxification metabolism in plants, are an emerging problem [135]. The occurrence and toxicity of this new DON-metabolite are poorly documented, as well as its possible hydrolysis to the parent mycotoxin in the intestine.

The toxicity of DON also needs to be addressed in the context of mycotoxin mixtures. Indeed, the co-occurrence of mycotoxins is likely to arise due to at least three different reasons: (i) most fungi are able to produce a number of mycotoxins simultaneously; (ii) food commodities can be contaminated by several fungi; and (iii) a complete diet is made up of various different food commodities [75]. Unfortunately, the toxicity of combinations of mycotoxins cannot always be predicted based upon their individual toxicities. Recent data suggest that the type of interaction depends not only on the type of toxin and their ratio, but also on the concentration of the toxin-mixture at a constant ratio [76]. More research is needed to understand the impact of mycotoxin combinations and to determine when synergistic interactions occur. These data are needed to assess the health risk due to the exposure of multi-mycotoxin contaminated food and feed [74].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by European Commission projects-Knowledge Based Bio-Economy (2007-222690-2, “MYCORED” and 2008-227549, “INTERPLAY”) and by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche project-“DON and Co”. The authors are solely responsible for the work described in this article, and their opinions are not necessarily those of the European Union. We thank John Woodley for language editing.

Author Contributions

Philippe Pinton selected the publications for illustrating the impact of trichothecenes on the different functions of the intestine and prepared the majority of the manuscript drafts. Isabelle Oswald has a research background in mycotoxins. She provided the main inputs in the structure of the manuscript and provided critical feedback.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oswald, I.P.; Marin, D.E.; Bouhet, S.; Pinton, P.; Taranu, I.; Accensi, F. Immunotoxicological risk of mycotoxins for domestic animals. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pestka, J.J.; Smolinski, A.T. Deoxynivalenol: Toxicology and potential effects on humans. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2005, 8, 39–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chu, F.S. Mycotoxins-Occurrence and Toxic Effect. Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition; Sadler, M., Strain, J.J., Caballero, B., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 858–869. [Google Scholar]
  4. Larsen, J.C.; Hunt, J.; Perrin, I.; Ruckenbauer, P. Workshop on trichothecenes with a focus on DON: Summary report. Toxicol. Lett. 2004, 153, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sugita-Konishi, Y.; Park, B.J.; Kobayashi-Hattori, K.; Tanaka, T.; Chonan, T.; Yoshikawa, K.; Kumagai, S. Effect of cooking process on the deoxynivalenol content and its subsequent cytotoxicity in wheat products. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 1764–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Canady, R.; Coker, R.; Rgan, S.; Krska, R.; Kuiper-Goodman, T.; Olsen, M.; Pestka, J.; Resnik, S.; Schlatter, J. Deoxynivalenol. Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food. WHO Food Addit. Ser. 2001, 47, 420–555. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhat, R.V.; Beedu, S.R.; Ramakrishna, Y.; Munshi, K.L. Outbreak of trichothecene mycotoxicosis associated with consumption of mould-damaged wheat production in Kashmir Valley, India. Lancet 1989, 1, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  8. Luo, Y. Fusarium toxins contamination of cereals in China. In Proceedings of the 7th International IUPAC Symposium on Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins, Tokyo, Japan, 16–19 August 1988; Aibara, K., Kumagai, S., Ohtsubo, K., Yoshizawa, T., Eds.; Japanese Association of Mycotoxicology: Tokyo, Japan, 1988; pp. 97–98. [Google Scholar]
  9. Food and Drugs Administration. Guidance for Industry and FDA: Advisory Levels for Deoxynivalenol (DON) in Finished Wheat Products for Human Consumption and Grains and Grain By-Products used for Animal Feed. FDA: Rockville, MD, USA. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM217558.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2014).
  10. European-Union. Commission Recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the Presence of Deoxynivalenol, Zearalenone, Ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and Fumonisins in Products Intended for Animal Feeding. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:229:0007:0009:EN:PDF (accessed on 15 May 2014).
  11. European-Union. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 463/2005 of 16 March 2005 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain tube or pipe fittings, of iron or steel, originating, inter alia, in Thailand. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32005R0463&from=EN (accessed on 15 May 2014).
  12. Bouhet, S.; Oswald, I.P. The effects of mycotoxins, fungal food contaminants, on the intestinal epithelial cell-derived innate immune response. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2005, 108, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Groschwitz, K.R.; Hogan, S.P. Intestinal barrier function: Molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pitman, R.S.; Blumberg, R.S. First line of defense: The role of the intestinal epithelium as an active component of the mucosal immune system. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 35, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Turner, J.R. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nejdfors, P.; Ekelund, M.; Jeppsson, B.; Westrom, B.R. Mucosal in vitro permeability in the intestinal tract of the pig, the rat, and man: Species- and region-related differences. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 35, 501–507. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rothkotter, H.J.; Sowa, E.; Pabst, R. The pig as a model of developmental immunology. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2002, 21, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Flannery, B.M.; Wu, W.; Pestka, J.J. Characterization of deoxynivalenol-induced anorexia using mouse bioassay. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 1863–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rotter, B.A.; Prelusky, D.B.; Pestka, J.J. Toxicology of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1996, 48, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, W.; Flannery, B.M.; Sugita-Konishi, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Zhang, H.; Pestka, J.J. Comparison of murine anorectic responses to the 8-ketotrichothecenes 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, fusarenon X and nivalenol. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 2056–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fioramonti, J.; Dupuy, C.; Dupuy, J.; Bueno, L. The mycotoxin, deoxynivalenol, delays gastric emptying through serotonin-3 receptors in rodents. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1993, 266, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar]
  22. Girish, C.K.; MacDonald, E.J.; Scheinin, M.; Smith, T.K. Effects of feedborne fusarium mycotoxins on brain regional neurochemistry of turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, Y. Sensory signal transduction in the vagal primary afferent neurons. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 2554–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pestka, J.J. Deoxynivalenol: Mechanisms of action, human exposure, and toxicological relevance. Arch. Toxicol. 2010, 84, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amuzie, C.J.; Shinozuka, J.; Pestka, J.J. Induction of suppressors of cytokine signaling by the trichothecene deoxynivalenol in the mouse. Toxicol. Sci. 2009, 111, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Flannery, B.M.; Clark, E.S.; Pestka, J.J. Anorexia induction by the trichothecene deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) is mediated by the release of the gut satiety hormone peptide YY. Toxicol. Sci. 2012, 130, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gaige, S.; Bonnet, M.; Tardivel, C.; Pinton, P.; Trouslard, J.; Jean, A.; Guzylack, L.; Troadec, J.; Dallaporta, M. c-Fos immunoreactivity in the pig brain following deoxynivalenol intoxication: Focus on NUCB2/nesfatin-1 expressing neurons. NeuroToxicology 2013, 34, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Girardet, C.; Bonnet, M.S.; Jdir, R.; Sadoud, M.; Thirion, S.; Tardivel, C.; Roux, J.; Lebrun, B.; Mounien, L.; Trouslard, J.; et al. Central inflammation and sickness-like behavior induced by the food contaminant deoxynivalenol: A PGE2-independent mechanism. Toxicol. Sci. 2011, 124, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Girardet, C.; Bonnet, M.S.; Jdir, R.; Sadoud, M.; Thirion, S.; Tardivel, C.; Roux, J.; Lebrun, B.; Wanaverbecq, N.; Mounien, L.; et al. The food-contaminant deoxynivalenol modifies eating by targeting anorexigenic neurocircuitry. PLoS One 2011, 6, e26134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumagai, S.; Shimizu, T. Effects of fusarenon-X and T-2 toxin on intestinal absorption of monosaccharide in rats. Arch. Toxicol. 1988, 61, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Awad, W.A.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bohm, J.; Zentek, J. Effects of B-trichothecenes on luminal glucose transport across the isolated jejunal epithelium of broiler chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2008, 92, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maresca, M.; Mahfoud, R.; Garmy, N.; Fantini, J. The mycotoxin deoxynivalenol affects nutrient absorption in human intestinal epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2723–2731. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hunder, G.; Schumann, K.; Strugala, G.; Gropp, J.; Fichtl, B.; Forth, W. Influence of subchronic exposure to low dietary deoxynivalenol, a trichothecene mycotoxin, on intestinal absorption of nutrients in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1991, 29, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Awad, W.A.; Rehman, H.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Zentek, J. Effects of luminal deoxynivalenol and L-proline on electrophysiological parameters in the jejunums of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 928–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Awad, W.A.; Aschenbach, J.R.; Setyabudi, F.M.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bohm, J.; Zentek, J. In vitro effects of deoxynivalenol on small intestinal D-glucose uptake and absorption of deoxynivalenol across the isolated jejunal epithelium of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Awad, W.A.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Hulan, H.W.; Zentek, J. Effects of deoxynivalenol on general performance and electrophysiological properties of intestinal mucosa of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1964–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Awad, W.A.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Zentek, J. In vitro effects of deoxynivalenol on electrical properties of intestinal mucosa of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yunus, A.W.; Blajet-Kosicka, A.; Kosicki, R.; Khan, M.Z.; Rehman, H.; Bohm, J. Deoxynivalenol as a contaminant of broiler feed: Intestinal development, absorptive functionality, and metabolism of the mycotoxin. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 852–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Devreese, M.; Girgis, G.N.; Tran, S.T.; de Baere, S.; de Backer, P.; Croubels, S.; Smith, T.K. The effects of feed-borne Fusarium mycotoxins and glucomannan in turkey poults based on specific and non-specific parameters. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 63, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dietrich, B.; Neuenschwander, S.; Bucher, B.; Wenk, C. Fusarium mycotoxin-contaminated wheat containing deoxynivalenol alters the gene expression in the liver and the jejunum of broilers. Animal 2013, 6, 278–291. [Google Scholar]
  41. Maresca, M. From the gut to the brain: Journey and pathophysiological effects of the food-associated mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol. Toxins 2013, 5, 784–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pollmann, D.S.; Koch, B.A.; Seitz, L.M.; Mohr, H.E.; Kennedy, G.A. Deoxynivalenol-contaminated wheat in swine diets. J. Anim. Sci. 1985, 60, 239–247. [Google Scholar]
  43. Trenholm, H.L.; Hamilton, R.M.; Friend, D.W.; Thompson, B.K.; Hartin, K.E. Feeding trials with vomitoxin (deoxynivalenol)-contaminated wheat: Effects on swine, poultry, and dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1984, 185, 527–531. [Google Scholar]
  44. Harvey, R.B.; Kubena, L.F.; Huff, W.E.; Corrier, D.E.; Clark, D.E.; Phillips, T.D. Effects of aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol, and their combinations in the diets of growing pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1989, 50, 602–607. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cote, L.M.; Beasley, V.R.; Bratich, P.M.; Swanson, S.P.; Shivaprasad, H.L.; Buck, W.B. Sex-related reduced weight gains in growing swine fed diets containing deoxynivalenol. J. Anim. Sci. 1985, 61, 942–950. [Google Scholar]
  46. D’Mello, J.P.F. Antinutritional factors and mycotoxins. In Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition; D’Mello, J.P.F., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2000; pp. 383–403. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kolf-Clauw, M; Oswald, I.P. Toxalim, Research Centre in Food Toxicology, Toulouse, France. Effect of DON on the intestine in pig. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kolf-Clauw, M.; Castellote, J.; Joly, B.; Bourges-Abella, N.; Raymond-Letron, I.; Pinton, P.; Oswald, I.P. Development of a pig jejunal explant culture for studying the gastrointestinal toxicity of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol: Histopathological analysis. Toxicol. Vitro 2009, 23, 1580–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bracarense, A.P.; Lucioli, J.; Grenier, B.; Drociunas Pacheco, G.; Moll, W.D.; Schatzmayr, G.; Oswald, I.P. Chronic ingestion of deoxynivalenol and fumonisin, alone or in interaction, induces morphological and immunological changes in the intestine of piglets. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1776–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Payros, D; Oswald, I.P. Toxalim, Research Centre in Food Toxicology, Toulouse, France. Effect of DON on the intestine in rat. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pinton, P.; Tsybulskyy, D.; Lucioli, J.; Laffitte, J.; Callu, P.; Lyazhri, F.; Grosjean, F.; Bracarense, A.P.; Kolf-Clauw, M.; Oswald, I.P. Toxicity of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated derivatives on the intestine: Differential effects on morphology, barrier function, tight junctions proteins and MAPKinases. Toxicol. Sci. 2012, 130, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Awad, W.A.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bohm, J.; Zentek, J. Influence of deoxynivalenol on the D-glucose transport across the isolated epithelium of different intestinal segments of laying hens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 91, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zielonka, L.; Wisniewska, M.; Gajecka, M.; Obremski, K.; Gajecki, M. Influence of low doses of deoxynivalenol on histopathology of selected organs of pigs. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2009, 12, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yoshizawa, T.; Yamashita, A.; Luo, Y. Fumonisin occurrence in corn from high- and low-risk areas for human esophageal cancer in China. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 1626–1629. [Google Scholar]
  55. Luo, Y.; Yoshizawa, T.; Katayama, T. Comparative study on the natural occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins (trichothecenes and zearalenone) in corn and wheat from high- and low-risk areas for human esophageal cancer in China. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 3723–3726. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ohtsubo, K.; Ryu, J.C.; Nakamura, K.; Izumiyama, N.; Tanaka, T.; Yamamura, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Ueno, Y. Chronic toxicity of nivalenol in female mice: A 2-year feeding study with Fusarium nivale Fn 2B-moulded rice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1989, 27, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Basso, K.; Gomes, F.; Bracarense, A.P. Deoxynivanelol and fumonisin, alone or in combination, induce changes on intestinal junction complexes and in e-cadherin expression. Toxins 2013, 5, 2341–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ueno, Y. Trichothecenes: Chemical, Biological, and Toxicological Aspects. Trichothecenes; Ueno, Y., Ed.; Elsevier Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983; pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar]
  59. Plotnikov, A.; Zehorai, E.; Procaccia, S.; Seger, R. The MAPK cascades: Signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813, 1619–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pestka, J.J. Mechanisms of deoxynivalenol-induced gene expression and apoptosis. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 1128–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Booth, C.; Potten, C.S. Gut instincts: Thoughts on intestinal epithelial stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2000, 105, 1493–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kasuga, F.; Hara-Kudo, Y.; Saito, N.; Kumagai, S.; Sugita-Konishi, Y. In vitro effect of deoxynivalenol on the differentiation of human colonic cell lines Caco-2 and T84. Mycopathologia 1998, 142, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sergent, T.; Parys, M.; Garsou, S.; Pussemier, L.; Schneider, Y.J.; Larondelle, Y. Deoxynivalenol transport across human intestinal Caco-2 cells and its effects on cellular metabolism at realistic intestinal concentrations. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 164, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Instanes, C.; Hetland, G. Deoxynivalenol (DON) is toxic to human colonic, lung and monocytic cell lines, but does not increase the IgE response in a mouse model for allergy. Toxicology 2004, 204, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bony, S.; Carcelen, M.; Olivier, L.; Devaux, A. Genotoxicity assessment of deoxynivalenol in the Caco-2 cell line model using the Comet assay. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 166, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bony, S.; Olivier-Loiseau, L.; Carcelen, M.; Devaux, A. Genotoxic potential associated with low levels of the Fusarium mycotoxins nivalenol and fusarenon X in a human intestinal cell line. Toxicol. Vitro 2007, 21, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Awad, W.A.; Aschenbach, J.R.; Zentek, J. Cytotoxicity and metabolic stress induced by deoxynivalenol in the porcine intestinal IPEC-J2 cell line. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 96, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bensassi, F.; El Golli-Bennour, E.; Abid-Essefi, S.; Bouaziz, C.; Hajlaoui, M.R.; Bacha, H. Pathway of deoxynivalenol-induced apoptosis in human colon carcinoma cells. Toxicology 2009, 264, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bianco, G.; Fontanella, B.; Severino, L.; Quaroni, A.; Autore, G.; Marzocco, S. Nivalenol and deoxynivalenol affect rat intestinal epithelial cells: A concentration related study. PLoS One 2012, 7, e52051. [Google Scholar]
  70. Akbari, P.; Braber, S.; Gremmels, H.; Koelink, P.J.; Verheijden, K.A.; Garssen, J.; Fink-Gremmels, J. Deoxynivalenol: A trigger for intestinal integrity breakdown. FASEB J. 2014. in press. [Google Scholar]
  71. Pinton, P.; Nougayrede, J.P.; del Rio, J.C.; Moreno, C.; Marin, D.E.; Ferrier, L.; Bracarense, A.P.; Kolf-Clauw, M.; Oswald, I.P. The food contaminant deoxynivalenol, decreases intestinal barrier permeability and reduces claudin expression. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 237, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maresca, M.; Yahi, N.; Younes-Sakr, L.; Boyron, M.; Caporiccio, B.; Fantini, J. Both direct and indirect effects account for the pro-inflammatory activity of enteropathogenic mycotoxins on the human intestinal epithelium: Stimulation of interleukin-8 secretion, potentiation of interleukin-1beta effect and increase in the transepithelial passage of commensal bacteria. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 228, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Van De Walle, J.; Sergent, T.; Piront, N.; Toussaint, O.; Schneider, Y.J.; Larondelle, Y. Deoxynivalenol affects in vitro intestinal epithelial cell barrier integrity through inhibition of protein synthesis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 245, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Grenier, B.; Oswald, I.P. Mycotoxin co-contamination of food and feed: Meta-analysis of publications describing toxicological interactions. World Mycotoxin J. 2011, 4, 285–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Streit, E.; Schatzmayr, G.; Tassis, P.; Tzika, E.; Marin, D.; Taranu, I.; Tabuc, C.; Nicolau, A.; Aprodu, I.; Puel, O.; et al. Current situation of mycotoxin contamination and co-occurrence in animal feed–focus on Europe. Toxins 2012, 4, 788–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Alassane-Kpembi, I.; Kolf-Clauw, M.; Gauthier, T.; Abrami, R.; Abiola, F.A.; Oswald, I.P.; Puel, O. New insights into mycotoxin mixtures: The toxicity of low doses of Type B trichothecenes on intestinal epithelial cells is synergistic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 272, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Awad, W.A.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Ghareeb, K.; Zentek, J. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Madara, J.L. Regulation of the movement of solutes across tight junctions. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1998, 60, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Harhaj, N.S.; Antonetti, D.A. Regulation of tight junctions and loss of barrier function in pathophysiology. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 1206–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Van De Walle, J.; Romier, B.; Larondelle, Y.; Schneider, Y.J. Influence of deoxynivalenol on NF-kappaB activation and IL-8 secretion in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 177, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  81. Diesing, A.K.; Nossol, C.; Danicke, S.; Walk, N.; Post, A.; Kahlert, S.; Rothkotter, H.J.; Kluess, J. Vulnerability of polarised intestinal porcine epithelial cells to mycotoxin deoxynivalenol depends on the route of application. PLoS One 2011, 6, e17472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gonzalez-Vallina, R.; Wang, H.; Zhan, R.; Berschneider, H.M.; Lee, R.M.; Davidson, N.O.; Black, D.D. Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein secretion by a newborn piglet intestinal cell line (IPEC-1). Am. J. Physiol. 1996, 271, G249–G259. [Google Scholar]
  83. Pinto, M.; Robine-Leon, S.; Appay, M. Enterocyte-like differentiation and polarization of the human colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2 in culture. Biol. Cell 1983, 47, 323–330. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kadota, T.; Furusawa, H.; Hirano, S.; Tajima, O.; Kamata, Y.; Sugita-Konishi, Y. Comparative study of deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, and 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol on intestinal transport and IL-8 secretion in the human cell line Caco-2. Toxicol. Vitro 2013, 27, 1888–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Barrett, K.E. Positive and negative regulation of chloride secretion in T84 cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1993, 265, C859–C868. [Google Scholar]
  86. Nossol, C.; Diesing, A.K.; Kahlert, S.; Kersten, S.; Kluess, J.; Ponsuksili, S.; Hartig, R.; Wimmers, K.; Danicke, S.; Rothkotter, H.J. Deoxynivalenol affects the composition of the basement membrane proteins and influences en route the migration of CD16 cells into the intestinal epithelium. Mycotoxin Res. 2013, 29, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vandenbroucke, V.; Croubels, S.; Martel, A.; Verbrugghe, E.; Goossens, J.; van Deun, K.; Boyen, F.; Thompson, A.; Shearer, N.; de Backer, P.; et al. The mycotoxin deoxynivalenol potentiates intestinal inflammation by salmonella typhimurium in porcine ileal loops. PLoS One 2011, 6, e23871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hara-Kudo, Y.; Sugita-Konoshi, Y.; Kasuga, F.; Kumagai, S. Effects of deoxynivalenol on Salmonella enteritidis infection. Mycotoxins 1996, 42, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  89. Li, M.; Cuff, C.F.; Pestka, J.J. Modulation of murine host response to enteric reovirus infection by the trichothecene deoxynivalenol. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 87, 134–145. [Google Scholar]
  90. Lowell, C.A. Src-family kinases: Rheostats of immune cell signaling. Mol. Immunol. 2004, 41, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, H.R.; Jia, Q.; Pestka, J.J. Ribotoxic stress response to the trichothecene deoxynivalenol in the macrophage involves the SRC family kinase Hck. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 85, 916–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pinton, P.; Braicu, C.; Nougayrede, J.P.; Laffitte, J.; Taranu, I.; Oswald, I.P. Deoxynivalenol impairs porcine intestinal barrier function and decreases the protein expression of claudin-4 through a mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent mechanism. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 1956–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Diesing, A.K.; Nossol, C.; Ponsuksili, S.; Wimmers, K.; Kluess, J.; Walk, N.; Post, A.; Rothkotter, H.J.; Kahlert, S. Gene regulation of intestinal porcine epithelial cells ipec-j2 is dependent on the site of deoxynivalenol toxicological action. PLoS One 2012, 7, e34136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Some Naturally Occurring Substances: Food Items and Constituents, Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Mycotoxins. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol56/volume56.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2014).
  95. Tsuda, S.; Kosaka, Y.; Murakami, M.; Matsuo, H.; Matsusaka, N.; Taniguchi, K.; Sasaki, Y.F. Detection of nivalenol genotoxicity in cultured cells and multiple mouse organs by the alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat. Res. 1998, 415, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Stadnyk, A.W. Intestinal epithelial cells as a source of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 16, 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  97. Rescigno, M.; di Sabatino, A. Dendritic cells in intestinal homeostasis and disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2009, 119, 2441–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, F.; Ma, Y.; Xue, C.; Ma, J.; Xie, Q.; Wang, G.; Bi, Y.; Cao, Y. The combination of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone at permitted feed concentrations causes serious physiological effects in young pigs. J. Vet. Sci. 2008, 9, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Moon, Y.; Yang, H.; Lee, S.H. Modulation of early growth response gene 1 and interleukin-8 expression by ribotoxin deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) via ERK1/2 in human epithelial intestine 407 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 362, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wan, L.Y.; Turner, P.C.; El-Nezami, H. Individual and combined cytotoxic effects of Fusarium toxins (deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, zearalenone and fumonisins B1) on swine jejunal epithelial cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 57, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Moon, Y.; Yang, H.; Park, S.H. Hypo-responsiveness of interleukin-8 production in human embryonic epithelial intestine 407 cells independent of NF-kappaB pathway: New lessons from endotoxin and ribotoxic deoxynivalenol. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 231, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  102. Cano, P.M.; Seeboth, J.; Meurens, F.; Cognie, J.; Abrami, R.; Oswald, I.P.; Guzylack-Piriou, L. Deoxynivalenol as a new factor in the persistence of intestinal inflammatory diseases: An emerging hypothesis through possible modulation of Th17-mediated response. PLoS One 2013, 8, e53647. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ghareeb, K.; Awad, W.A.; Soodoi, C.; Sasgary, S.; Strasser, A.; Bohm, J. Effects of feed contaminant deoxynivalenol on plasma cytokines and mRNA expression of immune genes in the intestine of broiler chickens. PLoS One 2013, 8, e71492. [Google Scholar]
  104. Islam, Z.; Gray, J.S.; Pestka, J.J. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates IL-8 induction by the ribotoxin deoxynivalenol in human monocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2006, 213, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mbandi, E.; Pestka, J.J. Deoxynivalenol and satratoxin G potentiate proinflammatory cytokine and macrophage inhibitory protein 2 induction by Listeria and Salmonella in the macrophage. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1334–1339. [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhou, H.R.; Harkema, J.R.; Yan, D.; Pestka, J.J. Amplified proinflammatory cytokine expression and toxicity in mice coexposed to lipopolysaccharide and the trichothecene vomitoxin (deoxynivalenol). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 1999, 57, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Van Leeuwen, P.A.; Boermeester, M.A.; Houdijk, A.P.; Ferwerda, C.C.; Cuesta, M.A.; Meyer, S.; Wesdorp, R.I. Clinical significance of translocation. Gut 1994, 35, S28–S34. [Google Scholar]
  108. Islam, L.N.; Nabi, A.H. Endotoxins of enteric pathogens modulate the functions of human neutrophils and lymphocytes. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 36, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Islam, Z.; Pestka, J.J. Role of IL-1(beta) in endotoxin potentiation of deoxynivalenol-induced corticosterone response and leukocyte apoptosis in mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 74, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Azcona-Olivera, J.I.; Ouyang, Y.; Murtha, J.; Chu, F.S.; Pestka, J.J. Induction of cytokine mRNAs in mice after oral exposure to the trichothecene vomitoxin (deoxynivalenol): Relationship to toxin distribution and protein synthesis inhibition. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1995, 133, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Maheshwari, A.; Lacson, A.; Lu, W.; Fox, S.E.; Barleycorn, A.A.; Christensen, R.D.; Calhoun, D.A. Interleukin-8/CXCL8 forms an autocrine loop in fetal intestinal mucosa. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Al-Sadi, R.; Boivin, M.; Ma, T. Mechanism of cytokine modulation of epithelial tight junction barrier. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 2765–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bambou, J.C.; Giraud, A.; Menard, S.; Begue, B.; Rakotobe, S.; Heyman, M.; Taddei, F.; Cerf-Bensussan, N.; Gaboriau-Routhiau, V. In vitro and ex vivo activation of the TLR5 signaling pathway in intestinal epithelial cells by a commensal Escherichia coli strain. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 42984–42992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hopkins, S.J. The pathophysiological role of cytokines. Leg Med. Tokyo 2003, 5, S45–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Do, K.H.; Choi, H.J.; Kim, J.; Park, S.H.; Kim, K.H.; Moon, Y. SOCS3 regulates BAFF in human enterocytes under ribosomal stress. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 6501–6510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Borka, K.; Kaliszky, P.; Szabo, E.; Lotz, G.; Kupcsulik, P.; Schaff, Z.; Kiss, A. Claudin expression in pancreatic endocrine tumors as compared with ductal adenocarcinomas. Virchows Arch. 2007, 450, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Eun, C.S.; Han, D.S.; Lee, S.H.; Paik, C.H.; Chung, Y.W.; Lee, J.; Hahm, J.S. Attenuation of colonic inflammation by PPARgamma in intestinal epithelial cells: Effect on Toll-like receptor pathway. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006, 51, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Oswald, I.P. Role of intestinal epithelial cells in the innate immune defence of the pig intestine. Vet. Res. 2006, 37, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Denning, T.L.; Wang, Y.C.; Patel, S.R.; Williams, I.R.; Pulendran, B. Lamina propria macrophages and dendritic cells differentially induce regulatory and interleukin 17-producing T cell responses. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Alzoghaibi, M.A.; Walsh, S.W.; Willey, A.; Yager, D.R.; Fowler, A.A., 3rd; Graham, M.F. Linoleic acid induces interleukin-8 production by Crohn’s human intestinal smooth muscle cells via arachidonic acid metabolites. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2004, 286, G528–G537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Banks, C.; Bateman, A.; Payne, R.; Johnson, P.; Sheron, N. Chemokine expression in IBD. Mucosal chemokine expression is unselectively increased in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. J. Pathol. 2003, 199, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Georganas, C.; Liu, H.; Perlman, H.; Hoffmann, A.; Thimmapaya, B.; Pope, R.M. Regulation of IL-6 and IL-8 expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts: The dominant role for NF-kappa B but not C/EBP beta or c-Jun. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 7199–7206. [Google Scholar]
  123. Martin, H.M.; Campbell, B.J.; Hart, C.A.; Mpofu, C.; Nayar, M.; Singh, R.; Englyst, H.; Williams, H.F.; Rhodes, J.M. Enhanced Escherichia coli adherence and invasion in Crohn’s disease and colon cancer. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pestka, J.J. Deoxynivalenol-induced IgA production and IgA nephropathy-aberrant mucosal immune response with systemic repercussions. Toxicol. Lett. 2003, 140–141, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Beagley, K.W.; Eldridge, J.H.; Lee, F.; Kiyono, H.; Everson, M.P.; Koopman, W.J.; Hirano, T.; Kishimoto, T.; McGhee, J.R. Interleukins and IgA synthesis. Human and murine interleukin 6 induce high rate IgA secretion in IgA-committed B cells. J. Exp. Med. 1989, 169, 2133–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Shi, Y.; Pestka, J.J. Attenuation of mycotoxin-induced IgA nephropathy by eicosapentaenoic acid in the mouse: Dose response and relation to IL-6 expression. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2006, 17, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Yan, D.; Zhou, H.R.; Brooks, K.H.; Pestka, J.J. Potential role for IL-5 and IL-6 in enhanced IgA secretion by Peyer’s patch cells isolated from mice acutely exposed to vomitoxin. Toxicology 1997, 122, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pinton, P.; Accensi, F.; Beauchamp, E.; Cossalter, A.M.; Callu, P.; Grosjean, F.; Oswald, I.P. Ingestion of deoxynivalenol (DON) contaminated feed alters the pig vaccinal immune responses. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 177, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bouhet, S.; le Dorze, E.; Peres, S.; Fairbrother, J.M.; Oswald, I.P. Mycotoxin fumonisin B1 selectively down-regulates the basal IL-8 expression in pig intestine: in vivo and in vitro studies. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1768–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. McLaughlin, J.; Padfield, P.J.; Burt, J.P.; O’Neill, C.A. Ochratoxin A increases permeability through tight junctions by removal of specific claudin isoforms. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 287, C1412–C1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sergent, T.; Dupont, I.; Jassogne, C.; Ribonnet, L.; van der Heiden, E.; Scippo, M.L.; Muller, M.; McAlister, D.; Pussemier, L.; Larondelle, Y.; et al. CYP1A1 induction and CYP3A4 inhibition by the fungicide imazalil in the human intestinal Caco-2 cells-comparison with other conazole pesticides. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 184, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Maresca, M.; Fantini, J. Some food-associated mycotoxins as potential risk factors in humans predisposed to chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases. Toxicon 2010, 56, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wache, Y.J.; Valat, C.; Postollec, G.; Bougeard, S.; Burel, C.; Oswald, I.P.; Fravalo, P. Impact of deoxynivalenol on the intestinal microflora of pigs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  134. Sirot, V.; Fremy, J.M.; Leblanc, J.C. Dietary exposure to mycotoxins and health risk assessment in the second French total diet study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 52, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Berthiller, F.; Crews, C.; Dall’asta, C.; Saeger, S.D.; Haesaert, G.; Karlovsky, P.; Oswald, I.P.; Seefelder, W.; Speijers, G.; Stroka, J. Masked mycotoxins: A review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 165–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins EISSN 2072-6651 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert