Degradation of Aflatoxin B1 during the Fermentation of Alcoholic Beverages

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a contaminant of grain and fruit and has one of the highest levels of carcinogenicity of any natural toxin. AFB1 and the fungi that produce it can also contaminate the raw materials used for beer and wine manufacture, such as corn and grapes. Therefore, brewers must ensure strict monitoring to reduce the risk of contamination. In this study, the fate of AFB1 during the fermentation process was investigated using laboratory-scale bottom and top beer fermentation and wine fermentation. During fermentation, cool wort beer samples and wine must samples were artificially spiked with AFB1 and the levels of AFB1 remaining after fermentation were analyzed. AFB1 levels were unchanged during both types of fermentation used for beer but were reduced to 30% of their initial concentration in wine. Differential analysis of the spiked and unspiked wine samples showed that the degradation compound was AFB2a, a hydrated derivative of AFB1. Thus, the results showed that the risk of AFB1 carryover was still present for both types of beer fermentation but was reduced in the case of wine fermentation because of hydration.


Introduction
Mycotoxins are frequent contaminants of grain and fruit. Fungi and mycotoxins are potential problems for farmers and food producers because they can adversely affect production. Close attention should therefore be paid to the risk of contamination. In our previous studies, we investigated the fate of mycotoxins in several different kinds of alcoholic beverages [1][2][3]. Such studies are required in order to understand the fate of these toxins during manufacturing, thereby improving risk management and reducing the potential for mycotoxin contamination.
In the current study, we focused on the fate of aflatoxin B 1 during the fermentation processes used for beer and wine. AFB 1 has one of the highest levels of carcinogenicity of any natural toxin and has been classified as a Group 1 (carcinogenic to humans) compound by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [4]. In a putative pathway of carcinogenicity, cytochrome P450 metabolizes ingested AFB 1 to AFB 1 -8-9-epoxide, which then covalently reacts with DNA [5][6][7]. AFB 1 can contaminate both beer [8,9] and raw materials, such as barley [10,11] and corn [12,13], which are used for the production of beer. AFB 1 and Aspergillus flavus, a fungus that is known to produce AFB 1 , can also be found in the grapes or must (i.e., pressed grapes) used for wine [14,15].
In this study, we focused on beer and wine, that is, alcoholic beverages with high levels of annual global consumption. Beer can be classified into two groups on the basis of the brewing method used: top-fermented beer and bottom-fermented beer. Historically, top-fermented beer has been the traditional type of beer commonly produced in European countries. This type of beer is fermented using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, typically at 15-25 °C for 1 week. Bottom-fermented beer became popular only from the 19th century onwards but is now the most commonly consumed type of beer worldwide. Bottom-fermented beer is fermented using S. pastorianus, typically at 6-12 °C for 7-10 days (primary) and at 1-10 °C for several weeks (secondary for maturation) [16]. The fermentation conditions used for wine are similar to those used for top-fermented beer, in that S. cerevisiae is used at 20-30 °C for wine.
In this study, cool wort and must were spiked with AFB 1 and fermented in a laboratory-scale setup under three different conditions to determine the fate of AFB 1 and help predict the degree of contamination risk.

Method Validation
The analysis methods for AFB 1 were validated using cool wort (pre-fermented beer), beer, yeast crop, must, wine, and wine lees (deposits of residual yeast and other particles), that is, the interim and final products of both beer and wine. The conditions used for validation are described in Section 3.7. The ideal criteria for validation were defined as follows: relative standard deviation of repeatability (RSD) of less than 20%, recovery between 70% and 120%, and correlation coefficients for linearity (r) of more than 0.99. Cool wort, beer, must, wine, and wine lees all provided good results, as shown in Table 1. However, the results for the yeast crop were ideal in terms of repeatability and linearity but not in terms of recovery. Hence, in this study, a standard addition calibration curve was used to estimate residual concentrations. Table 1. Results of method validation for Aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ) in each sample. The standard deviation of repeatability (RSD) was calculated at 5 ng·mL −1 (n = 5). Linearity (r) was estimated from eight data points, that is, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 ng·mL −1 , and recovery was calculated at 5 ng·mL −1 (n = 5).

Fate of Mycotoxins during Beer Brewing
The residual ratio of AFB 1 during bottom fermentation with S. pastorianus has been calculated and published as part of our previous study [3]. These results showed that AFB 1 concentration did not change significantly during the bottom-fermentation process. After fermentation, approximately 5% of the initial contaminant AFB 1 was found on the yeast surface. This finding indicated that adsorption upon yeast settling was the main reason for a drop in AFB 1 concentrations from 100% to 82% during fermentation. Top fermentation is an alternative method used for brewing beer. It differs from bottom fermentation in the type of yeast strain, fermentation temperature, and fermentation period used, as indicated in Section 3.4.1, "Laboratory-Scale Beer Fermentation". We investigated the fate of AFB 1 by performing top-beer fermentation trials for 7 d in the presence of S. cerevisiae in four replicate experiments. The residual ratios of AFB 1 present were calculated from cool wort artificially spiked with AFB 1 . By the 7th day, the residual concentration of AFB 1 had decreased to 75.1% of the initial level ( Figure 1). Interestingly, although the AFB 1 level decreased to 78.8% of its initial concentration on the first day, it increased to 96.0% again on the second day. This finding suggests that AFB 1 was taken up by the foam produced during the early phase of fermentation and that, after the foam disappeared, AFB 1 was released again into the wort. The adsorption ratio for the yeast crop was also analyzed after the fermentation process was complete. In contrast with the results for bottom fermentation, AFB 1 was not adsorbed on the yeast surface.

Fate of Aflatoxins during Vinification
The fermentation conditions examined for wine were similar to those used for top-fermented beer, where the temperature was 25 °C, the yeast strain used was S. cerevisiae, and the length of the fermentation period was 7 days. The residual ratio in the fermenting must was analyzed every day in 4 replicate experiments. The results are shown in Figure 1. During the fermentation process, the AFB 1 levels gradually decreased to 29.6% of the initial concentration ( Figure 1). Wine lees were collected by centrifugation after fermentation, and the adsorption ratio was analyzed. The results showed that 7.2% of the AFB 1 present was adsorbed on the wine lees. Hence, approximately 60% of the spiked AFB 1 had been converted into other compounds.

Identification of Degradation Compounds
In order to determine the safety of wine for consumption, it is important that the degradation compounds of AFB 1 be identified. Therefore, liquid chromatography-interfaced quadrupole time-of-flight hybrid tandem mass spectrometry (LC-q-TOFMS) was used. Because q-TOFMS provided high resolution (mearurement at the milli-mass unit level), it could be used to separate the compound peaks of the degradation products from those of all the other wine components. Moreover, this approach narrowed down the range of possible candidates in terms of their composition formula and facilitated the estimation of structure. The actual degradation compounds were determined using differential analysis of fermented must samples spiked or unspiked with AFB 1 . These samples were analyzed in the full-scan mode by using q-TOFMS. Analysis of the differences in the peaks for AFB 1 -spiked and unspiked samples with Metabolite Pilot (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) helped identify a new peak, implicated as a relevant compound, at 5.4 min ( Figure 2). This compound had a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 331.0793, whereas AFB 1 , the original compound, had an m/z of 313.0707. This result indicated that the new compound had been modified with an m/z of 18.0086 to AFB 1 and that one of the candidates was hydrated AFB 1 , assuming that the new compound was detected as proton-adducted ions. This hypothesis was supported by the finding that the new compound was detected earlier than AFB 1 on the ODS column. Collectively, these results suggested that the new compound had a much more polar structure than AFB 1 , which could be due to hydration. Here, AFB 2a is known to be a hydrolyte of AFB 1 , and it has been successfully synthesized chemically [17]. Therefore, each fermented sample contaminated with AFB 1 and chemically synthesized AFB 2a was analyzed by LC-q-TOFMS. The data acquired for the new compound and AFB 2a showed homology in terms of retention time, m/z at high resolution, and the fragmentation pattern of ms/ms spectra ( Figure 3). Therefore, we concluded that AFB 1 was converted to AFB 2a which is the less toxic compound [18,19], during the process of wine fermentation (Figure 4).

Aflatoxin B 2a during Beer Fermentation
It was found that AFB 1 was converted to AFB 2a during vinification. Although the AFB 1 levels did not decrease substantially during beer fermentation, AFB 2a production was confirmed by high-sensitivity tandem mass spectra in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. AFB 2a was never detected during the bottom fermentation of beer. However, trace levels of AFB 2a were detected in top-fermented beer. In conclusion, although both vinification and brewing are based on fermentation carried out by yeast, AFB 1 appears to be preferentially hydrated during the wine-making process only. This finding may be explained by differences with respect to the yeast, fermentation conditions, or raw materials used. Specifically, although S. cerevisiae was used in both the processes, different strains were present in wine versus beer fermentation. Furthermore, the fermentation conditions for wine (25 °C and pH 3) were distinct from those for beer (20 °C and a change in pH from 5 to 4). In addition, the raw materials used for wine making (grapes) are different to those used to brew beer (wort made from barley, corn, and hops).

High-Sensitivity Tandem Mass Spectrometry
The concentration of each sample was analyzed with high-sensitivity tandem mass spectrometry under the following analytical conditions: Five microliters of each sample was injected into the column with the temperature controlled at 40 °C and the flow rate of gradient elution set at 0.5 mL·min −1 . The mobile phase solvents consisted of 2 types of eluents: (a) water and (b) 2% acetic acid and 0.1 mM ammonium acetate in methanol.

High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry
The degradation compound was assigned using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry under the following analytical conditions: Five microliters of each sample was injected into the column with the temperature controlled at 40 °C and the flow rate of gradient elution set at 0.2 mL·min −1 . The mobile phase solvents consisted of 2 types of eluents: (a) 5 mM ammonium acetate in water and (b) acetonitrile.

Laboratory-Scale Beer Fermentation
Bottom fermentation was performed in our previous study on mycotoxin fate [3]. Briefly, cool wort spiked with mycotoxins was added to yeast (S. pastorianus, 1 g), and fermentation was performed at 10 °C for the first 7 days, using a magnetic stirrer. Further fermentation was performed under static conditions at 10 °C for the next 7 days and then at 4 °C for the last 4 days.
For top-fermented beer, cool wort was prepared using a process described in our previous study [2,3]. The noncontaminated cool wort (200 mL) was spiked with AFB 1 standard solution at a concentration of 10 ng·mL −1 . In top-beer fermentation trials, yeast (S. cerevisiae, 80 mg) was then added to the contaminated cool wort, and fermentation was performed under static conditions at 20 °C for 7 days. The progress of the fermentation process was monitored daily by measuring the Brix levels (°Bx), which denote the sugar content in an aqueous solution. The cool wort was analyzed to confirm that no mycotoxin contamination was present before this set of fermentation experiments.

Laboratory-Scale Wine Vinification
Red wine is prepared from must. In this study, to simplify the research method, frozen concentrated grape juice was used. This frozen concentrated juice was diluted with water to 19.5°Bx as must. Before use, the must was tested to confirm that it was not contaminated with mycotoxins. The must was autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min and then cooled at room temperature. AFB 1 was added to this must (350 mL) at a concentration of 10 ng·mL −1 (for determining its fate) or 10 μg·mL −1 (for differential analysis). Dried yeast (S. cerevisiae, 87.5 mg) was rehydrated and added to the contaminated must and fermented under static conditions at 25 °C for 7 days.

Sample Preparation for Beer
Samples were obtained during the beer fermentation process and pretreated using an Oasis HLB solid phase cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Each sample (1 mL) was added to 5% methanol:water (3 mL) and sonicated for 5 min. This solution was loaded on the HLB cartridge conditioned with 50% methanol (5 mL) and 5% methanol (5 mL), washed with 5% methanol (4 mL) 3 times, and then eluted with methanol (5 mL). The eluate was dried under a nitrogen atmosphere at 40 °C and the dried residue was dissolved with 10 mM ammonium acetate in water:acetonitrile = 85/15 solution (1 mL). The analytical solution was filtered through a PTFE filter with a 0.2-μm mesh and then transferred to a 2 mL glass vial. The mycotoxins present in the yeast crop required extraction with organic solvents before being cleaned up. Yeast crop (1 g) was added to 80% methanol (3 mL) and shaken vigorously for 10 min. The mixed solution was then centrifuged (3000 rpm, 5 min), and the supernatant was cleaned up using a solid phase column.

Sample Preparation for Wine
The samples obtained during the wine fermentation process were pretreated using a published method for simultaneous mycotoxin analysis, with an Oasis HLB solid phase cartridge and a MultiSep #229 Ochra solid phase cartridge [20]. Briefly, a 5 mL sample was diluted with 25 mL of 10 mM ammonium acetate aqueous solution and was applied to an Oasis HLB cartridge. The cartridge was washed with 5 mL of 10 mM ammonium acetate aqueous solution and then eluted with 5 mL of 10 mM ammonium acetate aqueous solution:acetonitrile (1:1 v/v) and with 5 mL of acetonitrile. The eluate was dehydrated at 40 °C under a nitrogen stream. The dried sample was dissolved with 1 mL of water. Subsequently, 60 μL of formic acid and 5 mL of acetonitrile were added to the sample, and the mixture was applied to a MultiSep #229 Ochra cartridge. Four milliliters of the purified eluate was dehydrated at 40 °C under a nitrogen stream and was dissolved with 500 μL of 10 mM ammonium acetate aqueous solution:acetonitrile (85:15, v/v). Each sample was filtrated through a 0.20-μm PTFE filter immediately before UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. Extraction from wine lees was performed in the same way as that for the yeast crop of beer [3]. Wine lees (200 g) was added to 80% methanol (3 mL) and shaken vigorously for 10 min. The mixure was then centrifuged (3000 rpm, 5 min) and the supernatant was cleaned up using a solid phase cartridge as per the protocol used for wine fermentation.

Synthesis of Aflatoxin B 2a
AFB 2a was synthesized with trifluoroacetic acid using the method reported by Takahashi et al. [17]. An AFB 1 standard solution (3 μg·mL −1 , 200 μL) was dried in a brown vial, and trifluoroacetic acid (200 μL) was added. Crude samples were kept under static conditions in a cool dark place for 1 h. This solution was then dried and resolved with acetonitrile (600 μL) to obtain an AFB 2a standard solution (1 μg·mL −1 ), which was then tested by LC-MSMS to confirm that all the AFB 1 had been converted to AFB 2a .

Method Validation
The experimental method was statistically validated by comparing the RSD, recovery, and linearity (r). Repeatability and recovery were calculated from 5 experimental replicates per sample. Each noncontaminated sample was spiked with AFB 1 at 5 ng·mL −1 before and after pretreatment. The linearity of the standard addition calibration curves was estimated from 8 data points: 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 ng·mL −1 .

Analysis
The residual level of AFB 1 in each sample was quantified using the standard addition calibration curve over a range from 0.5 to 100 ng·mL −1 . The curve was based on samples that were prepared by spiking known amounts of analyte in the blank sample before pretreatment. The residual ratio was calculated from the concentration of each mycotoxin in the sample, with the initial concentration for the ground malt set at 100%. The following formula was used: Residual ratio (%) = (concentration of AFB 1 in sample)/(concentration of spiked AFB 1 ) × 100 (1)

Conclusions
Here, we studied the fate of AFB 1 during a laboratory-scale brewing and vinification process. The residual AFB 1 levels were not greatly affected by either bottom or top fermentation in beer but were reduced during wine fermentation to 40% of their initial concentration. Differential analysis has previously shown that AFB 1 is hydrated to the less toxic AFB 2a compound during the process of wine fermentation. Although both brewing and vinification involve fermentation by yeast, the residual ratios of AFB 1 were significantly differed between these processes. This finding may be attributable to differences in the yeast strain, fermentation condition, or raw materials used. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that the AFB 1 concentration decreases during fermentation and that this is due to increased production of the hydrated derivative, AFB 2a . These findings may assist in the development of strategies for reducing AFB 1 contamination in alcoholic beverages.