Next Article in Journal
The Discodermia calyx Toxin Calyculin A Enhances Cyclin D1 Phosphorylation and Degradation, and Arrests Cell Cycle Progression in Human Breast Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Towards New Uses of Botulinum Toxin as a Novel Therapeutic Tool
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Loss of msnA, a Putative Stress Regulatory Gene, in Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus Increased Production of Conidia, Aflatoxins and Kojic Acid

1
Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, 1100 Robert E. Lee Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
2
Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA
3
Current adddress: College of Pharmacy, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili Street, Hilo, HI 96720, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2011, 3(1), 82-104; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3010082
Submission received: 10 November 2010 / Revised: 30 December 2010 / Accepted: 6 January 2011 / Published: 12 January 2011

Abstract

:
Production of the harmful carcinogenic aflatoxins by Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus has been postulated to be a mechanism to relieve oxidative stress. The msnA gene of A. parasiticus and A. flavus is the ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSN2 that is associated with multi-stress response. Compared to wild type strains, the msnA deletion (∆msnA) strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus exhibited retarded colony growth with increased conidiation. The ∆msnA strains also produced slightly higher amounts of aflatoxins and elevated amounts of kojic acid on mixed cereal medium. Microarray assays showed that expression of genes encoding oxidative stress defense enzymes, i.e., superoxide dismutase, catalase, and cytochrome c peroxidase in A. parasiticus ∆msnA, and the catalase A gene in A. flavus ∆msnA, was up-regulated. Both A. parasiticus and A. flavus ∆msnA strains produced higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and ROS production of A. flavus msnA addback strains was decreased to levels comparable to that of the wild type A. flavus. The msnA gene appears to be required for the maintenance of the normal oxidative state. The impairment of msnA resulted in the aforementioned changes, which might be used to combat the increased oxidative stress in the cells.

1. Introduction

In nature all living organisms react to unfavorable environmental conditions, such as high temperature, osmotic shock, oxidative damage and nutrient depletion via complex regulatory networks. These specific responses usually result from induction of a set of stress-associated genes whose expression is controlled by a common transcription factor. For example, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae a gene named MSN2 that encodes a C2H2-type zinc-finger regulator, Msn2p, is required for yeast cells to cope with a broad range of environmental and physiological stresses [1]. Msn2p mediates expression of a number of genes that are induced by stress conditions by binding to STRE (stress response element) motifs, CCCCT, which are located in the promoters of the regulated genes [2,3]. In Trichoderma atrovirde the expression of the MSN2 ortholog seb1 (stress response element binding) was increased under osmotic stress conditions [4]. Seb1 functions to up-regulate the glycerol dehydrogenase gene (gld1) whose product, Gld1, is required for glycerol biosynthesis to alleviate osmotic stress [5].
Conidiation and formation of sclerotia, hyphal aggregates that serve as the over-winter structure, are believed to be triggered by a hyperoxidant state (oxidative stress) in cells at late stages of fungal development [6,7]. These processes are often interrelated with production of secondary metabolites, such as aflatoxins [8,9,10] which may allow fungi to adapt to unique niches and life cycles. Jeon et al. [8] showed that deletion of the MSN2 ortholog (msnA) in Aspergillus nidulans resulted in enhanced asexual conidiation and production of sexual cleistothecia. Hence, they renamed the A. nidulansmsnA as nrdA (negative regulator of differentiation). Not all Aspergillus species have a natural sexual reproductive stage. Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus, the predominant producers of the aflatoxins, were thought, until recently, to possess only the asexual state, but under forced mating conditions in the laboratories strains of opposite mating types were able to undergo sexual reproduction [9,10]. The majority of A. parasiticus strains produce abundant conidia, but some strains, in addition to conidia, also produce large numbers of sclerotia on the same media [11]. A. flavus strains are morphologically diverse. Some strains produce predominantly conidia with a few large-sized sclerotia, and others produce copious tiny sclerotia along with a low number of conidia; the former is called L-strain and the latter S-strain [12].
In this study, we investigated the role of msnA in two morphologically distinct A. parasiticus strains and an L-strain A. flavus isolate. Deletion of msnA adversely affected vegetative growth and altered development as manifested by dense conidiation and the lack of sclerotial formation. Expression of oxidative stress defense genes and the production of kojic acid (5-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-4-pyrone), a free radical scavenger, increased significantly in the A. parasiticus ∆msnA strains. Compared to respective wild-type strains, the ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus produced increased levels of reactive oxygen species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains and Media

Aspergillus parasiticus BN9∆ku70 [13] and RH∆ku70 [14] and A. flavus CA14PTs∆pyrG [15], a ∆ku70 strain sensitive to pyrithiamine, were the recipient strains used in the msnA gene knockout experiments. A. parasiticus BN9∆ku70 and A. flavus CA14PTs∆pyrG are aflatoxigenic and produce abundant conidia and a few sclerotia. RH∆ku70 accumulates O-methylsterigmatocystin (OMST) as the end product; it produces abundant sclerotia and conidia when grown in the dark. OMST-accumulating isolates have been found to account for about 2.6% of an A. parasiticus population in a southwestern Georgia peanut field [11]. Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; EMD Chemicals Inc., Darmstadt, Germany) was used for fungal growth and production of conidia and sclerotia for enumeration. The mixed cereal agar (MCA, 5% Gerber® Mixed Grain Cereal, 1.5% agar) [16] was also used to promote sclerotial production.

2.2. Construction of the msnA Disruption Vector

TheEST of the A. flavus msnA gene (NAFAE55TH) was identified initially from the Aspergillus flavus Gene Index database at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) based on S. cerevisiaeMSN2 and its homologue in A. nidulans (AN1652.2). The complete A. flavus msnA gene was subsequently obtained from the Aspergillus Comparative Database at Broad Institute (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/aspergillus_group/MultiHome.html). Restriction analysis of A. flavus msnA and flanking regions was carried out using the DNAMAN software (Lynnon Soft, Vandreuil, Quebec, Canada). The msnA disruption vector was constructed as follows: a 1.4-kb msnA 5’ and coding region and a 0.7-kb coding region near the 3’ end were amplified by PCR using primers msn5K: CTGTCTCCCGGTACCTTTGATCG and msn5P: GAGTATGCGCTGCAGCGCTGTCTC, and msn3P: GAGACAGCGCTGCAGCGCATACTC and msn3H: CGTGGGAAGCTTCATAGAGCAC, respectively. The PCR fragments after digestion were cloned sequentially into corresponding sites in pUC19. The 2.0-kb A. oryzaeptr selectable marker amplified from pPTR1 [17] was cloned into the PstI site of the above construct. This disruption vector construct, msnDV, was linearized by HindIII and KpnI to release the portion of pUC19 prior to fungal transformation.

2.3. Generation of msnA Disruption Strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus

Preparation of protoplasts, ptr-based fungal transformation and selection of mutants were performed as previously described for A. parasiticus and A. flavus [14]. Homologous recombination is the primary event in fungi with the ku70-deficient background. The msnA gene disruption was confirmed by PCR with location-specific primers based on the expected genomic patterns generated by homologous recombination in the ∆ku70 genetic background. The primers used were P1: GACACAAGGTTCGTCGGTGACT and P2: GGTACTCGCGTCGCGATTA. PCR was carried out under the following conditions in a Perkin Elmer GeneAmp PCR System 2400. Twenty-five pmol of each primer and 10 ng genomic DNA were added to 25 μL Platinum Blue PCR Supermix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and subject to 30 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 5 min.

2.4. Reintroduction of msnA into the A. flavus ∆msnA Strain

A genomic DNA fragment containing the full-length msnA gene including a 0.58 kb 5’UTR and a 0.24 kb 3’UTR was amplified by PCR using the Accuprime supermix (Invitrogen) with primers msn-E-pyrG, ATAGAATTCCCCGCGACTGTCCATTAGTC and msn-B-pyrG, ATAGGATCCTTTGTGAAGACCATGT. The PCR product was first cloned into the EcoR1 and BamH1 sites of pPG28 [18]. The A. nidulans autonomously-replicating sequence in the 5.2 kb HindIII fragment from pHELP1 [19] was cloned into the resulting construct. The circular plasmid was transformed into an A. flavus CA14∆msnA strain by the pyrG-based transformation protocol [15].

2.5. Colony Growth, Conidial Production, and Sclerotial Formation

The ∆msnA and the parental strains were point inoculated on PDA plates (100 × 15 mm) in triplicate and grown for five days at 30 °C for the determination of vegetative growth based on the colony diameter. For enumeration of conidia, two culture plugs were cored with Transfertube® (Spectrum, Houston, Texas, USA) from each of the three seven-day-old replicate PDA plates. The plugs were placed in a microfuge tube containing 0.5 mL ethanol to kill conidia and then vortexed 2 min with a Disruption Genie apparatus (ZYMO RESEARCH, Orange County, California, USA). Each sample was diluted 100-fold with a 0.01% Triton solution, and conidia were counted two to four times using a hemocytometer. The calculated numbers were the total conidia from the two agar plugs. Strains were cultured on PDA and MCA plates at 30 °C for a week for sclerotial formation.

2.6. Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-Vis) Spectrophotometry and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

The ∆msnA strains produced an unknown diffusible pigment on MCA plates not observed on PDA plates. The water-soluble orange pigment was isolated from 25 MCA plates inoculated with A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA. The frozen and thawed cultures were filtered through No. 4 paper (Whatman, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA) and the filtrate passed through a 33mm Millex GP 0.22 µ syringe filter (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). The filtrate was stirred overnight with Amberlite XAD-2 resin (Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA). The pigment was eluted from the XAD-2 resin with MeOH, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The remaining solids were dissolved in water and applied to a Sephadex G-25 column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). The column was eluted with water, and the orange band was collected and lyophilized yielding 44 mg of the pigment. The absorbance spectrum between 350 and 700 nm for the pigment dissolved in water was recorded on an Agilent 8453 photodiode array UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA). Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis, which provides information about the chemical bonding and the molecular structure of a compound, was performed. The infrared spectrum of the mixture of 0.5% of the orange pigment in KBr was obtained by diffuse reflectance on a Nicolet 6700 FTIR (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).

2.7. Determination of Aflatoxins and Kojic Acid by HPLC

The amounts of aflatoxins and kojic acid produced on MCA plates in triplicate by four- and eight-day-old cultures of wild type and ∆msn strains of A. parasiticus BN9 (only kojic acid was determined for RH), and A. flavus CA14 were determined. For each sample, the entire contents of the Petri dish (100 × 15 mm, 25 mL per plate) were added to a Waring MC-2 blender cup and blended for 30 s with 20 mL hot water. The mixture was filtered through Whatman No. 4 paper and a 33 mm Millipore Millex GP 0.22μm syringe filter. The filtered extracts were analyzed for aflatoxins and kojic acid on a HPLC system (Agilent) consisting of a quaternary pump, autosampler, photodiode array detector, and fluorescence detector. The analyses were performed on a column of Intersil ODS-3, 5 μ, 4.6 × 250 mm (GL Sciences, Torrance, California, USA) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 μL. The mobile phase for aflatoxins was H2O:CH3CN:MeOH (45:25:30) and for kojic acid MeOH:0.1% H3PO4 (25:75), isocratic. Detection of aflatoxins was based on fluorescence at 365 nm excitation and 455 nm emission with “PHRED” postcolumn photochemical derivatization (Aura Industries, New York, New York, USA). Detection of kojic acid was based on UV absorption at 265 nm. The retention times of the standards for aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 were 10.6 min, 9.4 min, 8.7 min and 7.8 min, respectively, and for kojic acid the retention time was 5.4 min.

2.8. RNA Isolation and Probe Labeling

An aliquot of spore suspension was added to each Petri dish plate (100 × 15 mm) containing 30 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to give a final concentration of 3 × 105 spores per milliliter. Four dishes were used for each strain. Stationary cultures were incubated at 30 °C in the dark for 4 days. Harvested mycelium were pooled and rinsed with sterilized distilled water and pulverized to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle in the presence of liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with amplification grade DNase I followed by purification with an RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA).
Fluorescent dye Cy3 and Cy5 labeled probes were prepared using the indirect labeling method of aminoallyl-cRNA according to the protocol provided by TIGR. A total of 6 μg of aminoallyl-cRNA were needed in each probe labeling. The aminoallyl-cRNA was synthesized and amplified using an Amino Allyl MessageAmp™ II aRNA Amplification kit (Ambion, Austin, Texas, USA). Mono-reactive dyes Cy3 and Cy5 (Amersham, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA) were coupled respectively to aminoallyl-cRNA from wild type and mutant. The unincorporated free dyes were removed using the RNeasy MinElute cleanup kit (Qiagen).

2.9. Microarray Assays

The microarray used was Aspergillus flavus NRRL3357 27.6k oligo array [20]. A direct comparison design was applied, including Mutant/Wild type. Four technical replicates were used, including two dye swaps to compensate for cyanine dye effects. Following hybridization and washing according to the TIGR protocol, the microarray slides were scanned by a Genepix 4000B (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, California, USA), and the images were analyzed using GENEPIX 6.0 software.
Microarray data were normalized and analyzed using GeneSpring GX 10.0 software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, California, USA). Two criteria were used for selecting positive spots, (Signal-Background) mean > 500 unit as expression intensity filter, and at least two of the four replicates showing positive. These filters were imposed to remove genes with very minor differential expression or genes with little evidence for expression. Data normalization was performed using local regression LOWESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing). Differentially expressed genes were identified by performing a one-way ANOVA on the normalized data using a T test with no assumption of equal variance. The cutoff criteria in fold change analysis were set as P < 0.05 in significant difference and fold change >2.

2.10. Quantitative PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was carried out in a 20-μL reaction volume with the SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) in a StepOneTM thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). PCR conditions were as follows: an initial step of 95 °C for 10 min and 40 cycles with each cycle consisting of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The primers sets used were designed by the PrimerExpress 3.0 software following the guidelines specified by Applied Biosystems. The specificity of the PCR products was confirmed by the melt curve analysis. The relative expression levels of the genes examined were determined by the relative standard curve method, in which standard curves based on 5-point, 10-fold serial dilutions were constructed for the endogenous (18S) and the target gene in each experiment using genomic DNA as the template.

2.11. Quantification of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

ROS generation was assessed using the substrate 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma D6883). Oxidation of non-fluorescent DCFH-DA by ROS, such as H2O2 and the hydroxyl radical, yields the fluorescent product dichlorofluorescin (DCF). DCF fluorescence spectra is usually measured using excitation/emission wavelength of 490/525 nm. In this study, we used the OneStepPlus qPCR instrument (Applied Biosystems) that is able to measure dye fluorescence with the program set for the detection of SYBR®-DNA complex at excitation/emission wavelength of 488/522 nm. DCFH-DA stock solution (100×, 1 mM in dimethyl formamide) was prepared. Four agar plugs were cored from each PDA culture plate grown for 7 days at 30 °C. They were placed into a microfuge tube, and 1mL freshly made 1× PBS containing DCFH-DA at a final concentration of 1 μM was added. The reaction was allowed to continue at 37 °C for specified time periods (1, 5 or 24 hr). At the end of each time period, three replicates of 30 μL from each sample were loaded into the optical 48-well reaction plate. The program was set to hold at 37 °C and fluorescence measurements were taken for 6 cycles at 10 min intervals.

3. Results

3.1. Vegetative Growth, Conidial Production, and Sclerotial Formation of ∆msnA Strains

Disruption of msnA in A. parasiticus BN9 and RH, and A. flavus CA14 was confirmed by PCR based on expected genomic patterns (Figure S1). Colonies of the ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus exhibited a restricted, densely-packed appearance on PDA plates. The radial colony growth of the ∆msnA strains was 2 to 3-fold less than that of the parental strains (Figure 1A). Compared to the parental strains the ∆msnA strains produced more conidia as estimated from an identical area (Figure 1B). The increase in conidiation of A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA (36%) was less than that of A. parasiticus RH∆msnA (>600%) and A. flavus CA14∆msnA (84%). Although A. parasiticus RH is a strain that produces many sclerotia, RH∆msnA was unable to produce any on PDA; BN9∆msnA and CA14∆msnA were also unable to produce sclerotia on the same medium.
Figure 1. Effect of msnA disruption on colony size and conidial production. (A) Colony size after growth for five days at 30 °C. (B) Conidial production estimated from two cored agar plugs (see Materials and Methods 2.5). The gray bar represents the wild-type strain, and the clear bar represents the ∆msnA strain. Ap: A. parasiticus; Af: A. flavus.
Figure 1. Effect of msnA disruption on colony size and conidial production. (A) Colony size after growth for five days at 30 °C. (B) Conidial production estimated from two cored agar plugs (see Materials and Methods 2.5). The gray bar represents the wild-type strain, and the clear bar represents the ∆msnA strain. Ap: A. parasiticus; Af: A. flavus.
Toxins 03 00082 g001
To further examine whether sclerotial formation of the three ∆msnA strains was abolished, we grew them on mixed cereal agar plates. All strains did not produce sclerotia on this medium either. They, however, produced a diffusible orange-colored substance that increased in intensity after prolonged incubation (Figure 2). In contrast, the orange-colored pigment was barely produced by the wild-type strains after the same 7-day period of growth.

3.2. Characterization of the Pigment by FTIR

Based on the color we speculated that the orange pigment might be a complex derived from kojic acid, a metabolite commonly produced by some strains of A. flavus and closely related A. oryzae. The UV-Vis spectrum of the pigment purified from the A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA culture matched with the published spectrum of the complex of 3 kojic acid moieties per Fe(III) [21] and had a peak absorbance at 398 nm and a broad shoulder at 460 nm (Figure S2). The kojic acid in the complex was confirmed by FTIR analysis using kojic acid as the reference. The separate FTIR spectra of kojic acid and the pigment are shown in Figure 3A. The overlaid image indicates that the two spectra are nearly identical (Figure 3B); two extra peaks in the carbonyl region (1,500 to 1,700 cm−1) appear in the pigment and another observed difference is at about 2,550 cm−1.
Figure 2. Culture morphology of A. parasiticus and A. flavus strains on MCA plates. (A) wild-type A. parasiticus BN9 (B) A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA (C) wild-type A. parasiticus RH; the white granules around the edge of the colony are sclerotia (D)A. parasiticus RH∆msnA (E) wild-type A. flavus CA14 (F) A. flavus CA14∆msnA.
Figure 2. Culture morphology of A. parasiticus and A. flavus strains on MCA plates. (A) wild-type A. parasiticus BN9 (B) A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA (C) wild-type A. parasiticus RH; the white granules around the edge of the colony are sclerotia (D)A. parasiticus RH∆msnA (E) wild-type A. flavus CA14 (F) A. flavus CA14∆msnA.
Toxins 03 00082 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of the orange pigment by FTIR. (A) Spectrum of kojic acid: top panel red-line and spectrum of the pigment isolated from A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA: bottom panel blue-line. (B) Overlaid spectra.
Figure 3. Characterization of the orange pigment by FTIR. (A) Spectrum of kojic acid: top panel red-line and spectrum of the pigment isolated from A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA: bottom panel blue-line. (B) Overlaid spectra.
Toxins 03 00082 g003

3.3. Production of Aflatoxins and Kojic Acid by the ∆msnA Strains of A. parasiticus BN9 and A. flavus CA14

To determine how production of aflatoxins and kojic acid was affected by msnA disruption, we carried out a time-course quantitative determination. The normalized data (to growth area, Table 1) showed that the production of total aflatoxins and kojic acid increased from day 4 to day 8 in the parasiticus BN9∆msnA strain. The ∆msnA strain accumulated 50% more aflatoxins and 20-fold more kojic acid than the parental strain at day 8. The A. parasiticus strain RH is a blocked strain that accumulates O-methylsterigmatocystin as the end product. Although it does not produce aflatoxins, the derived RH∆msnA strain produced 10-fold more kojic acid. The A. flavus CA14∆msnA strain produced only small amounts of aflatoxins, but it produced four-fold more kojic acid than the parental strain.
Table 1. Production of aflatoxins and kojic acid by ∆msnA strains on MCA.
Table 1. Production of aflatoxins and kojic acid by ∆msnA strains on MCA.
Strain(T)aColony(mm)bAF(μg)c KA(mg)c
B1B2G1G2Total
a: T, days of growth. RH is a blocked strain and accumulates O-methylsterigmatocystin as the end product; it does not produce aflatoxins; b: Diameter averages from triplicate MCA plates; c: Data were normalized to an area with the radius of 1.0 cm; d: ND, not determined.
BN9(4)422.870.094.500.097.580.06
BN∆msn (4)174.360.135.110.099.691.06
BN9(8)755.360.187.180.1712.900.05
BN∆msn (8)289.310.3110.040.2419.811.19
RH(4)42 NDd0.10
RH∆msn (4)13 ND1.17
RH(7)67 ND0.12
RH∆msn (8)20 ND1.38
CA14(4)35<0.01 <0.010.18
CA∆msn (4)130.02 0.020.83
CA14(8)76<0.01 <0.010.35
CA∆msn (8)270.01 0.011.33

3.4. Microarray Profiling of Differentially Expressed Genes in the ∆msnA Strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus

Microarray assays identified many differentially expressed genes in the ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus BN9 and A. flavus CA14 (Table S1 and Table S2). For A. parasiticus, approximately 85% of the genes (0.005% saturation and 500 cutoff) were down-regulated; only 12 genes were up-regulated (°2-fold), and they included those oxidative stress defense genes encoding superoxide dismutase, catalase, and cytochrome c peroxidase. The up-regulation of these genes was confirmed by qPCR (Table 2). For A. flavus, approximately two thirds of the genes profiled were down-regulated; the genes up-regulated were diverse including many of those encoding hypothetical proteins, and only one up-regulated catalase A gene for the A. flavus ∆msnA strain was found.
Table 2. Expression of oxidative stress defense genes in A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA.
Table 2. Expression of oxidative stress defense genes in A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA.
EnzymeGene Locus Oligoprimer SequenceFold-of-Increase c
Primers used for 18S rDNA in qPCR are ttcctagcgagcccaacct and cccgccgaagcaactaag.
a: Broad Institute Aspergillus Comparative Database gene accession number (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/aspergillus_group/MultiHome.html); b: NCBI Entrez Gene accession number (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) (Table S1 and Table S2); c: Relative gene expression level ° S.D. The gene expression level of A. parasiticus BN9 is 1.00.
superoxide dismutaseAFL2G_10810.2 acgccggtactgacgacctt2.09 ° 0.06
AFLA_099000 bagcattgccagtcttcttgga
catalaseAFL2G_05806.2caggtggcttcgcgtccta2.30 ° 0.13
AFLA_056170caggccgcgcttcttg
cytochrome c peroxidase AFL2G_04481.2tcggtcgtgcccatcct2.38 ° 0.12
AFLA_110690aagacagtagggctgaagttcca

3.5. ROS Production by A. parasiticus and A. flavus ∆msnA Strains and by A. flavus msnA Addback Strains

The recent generation of the A. flavus CA14-derived double mutant makes it possible to retransform a knockout strain, such as the ∆msnA strain, using a second selectable marker along with an intact gene to confirm gene function [15]. By this approach, the defects in colony growth were remediated in the A. flavus CA14∆msnA strain after the intact msnA genomic DNA was reintroduced (Figure S3).
Figure 4. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by A. parasiticus and A. flavus strains. Solid bar: parental strain, clear bar: independent ∆msnA strains, and gray bar, independent msnA addback strains.
Figure 4. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by A. parasiticus and A. flavus strains. Solid bar: parental strain, clear bar: independent ∆msnA strains, and gray bar, independent msnA addback strains.
Toxins 03 00082 g004
ROS production by the wild-type strains, ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus, and by the A. flavus msnA addback strain was determined to see whether ROS levels correlated with observed changes in growth, development and secondary metabolite production. ROS production was found to fluctuate in the first 5 hr incubation assays (data not shown). Only after 24 hr incubation a more distinct pattern emerged; an increase in ROS production was seen in all ∆msnA strains (Figure 4). ROS production by the A. flavus msnA addback strains was decreased to levels comparable to that of the wild-type A. flavus.

4. Discussion

Our results show that msnA is required for normal colony growth and development of A. parasiticus and A. flavus. Similar findings have been reported for Trichoderma atrovidire [4] and A. nidulans [22]. The role of oxidative stress in conidiation has been implicated in A. nidulans [23]. Likewise, exposure of Neurospora crassa to antioxidants inhibits conidiation [24]. The N. crassa catalase-3 gene mutant that was sensitive to hydrogen peroxide produced six-times more conidia [25]. The increased production of conidia in the ∆msnA strains (Figure 1B) can be correlated with the increased levels of ROS (Figure 4) and suggests that conidiation is a response to increased levels of oxidative stress in the cells.
Sclerotial formation like conidiation has been correlated with oxidative stress, antioxidant effects, and antioxidant enzyme activities [26,27]. Sclerotia of A. parasiticus and A. flavus are considered to be a vestige of the sexual cleistothecia produced by other aspergilli [28]. The light responses of the two structures regulated by the common factor VeA [29,30,31] are similar. In the dark A. nidulans favors the formation of cleistothecia [32,33], and under light A. parasiticus and A. flavus suppress sclerotial production [34]. The ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus are unable to produce sclerotia. This result was unexpected since the A. nidulans nrdA(msnA)-null strain produced enhanced levels of cleistothecia [22]. It suggests that subtle differences likely exist in the regulation of sclerotial and cleistothecial morphogenesis. Impairment of msnA like the disruption of laeA, a secondary metabolism regulatory gene [35], abolishes sclerotial formation but not conidiation, which shows that the two developmental processes are regulated differently.
Aflatoxin biosynthesis may be a defense mechanism against oxidative stress [36,37,38]. Studies have demonstrated that natural antioxidants, such as gallic acid, caffeic acid and eugenol can reduce aflatoxin production [39,40,41]. Several lines of evidence also have suggested a positive correlation between ROS accumulation and aflatoxin production by A. flavus and A. parasiticus [36,42]. Deletion of the A. parasiticus yapA gene, which encodes a transcription factor that mediates oxidative stress response, resulted in precocious ROS formation and increased aflatoxin biosynthesis [38]. Supporting this correlation we found that compared to respective parental strains, the ∆msnA strains produced more aflatoxins (Table 1) and had higher levels of ROS accumulation (Figure 4). Beside aflatoxins, FTIR assays confirm that the orange pigment is a kojic acid-iron complex (Figure 3). The peaks at 1500 and 1580 cm−1 in the spectrum of the pigment are consistent with the chelation of kojic acid with a metal through the carbonyl moiety (Figure 3B). Kojic acid is a scavenger of free radicals [43]. The highly elevated production levels (Table 1) suggest that the ∆msnA strains use the formation of kojic acid as a main detoxifying mechanism.
Microarray comparisons of ∆msnA to wild-type showed that genes encoding superoxide dismutase, catalase, and cytochrome c peroxidase in the A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA strain were up-regulated (Table 2). The result suggests that expression of these genes is probably needed to cope with increased oxidative stress in the cells. The generation of ROS is potentially deleterious. Superoxide dismutase converts superoxide to another ROS, hydrogen peroxide, probably to shunt the superoxide away from harmful lipid peroxidation to the cells [44] or from damages to DNA [45]. Catalase converts hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen molecule. Like catalase, cytochrome c peroxidase takes reducing equivalents from cytochrome c and converts hydrogen peroxide to water. Different types of oxidative stress defense genes operate in the ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus; this likely reflects respective physiological responses of each species in spite of their close genetic relatedness. The varied amounts of aflatoxins and/or kojic acid produced by respective ∆msnA strains also reflect intrinsic differences of the two species and within members of the same species, such as BN9 and RH.

5. Conclusions

This study suggests that the ∆msnA strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus are not as capable as the wild-type strains in relieving oxidative stress and respond by up-regulating antioxidant enzyme genes as well as by increasing the production of conidia, aflatoxins, and kojic acid to alleviate the increased oxidative stress caused by the loss of msnA.

References

  1. Ruis, H.; Schuller, C. Stress signaling in yeast. Bioessays 1995, 17, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schmitt, A.P.; McEntee, K. Msn2p, a zinc finger DNA-binding protein, is the transcriptional activator of the multistress response in Saccharomyces cerevisia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5777–5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Treger, J.M.; Magee, T.R.; McEntee, K. Functional analysis of the stress response element and its role in the multistress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 243, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Peterbauer, C.K.; Litscher, D.; Kubicek, C.P. The Trichoderma atroviride seb1 (stress response element binding) gene encodes an AGGGG-binding protein which is involved in the response to high osmolarity stress. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2002, 268, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seidl, V.; Seiboth, B.; Karaffa, L.; Kubicek, C.P. The fungal STRE-element-binding protein Seb1 is involved but not essential for glycerol dehydrogenase (gld1) gene expression and glycerol accumulation in Trichoderma atroviride during osmotic stress. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2004, 41, 1132–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aguirre, J.; Rios-Momberg, M.; Hewitt, D.; Hansberg, W. Reactive oxygen species and development in microbial eukaryotes. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Georgiou, C.D.; Patsoukis, N.; Papapostolou, I.; Zervoudakis, G. Sclerotial metamorphosis in filamentous fungi is induced by oxidative stress. Integ. Comp. Biol. 2006, 46, 691–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jeon, M.-H.; Hagiwara, D.; Yoshimi, A.; Abe, K.; Han, D.-M.; Chae, S.-K. Analysis of nrdA, a negative regulator of differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans. In Proceedings of 25thFungal Genetics Conference, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 17-22 March 2009.
  9. Horn, B.W.; Moore, G.G.; Carbone, I. Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus flavus. Mycologia 2009, 101, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Horn, B.W.; Ramirez-Prado, J.H.; Carbone, I. Sexual reproduction and recombination in the aflatoxin-producing fungus Aspergillus parasiticus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Horn, B.W.; Greene, R.L.; Sobolev, V.S.; Dorner, J.W.; Powell, J.H.; Layton, R.C. Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii. Mycologia 1996, 88, 574–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cotty, P.J. Virulence and cultural characteristics of two Aspergillus flavus strains pathogenic on cotton. Phytopathology 1989, 79, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ehrlich, K.C.; Scharfenstein, L.L.; Montalbano, B.G.; Chang, P.-K. Are the genes nadA and norB involved in formation of aflatoxin G1? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 1717–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chang, P.-K. A highly efficient gene-targeting system for Aspergillus parasiticus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chang, P.-K.; Scharfenstein, L.L.; Wei, Q.; Bhatnagar, D. Development and refinement of a high-efficiency gene-targeting system for Aspergillus flavus. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McAlpin, C.E.; Wicklow, D.T. Culture media and sources of nitrogen promoting the formation of stromata and ascocarps in Petromyces alliaceus (Aspergillus section Flavi). Can. J. Microbiol. 2005, 51, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kubodera, T.; Yamashita, N.; Nishimura, A. Pyrithiamine resistance gene (ptrA) of Aspergillus oryzae: cloning, characterization and application as a dominant selectable marker for transformation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 1416–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Takahashi, T.; Chang, P.-K.; Matsushima, K.; Yu, J.; Abe, K.; Bhatnagar, D.; Cleveland, T.E.; Koyama, Y. Nonfunctionality of Aspergillus sojae aflR in a strain of Aspergillus parasiticus with a disrupted aflR gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3737–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gems, D.H.; Clutterbuck, A.J. Co-transformation with autonomously-replicating helper plasmids facilitates gene cloning from an Aspergillus nidulans gene library. Curr. Genet. 1993, 24, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wan, C.; Sun, C.; Yu, J.; Niermann, W.; Fedorova, N.; Varga, J. JCVI Aspergillus flavus NRRL3357 27.6k oligo array. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GPL7117 (Accessed on 6 January 2011).
  21. McBryde, W.A.E.; Atkinson, G.F. Spectrophotometric study of the reaction between iron(III) and kojic acid. Can. J. Chem. 1961, 39, 510–525. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeon, M.-H.; Hagiwara, D.; Yoshimi, A.; Abe, K.; Han, D.-M.; Chae, S.-K. Analysis of nrdA, a negative regulator of differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans. In Proceedings of 25th Fungal Genetics Conference, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 17-22 March 2009.
  23. Navarro, R.E.; Stringer, M.A.; Hansberg, W.; Timberlake, W.E.; Aguirre, J. catA, a new Aspergillus nidulans gene encoding a developmentally regulated catalase. Curr. Genet. 1996, 29, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Hansberg, W.; de Groot, H.; Sies, H. Reactive oxygen species associated with cell differentiation in Neurospora crassa. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 14, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Michan, S.; Lledias, F.; Hansberg, W. Asexual development is increased in Neurospora crassa cat-3-null mutant strains. Eukaryot. Cell 2003, 2, 798–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Patsoukis, N.; Georgiou, C.D. Effect of thiol redox state modulators on oxidative stress and sclerotial differentiation of the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol. 2007, 188, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Patsoukis, N.; Georgiou, D.C. Thiol redox state and related enzymes in sclerotium-forming filamentous phytopathogenic fungi. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Geiser, D.M.; Timberlake, W.E.; Arnold, M.L. Loss of meiosis in Aspergillus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Calvo, A.M.; Bok, J.; Brooks, W.; Keller, N.P. veA is required for toxin and sclerotial production in Aspergillus parasiticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4733–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cary, J.W.; O'Brian, G.R.; Nielsen, D.M.; Nierman, W.; Harris-Coward, P.; Yu, J.; Bhatnagar, D.; Cleveland, T.E.; Payne, G.A.; Calvo, A.M. Elucidation of veA-dependent genes associated with aflatoxin and sclerotial production in Aspergillus flavus by functional genomics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 1107–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, H.; Han, K.; Kim, K.; Han, D.; Jahng, K.; Chae, K. The veA gene activates sexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2002, 37, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mooney, J.L.; Yager, L.N. Light is required for conidiation in Aspergillus nidulans. Genes Devel. 1990, 4, 1473–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Purschwitz, J.; Muller, S.; Kastner, C.; Schoser, M.; Haas, H.; Espeso, E.A.; Atoui, A.; Calvo, A.M.; Fischer, R. Functional and physical interaction of blue- and red-light sensors in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bennett, J.W.; Fernholz, F.A.; Lee, L.S. Effect of light on aflatoxins, anthraquinones, and sclerotia in Aspergillus flavus and parasiticus. Mycologia 1978, 70, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kale, S.P.; Milde, L.; Trapp, M.K.; Frisvad, J.C.; Keller, N.P.; Bok, J.W. Requirement of LaeA for secondary metabolism and sclerotial production in Aspergillus flavus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1422–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Narasaiah, K.V.; Sashidhar, R.B.; Subramanyam, C. Biochemical analysis of oxidative stress in the production of aflatoxin and its precursor intermediates. Mycopathologia 2006, 162, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, J.H.; Campbell, B.C.; Yu, J.; Mahoney, N.; Chan, K.L.; Molyneux, R.J.; Bhatnagar, D.; Cleveland, T.E. Examination of fungal stress response genes using Saccharomy cescerevisiae as a model system: targeting genes affecting aflatoxin biosynthesis by Aspergillus flavus Link. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Reverberi, M.; Zjalic, S.; Ricelli, A.; Punelli, F.; Camera, E.; Fabbri, C.; Picardo, M.; Fanelli, C.; Fabbri, A.A. Modulation of antioxidant defense in Aspergillus parasiticus is involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis: a role for the ApyapA gene. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 988–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jayashree, T.; Subramanyam, C. Antiaflatoxigenic activity of eugenol is due to inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 28, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mahoney, N.; Molyneux, R.J. Phytochemical inhibition of aflatoxigenicity in Aspergillus flavus by constituents of walnut (Juglans regia). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kim, J.H.; Yu, J.; Mahoney, N.; Chan, K.L.; Molyneux, R.J.; Varga, J.; Bhatnagar, D.; Cleveland, T.E.; Nierman, W.C.; Campbell, B.C. Elucidation of the functional genomics of antioxidant-based inhibition of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Reverberi, M.; Fabbri, A.A.; Zjalic, S.; Ricelli, A.; Punelli, F.; Fanelli, C. Antioxidant enzymes stimulation in Aspergillus parasiticus by Lentinula edodes inhibits aflatoxin production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 69, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Niwa, Y.; Akamatsu, H. Kojic acid scavenges free radicals while potentiating leukocyte functions including free radical generation. Inflammation 1991, 15, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Halliwell, B.; Chirico, S. Lipid peroxidation: its mechanism, measurement, and significance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993, 57, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Keyer, K.; Gort, A.S.; Imlay, J.A. Superoxide and the production of oxidative DNA damage. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 6782–6790. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Disruption of the msnA gene in A. parasiticus and A. flavus by the ptr selectable marker. (A) Diagram depicting the gene disruption event via double-crossover recombination. I: linearized portion of the disruption vector; II: genomic pattern of the recipient strain; III: expected genomic pattern after recombination. (B) PCR confirmation of genomic DNA patterns of the recipient, R, and the msnA disruptant, D. The primers used were P1 and P2. The DNA size markers (in kb) are lambda DNA/Hind III fragments. The three sets are 1: A. parasiticus BN9, 2: A parasiticus RH and 3: A. flavus CA14.
Figure S1. Disruption of the msnA gene in A. parasiticus and A. flavus by the ptr selectable marker. (A) Diagram depicting the gene disruption event via double-crossover recombination. I: linearized portion of the disruption vector; II: genomic pattern of the recipient strain; III: expected genomic pattern after recombination. (B) PCR confirmation of genomic DNA patterns of the recipient, R, and the msnA disruptant, D. The primers used were P1 and P2. The DNA size markers (in kb) are lambda DNA/Hind III fragments. The three sets are 1: A. parasiticus BN9, 2: A parasiticus RH and 3: A. flavus CA14.
Toxins 03 00082 g005
Figure S2. Characterization of the orange pigment by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry. (A) Structure of the 3kojic acid-ferric iron (Fe+3) complex. (B) UV-Vis spectrum of the orange pigment.
Figure S2. Characterization of the orange pigment by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry. (A) Structure of the 3kojic acid-ferric iron (Fe+3) complex. (B) UV-Vis spectrum of the orange pigment.
Toxins 03 00082 g006
Figure S3. Colony morphology of A. flavus CA14∆msnA retransformed with the genomic msnA gene. Left: wild type, middle: CA14∆msnA, and right: msnA addback transformant. Cultures were grown at 30 °C for a week in the dark on PDA plates.
Figure S3. Colony morphology of A. flavus CA14∆msnA retransformed with the genomic msnA gene. Left: wild type, middle: CA14∆msnA, and right: msnA addback transformant. Cultures were grown at 30 °C for a week in the dark on PDA plates.
Toxins 03 00082 g007
Table S1. Genes differentially expressed in A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA.
Table S1. Genes differentially expressed in A. parasiticus BN9∆msnA.
Gene ID (a)Fold changeRegulationAnnotation
(a) NCBI Entrez Gene (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) accession number.
AFLA_0030502.13downRTA1 like protein
AFLA_0030502.12downRTA1 like protein
AFLA_0030902.10downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0046902.12uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0046902.21uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0049408.07downGlycolipid 2-alpha-mannosyltransferase family protein
AFLA_0055203.38downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0061602.90downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0119702.22downMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0142603.08uphydrophobin, putative
AFLA_0149602.73downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0153002.03downFMN-dependent dehydrogenase family protein
AFLA_0153002.43downFMN-dependent dehydrogenase family protein
AFLA_0155504.26downSugar transporter family protein
AFLA_0157805.24downsmall oligopeptide transporter, OPT family protein
AFLA_0178602.00uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0242502.01upAmidase family protein
AFLA_0273402.04downAha1 domain family, putative
AFLA_0273402.16downAha1 domain family, putative
AFLA_0280303.03downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0293904.22downHMG box family protein
AFLA_0360402.18downmitochondrial inner membrane translocase subunit (TIM17), putative
AFLA_0360402.23downmitochondrial inner membrane translocase subunit (TIM17), putative
AFLA_0369802.76downMOSC N-terminal beta barrel domain containing protein
AFLA_0371602.40upthiazole biosynthesis enzyme, putative
AFLA_0371602.29upthiazole biosynthesis enzyme, putative
AFLA_0372902.10downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0372905.14downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0401402.02downMajor intrinsic protein
AFLA_0404006.62downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0419302.93downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0429703.98downMIF4G domain containing protein
AFLA_0429705.44downMIF4G domain containing protein
AFLA_0462304.20downamino acid permease (Dip5), putative
AFLA_0464004.57downunknown-related
AFLA_0464004.41downDUF788 domain protein
AFLA_0515703.88downTo ribosomal protein YmL36 precursormitochondrial
AFLA_0526402.07downPH domain containing protein
AFLA_0561702.10upmycelial catalase Cat1, putative
AFLA_0561702.05upmycelial catalase Cat1, putative
AFLA_0564802.91downglycosyl transferase, group 2 family protein
AFLA_0564803.85downglycosyl transferase, group 2 family protein
AFLA_0579502.50uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0579502.33uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0596602.38downMajor intrinsic protein
AFLA_0600503.07downAmino acid permease family protein
AFLA_0600503.99downAmino acid permease family protein
AFLA_0600903.87downMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0686102.92downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0709003.43downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0735802.96downcell division control protein Cdc6, putative
AFLA_0738002.07upshort chain dehydrogenase/reductase family, putative
AFLA_0738002.10upshort chain dehydrogenase/reductase family, putative
AFLA_0768602.38downMOSC domain containing protein
AFLA_0809102.98downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0809102.65downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0852502.03downRNA recognition motif. (a.k.a. RRM, RBD, or RNP domain) protein, putative
AFLA_0877403.09downANTH domain containing protein
AFLA_0892402.98downAmidase family protein
AFLA_0892403.09downAmidase family protein
AFLA_0916003.23downnascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) subunit, putative
AFLA_0919804.26downCtr copper transporter family protein
AFLA_0919803.38downCtr copper transporter family protein
AFLA_0926002.54downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0944702.58downTo UV radiation resistance associated protein p63
AFLA_0965202.11downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0965704.88downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0977902.15downTo chloride-bicarbonate anion exchanger AE2, putative
AFLA_0980503.28downgamma-cysteine synthetase regulatory subunit, putative
AFLA_0990002.07upCu, Zn superoxide dismutase SOD1, putative
AFLA_1063702.46downConserved hypothetical ATP binding protein
AFLA_1106902.04upPeroxidase family protein
AFLA_1106902.03upPeroxidase family protein
AFLA_1117402.83downTo SAC1 protein, putative
AFLA_1117403.30downTo SAC1 protein, putative
AFLA_1121802.50downATP-dependent RNA helicase, putative
AFLA_1124202.59downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1125404.63downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1125405.17downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1145703.92downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_1180502.31downPOT family protein
AFLA_1180502.47downPOT family protein
AFLA_1194302.07downSec1 family protein
AFLA_1209602.50downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1221102.32upbifunctional catalase-peroxidase Cat2
AFLA_1232903.12downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1232902.35downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1244202.32downamine oxidase, flavin-containing family protein
AFLA_1275703.63downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1285603.84downPrnA protein, putative
AFLA_1314103.93downPCI domain containing protein
AFLA_1323102.45downtRNA intron endonuclease, catalytic C-terminal domain containing protein
AFLA_1323103.58downtRNA intron endonuclease, catalytic C-terminal domain containing protein
AFLA_1327502.47downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_1338103.05downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_1375104.23downEmopamil binding protein
AFLA_1385902.01upcysteine-type peptidase, putative
AO0900120005382.90downpredicted protein
AO0900120005382.45downpredicted protein
Table S2. Genes differentially expressed in A. flavus CA14∆msnA.
Table S2. Genes differentially expressed in A. flavus CA14∆msnA.
Gene ID Fold changeRegulationAnnotation
a: NCBI Entrez Gene (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) accession number.
AFLA_0010104.06uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0028403.43downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0028404.83downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0028602.62downOxidoreductase family, NAD-binding Rossmann fold containing protein
AFLA_0029402.43downGlycosyl hydrolase family 76 protein
AFLA_0039802.51downcation diffusion facilitator family transporter containing protein
AFLA_0039802.38downcation diffusion facilitator family transporter containing protein
AFLA_0044202.22uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0078302.85uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0078303.00uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0078602.09upMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0078602.12upMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0101802.42uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0101802.35uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0113702.17uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0113702.23uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0115305.11uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0115305.76uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0115602.49upPhosphoesterase family protein
AFLA_0115602.43upPhosphoesterase family protein
AFLA_0120302.10downDUF895 domain membrane protein, putative
AFLA_0120302.08downDUF895 domain membrane protein, putative
AFLA_0120502.68downN-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase family protein
AFLA_0120502.47downN-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase family protein
AFLA_0120802.74downglucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase, putative
AFLA_0120802.74downglucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase, putative
AFLA_0130602.88downexpressed protein, putative
AFLA_0130602.83downexpressed protein, putative
AFLA_0137402.46upacid phosphatase SurE family protein
AFLA_0137402.45upacid phosphatase SurE family protein
AFLA_0142103.22downMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0142103.78downMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0145104.89downFormate/nitrite transporter family protein
AFLA_0145104.33downFormate/nitrite transporter family protein
AFLA_0157804.29downsmall oligopeptide transporter, OPT family protein
AFLA_0157803.91downsmall oligopeptide transporter, OPT family protein
AFLA_0158002.25downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0177503.37downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0177502.75downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0187903.16downnitrate transporter (nitrate permease), putative
AFLA_0187903.21downnitrate transporter (nitrate permease), putative
AFLA_0195102.60upconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0195103.04upconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0210002.16downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0223702.08downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0236103.94downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0251304.27upTo blastomyces yeast phase-specific protein 1
AFLA_0259602.26downNucleoside transporter family protein
AFLA_0259602.10downNucleoside transporter family protein
AFLA_0269502.05downacetyl-CoA-acetyltransferase, putative
AFLA_0269502.22downacetyl-CoA-acetyltransferase, putative
AFLA_0288302.30upFG-GAP repeat family protein
AFLA_0288302.45upFG-GAP repeat family protein
AFLA_0289502.41downGlycosyl hydrolase family 81 protein
AFLA_0290002.03uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0290002.05uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0299703.69downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0299703.51downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0313803.64downclass V chitinase, putative
AFLA_0313803.82downclass V chitinase, putative
AFLA_0341403.10downMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0341402.88downMajor Facilitator Superfamily protein
AFLA_0363702.37downphosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (ATP), putative
AFLA_0363702.24downphosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (ATP), putative
AFLA_0378203.75upHsp20/alpha crystallin family protein
AFLA_0378203.81upHsp20/alpha crystallin family protein
AFLA_0401402.07downMajor intrinsic protein
AFLA_0403304.54downChitin binding Peritrophin-A domain containing protein
AFLA_0403304.58downChitin binding Peritrophin-A domain containing protein
AFLA_0410102.16uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0410102.16uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0411807.25downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0420002.01downD-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family protein, putative
AFLA_0423602.07uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0423602.01uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0425402.38uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0433902.26downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0433902.13downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0440403.66downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0447203.39downpermease, cytosine/purines, uracil, thiamine, allantoin family protein
AFLA_0447203.37downpermease, cytosine/purines, uracil, thiamine, allantoin family protein
AFLA_0466202.91upMAPEG family protein
AFLA_0466202.66upMAPEG family protein
AFLA_0494703.22uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0494703.36uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0500702.19downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0509402.08downphenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase, beta subunit, putative
AFLA_0537002.07uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0555502.75downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0555502.55downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0580302.77downMFS transporter, putative
AFLA_0580302.81downMFS transporter, putative
AFLA_0602602.32upheat shock protein HSP30, putative
AFLA_0624602.46downnon-classical export protein (Nce2), putative
AFLA_0624602.66downnon-classical export protein (Nce2), putative
AFLA_0632603.03downSic1.20-related
AFLA_0632603.08downSic1.20-related
AFLA_0632903.92downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0632904.09downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0633203.34downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0633203.74downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0652204.99uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0652204.93uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0654503.37downDeuterolysin metalloprotease, putative
AFLA_0654503.01downDeuterolysin metalloprotease, putative
AFLA_0654606.03downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0654607.02downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0659603.05upfucose-specific lectin, putative
AFLA_0659603.02upfucose-specific lectin, putative
AFLA_0668104.31upTo blastomyces yeast phase-specific protein 1
AFLA_0676402.15downalternative NADH-dehydrogenase, putative
AFLA_0676402.18downalternative NADH-dehydrogenase, putative
AFLA_0677702.62downPQ loop repeat family protein
AFLA_0677702.64downPQ loop repeat family protein
AFLA_0686002.89downammonium transporter MEAA, putative
AFLA_0686002.90downammonium transporter MEAA, putative
AFLA_0687902.23downadenylylsulfate kinase, putative
AFLA_0687902.27downadenylylsulfate kinase, putative
AFLA_0700702.09uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0700702.07uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0704702.02uphypothetical protein
AFLA_0740602.40downR3H domain containing protein
AFLA_0751902.96downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0751902.94downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0782102.37downmembrane protein-related
AFLA_0782102.36downmembrane protein-related
AFLA_0789003.11downGlycosyl hydrolase family 20, catalytic domain containing protein
AFLA_0789002.70downGlycosyl hydrolase family 20, catalytic domain containing protein
AFLA_0838902.60upoxidoreductase, zinc-binding dehydrogenase family protein
AFLA_0838902.59upoxidoreductase, zinc-binding dehydrogenase family protein
AFLA_0876302.96downalpha, alpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase subunit, putative
AFLA_0876302.36downalpha, alpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase subunit, putative
AFLA_0877502.96downisopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase, putative
AFLA_0906902.25upcatalase A, putative
AFLA_0906902.73upcatalase A, putative
AFLA_0909702.24downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0909702.09downconserved hypothetical protein
AFLA_0912602.08downacetyltransferase, GNAT family protein
AFLA_0912602.15downacetyltransferase, GNAT family protein
AFLA_0946302.11downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0946302.16downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0954602.39downPBS lyase HEAT-like repeat family protein
AFLA_0983803.39downconidial hydrophobin RodA, putative
AFLA_0983803.77downconidial hydrophobin RodA, putative
AFLA_0987002.54downoxidoreductase, short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein
AFLA_0987002.47downoxidoreductase, short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein
AFLA_0990503.83downhypothetical protein
AFLA_0990503.70downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1017802.41downOxidoreductase molybdopterin binding domain containing protein
AFLA_1017802.20downOxidoreductase molybdopterin binding domain containing protein
AFLA_1018003.81downGlycosyl hydrolases family 18 protein
AFLA_1018004.33downGlycosyl hydrolases family 18 protein
AFLA_1043508.01downDynamin central region family protein
AFLA_1043506.90downDynamin central region family protein
AFLA_1056303.94upCytochrome P450 family protein
AFLA_1056303.82upCytochrome P450 family protein
AFLA_1090303.01downTo nucleotide exsicion repair protein RAD7
AFLA_1091603.31downisopentenyl-diphosphate delta-isomerase, putative
AFLA_1100405.26downblr7677-related
AFLA_1100406.41downblr7677-related
AFLA_1127202.26downdiphosphomevalonate decarboxylase, putative
AFLA_1129102.85uphypothetical protein
AFLA_1129102.89uphypothetical protein
AFLA_1137902.78downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1137902.39downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1159303.40uphypothetical protein
AFLA_1159303.22uphypothetical protein
AFLA_1193402.12upHelix-loop-helix DNA-binding domain containing protein
AFLA_1193402.29upHelix-loop-helix DNA-binding domain containing protein
AFLA_1257703.03downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1257703.25downhypothetical protein
AFLA_1276207.70downNew cDNA-based gene: (AO_CDS_042706, novel, updateIDs: 11597, [gene: novel_gene_1223, model: novel_model_1223])
AFLA_12762011.51downNew cDNA-based gene: (AO_CDS_042706, novel, updateIDs: 11597, [gene: novel_gene_1223, model: novel_model_1223])
AFLA_1298103.08downcytoplasmic asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, putative
AFLA_1298102.94downcytoplasmic asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, putative
AFLA_1301502.02downNAD+ dependent glutamate dehydrogenase, putative
AFLA_1338302.02downoxidoreductase, zinc-binding dehydrogenase family protein
AFLA_1344202.02upSugar transporter family protein
AFLA_1392702.28upaflNa/ hypD/ hypothetical protein
AFLA_1392702.37upaflNa/ hypD/ hypothetical protein
AFLA_1392903.06upaflMa/ hypE/ hypothetical protein
AFLA_1394002.17upaflCa/hypC/hypothetical protein
AFLA_1394002.03upaflCa/hypC/hypothetical protein
AO0901200004476.76down predicted protein
AO0901200004475.18down predicted protein

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, P.-K.; Scharfenstein, L.L.; Luo, M.; Mahoney, N.; Molyneux, R.J.; Yu, J.; Brown, R.L.; Campbell, B.C. Loss of msnA, a Putative Stress Regulatory Gene, in Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus Increased Production of Conidia, Aflatoxins and Kojic Acid. Toxins 2011, 3, 82-104. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3010082

AMA Style

Chang P-K, Scharfenstein LL, Luo M, Mahoney N, Molyneux RJ, Yu J, Brown RL, Campbell BC. Loss of msnA, a Putative Stress Regulatory Gene, in Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus Increased Production of Conidia, Aflatoxins and Kojic Acid. Toxins. 2011; 3(1):82-104. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3010082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Perng-Kuang, Leslie L. Scharfenstein, Meng Luo, Noreen Mahoney, Russell J. Molyneux, Jiujiang Yu, Robert L. Brown, and Bruce C. Campbell. 2011. "Loss of msnA, a Putative Stress Regulatory Gene, in Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus Increased Production of Conidia, Aflatoxins and Kojic Acid" Toxins 3, no. 1: 82-104. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3010082

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop