Next Article in Journal
Rice Phyllosphere Bacillus Species and Their Secreted Metabolites Suppress Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin Production In Vitro and in Maize Seeds
Next Article in Special Issue
Basics of Antibody Phage Display Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Alpha-Toxin Contributes to Biofilm Formation among Staphylococcus aureus Wound Isolates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies (VHHs) against Crotoxin: A Basis for Developing Modular Building Blocks for the Enhancement of Treatment or Diagnosis of Crotalic Envenoming
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/toxins10040158
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antivenom Production against Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops erythromelas Snake Venoms Using Cross-Linked Chitosan Nanoparticles as an Immunoadjuvant

by
Karla Samara Rocha Soares
1,
Fiamma Gláucia-Silva
1,
Alessandra Daniele-Silva
1,
Manoela Torres-Rêgo
1,
Nathália Kelly de Araújo
1,
Yamara Arruda Silva de Menezes
1,
Igor Zumba Damasceno
2,
Denise Vilarinho Tambourgi
3,
Arnóbio Antônio Da Silva-Júnior
1,* and
Matheus De Freitas Fernandes-Pedrosa
1,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59012-570, Brazil
2
Department of Materials Engineering, Technology Center, University Campus, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
3
Laboratory of Immunochemistry, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2018, 10(4), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10040158
Submission received: 12 March 2018 / Revised: 3 April 2018 / Accepted: 5 April 2018 / Published: 16 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discovery of Antibodies and Novel Antivenoms against Envenoming)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In Brazil, envenomation by snakes of the genus Bothrops is clinically relevant, particularly for the species Bothrops jararaca and B. erythromelas. The most effective treatment for envenomation by snakes is the administration of antivenoms associated with adjuvants. Novel adjuvants are required to reduce side effects and maximize the efficiency of conventional serum and vaccine formulations. The polymer chitosan has been shown to have immunoadjuvant properties, and it has been used as a platform for delivery systems. In this context, we evaluated the potential immunoadjuvant properties of chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) loaded with B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms in the production of sera against these venoms. Stable CNPs were obtained by ionic gelation, and mice were immunized subcutaneously for 6 weeks with 100 µL of each snake venom at concentrations of 5.0 or 10.0% (w/w), encapsulated in CNPs or associated with aluminium hydroxide (AH). The evaluation of protein interactions with the CNPs revealed their ability to induce antibody levels equivalent to those of AH, even with smaller doses of antigen. In addition, the CNPs were less inflammatory due to their modified release of proteins. CNPs provide a promising approach for peptide/protein delivery from snake venom and will be useful for new vaccines.
Keywords:
Bothrops venoms; antivenom; adjuvants; nanoparticles; chitosan; nanovaccines
Key Contribution: We present a biotechnological approach to produce antivenom against Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops erythromelas snake venoms. The potential immunoadjuvant properties of chitosan nanoparticles loaded with these venoms were evaluated; the results show that this approach can be applied to obtain polyclonal serum.

1. Introduction

Snakebite envenoming is a highly relevant global public health issue that is considered a major occupational health problem and has been a perennial cause of death or chronic disability for many active young people [1,2]. The global incidence of snakebites is approximately 5,400,000 per year, and approximately 125,000 of these cases are fatal [1,3]. Snakebite envenoming is estimated to occur mostly in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, where between 20,000 and 94,000 fatalities are reported each year [2,3,4]. Generally, snakebites are most common in tropical and subtropical areas, but they also occur in regions with temperate climes [3]. In Brazil, accidental snakebite envenoming represents an important public health hazard. Ninety percent of the yearly estimated 20–30,000 snakebite accidents are caused by species of the Bothrops genus. B. jararaca (South and Southeast), B. moojeni (Centre-West), B. atrox (North), and B. erythromelas (Northeast) are responsible for most of these accidents [5,6,7,8,9,10].
Systemic signs of envenomation are observed in patients bitten by Bothrops snakes, such as haemostatic disturbances, signs at the site of bite, haemorrhage, myonecrosis, dermonecrosis, and inflammatory reactions (oedema, leukocyte infiltration, and pain) [9,11,12,13]. The pathogenesis of Bothrops envenomation is complex, but local manifestations have been directly associated with the activity of metalloproteases, phospholipase A2, or serine proteases present in the venom [11,12,14,15,16]. Parenteral administration of animal-derived antivenoms is the mainstay treatment for snakebite envenoming [17,18,19,20]. In Brazil, the treatment for envenomation by bothropic species involves the use of an equine polyspecific antibothropic (or antibothropic-lachetic) F(ab’)2 antivenom, prepared by conventional immunization schedules using a pool that includes the venoms of five Bothrops species: B. jararaca, B. jararacussu, B. moojeni, B. alternatus, and B. neuwiedi [10,17].
The serums routinely produced are safe and effective for treatment. However, some problems have arisen related to the application of immunoadjuvants for vaccines and sera, such as the toxic potential and collateral effects of these formulations [21,22,23]. Aluminium-containing adjuvants are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for human use and are widely applied in immunobiological production [23]. There are two main aluminium containing adjuvants: aluminium hydroxide (AH) and aluminium phosphate [23].
Unfortunately, some evidence about the toxicity of aluminium salts has been reported [24,25,26,27]. The effects of these salts include late hypersensitivity [28,29], severe granulomatous inflammation [22,27,30] and pruritic subcutaneous nodules [28]. Other side effects of aluminium include increased immunoglobulin E titres, allergenicity, and potential neurotoxicity [22,30,31]. Normally, aluminium is excreted by the kidneys; however, under certain conditions, such as reduced renal function, aluminium accumulates in the body and can become toxic [30].
Consequently, several studies have focused on the development of new adjuvants for human vaccines to generate stronger vaccines capable of inducing protective and long-lasting immunity in humans with reduced side effects and toxicity compared with conventional formulations [30]. For example, one study evaluated the development of a new carrier for vaccine delivery that was aimed at treating scorpion envenoming [32]. Sustained drug release through nanocarriers has already been introduced in previous studies [33]. Hydrophilic nanoparticles have received much attention regarding their ability to deliver therapeutic peptides, proteins, antigens, oligonucleotides, and genes by intravenous, oral, and mucosal administration routes [34,35]. For protein incorporation, the ideal diameter of a nanoparticle should be between 100 and 200 nm [21,36,37]. Nanoparticles can potentially circulate for a long time in the body, releasing their loads over multiple hours or days, depending on their properties [33,38,39]. Hence, protein delivery through nanoparticles is an effective way to control drug release as well as to design an efficient protein delivery system [33]. In this context, several polymers that have shown interesting properties, such as chitosan, have been investigated as both delivery systems and adjuvants for vaccine preparations [34,40,41,42].
Chitosan (CN) is a naturally occurring polysaccharide obtained by partial N-deacetylation of chitin. It is used as a nanocarrier because of its unique biodegradability, biocompatibility, hydrophilicity, non-toxic, and immunomodulatory properties as well as its low cost [34,35,41,43,44,45]. CN has been extensively investigated for carrier and delivery system formulations for therapeutic macrosolutes. Particularly, gene and protein molecule formulations have been explored due to the positive charge of chitosan, which can be easily complexed with negatively charged DNAs and proteins [21,46,47]. Chitosan can effectively bind DNA and proteins, protecting these molecules from nuclease and protease degradation, respectively [47].
Effective immune responses have been observed when chitosan was used as an immunoadjuvant in vaccines for immunization against Helicobacter pylori [48], diphtheria [49], hepatitis B [50], T. serrulatus venom [21], and Naja naja oxiana snake venom [36]; moreover, CN has recently been applied in gene therapy strategies for the control of Aedes aegypti mosquito proliferation [43].
A more detailed approach to the use of this non-toxic and non-inflammatory immunoadjuvant as a delivery system would provide a powerful public health tool as well as an innovative approach for the development of a new serum against toxins from the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas snake venoms. This system could generate an effective immune response with low loads of antigens, thus minimizing the adverse effects caused by traditional immunoadjuvants. This study evaluated the potential immunoadjuvant effects of chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) loaded with B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms in the production of serum against these venoms, and comparatively assessed the inflammatory process generated by CNPs versus a conventional adjuvant.

2. Results

2.1. Preparation of Chitosan Nanoparticles

Titrations of a tripolyphosphate (TPP) solution into a chitosan solution formed cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles spontaneously through intra- and intermolecular bonds between the phosphate groups of the polyanion TPP and the amine groups of chitosan [35,51,52]. The chitosan nanoparticles were generated via an ionic gelation technique and had an average size of 167.5 nm, a zeta potential (ZP) of +24.5 mV, and a polydispersity index (PdI) of ≤0.3 (Table 1). The ZP and PdI values of different samples were not significantly different.

2.2. Protein Loading Efficiency of the Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops erythromelas Venoms

The snake venom proteins were loaded into the nanoparticles using an incorporation method in which the proteins were dissolved in the TPP solution. The proteins did not impair the formation of the chitosan nanoparticles, which occurred spontaneously during the dropwise addition of TPP into the chitosan solution.
The successful production of cross-linked nanoparticles was confirmed by their average particle size. A slight increase in particle size occurred with the addition of venoms into the system, but a small size of 200 nm was maintained. The CNPs loaded with both B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venom exhibited similar behaviour. All formulations had a polydispersity index of ≤0.3 (with no significant differences among the samples), and the protein loading did not change their cationic characteristics (Table 1).
The nanoparticles demonstrated a great protein loading capacity with the ability to maintain a particle size of approximately 200 nm for all of the different venom and chitosan ratios used. The data showed an encapsulation efficiency greater than 87% for all tested formulations containing B. erythromelas venom. For B. jararaca, the protein encapsulation efficiency reached levels greater than 67% (Table 1). Electrophoresis assays of protein-free nanoparticles and protein-loaded nanoparticles were used to visualize these protein loading events.
The protein profiles of the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms as well as the distinct protein-loaded cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles were analysed by SDS-PAGE and are shown in Figure 1. The B. jararaca (BJ) and B. erythromelas (BE) venom protein fractions were distributed within a molecular mass range of approximately 14 to 66.4 kDa. A pool of proteins was characterized for medium to low molecular weight proteins. Highlighting the bands between 55.5 and 42.7 kDa, as well as those at 14.3 and 6.5 kDa, was possible in both venoms analysed. Comparing the electrophoretic profiles of the protein-free nanoparticles, the free venom proteins (BJ and BE), and the protein-loaded nanoparticles with the B. jararaca protein-loaded nanoparticles (CNPs/BJ 5 and CNPs/BJ 10) and the B. erythromelas protein-loaded nanoparticles (CNPs/BE 5 and CNPs/BE 10) demonstrated the ability of the CNPs to be a nanocarrier for the examined negatively charged proteins. The bands of venom proteins were not detected in the nanoparticle samples, thus confirming formation of venom protein–nanoparticle complexes (Figure 1, lanes CNPs/BJ 5, CNPs/BJ 10, CNPs/BE 5, CNPs/BE 10 and CNPs). These results reinforce the high protein–nanoparticle loading capacity of the CNPs.
The morphology of the nanoparticles and protein-loaded nanoparticles was examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Their surfaces and aspects are shown in Figure 2; they presented a size of approximately 200 nm with a spherical shape, homogeneous aspect, rough surface, and great encapsulation efficiency.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy analyses were used to evaluate the interactions between chitosan and the venom proteins. This evaluation was based on the fact that this interaction leads to frequency shifts or absorption band splitting [21]. Figure 3 shows the spectra recorded for the CNPs and protein–protein nanoparticles containing distinct snake venoms loaded at a 10% w/w concentration. In the analysis of the CNPs, N-H bending and C=O stretching of amide groups were observed at 1561 and 1649 cm−1, respectively, indicating pure chitosan [53]. Moreover, the higher intensity of these bands in the CNPs/BJ and CNPs/BE is due to the formation of new amide interactions by ionic gelation. This fact is further supported by the remarkable P=O band stretching at 1214 cm−1 and the P-O-P stretching at 892 cm−1, which is characteristic of TPP [53,54]. These characteristic intermolecular interactions have been established in previous studies of ionic gelation and are due to chitosan chain cross-linking [55,56]. The protein-loaded nanoparticle sample had C=O bands of increased intensity for the carbonyl groups of the secondary amides (1651 cm−1) and primary amides (1540 cm−1) of proteins.

2.3. Stability Assay

The physical stability of the protein-loaded nanoparticles and protein-free nanoparticles was assessed using samples stored at 4 ± 2 °C for 40 days (Figure 4). Particle size measurements, which were taken every 5 days, revealed the incredible performance of the protein-loaded CNPs. Venom loading improved the stability of the CNPs, as nanoparticles without added venom began to increase in size after the fifth day (*** p < 0.001). No differences were observed among the protein-loaded nanoparticle formulations.

2.4. Antibody Titres

Mice were immunized subcutaneously for 6 weeks with 100 µL of each snake venom at concentrations of 5.0 or 10.0% (w/w), encapsulated in CNPs or associated with AH [21]. One week after booster vaccination, serum was obtained via ocular plexus blood collection. The serum samples were subjected to serial dilutions with a standard diluent (PBS/0.1% w/w BSA), starting at a dilution of 1:6400 and continuing to 1:204,800, and the antibody titres were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The antibody titres were detected in the serum of mice immunized with venom from both snakes, B. jararaca (Figure 5A) and B. erythromelas (Figure 5B), up to the 1:102,400 dilution. These results were statistically equal to those of the AH immunized groups and demonstrated that the nanoparticles can stimulate refined and high titres of production even at low concentrations. Similar results were found in experiments performed with cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles loaded with protein from the scorpion Tityus serrulatus [21].

3. Discussion

In the present study, cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles were successfully produced using the established parameters of the ionic gelation technique. Chitosan nanoparticles containing B. jararaca or B. erythromelas venom formed spontaneously when a solution of protein and TPP was added to a chitosan solution. In the incorporation process, the proteins are entrapped and embedded into the chitosan–protein matrix, with some protein molecules also adsorbing to the particle surface [51,57]. This phenomenon explains the high encapsulation efficiency of nanoparticles of <200 nm, even after the addition of snake venom. This fact is further supported by the intermolecular interactions of the carboxyl groups from proteins with the free amine groups of chitosan observed in the FT-IR spectra. These specific interactions can be monitored by the enhancement of the intensities of these bands in the spectra of protein-loaded nanoparticles. The ionic gelation technique has been successfully applied to obtained chitosan nanoparticles for medical proposes, such as anti-staphylococci agents [58] and letrozole delivery (anticancer drug) [59].
Loading protein into nanoparticles preserves their physical stability by keeping their average diameter in the nanometre range and their particle size distribution uniform for parenteral administration [60]. Their characteristics, including an average size of 167.5 nm, a zeta potential of +24.5 mV, and a polydispersity index of ≤0.3, are in accordance with other chitosan nanoparticles obtained in other studies. Costa et al. (2017) reported an average size of 244 (±11.64) nm with a polydispersity index of 0.358 and a zeta potential of +17.3 9 (±1.41) mV [58]. The FT-IR spectra recorded for the chitosan nanoparticles are consistent with previously published data by our group [54]. These results confirm the presence of pure chitosan as well as new amide interactions from the ionic gelation process. Costa et al. (2017) related that chitosan–TPP crosslinking is realized through interactions between TPP and the amino groups present in chitosan, which can be confirmed by the peak at 1586 cm−1 [58]. Alterations in the NH2 bending vibration band of chitosan were also described by Gomathi and colleagues [59]. In addition, the experimental data demonstrated that the electrostatic interactions of the venom proteins with chitosan also induce crosslinking, which is a barrier for rapid protein release in the medium.
The high encapsulation efficiency (greater than 87% for all tested B. erythromelas protein concentrations) observed for the cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles can be attributed to venom dissolution in the TTP solution. Thus, these venom proteins are fully trapped inside the polymer nanomatrix at the instant of nanoparticle cross-linking. Furthermore, that Bothrops venom has negatively charged peptides [9,61] can also explain the high loading efficiency. These results demonstrate the substantial ability of the optimized nanoparticle formulation to carry negatively charged proteins, maintaining colloidal stability, which is not common for particle-encapsulated proteins. The 3D conformational structure of nanoparticles is complex and dependent on environmental conditions, such as pH, ionic strength, electrostatic interactions and composition. The great ability of this polymeric nanocarrier to interact with negatively charged biomolecules is due to the cationic character of chitosan [54,60,62].
An effective polymeric nanocarrier should be able to condense DNA or protein to protect against denaturation [63]. This ability of cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles was confirmed for distinct proteins via the gel retardation assay. The data revealed that when nanoparticle–protein complexes formed, the protein bands were no longer visible, indicating entrapment of the venom protein in the polymeric matrix.
The increased physical stability of the CNPs induced by protein loading suggests a possible perturbation of the electrostatic interactions among the positively charged groups of chitosan during the formation of nanoparticles that resulted in further steric stabilization [47,51].
A suitable antigen-presenting system is required for vaccine success and is directly related to the adjuvant or vehicle used [48]. The treatment for envenomation by bothropic species includes antiophidic serum administration. Although this approach has been efficient, studies must be performed to identify a less toxic adjuvant that is able to induce antibody titres greater than those produced by the already established approach.
Mice were immunized with the chitosan nanoparticle or AH adjuvant alone or in conjunction with B. jararaca or B. erythromelas venom. In terms of immune protection, the data revealed that animals immunized with CNPs cross-linked with B. erythromelas venom at concentrations of 5.0 or 10.0% were statistically equal when compared with the antibody titres of groups vaccinated with the adjuvant AH and the venom at the same concentrations. For animals immunized with CNPs loaded with B. erythromelas venom, the antibody titres were not significantly different when compared with those of the AH groups immunized with the same venom. The application of CNPs as an immunoadjuvant in vaccines can support an efficient immune response and may lead to antibody production similar to that induced by aluminium hydroxide. However, this polymer displays the advantage of being less inflammatory or non-inflammatory and provides modified antigen release, which promotes greater antibody titres in serum with the administration of a smaller amount of antigen.
The experimental data demonstrated that chitosan nanoparticles can induce antibody production equivalent to that of AH, reinforcing data previously published by our group [21]. Other studies have shown efficient immunization using CNPs; for example, the strong adjuvant effect of γ-PGA and chitosan nanoparticles for toxin B from Clostridium difficile was reported [64]. Thus, chitosan nanoparticles provide an efficient and secure approach for the delivery of peptides/proteins from snake venom.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Chitosan (85% deacetylated; molecular weight, 90–190 kDa), AH, and TTP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich® (Saint Louis, MO, USA). The B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms were kindly supplied by the Butantan Institute in São Paulo. The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Protein Assay kits were purchased from Pierce (Woburn, MA, USA), and the Mouse IgG total ELISA kits were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). All other reagents and solvents used were of analytical grade.

4.2. Cross-Linked Chitosan Nanoparticles

The cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles used for the incorporation of the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms were acquired using the ionic gelation technique. A solution of 0.1% w/v TPP in water obtained by reverse osmosis (<1.3 µS cm−1) was added dropwise to chitosan (0.1% w/v in 0.175% w/v acetic acid) under magnetic stirring. After an opalescent suspension spontaneously formed, the mix was maintained under agitation at room temperature for 30 min.

4.3. Loading of the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas Venoms into Cross-Linked Chitosan Nanoparticles

To load protein into the chitosan nanoparticles, different amounts of proteins (B. jararaca or B. erythromelas venoms) in different proportions (5, 10 and 15% w/w) were solubilized in the TPP solution in a pre-mixing procedure under magnetic stirring (700 rpm) in a thermostatized bath at 20 ± 2 °C [51]. These solutions containing TPP and each specific protein sample were titrated into the copolymer solution using the same optimized procedure described above to obtain cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles. Protein-free nanoparticles were also produced to evaluate the effect of protein loading on the physio-chemical properties of the particles. All experimental procedures were carried out in triplicate, and the data is expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

4.4. Protein-Loading Efficiency Assay

Distinct samples of protein-loaded (with the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms) cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles were carefully transferred to 1.5-mL centrifuge tubes and then centrifuged at 20,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration of each supernatant was analysed using a BCA Protein Assay Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated using Equation (1) [47,60]. All analyses were carried out in triplicate, and the data isexpressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
EE % = ( T o t a l   p r o t e i n − supernatant   protein ) T o t a l   p r o t e i n × 100

4.5. Electrophoresis

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was used to determine the protein profiles of the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms and their resultant protein-loaded cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles. For this, a mini-gel electrophoresis system (Mini-Protean® II, BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) was used [65]. The migration of a standard protein mixture (Gibco-BRL Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was used to determine the relative molecular masses of the test proteins. The obtained gels were stained with a solution of Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 [66].

4.6. Physicochemical Properties of the Nanoparticles

Scanning electronic microscopy images (SSX550, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, SPM-9700, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) were used to assess the shape and surface aspects of the nanoparticles. For the AFM analysis, one drop of each nanoparticle dispersion was placed on a washed microscope slide and dried under a desiccator for 24 h prior to observation. The measurements were performed at room temperature in cantilever non-contact mode.
The physicochemical properties of the CNPs such as their zeta potential (ZP) and polydispersity index (PdI) were determined. The potential of the slipping/shear plane of a colloid particle moving under an electric field corresponds to the ZP. The electric double layer (EDL) of electrophoretically mobile particles and the layer of dispersant around them show different potential, which is the ZP [67]. The PdI provides information about the homogeneity of the particle size distribution in a sample [68].
Particle size measurements of distinct nanoparticles were assessed at 25 °C using a cumulative method of analysis in which the intensity of the light scattered (DLS) was measured in a particle size analyser (Zeta Plus-Brookhaven Instruments, New York, NY, USA) at a wavelength of 659 nm with a 90° detection angle. The correlation was run in parallel mode, and data was analysed using Zeta Plus® Particle Sizing version 3.95 software. Zeta potential (ZP) measurements were performed using the same equipment by applying a field strength approximately 5.9 V cm−1. Five runs were performed for each sample to determine the ZP value with PALS Zeta Potential Analyser software using electrophoretic mobility according to the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski equation. The samples were diluted 1:100 (v/v) with purified water. All measurements were carried out in triplicate, and the data is expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) [21,54].
Fourier transformed infrared absorption spectra (FT-IR) were recorded using a Prestige 21 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Spectra of cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles were compared with protein-loaded cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles containing the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms. The samples were dried using a Centrivap Labconco speed vacuum concentrator (Kansas City, MO, USA), mixed with potassium bromide (KBr) in a melting pot and then compressed in hydraulic press. The weight ratio between the powder and KBr was approximately 1:200 w/w [21,54].

4.7. Stability Assay

Samples of protein-loaded nanoparticles containing the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms (5 and 10% w/w) were stored at 20 ± 2 °C for 40 days; every 5 days, the particle diameters were assessed at 25 °C using a cumulative method of analysis in which the intensity of the light scattered (DLS) was measured in a particle size analyser (Zeta Plus-Brookhaven Instruments, New York, NY, USA) at a wavelength of 659 nm with a 90° detection angle. The correlation was run in parallel mode, and the data was analysed using Zeta Plus® Particle Sizing version 3.95 software.

4.8. Animals

Male and female BALB/c mice (25–35 g, 6–8 weeks of age) were received from the “Animal Facility at the Center for Health Sciences” at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). The animals were kept under controlled temperature (22 ± 2 °C) conditions with free access to commercial feed and water ad libitum, and they spent at least one week in the experimental room prior to the adaptation test. The animal care and experimental assays were performed in accordance with the guidelines established for the care of laboratory animals (Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Protocol No: 003/2012; 18 April 2012).

4.9. Immunization

One hundred microliters of the B. jararaca and B. erythromelas venoms at different concentrations (5 or 10% w/w) cross-linked with the CNPs or combined with AH were used to immunize the animals. Immunization was performed six times, once per week, via the subcutaneous administration of the test compounds in the lumbar region (bilaterally) [21]. As a control, animals were immunized with the adjuvants in the absence of either venom.

4.10. Serum Production

Blood samples were treated for clot retraction. Initially, samples were kept at 37 °C for 30 min. After this step, the samples were incubated at 4 °C for 2 h and then centrifuged at 15,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The serum (supernatant) was collected and maintained at −20 °C [21].

4.11. Serum Antibody Responses

Serum samples were subjected to serial dilutions with a standard diluent (phosphate buffer saline (PBS)/ 0.1% w/w bovine serum albumin (BSA)), starting at a 1:25 dilution and continuing to 1:204,800, and antigen-specific serum antibody reactions were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).
The ELISA assays were performed using the protocol described by Fernandes-Pedrosa in 2002 [69]. Each plate was sensitized with 100 μL/well of a venom solution (10 µg/mL w/v), followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C. After, the wells were washed (PBS solution), blocked with 100 μL of blocking solution (PBS/5% w/w BSA), and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The blocking solution was discarded, and 100 μL/well of each pre-diluted serum sample in PBS/0.1% w/w BSA were added and then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing three times, conjugated-antibodies were added (100 μL/well), and the plate was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the plate was washed, and 50 μL/well of diluted detection antibodies were added, followed by incubation at room temperature for 3 h. The plate was then washed again, the substrate was added, and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Finally, the plate was read at 450 nm in a microplate reader.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were carried out using Student’s t tests or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s tests using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 (San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in the mean values with *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 or * p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

Data presented here demonstrates that cross-linked CNPs obtained via an ionic gelation technique presented high efficiency encapsulation for all formulations, which was confirmed by electrophoretic profiling and encapsulation efficiency assays. The nanoparticles were highly stabile for 40 days, and the addition of venom to the nanoparticles improved their stability. Considering the antibody levels produced, the results demonstrate that CNPs perform equivalent to or better than AH as an immunoadjuvant, yet chitosan is a less inflammatory biopolymer that requires a smaller dose of antigen, likely due to its modified release. This study presents a new immunization adjuvant approach for snake venom that could be applied to obtain polyclonal serum. As a follow-up to the development of this approach, our research group intends to use the CNPs in large mammals to evaluate the scaled-up production of antivenom serum. This system could be used in the future to obtain pharmaceutical composites that are very useful for public health.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all participants for their valuable time and commitment to the study. This research was supported by grants from the CNPq as well as financial support from FAPERN (PRONEM/2011) and CAPES (Toxinology/2010). Matheus de Freitas Fernandes-Pedrosa, Arnóbio Antônio da Silva-Júnior and Denise Vilarinho Tambourgi are researchers at the CNPq.

Author Contributions

Karla Samara Rocha Soares, Arnóbio Antônio da Silva-Júnior, and Matheus de Freitas Fernandes-Pedrosa conceived and designed the experiments. Karla Samara Rocha Soares, Fiamma Gláucia-Silva, Alessandra Daniele-Silva, Manoela Torres-Rêgo, Yamara Arruda Silva de Menezes, and Igor Zumba Damasceno performed the experiments. Igor Zumba Damasceno, Denise Vilarinho Tambourgi, Arnóbio Antônio da Silva-Júnior, and Matheus de Freitas Fernandes-Pedrosa contributed the reagents, materials, and/or analytical tools. Karla Samara Rocha Soares, Manoela Torres-Rêgo, and Nathália Kelly de Araújo wrote the manuscript. Manoela Torres-Rêgo, Nathália Kelly de Araújo, and Matheus de Freitas Fernandes-Pedrosa refined the manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dharmadasa, R.M.; Akalanka, G.C.; Muthukumarana, P.R.M.; Wijesekara, R.G.S. Ethnopharmacological survey on medicinal plants used in snakebite treatments in Western and Sabaragamuwa provinces in Sri Lanka. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 179, 110–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gutierrez, J.M.; Lomonte, B.; Sanz, L.; Calvete, J.J.; Pla, D. Immunological profile of antivenoms: Preclinical analysis of the efficacy of a polyspecific antivenom through antivenomics and neutralization assays. J. Proteom. 2014, 105, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Karabuva, S.; Vrkić, I.; Brizić, I.; Ivić, I.; Lukšić, B. Venomous snakebites in children in southern Croatia. Toxicon 2016, 112, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kasturiratne, A.; Wickremasinghe, A.R.; De Silva, N.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Premaratna, R.; Savioli, L.; Lalloo, D.G.; De Silva, H.J. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gonçalves-Machado, L.; Pla, D.; Sanz, L.; Jorge, R.J.B.; Leitão-De-Araújo, M.; Alves, M.L.M.; Alvares, D.J.; De Miranda, J.; Nowatzki, J.; de Morais-Zani, K.; et al. Combined venomics, venom gland transcriptomics, bioactivities, and antivenomics of two Bothrops jararaca populations from geographic isolated regions within the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. J. Proteom. 2016, 135, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fenwick, A.M.; Greene, H.W.; Parkinson, C.L. The serpent and the egg: Unidirectional evolution of reproductive mode in vipers? J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2012, 50, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oliveira, F.N.; Brito, M.T.; de Morais, I.C.O.; Fook, S.M.L.; de Albuquerque, H.N. Accidents caused by Bothrops and Bothropoides in the State of Paraiba: Epidemiological and clinical aspects. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2010, 43, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lira-da-silva, R.M.; Mise, Y.F.; Casais-e-silva, L.L.; Ulloa, J.; Hamdan, B.; Brazil, T.K. Serpentes de importância médica do nordeste do Brasil. Gazeta Médica da Bahia 2009, 79, 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Delafontaine, M.; Villas-Boas, I.M.; Mathieu, L.; Josset, P.; Blomet, J.; Tambourgi, D.V. Enzymatic and pro-inflammatory activities of Bothrops lanceolatus venom: Relevance for envenomation. Toxins (Basel) 2017, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jorge, R.J.B.; Monteiro, H.S.A.; Gonçalves-Machado, L.; Guarnieri, M.C.; Ximenes, R.M.; Borges-Nojosa, D.M.; Luna, K.P.d.O.; Zingali, R.B.; Corrêa-Netto, C.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; et al. Venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops erythromelas from five geographic populations within the Caatinga ecoregion of northeastern Brazil. J. Proteom. 2015, 114, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zychar, B.C.; Dale, C.S.; Demarchi, D.S.; Gonçalves, L.R.C. Contribution of metalloproteases, serine proteases and phospholipases A2 to the inflammatory reaction induced by Bothrops jararaca crude venom in mice. Toxicon 2010, 55, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gutierrez, J.M.; Lomonte, B. Efectos Locales en el Envenenamiento Ofídico en America Latina. In Animais Peçonhentos No Brasil; Sarvier: Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2003; pp. 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Freitas-de-sousa, L.A.; Colombini, M.; Lopes-Ferreira, M.; Serrano, S.M.T.; Moura-da-silva, A.M. Insights into the mechanisms involved in strong hemorrhage and dermonecrosis induced by atroxlysin-Ia, a PI-class snake venom metalloproteinase. Toxins (Basel) 2017, 9, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bjarnason, J.B.; Fox, J.W. Hemorrhagic Metalloproteinases from Snake-Venoms. Pharmacol. Ther. 1994, 62, 325–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Serrano, S.M.T.; Maroun, R.C. Snake venom serine proteinases: Sequence homology vs. substrate specificity, a paradox to be solved. Toxicon 2005, 45, 1115–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferreira, F.B.; Gomes, M.S.R.; de Souza, D.L.N.; Gimenes, S.N.C.; Castanheira, L.E.; Borges, M.H.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Yoneyama, K.A.G.; Brandeburgo, M.I.H.; Rodrigues, V.M. Molecular cloning and pharmacological properties of an acidic PLA2 from Bothrops pauloensis snake venom. Toxins (Basel) 2013, 5, 2403–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Oguiura, N.; Kapronezai, J.; Ribeiro, T.; Rocha, M.M.T.; Medeiros, C.R.; Marcelino, J.R.; Prezoto, B.C. An alternative micromethod to access the procoagulant activity of Bothrops jararaca venom and the efficacy of antivenom. Toxicon 2014, 90, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Espino-Solis, G.P.; Riaño-Umbarila, L.; Becerril, B.; Possani, L.D. Antidotes against venomous animals: State of the art and prospectives. J. Proteom. 2009, 72, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alvarenga, L.M.; Zahid, M.; Tommaso, A.D.; Juste, M.O.; Aubrey, N.; Billiald, P.; Muzard, J. Engineering venom’s toxin-neutralizing antibody fragments and its therapeutic potential. Toxins (Basel) 2014, 6, 2541–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Faioli, C.N.; Domingos, T.F.S.; de Oliveira, E.C.; Sanchez, E.F.; Ribeiro, S.; Muricy, G.; Fuly, A.L. Appraisal of antiophidic potential of marine sponges against Bothrops jararaca and Lachesis muta venom. Toxins (Basel) 2013, 5, 1799–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rocha Soares, K.S.; Fonseca, J.L.C.; Bitencourt, M.A.O.; Santos, K.S.C.R.; Silva-Júnior, A.A.; Fernandes-Pedrosa, M.F. Serum production against Tityus serrulatus scorpion venom using cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles as immunoadjuvant. Toxicon 2012, 60, 1349–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gupta, R.K.; Siber, G.R. Adjuvants for human vaccines-current status, problems and future prospects. Vaccine 1995, 13, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X.; Aldayel, A.M.; Cui, Z. Aluminum hydroxide nanoparticles show a stronger vaccine adjuvant activity than traditional aluminum hydroxide microparticles. J. Control. Release 2014, 173, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gherardi, R.K. Lessons from macrophagic myofasciitis: Towards definition of a vaccine adjuvant-related syndrome. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 2003, 159, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Petrovsky, N.; Aguilar, J.C. Special Feature Vaccine adjuvants: Current state and future trends. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2004, 82, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. prasanth Koppolu, B.; Smith, S.G.; Ravindranathan, S.; Jayanthi, S.; Suresh Kumar, T.K.; Zaharoff, D.A. Controlling chitosan-based encapsulation for protein and vaccine delivery. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 4382–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zaharoff, D.A.; Rogers, C.J.; Hance, K.W.; Schlom, J.; Greiner, J.W. Chitosan solution enhances the immunoadjuvant properties of GM-CSF. Vaccine 2007, 25, 8673–8686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bergfors, E.; Trollfors, B.; Inerot, A. Unexpectedly high incidence of persistent itching nodules and delayed hypersensitivity to aluminium in children after the use of adsorbed vaccines from a single manufacturer. Vaccine 2003, 22, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bansal, V.; Kumar, M.; Dalela, M.; Brahmne, H.G.; Singh, H. Evaluation of synergistic effect of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles and aluminum based adjuvant for improving vaccine efficacy. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 471, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Aguilar, J.C.; Rodriguez, E.G. Vaccine adjuvants revisited. Vaccine 2007, 25, 3752–3762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gupta, R.K.; Rost, B.E.; Relyveld, E.; Siber, G.R. Adjuvant Properties of Aluminum and Calcium Compounds. Pharm Biotechnol. 2000, 6, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nait Mohamed, F.A.; Laraba-Djebari, F. Development and characterization of a new carrier for vaccine delivery based on calcium-alginate nanoparticles: Safe immunoprotective approach against scorpion envenoming. Vaccine 2016, 34, 2692–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gupta, R.; Mohanty, S. Nanoparticle formulation having ability to control the release of protein for drug delivery application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, Y.; Du, Y. Effect of molecular structure of chitosan on protein delivery properties of chitosan nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 250, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Janes, K.A.; Calvo, P.; Alonso, M.J. Polysaccharide colloidal particles as delivery systems for macromolecules. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mohammadpourdounighi, N.; Behfar, A.; Ezabadi, A.; Zolfagharian, H.; Heydari, M. Preparation of chitosan nanoparticles containing Naja naja oxiana snake venom, Nanomedicine Nanotechnology. Biol. Med. 2010, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McClements, D.J. Encapsulation, protection, and delivery of bioactive proteins and peptides using nanoparticle and microparticle systems: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 253, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Calvo, P.; Remunan-Lopez, C. Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 63, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sinha, R. Nanotechnology in cancer therapeutics: bioconjugated nanoparticles for drug delivery. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Scherließ, R.; Buske, S.; Young, K.; Weber, B.; Rades, T.; Hook, S. In vivo evaluation of chitosan as an adjuvant in subcutaneous vaccine formulations. Vaccine 2013, 31, 4812–4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rampino, A.; Borgogna, M.; Blasi, P.; Bellich, B.; Cesàro, A. Chitosan nanoparticles: Preparation, size evolution and stability. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 455, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Borges, O.; Silva, M.; de Sousa, A.; Borchard, G.; Junginger, H.E.; Cordeiro-da-Silva, A. Alginate coated chitosan nanoparticles are an effective subcutaneous adjuvant for hepatitis B surface antigen. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2008, 8, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ramesh Kumar, D.; Saravana Kumar, P.; Gandhi, M.R.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Paulraj, M.G.; Ignacimuthu, S. Delivery of chitosan/dsRNA nanoparticles for silencing of wing development vestigial (vg) gene in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Qi, L.; Xu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Hu, C.; Zou, X. Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 2693–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Anandhakumar, S.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Ramkumar, K.M.; Raichur, A.M. Preparation of collagen peptide functionalized chitosan nanoparticles by ionic gelation method: An effective carrier system for encapsulation and release of doxorubicin for cancer drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tavares, I.S.; Caroni, A.L.P.F.; Neto, A.A.D.; Pereira, M.R.; Fonseca, J.L.C. Surface charging and dimensions of chitosan coacervated nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 90, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gan, Q.; Wang, T.; Cochrane, C.; McCarron, P. Modulation of surface charge, particle size and morphological properties of chitosan-TPP nanoparticles intended for gene delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2005, 44, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xie, Y.; Zhou, N.J.; Gong, Y.F.; Zhou, X.J.; Chen, J.; Hu, S.J.; Lu, N.H.; Hou, X.H. Th immune response induced by H. pylori vaccine with chitosan as adjuvant and its relation to immune protection. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhiming, H.; Sinha, R.; McNeela, E.A.; Borrow, R.; Giemza, R.; Cosgrove, C.; Heath, P.T.; Mills, K.H.G.; Rappuoli, R.; Griffin, G.E.; et al. Induction of protective serum meningococcal bactericidal and diphtheria-neutralizing antibodies and mucosal immunoglobulin A in volunteers by nasal insufflations of the Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C polysaccharide-CRM197 conjugate vaccine mixed with. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 8256–8265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Prego, C.; Paolicelli, P.; Díaz, B.; Vicente, S.; Sánchez, A.; González-Fernández, Á.; Alonso, M.J. Chitosan-based nanoparticles for improving immunization against hepatitis B infection. Vaccine 2010, 28, 2607–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gan, Q.; Wang, T. Chitosan nanoparticle as protein delivery carrier-Systematic examination of fabrication conditions for efficient loading and release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 59, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pan, Y.; Li, Y.J.; Zhao, H.Y.; Zheng, J.M.; Xu, H.; Wei, G.; Hao, J.S.; De Cui, F. Bioadhesive polysaccharide in protein delivery system: Chitosan nanoparticles improve the intestinal absorption of insulin in vivo. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 249, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Antoniou, J.; Liu, F.; Majeed, H.; Qi, J.; Yokoyama, W.; Zhong, F. Aspects Physicochemical and morphological properties of size-controlled chitosan—Tripolyphosphate nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. 2015, 465, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rocha Soares, K.S.; AOliveira, R.; Daniele-Silva, A.; Glaucia-Silva, F.; Caroni, A.L.P.; Fernandes-Pedrosa, M.F.; da Silva-Júnior, A.A. Self-assembled scorpion venom proteins cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles for use in the immunotherapy. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 241, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Papadimitriou, S.; Bikiaris, D.; Avgoustakis, K.; Karavas, E.; Georgarakis, M. Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with dorzolamide and pramipexole. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 73, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rodrigues, S.; Da Costa, A.M.R.; Grenha, A. Chitosan/carrageenan nanoparticles: Effect of cross-linking with tripolyphosphate and charge ratios. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hamidi, M.; Azadi, A.; Rafiei, P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1638–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Costa, E.M.; Silva, S.; Vicente, S.; Neto, C.; Castro, P.M.; Veiga, M.; Madureira, R.; Tavaria, F.; Pintado, M.M. Chitosan nanoparticles as alternative anti-staphylococci agents: Bactericidal, antibiofilm and antiadhesive effects. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 79, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gomathi, T.; Sudha, P.N.; Florence, J.A.K.; Venkatesan, J.; Anil, S. Fabrication of letrozole formulation using chitosan nanoparticles through ionic gelation method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 104, 1820–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mesquita, P.C.; dos Santos-Silva, E.; Streck, L.; Damasceno, I.Z.; Maia, A.M.S.; Fernandes-Pedrosa, M.F.; da Silva-Júnior, A.A. Cationic functionalized biocompatible polylactide nanoparticles for slow release of proteins, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 513, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Silva, M.C.; Silva, T.L.; Silva, M.V.; Mota, C.M.; Santiago, F.M.; Fonseca, K.C.; Oliveira, F.; Mineo, T.W.P.; Mineo, J.R. Interaction between TNF and BmooMP-Alpha-I, a Zinc Metalloprotease Derived from Bothrops moojeni Snake Venom, Promotes Direct Proteolysis of This Cytokine: Molecular Modeling and Docking at a Glance. Toxins (Basel) 2016, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Leong, K.W.; Mao, H.Q.; Truong-Le, V.L.; Roy, K.; Walsh, S.M.; August, J.T. DNA-polycation nanospheres as non-viral gene delivery vehicles. J. Control. Release 1998, 53, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Son, S.; Kim, W.J. Biodegradable nanoparticles modified by branched polyethylenimine for plasmid DNA delivery. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, Y.-W.; Chen, Y.-H.; Chen, J.-W.; Tsai, P.-J.; Huang, I.-H. Immunization with Recombinant TcdB-Encapsulated Nanocomplex Induces Protection against Clostridium difficile Challenge in a Mouse Model. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Morrissey, J.H. Silver stains for proteins in polyacrylamide gels: A modified procedure with enhanced sensitivity. Anal. Biochem. 1981, 117, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bhattacharjee, S. DLS and zeta potential—What they are and what they are not? J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Nemen, D.; Lemos-Senna, E. Preparação e caracterização de suspensões coloidais de nanocarreadores lipídicos contendo resveratrol destinados à administração cutânea. Química Nova 2011, 34, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pedrosa, M.D.; de Azevedo, I.D.; Gonçalves-de-Andrade, R.M.; van den Berg, C.W.; Ramos, C.R.; Ho, P.L.; Tambourgi, D.V. Molecular cloning and expression of a functional dermonecrotic and haemolytic factor from Loxosceles laeta venom. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 298, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 10 00158 g001 550
Figure 1. Electrophoretic profile of Bothrops jararaca venom at 10% (BJ), chitosan nanoparticles with Bothrops jararaca at 5% (CNPs/BJ 5) and 10% (CNPs/BJ 10), Bothrops erythromelas venom at 10% (BE), chitosan nanoparticles with Bothrops erythromelas venom at 5% (CNPs/BE 5) and 10% (CNPs/BE 10), and CNPs.
Figure 1. Electrophoretic profile of Bothrops jararaca venom at 10% (BJ), chitosan nanoparticles with Bothrops jararaca at 5% (CNPs/BJ 5) and 10% (CNPs/BJ 10), Bothrops erythromelas venom at 10% (BE), chitosan nanoparticles with Bothrops erythromelas venom at 5% (CNPs/BE 5) and 10% (CNPs/BE 10), and CNPs.
Toxins 10 00158 g001
Toxins 10 00158 g002 550
Figure 2. 2D and 3D atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy images of Bothrops protein-loaded chitosan nanoparticle formulations. (A) Protein-free chitosan nanoparticles, (B) Bothrops jararaca protein-loaded chitosan nanoparticles at a concentration of 10% and (C) Bothrops erythromelas protein-loaded chitosan nanoparticles at a concentration of 10%.
Figure 2. 2D and 3D atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy images of Bothrops protein-loaded chitosan nanoparticle formulations. (A) Protein-free chitosan nanoparticles, (B) Bothrops jararaca protein-loaded chitosan nanoparticles at a concentration of 10% and (C) Bothrops erythromelas protein-loaded chitosan nanoparticles at a concentration of 10%.
Toxins 10 00158 g002
Toxins 10 00158 g003 550
Figure 3. Infrared spectroscopy of CNPs, chitosan nanoparticles loaded with Bothrops jararaca venom protein (CNPs/BJ) and chitosan nanoparticles loaded with Bothrops erythromelas venom protein (CNPs/BE).
Figure 3. Infrared spectroscopy of CNPs, chitosan nanoparticles loaded with Bothrops jararaca venom protein (CNPs/BJ) and chitosan nanoparticles loaded with Bothrops erythromelas venom protein (CNPs/BE).
Toxins 10 00158 g003
Toxins 10 00158 g004 550
Figure 4. Evaluation of the stability of cross-linked chitosan nanoparticle samples loaded with Bothrops jararaca or Bothrops erythromelas venom (5% and 10% w/w). *** p < 0.001 compared to the size of the CNPs on day 1. CNPs: protein-free chitosan nanoparticles; CNPs/BE 5: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. erythromelas protein at a concentration of 5%; CNPs/BE 10: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. erythromelas protein at a concentration of 10%; CNPs/BJ 5: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. jararaca protein at a concentration of 5%; CNPs/BJ 10: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. jararaca protein at a concentration of 10%.
Figure 4. Evaluation of the stability of cross-linked chitosan nanoparticle samples loaded with Bothrops jararaca or Bothrops erythromelas venom (5% and 10% w/w). *** p < 0.001 compared to the size of the CNPs on day 1. CNPs: protein-free chitosan nanoparticles; CNPs/BE 5: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. erythromelas protein at a concentration of 5%; CNPs/BE 10: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. erythromelas protein at a concentration of 10%; CNPs/BJ 5: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. jararaca protein at a concentration of 5%; CNPs/BJ 10: chitosan nanoparticles loaded with B. jararaca protein at a concentration of 10%.
Toxins 10 00158 g004
Toxins 10 00158 g005 550
Figure 5. Evaluation of antibody titres from mice immunized subcutaneously for 6 weeks with Bothrops jararaca (A) or Bothrops erythromelas (B) venom at concentrations of 5.0 or 10.0% encapsulated in CNPs or associated with AH, as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Figure 5. Evaluation of antibody titres from mice immunized subcutaneously for 6 weeks with Bothrops jararaca (A) or Bothrops erythromelas (B) venom at concentrations of 5.0 or 10.0% encapsulated in CNPs or associated with AH, as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Toxins 10 00158 g005
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of different cross-linked nanoparticles containing B. jararaca (BJ) and B. erythromelas (BE) venoms at concentrations of 5, 10, and 15%.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of different cross-linked nanoparticles containing B. jararaca (BJ) and B. erythromelas (BE) venoms at concentrations of 5, 10, and 15%.
SampleSize (nm)Zeta Potential (mV)PdIEncapsulation Efficiency (%)
CNPs159.6 ± 2.224.50 ± 3.640.272 ± 0.01-
CNPs/BJ 5179.3 ± 9.4 **23.03 ± 3.090.188 ± 0.0876.7
CNPs/BJ 10174.7 ± 5.0 **24.91 ± 2.910.203 ± 0.0767.7
CNPs/BJ 15187.3 ± 7.5 ***31.40 ± 3.860.185 ± 0.0774.0
CNPs/BE 5189.4 ± 1.0 ***20.71 ± 2.930.305 ± 0.0597.2
CNPs/BE 10160.0 ± 2.319.00 ± 2.760.302 ± 0.0187.6
CNPs/BE 15200.3 ± 5.6 ***27.21 ± 1.500.328 ± 0.0588.1
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.), n = 3; *** p < 0.001 and ** p < 0.01 for the venom-group compared to the CNP group.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soares, K.S.R.; Gláucia-Silva, F.; Daniele-Silva, A.; Torres-Rêgo, M.; Araújo, N.K.d.; Menezes, Y.A.S.d.; Damasceno, I.Z.; Tambourgi, D.V.; Da Silva-Júnior, A.A.; Fernandes-Pedrosa, M.D.F. Antivenom Production against Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops erythromelas Snake Venoms Using Cross-Linked Chitosan Nanoparticles as an Immunoadjuvant. Toxins 2018, 10, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10040158

AMA Style

Soares KSR, Gláucia-Silva F, Daniele-Silva A, Torres-Rêgo M, Araújo NKd, Menezes YASd, Damasceno IZ, Tambourgi DV, Da Silva-Júnior AA, Fernandes-Pedrosa MDF. Antivenom Production against Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops erythromelas Snake Venoms Using Cross-Linked Chitosan Nanoparticles as an Immunoadjuvant. Toxins. 2018; 10(4):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10040158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soares, Karla Samara Rocha, Fiamma Gláucia-Silva, Alessandra Daniele-Silva, Manoela Torres-Rêgo, Nathália Kelly de Araújo, Yamara Arruda Silva de Menezes, Igor Zumba Damasceno, Denise Vilarinho Tambourgi, Arnóbio Antônio Da Silva-Júnior, and Matheus De Freitas Fernandes-Pedrosa. 2018. "Antivenom Production against Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops erythromelas Snake Venoms Using Cross-Linked Chitosan Nanoparticles as an Immunoadjuvant" Toxins 10, no. 4: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10040158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop