Next Article in Journal
Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
Previous Article in Journal
Higher Dietary Cost Is Associated with Higher Diet Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study among Selected Malaysian Adults
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Nutrients 2017, 9(9), 1026; doi:10.3390/nu9091026

Insights into the Hexose Liver Metabolism—Glucose versus Fructose

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 July 2017 / Revised: 9 September 2017 / Accepted: 11 September 2017 / Published: 16 September 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3701 KB, uploaded 16 September 2017]   |  

Abstract

High-fructose intake in healthy men is associated with characteristics of metabolic syndrome. Extensive knowledge exists about the differences between hepatic fructose and glucose metabolism and fructose-specific mechanisms favoring the development of metabolic disturbances. Nevertheless, the causal relationship between fructose consumption and metabolic alterations is still debated. Multiple effects of fructose on hepatic metabolism are attributed to the fact that the liver represents the major sink of fructose. Fructose, as a lipogenic substrate and potent inducer of lipogenic enzyme expression, enhances fatty acid synthesis. Consequently, increased hepatic diacylglycerols (DAG) are thought to directly interfere with insulin signaling. However, independently of this effect, fructose may also counteract insulin-mediated effects on liver metabolism by a range of mechanisms. It may drive gluconeogenesis not only as a gluconeogenic substrate, but also as a potent inducer of carbohydrate responsive element binding protein (ChREBP), which induces the expression of lipogenic enzymes as well as gluconeogenic enzymes. It remains a challenge to determine the relative contributions of the impact of fructose on hepatic transcriptome, proteome and allosterome changes and consequently on the regulation of plasma glucose metabolism/homeostasis. Mathematical models exist modeling hepatic glucose metabolism. Future models should not only consider the hepatic adjustments of enzyme abundances and activities in response to changing plasma glucose and insulin/glucagon concentrations, but also to varying fructose concentrations for defining the role of fructose in the hepatic control of plasma glucose homeostasis. View Full-Text
Keywords: NAFLD; type 2 diabetes; fructose; glucose; insulin; ChREBP; SREBP1c; gluconeogenesis; de novo lipogenesis; triglyceride NAFLD; type 2 diabetes; fructose; glucose; insulin; ChREBP; SREBP1c; gluconeogenesis; de novo lipogenesis; triglyceride
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Geidl-Flueck, B.; Gerber, P.A. Insights into the Hexose Liver Metabolism—Glucose versus Fructose. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1026.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top