Next Article in Journal
Yerba Maté (Ilex paraguariensis) Metabolic, Satiety, and Mood State Effects at Rest and during Prolonged Exercise
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Breakfast Cereals Available in the Mexican Market: Sodium and Sugar Content
Previous Article in Journal
Diet Quality Scores of Australian Adults Who Have Completed the Healthy Eating Quiz
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Consumer Attitudes toward Broad-Based and Environment-Specific Sodium Policies—SummerStyles 2012 and 2015
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2017, 9(8), 881; doi:10.3390/nu9080881

The Healthy Eating Agenda in Australia. Is Salt a Priority for Manufacturers?

The Australian Health Policy Collaboration, College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, 300 Queen St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 June 2017 / Revised: 7 August 2017 / Accepted: 10 August 2017 / Published: 15 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reducing Dietary Sodium and Improving Human Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [246 KB, uploaded 15 August 2017]

Abstract

Many nation states have endorsed and acted on the World Health Organization’s target of a 30% reduction in global salt consumption by 2025. In Australia, new government-led voluntary measures were initiated in 2009, consisting of public–private partnerships, front-of-pack labelling, and food reformulation targets (which include reduced salt). How Australia’s private sector has responded to this healthy eating agenda has been investigated in a limited way, particularly with regards to manufacturers which produce processed foods considered significant sources of sodium. In this study we asked: have Australia’s largest food manufacturers made “…positive (nutrition) changes to their product portfolios” as disclosed in their public policies, priorities, and communications? And, is salt reduction a priority for processed food manufacturers? A systematic search and critical content-analysis of grey literature published by food manufacturers was conducted. The results suggest half of the sample publically describe some salt reduction activities but the scale and efficacy of these changes is unclear from the available literature. The Australian Government’s Healthy Food Partnership could capitalise on current documented activities in salt reduction, and implement a more comprehensive healthy eating agenda moving forward. In light of the increasing rates of hypertension, population salt consumption and diet-related disease, more could be done. View Full-Text
Keywords: salt; food policy; food reformulation; food industry salt; food policy; food reformulation; food industry
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lindberg, R.; Nichols, T.; Yam, C. The Healthy Eating Agenda in Australia. Is Salt a Priority for Manufacturers? Nutrients 2017, 9, 881.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top