Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Strawberry Genotype, Cultivation and Processing on the Fra a 1 Allergen Content
Previous Article in Journal
Curcumin in Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review of the Cellular Mechanisms of Oxidative Stress and Clinical Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Synbiotics among Constipated Adults in Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia—A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2018, 10(7), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10070856

Determining the Glycaemic Index of Standard and High-Sugar Rodent Diets in C57BL/6 Mice

1
Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 May 2018 / Revised: 23 June 2018 / Accepted: 29 June 2018 / Published: 1 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition Solutions for a Changing World)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2800 KB, uploaded 2 July 2018]   |  

Abstract

The glycaemic index (GI) is a useful tool to compare the glycaemic responses of foods. Numerous studies report the favorable effects of low GI diets on long term metabolic health compared with high GI diets. However, it has not been possible to link these effects to the GI itself because of other components such as macronutrients and dietary fibre, which are known to affect GI. This study aimed to create and evaluate isocaloric diets differing in GI independent of macronutrient and fibre content. The GIs of eight diets differing in carbohydrate source were evaluated in mice; cooked cornstarch (CC), raw cornstarch (RC), chow, maltodextrin, glucose, sucrose, isomaltulose, and fructose. A glucose control was also tested. The GIs of all eight diets were different from the GI of the glucose control (GI: 100; p < 0.0001). The GIs of the glucose (mean ± SEM: 52 ± 3), maltodextrin (52 ± 6), CC (50 ± 4), RC (50 ± 6), and chow (44 ± 4) diets were similar, while the GIs of the sucrose (31 ± 4), isomaltulose (24 ± 5), and fructose (18 ± 2) diets were lower than all other diets (p < 0.05). This is the first trial to report GI testing in vivo in mice, resulting in three main findings: chow is relatively high GI, the glucose availability of raw and cooked cornstarch is similar, and the GI of different sugar diets occur in the same rank order as in humans. View Full-Text
Keywords: glycaemic index; mice; rodent diets; sugar; carbohydrate glycaemic index; mice; rodent diets; sugar; carbohydrate
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Campbell, G.J.; Belobrajdic, D.P.; Bell-Anderson, K.S. Determining the Glycaemic Index of Standard and High-Sugar Rodent Diets in C57BL/6 Mice. Nutrients 2018, 10, 856.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top