Antarctic Sea-Ice Thickness Retrieval from ICESat: Inter-Comparison of Different Approaches
AbstractAccurate circum-Antarctic sea-ice thickness is urgently required to better understand the different sea-ice cover evolution in both polar regions. Satellite radar and laser altimetry are currently the most promising tools for sea-ice thickness retrieval. We present qualitative inter-comparisons of winter and spring circum-Antarctic sea-ice thickness computed with different approaches from Ice Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) laser altimeter total (sea ice plus snow) freeboard estimates. We find that approach A, which assumes total freeboard equals snow depth, and approach B, which uses empirical linear relationships between freeboard and thickness, provide the lowest sea-ice thickness and the smallest winter-to-spring increase in seasonal average modal and mean sea-ice thickness: A: 0.0 m and 0.04 m, B: 0.17 and 0.16 m, respectively. Approach C uses contemporary snow depth from satellite microwave radiometry, and we derive comparably large sea-ice thickness. Here we observe an unrealistically large winter-to-spring increase in seasonal average modal and mean sea-ice thickness of 0.68 m and 0.65 m, respectively, which we attribute to biases in the snow depth. We present a conceptually new approach D. It assumes that the two-layer system (sea ice, snow) can be represented by one layer. This layer has a modified density, which takes into account the influence of the snow on sea-ice buoyancy. With approach D we obtain thickness values and a winter-to-spring increase in average modal and mean sea-ice thickness of 0.17 m and 0.23 m, respectively, which lay between those of approaches B and C. We discuss retrieval uncertainty, systematic uncertainty sources, and the impact of grid resolution. We find that sea-ice thickness obtained with approaches C and D agrees best with independent sea-ice thickness information—if we take into account the potential bias of in situ and ship-based observations. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
Supplementary (ZIP, 1131 KB)
Externally hosted supplementary file 1
Description: Antarctic sea-ice thickness distribution derived from ICESat total freeboard with the SICCI and the Worby 1-layer approaches for all ICESat measurement periods between February / March 2004 through February / March 2008 as described in the paper. Each data file, which is in netCDF file format, contains latitude and longitude information, sea-ice thickness and its uncertainty, total freeboard and its uncertainty, the number of valid ICESat measurements per grid cell and measurement period, the sea-ice concentration and for the SICCI approach also the snow depth.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Kern, S.; Ozsoy-Çiçek, B.; Worby, A.P. Antarctic Sea-Ice Thickness Retrieval from ICESat: Inter-Comparison of Different Approaches. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 538.
Kern S, Ozsoy-Çiçek B, Worby AP. Antarctic Sea-Ice Thickness Retrieval from ICESat: Inter-Comparison of Different Approaches. Remote Sensing. 2016; 8(7):538.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kern, Stefan; Ozsoy-Çiçek, Burcu; Worby, Anthony P. 2016. "Antarctic Sea-Ice Thickness Retrieval from ICESat: Inter-Comparison of Different Approaches." Remote Sens. 8, no. 7: 538.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.