Next Article in Journal
Aerosol Retrievals from CALIPSO Lidar Ocean Surface Returns
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Geoarchaeological Mapping with Electromagnetic Induction Instruments from Dedicated Processing and Inversion
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Mapping of Toxic Metals in Qatari Soils Using Remote Sensing and Ancillary Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Sensor Geomagnetic Prospection: A Case Study from Neolithic Thessaly, Greece
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2016, 8(12), 1007; doi:10.3390/rs8121007

Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic

1
Cornell Tree Ring Laboratory, Department of Classics and Cornell Institute of Archaeology and Material Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
2
U.S. National Park Service, Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA
3
Histoire de l'Art et Archéologie, Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne University, Paris 75005, France
4
Department of Anthropology and Circumpolar Laboratory, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
5
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
6
U.S. National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office, Anchorage, AK 99501, USA
7
Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Kenneth L. Kvamme, Henrique Lorenzo and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 26 November 2016 / Accepted: 1 December 2016 / Published: 9 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [19381 KB, uploaded 9 December 2016]   |  

Abstract

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) offers many advantages for assessing archaeological potential in frozen and partially frozen contexts in high latitude and alpine regions. These settings pose several challenges for GPR, including extreme velocity changes at the interface of frozen and active layers, cryogenic patterns resulting in anomalies that can easily be mistaken for cultural features, and the difficulty in accessing sites and deploying equipment in remote settings. In this study we discuss some of these challenges while highlighting the potential for this method by describing recent successful investigations with GPR in the region. We draw on cases from Bering Land Bridge National Preserve, Cape Krusenstern National Monument, Kobuk Valley National Park, and Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve. The sites required small aircraft accessibility with light equipment loads and minimal personnel. The substrates we investigate include coastal saturated active layer over permafrost, interior well-drained active layer over permafrost, a frozen thermo-karst lake, and an alpine ice patch. These examples demonstrate that GPR is effective at mapping semi-subterranean house remains in several contexts, including houses with no surface manifestation. GPR is also shown to be effective at mapping anomalies from the skeletal remains of a late Pleistocene mammoth frozen in ice. The potential for using GPR in ice and snow patch archaeology, an area of increasing interest with global environmental change exposing new material each year, is also demonstrated. View Full-Text
Keywords: ground-penetrating radar; Alaska; Arctic; permafrost; mammoth; Bering Land Bridge ground-penetrating radar; Alaska; Arctic; permafrost; mammoth; Bering Land Bridge
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Urban, T.M.; Rasic, J.T.; Alix, C.; Anderson, D.D.; Manning, S.W.; Mason, O.K.; Tremayne, A.H.; Wolff, C.B. Frozen: The Potential and Pitfalls of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology in the Alaskan Arctic. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 1007.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top