Next Article in Journal
Moving Target Detection Based on the Spreading Characteristics of SAR Interferograms in the Magnitude-Phase Plane
Previous Article in Journal
Improvements of a COMS Land Surface Temperature Retrieval Algorithm Based on the Temperature Lapse Rate and Water Vapor/Aerosol Effect
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Remote Sens. 2015, 7(2), 1798-1835; doi:10.3390/rs70201798

Comparison of Spatiotemporal Fusion Models: A Review

1
,
2
and
1,3,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
Department of Geography and Resource Management and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
3
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Center of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Raul Zurita-Milla and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 8 October 2014 / Accepted: 29 January 2015 / Published: 5 February 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [33618 KB, uploaded 5 February 2015]   |  

Abstract

Simultaneously capturing spatial and temporal dynamics is always a challenge for the remote sensing community. Spatiotemporal fusion has gained wide interest in various applications for its superiority in integrating both fine spatial resolution and frequent temporal coverage. Though many advances have been made in spatiotemporal fusion model development and applications in the past decade, a unified comparison among existing fusion models is still limited. In this research, we classify the models into three categories: transformation-based, reconstruction-based, and learning-based models. The objective of this study is to (i) compare four fusion models (STARFM, ESTARFM, ISTAFM, and SPSTFM) under a one Landsat-MODIS (L-M) pair prediction mode and two L-M pair prediction mode using time-series datasets from the Coleambally irrigation area and Poyang Lake wetland; (ii) quantitatively assess prediction accuracy considering spatiotemporal comparability, landscape heterogeneity, and model parameter selection; and (iii) discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the three categories of spatiotemporal fusion models. View Full-Text
Keywords: spatiotemporal fusion; comparison; prediction modes; assessment spatiotemporal fusion; comparison; prediction modes; assessment
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, B.; Huang, B.; Xu, B. Comparison of Spatiotemporal Fusion Models: A Review. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 1798-1835.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top