Next Article in Journal
Previous Article in Journal
Remote Sens. 2014, 6(2), 964-983; doi:10.3390/rs6020964
Article

Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery

1
, 2
, 2
, 3
 and 2,3,4,5,*
Received: 18 November 2013; in revised form: 10 January 2014 / Accepted: 13 January 2014 / Published: 24 January 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1129 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Although a large number of new image classification algorithms have been developed, they are rarely tested with the same classification task. In this research, with the same Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data set and the same classification scheme over Guangzhou City, China, we tested two unsupervised and 13 supervised classification algorithms, including a number of machine learning algorithms that became popular in remote sensing during the past 20 years. Our analysis focused primarily on the spectral information provided by the TM data. We assessed all algorithms in a per-pixel classification decision experiment and all supervised algorithms in a segment-based experiment. We found that when sufficiently representative training samples were used, most algorithms performed reasonably well. Lack of training samples led to greater classification accuracy discrepancies than classification algorithms themselves. Some algorithms were more tolerable to insufficient (less representative) training samples than others. Many algorithms improved the overall accuracy marginally with per-segment decision making.
Keywords: machine learning; maximum likelihood classification; logistic regression; support vector machine; tree classifiers; random forests machine learning; maximum likelihood classification; logistic regression; support vector machine; tree classifiers; random forests
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Hu, L.; Gong, P. Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 964-983.

AMA Style

Li C, Wang J, Wang L, Hu L, Gong P. Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. Remote Sensing. 2014; 6(2):964-983.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Congcong; Wang, Jie; Wang, Lei; Hu, Luanyun; Gong, Peng. 2014. "Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery." Remote Sens. 6, no. 2: 964-983.


Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert