Next Article in Journal
Interannual Changes of Fire Activity in the Protected Areas of the SUN Network and Other Parks and Reserves of the West and Central Africa Region Derived from MODIS Observations
Next Article in Special Issue
Near-Space Microwave Radar Remote Sensing: Potentials and Challenge Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Spectral Reflectance of Wheat Residue during Decomposition and Remotely Sensed Estimates of Residue Cover
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of a Least-Squares Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm from L-band Passive Observations
Remote Sens. 2010, 2(2), 432-445; doi:10.3390/rs2020432
Article

Comparing Accuracy of Airborne Laser Scanning and TerraSAR-X Radar Images in the Estimation of Plot-Level Forest Variables

1,* , 2
, 3
, 1
, 3
, 3
, 4
 and 5
Received: 7 December 2009; in revised form: 13 January 2010 / Accepted: 22 January 2010 / Published: 28 January 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microwave Remote Sensing)
Download PDF [1281 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]
Abstract: In this study we compared the accuracy of low-pulse airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, multi-temporal high-resolution noninterferometric TerraSAR-X radar data and a combined feature set derived from these data in the estimation of forest variables at plot level. The TerraSAR-X data set consisted of seven dual-polarized (HH/HV or VH/VV) Stripmap mode images from all seasons of the year. We were especially interested in distinguishing between the tree species. The dependent variables estimated included mean volume, basal area, mean height, mean diameter and tree species-specific mean volumes. Selection of best possible feature set was based on a genetic algorithm (GA). The nonparametric k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) algorithm was applied to the estimation. The research material consisted of 124 circular plots measured at tree level and located in the vicinity of Espoo, Finland. There are large variations in the elevation and forest structure in the study area, making it demanding for image interpretation. The best feature set contained 12 features, nine of them originating from the ALS data and three from the TerraSAR-X data. The relative RMSEs for the best performing feature set were 34.7% (mean volume), 28.1% (basal area), 14.3% (mean height), 21.4% (mean diameter), 99.9% (mean volume of Scots pine), 61.6% (mean volume of Norway spruce) and 91.6% (mean volume of deciduous tree species). The combined feature set outperformed an ALS-based feature set marginally; in fact, the latter was better in the case of species-specific volumes. Features from TerraSAR-X alone performed poorly. However, due to favorable temporal resolution, satellite-borne radar imaging is a promising data source for updating large-area forest inventories based on low-pulse ALS.
Keywords: forest inventory; forest planning; laser scanning; radar imaging; TerraSAR-X; k-NN; feature selection; genetic algorithm forest inventory; forest planning; laser scanning; radar imaging; TerraSAR-X; k-NN; feature selection; genetic algorithm
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Holopainen, M.; Haapanen, R.; Karjalainen, M.; Vastaranta, M.; Hyyppä, J.; Yu, X.; Tuominen, S.; Hyyppä, H. Comparing Accuracy of Airborne Laser Scanning and TerraSAR-X Radar Images in the Estimation of Plot-Level Forest Variables. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 432-445.

AMA Style

Holopainen M, Haapanen R, Karjalainen M, Vastaranta M, Hyyppä J, Yu X, Tuominen S, Hyyppä H. Comparing Accuracy of Airborne Laser Scanning and TerraSAR-X Radar Images in the Estimation of Plot-Level Forest Variables. Remote Sensing. 2010; 2(2):432-445.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Holopainen, Markus; Haapanen, Reija; Karjalainen, Mika; Vastaranta, Mikko; Hyyppä, Juha; Yu, Xiaowei; Tuominen, Sakari; Hyyppä, Hannu. 2010. "Comparing Accuracy of Airborne Laser Scanning and TerraSAR-X Radar Images in the Estimation of Plot-Level Forest Variables." Remote Sens. 2, no. 2: 432-445.


Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert