Next Article in Journal
Sustainability Matter and Financial Performance of Companies
Previous Article in Journal
Yields of the Major Food Crops: Implications to Food Security and Policy in Tanzania’s Semi-Arid Agro-Ecological Zone
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(9), 1497; doi:10.3390/su9091497

A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment

1
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
2
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
3
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
4
National Centre for Resilience, School of Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Glasgow, Dumfries DG1 4ZL, UK
5
Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
6
Stopford Energy & Environment, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 July 2017 / Revised: 14 August 2017 / Accepted: 18 August 2017 / Published: 23 August 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2867 KB, uploaded 23 August 2017]   |  

Abstract

Sustainability assessment of resource recovery from waste is an important prerequisite for informed and sound decision-making. Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) has been developed to support this process, yet its use is still constrained by the difficulty of identifying the most relevant impact parameters. This paper, seeks to inform LCSA for resource recovery from waste based on a parameter identification approach that uses the political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal (PESTEL) analysis. The novelty of this approach lies in the structured conceptualisation of the resource recovery system and the context within which decisions are made. The anaerobic digestion of source-separated food waste in the UK is used as a case study to trial and demonstrate the approach. Findings suggest that a conceptual, qualitative analysis, although limited in its scope due to the lack of quantitative components, is suitable in integrating different parameters, allowing for a holistic conceptualisation of the system and capturing important issues that could be easily overlooked. This type of analysis can summarise the key interdependencies, contrast the trade-offs and provide a wider understanding of the political and legal context within which the system operates, all important in extending the implementation of LCSA towards the right direction. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability assessment; anaerobic digestion; PESTEL; resource recovery; food waste; LCSA sustainability assessment; anaerobic digestion; PESTEL; resource recovery; food waste; LCSA
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Iacovidou, E.; Busch, J.; Hahladakis, J.N.; Baxter, H.; Ng, K.S.; Herbert, B.M.J. A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1497.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top