Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Potential Benefits and Limits of Electric Storage Heaters for Wind Curtailment Mitigation: A Finnish Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on Customer Satisfaction in Marine Cultural and Sustainable Tourism—A Case Study of Shanghai
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Farmer Willingness to Fallow Winter Wheat and Ecological Compensation Standards in a Groundwater Funnel Area in Hengshui, Hebei Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Cross-Strait Comparison of Innovation Policy under Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Development Transition
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(5), 835; doi:10.3390/su9050835

Low Carbon Strategy Analysis of Competing Supply Chains with Different Power Structures

School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Received: 20 December 2016 / Revised: 7 April 2017 / Accepted: 12 May 2017 / Published: 16 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Application of Green Production)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2446 KB, uploaded 16 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

This paper investigates the emission reduction performance for supply chain members in both single-channel and exclusive dual-channel cases. Two game scenarios (Manufacturer Stackelberg and Retailer Stackelberg) are examined under different channel structures. Furthermore, we introduce government subsidies as an impact factor of low-carbon strategy adoption. In the single-channel (Case 1), we mainly examine the influence of consumers’ price-sensitivity on channel members’ optimal decisions. In the dual-channel (Case 2), we focus on the joint impact of product substitutability and different channel power structures on the optimal decisions under asymmetric related channel status. The analysis suggests that the Stackelberg leaders always perform better than their corresponding followers before emission reduction, while they may not necessarily yield more benefits after emission reduction. The implementation of low-carbon strategy depends on parameters like product substitutability and channel base demand. Finally, all the supply chain members will encounter a Prisoner’s Dilemma when the product substitutability is relatively high. View Full-Text
Keywords: low-carbon strategy; dual channel; Stackelberg game; product substitutability; asymmetric channel status; analysis methods low-carbon strategy; dual channel; Stackelberg game; product substitutability; asymmetric channel status; analysis methods
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Li, T.; Tsai, S.-B. Low Carbon Strategy Analysis of Competing Supply Chains with Different Power Structures. Sustainability 2017, 9, 835.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top