Next Article in Journal
Review of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment and Potential for Its Adoption at an Automotive Company
Previous Article in Journal
Improvements in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Capacities after Shrub Planting to Stabilize Sand Dunes in China’s Horqin Sandy Land
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 669; doi:10.3390/su9040669

A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices

1
Institute for Social Change and Sustainability (IGN), Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Welthandelsplatz 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria
2
Institute of Social Ecology Vienna (SEC), Alpen Adria Universitaet Klagenfurt, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Vienna, Austria
3
Energieautark Consulting gmbh, Viktor-Hagl-Gasse 16, 1140 Vienna, Austria
4
Austrian Energy Agency, Mariahilfer Str. 136, 1150 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Helmut Haberl
Received: 7 March 2017 / Revised: 13 April 2017 / Accepted: 18 April 2017 / Published: 23 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Social Ecology and Sustainability)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [935 KB, uploaded 24 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

To date the concept of the bioeconomy—an economy based primarily on biogenic instead of fossil resources—has largely been associated with visions of “green growth” and the advancement of biotechnology and has been framed from within an industrial perspective. However, there is no consensus as to what a bioeconomy should effectively look like, and what type of society it would sustain. In this paper, we identify different types of narratives constructed around this concept and carve out the techno-political implications they convey. We map these narratives on a two-dimensional option space, which allows for a rough classification of narratives and their related imaginaries into four paradigmatic quadrants. We draw the narratives from three different sources: (i) policy documents of national and supra-national authorities; (ii) stakeholder interviews; and (iii) scenarios built in a biophysical modelling exercise. Our analysis shows that there is a considerable gap between official policy papers and visions supported by stakeholders. At least in the case of Austria there is also a gap between the official strategies and the option space identified through biophysical modelling. These gaps testify to the highly political nature of the concept of the bioeconomy and the diverging visions of society arising from it. View Full-Text
Keywords: bioeconomy; transition; biotechnology; bio-resources; technopolitics; agro-ecology; sufficiency; capitalism bioeconomy; transition; biotechnology; bio-resources; technopolitics; agro-ecology; sufficiency; capitalism
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hausknost, D.; Schriefl, E.; Lauk, C.; Kalt, G. A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices. Sustainability 2017, 9, 669.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top