Next Article in Journal
Difficulties and Challenges in Applying the European Tourism Indicators System (ETIS) for Sustainable Tourist Destinations: The Case of Braşov County in the Romanian Carpathians
Previous Article in Journal
Making the Water–Soil–Waste Nexus Work: Framing the Boundaries of Resource Flows
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(10), 1877; doi:10.3390/su9101877

Energy Performance Indicators in the Swedish Building Procurement Process

Department of Applied Physics and Electronics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 September 2017 / Revised: 12 October 2017 / Accepted: 13 October 2017 / Published: 19 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1681 KB, uploaded 19 October 2017]   |  


In Sweden, all new buildings need to comply with the National Board of Housing, Building and Planning’s requirement on specific purchased energy (kWh/m2). Accordingly, this indicator is often used to set design criteria in the building procurement process. However, when energy use is measured in finished buildings, the measurements often deviate significantly from the design calculations. The measured specific purchased energy does not necessarily reflect the responsibility of the building contractor, as it is influenced by the building operation, user behavior and climate. Therefore, Swedish building practitioners may prefer other indicators for setting design criteria in the building procurement process. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) to understand the Swedish building practitioners’ perspectives and opinions on seven building energy performance indicators (envelope air leakage, U-values for different building parts, average U-value, specific heat loss, heat loss coefficient, specific net energy, and specific purchased energy); and (ii) to understand the consequences for the energy performance of multi-family buildings of using the studied indicators to set criteria in the procurement process. The study involved a Delphi approach and simulations of a multi-family case study building. The studied indicators were discussed in terms of how they may meet the needs of the building practitioners when used to set building energy performance criteria in the procurement process. View Full-Text
Keywords: design criteria; energy performance; specific energy; simulation; procurement process; indicators design criteria; energy performance; specific energy; simulation; procurement process; indicators

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Allard, I.; Olofsson, T.; Nair, G. Energy Performance Indicators in the Swedish Building Procurement Process. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1877.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top