Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Stormwater Management: Examining the Role of Local Planning Capacity in Mitigating Peak Surface Runoff
Previous Article in Journal
Does Non-Fossil Energy Usage Lower CO2 Emissions? Empirical Evidence from China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(9), 867; doi:10.3390/su8090867

Does Intellectual Capital Disclosure Matter for Audit Risk? Evidence from the UK and Italy

1
Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, Via San Felice 5, Pavia 27100, Italy
2
Faculty of Economics, Rome University of International Studies, Via Cristoforo Colombo 200, Roma 00147, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Rachel J.C. Chen and Marc A. Rosen
Received: 7 June 2016 / Revised: 10 August 2016 / Accepted: 11 August 2016 / Published: 30 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Economic, Business and Management Aspects of Sustainability)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [519 KB, uploaded 30 August 2016]   |  

Abstract

Disclosure theory argues that better information quality reduces audit risk, by decreasing information asymmetry in the market and consequently, information risk for firms. Extant literature on voluntary disclosure analyzes the relationships between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and audit risk, finding that auditors charge lower fees and issue less going concern opinions to firms with good CSR performance. In this study, we test the relationship between intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) and audit risk and we assess the effect of ICD and audit risk on audit fees. To do so, we use data from the ESG Asset4 database (Thomson Reuters Datastream) on 166 UK and 27 Italian listed firms that issue stand-alone social and intellectual capital statements. The audit risk is measured from both a qualitative and a quantitative perspective. Panel data analysis on 2004–2011 years has been used to test our research hypotheses. Empirical findings from a sample of UK and Italian listed companies show that auditors estimate a lower qualitative risk, albeit a higher quantitative one, for those companies reporting higher ICD scores, compared to those ones with lower disclosure scores on the intellectual capital. Furthermore, we find that reputation risk contributes to the relationship between ICD and audit risk. View Full-Text
Keywords: intellectual capital disclosure; audit risk; audit fees; voluntary disclosure; country analysis intellectual capital disclosure; audit risk; audit fees; voluntary disclosure; country analysis
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Demartini, C.; Trucco, S. Does Intellectual Capital Disclosure Matter for Audit Risk? Evidence from the UK and Italy. Sustainability 2016, 8, 867.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top