A Cost Analysis of Food Waste Composting in Taiwan
AbstractTaiwan’s Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) has enacted a food waste recycling policy since 2003 as an alternative of landfill and incineration for the final disposal of municipal solid waste. Recycled food waste is currently seen as a valuable material, especially when appropriate technology is developed. This paper conducts a cost/benefit analysis based on six cases of food waste composting plants in Taiwan, finding that (1) the composting of food waste may yield the most net benefit compared to other applications of today; (2) the production cost of compost ranges from NT$ 2897–23,117/tonne; (3) the adoption of more automatic technology may reduce operation costs and, thus, a closed composting system with mechanical aeration may be more cost effective; (4) the output is a determinant of affecting production costs and private firms are more competitive in production costs than government-affiliated composting units; (5) all of the government-affiliated composting units face a negative profit and thus they are required to make use of the market value of the produced compost to achieve economic viability; and (6) a subsidy to the compost producer is needed to expand the market demand as the food waste recycled can save the disposal cost of municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Chen, Y.-T. A Cost Analysis of Food Waste Composting in Taiwan. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1210.
Chen Y-T. A Cost Analysis of Food Waste Composting in Taiwan. Sustainability. 2016; 8(11):1210.Chicago/Turabian Style
Chen, Yi-Tui. 2016. "A Cost Analysis of Food Waste Composting in Taiwan." Sustainability 8, no. 11: 1210.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.