Next Article in Journal
Lithium-Ion Batteries: Thermal Behaviour Investigation of Unbalanced Modules
Next Article in Special Issue
Conservation Messages in Speech Bubbles–Evaluation of an Environmental Education Comic Distributed in Elementary Schools in Madagascar
Previous Article in Journal
Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Its Spatial Characteristics in Central Asia’s Arid Regions: A Case Study in Altay Prefecture, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fostering Sustainable Energy Entrepreneurship among Students: The Business Oriented Technological System Analysis (BOTSA) Program at Eindhoven University of Technology
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(7), 8354-8373; doi:10.3390/su7078354

Training Conservation Practitioners to be Better Decision Makers

1
Southeast Ecological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 7920 NW 71 Street, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA
2
Southeast Climate Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 127H David Clark Labs, N.C. State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA
3
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Armin Lude
Received: 1 May 2015 / Revised: 28 May 2015 / Accepted: 18 June 2015 / Published: 29 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Education for Sustainable Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [100 KB, uploaded 29 June 2015]

Abstract

Traditional conservation curricula and training typically emphasizes only one part of systematic decision making (i.e., the science), at the expense of preparing conservation practitioners with critical skills in values-setting, working with decision makers and stakeholders, and effective problem framing. In this article we describe how the application of decision science is relevant to conservation problems and suggest how current and future conservation practitioners can be trained to be better decision makers. Though decision-analytic approaches vary considerably, they all involve: (1) properly formulating the decision problem; (2) specifying feasible alternative actions; and (3) selecting criteria for evaluating potential outcomes. Two approaches are available for providing training in decision science, with each serving different needs. Formal education is useful for providing simple, well-defined problems that allow demonstrations of the structure, axioms and general characteristics of a decision-analytic approach. In contrast, practical training can offer complex, realistic decision problems requiring more careful structuring and analysis than those used for formal training purposes. Ultimately, the kinds and degree of training necessary depend on the role conservation practitioners play in a decision-making process. Those attempting to facilitate decision-making processes will need advanced training in both technical aspects of decision science and in facilitation techniques, as well as opportunities to apprentice under decision analysts/consultants. Our primary goal should be an attempt to ingrain a discipline for applying clarity of thought to all decisions. View Full-Text
Keywords: conservation; curriculum; ecology; education; decision analysis; decision making; decision science; natural resource management; sociology; training; uncertainty; values conservation; curriculum; ecology; education; decision analysis; decision making; decision science; natural resource management; sociology; training; uncertainty; values
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Johnson, F.A.; Eaton, M.J.; Williams, J.H.; Jensen, G.H.; Madsen, J. Training Conservation Practitioners to be Better Decision Makers. Sustainability 2015, 7, 8354-8373.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top