Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Sustainable Development Coordination Unit, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
Adora Foundation, 12a Lawrence Avenue, Bristol, BS5 0LE, UK
Charles University Environment Center, José Martího 2/407, 16200 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Earth Charter Initiative, c/o University for Peace, San Jose 138 6100, Costa Rica
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
Barasa Consulting Group, 131 Croydon Avenue, Croydon Park NSW 2133, Australia
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 May 2013; in revised form: 20 June 2013 / Accepted: 25 June 2013 / Published: 12 July 2013
Abstract: This paper argues that the need for a core “fourth pillar” of sustainability/sustainable development, as demanded in multiple arenas, can no longer be ignored on the grounds of intangibility. Different approaches to this vital but missing pillar (cultural-aesthetic, religious-spiritual, and political-institutional) find common ground in the area of ethical values. While values and aspects based on them are widely assumed to be intangible and immeasurable, we illustrate that it is possible to operationalize them in terms of measurable indicators when they are intersubjectively conceptualized within clearly defined practical contexts. The processes require contextual localization of items, which can nonetheless fit into a generalizable framework. This allows useful measurements to be made, and removes barriers to studying, tracking, comparing, evaluating and correlating values-related dimensions of sustainability. It is advocated that those involved in operationalizing sustainability (especially in the context of creating post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals), should explore the potential for developing indicators to capture some of its less tangible aspects, especially those concerned with ethical values.
Keywords: Sustainable Development Goals; Post 2015 Development Agenda; Millennium Development Goals; sustainability; governance; values; ethical framework; indicators; intersubjectivity
Citations to this Article
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Burford, G.; Hoover, E.; Velasco, I.; Janoušková, S.; Jimenez, A.; Piggot, G.; Podger, D.; Harder, M.K. Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3035-3059.
Burford G, Hoover E, Velasco I, Janoušková S, Jimenez A, Piggot G, Podger D, Harder MK. Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators. Sustainability. 2013; 5(7):3035-3059.
Burford, Gemma; Hoover, Elona; Velasco, Ismael; Janoušková, Svatava; Jimenez, Alicia; Piggot, Georgia; Podger, Dimity; Harder, Marie K. 2013. "Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators." Sustainability 5, no. 7: 3035-3059.