Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variation and Phenotypic Response of 15 Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids to Population Density
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Impact of Business Activity in Sustainability Terms. Empirical Confirmation of Its Determination in Spanish Companies
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2013, 5(6), 2421-2441; doi:10.3390/su5062421

Bottom Rail on Top: The Shifting Sands of Sustainable Development Indicators as Tools to Assess Progress

Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK
Received: 15 April 2013 / Revised: 10 May 2013 / Accepted: 21 May 2013 / Published: 31 May 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1103 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  

Abstract

The Human Development Index (HDI) is often employed to capture some of the more social concerns in sustainable development at the scale of the nation-state. The HDI is founded on three components; life expectancy, education and income per capita. To avoid a dominance of the income component, proxied by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita per annum, it has been capped at a maximum level and transformed. Two methods for transforming the GDP/capita have been employed; the Atkinson transformation (1991 to 1998) and the Logarithmic transformation (all other years). The paper explores the impact that these transformations have had on the HDI rankings of 167 countries, by comparing the rank across two periods; 1991 to 1998 and 1999 to 2009. Results suggest that for the 167 countries in the dataset, the majority (65%) showed a high resilience to the transformations. For these countries, the use of the two alternatives does not alter the difference seen in the original ranking between the two periods. A significant proportion of countries had a medium (18%) and low (17%) resilience to the methodology for handling GDP/capita. For those countries the choice of methodology does matter in terms of their ranking, with some doing better and others worse relative to the original ranking. Consistency in methodology is desirable in order to avoid such misrepresentations but so is some flexibility to allow for new knowledge and experience. One can also question the value of the league table style of presentation so often employed with sustainable development indices given that change in rank for at least some countries is so vulnerable to shifts in methodology.
Keywords: Human Development Index (HDI); Gross Domestic Product (GDP); indicator transformation methodology; Sustainable Development Goals Human Development Index (HDI); Gross Domestic Product (GDP); indicator transformation methodology; Sustainable Development Goals
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Morse, S. Bottom Rail on Top: The Shifting Sands of Sustainable Development Indicators as Tools to Assess Progress. Sustainability 2013, 5, 2421-2441.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top