Next Article in Journal
Growth Is the Problem; Equality Is the Solution
Next Article in Special Issue
The Regional Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Flanders, Belgium
Previous Article in Journal
A Report of Contemporary Rammed Earth Construction and Research in North America
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rethinking What Counts. Perspectives on Wellbeing and Genuine Progress Indicator Metrics from a Canadian Viewpoint
Sustainability 2013, 5(2), 417-431; doi:10.3390/su5020417
Article

Understanding Progress: A Heterodox Approach

*  and
Received: 5 December 2012; in revised form: 15 January 2013 / Accepted: 21 January 2013 / Published: 30 January 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Measuring Socio-Economic Well-Being)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [208 KB, uploaded 30 January 2013]
Abstract: This paper examines the possibility of understanding and measuring well-being as a result of “progress” on the basis of today’s dominant epistemological framework. Market criteria distort social values by allowing purchasing power to define priorities, likening luxury goods to basic needs; in the process they reinforce patterns of discrimination against disadvantaged social groups and women, introducing fatal distortions into the analysis. Similarly, because there are no appropriate mechanisms to price natural resources adequately, the market overlooks the consequences of the abuse of natural resources, degrading the quality of life, individually and collectively, or—in the framework of Latin American indigenous groups—foreclosing the possibility of “living well”. We critique the common vision of the official development discourse that places its faith on technological innovations to resolve these problems. The analysis points to the need for new models of social and environmental governance to promote progress, approaches like those suggested in the paper that are inconsistent with public policies currently in place. At present, the social groups forging institutions to assure their own well-being and ecological balance are involved in local processes, often in opposition to the proposals of the political leaders in their countries.
Keywords: progress; sustainability; epistemology; alternatives; autonomy progress; sustainability; epistemology; alternatives; autonomy
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Barkin, D.; Lemus, B. Understanding Progress: A Heterodox Approach. Sustainability 2013, 5, 417-431.

AMA Style

Barkin D, Lemus B. Understanding Progress: A Heterodox Approach. Sustainability. 2013; 5(2):417-431.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barkin, David; Lemus, Blanca. 2013. "Understanding Progress: A Heterodox Approach." Sustainability 5, no. 2: 417-431.


Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert