Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Social Dynamics of Energy Regions—The Importance of Discourse Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Research Needs and Challenges from Science to Decision Support. Lesson Learnt from the Development of the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Nuclear Fuel Cycles and World Regional Issues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Sustainability Engineering to Gain Universal Sustainability Efficiency
Sustainability 2012, 4(6), 1239-1255; doi:10.3390/su4061239
Commentary

Renegotiation of the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: From Confusion to Promise

Received: 21 March 2012; in revised form: 8 June 2012 / Accepted: 12 June 2012 / Published: 15 June 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [203 KB, uploaded 15 June 2012]
Abstract: For nearly four decades, the Great Lakes regime has invoked the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement as the mechanism for binational cooperation on programs and policies. Many advances in water quality have led to unquestionable improvements in ecosystem quality, habitat and biodiversity, and water infrastructure. Still, Great Lakes scientists have issued compelling evidence that the ecological health of the basin ecosystem is at significant risk. In 2012, the Agreement will be revised for the first time in 25 years. The degree of engagement in a future Agreement, including scope, issues of significant importance, governance and collaboration will hinge on a thorough analytical process, so far seemingly absent, coupled with real consultation, so far marginally evident. Renegotiating the Agreement to generate a revitalized and sustainable future mandates that science inform contemporary public policy, and that inclusive discourse and public engagement be integral through the process. Many of these steps are still absent, and the analysis presented here strongly suggests that the constituents of the Great Lakes regime voice their views critically, emphatically, and often. If the negotiators listen, we can collectively make the Lakes Great.
Keywords: shared water; sustainable management approaches; public engagement; Great Lakes; ecosystem approach shared water; sustainable management approaches; public engagement; Great Lakes; ecosystem approach
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Krantzberg, G. Renegotiation of the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: From Confusion to Promise. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1239-1255.

AMA Style

Krantzberg G. Renegotiation of the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: From Confusion to Promise. Sustainability. 2012; 4(6):1239-1255.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krantzberg, Gail. 2012. "Renegotiation of the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: From Confusion to Promise." Sustainability 4, no. 6: 1239-1255.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert