Sustainability 2012, 4(2), 257-277; doi:10.3390/su4020257
Article

Problems with Reporting and Evaluating Mining Industry Community Development Projects: A Case Study from Tanzania

Received: 29 November 2011; in revised form: 7 February 2012 / Accepted: 15 February 2012 / Published: 20 February 2012
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Reporting on contributions to community development is one way gold mining companies communicate the expanse and depth of their commitment to social responsibility. These projects are intended to provide the mine-proximate communities with some of the wealth and other benefits generated by mine development in their locales. We raise questions about reporting and evaluation of community development projects undertaken by AngloGold Ashanti in the two communities of Nyakabale and Nyamalembo, near its Geita mining projects in the Lake Victoria goldfields of Tanzania. We use archival data and data obtained from field research conducted during different periods throughout 2005, 2007 and 2010 to compare what the company reports to have done with what is found on the ground. Our findings revealed that the corporate reporting is misleading, ambiguous, and omissive. Much of the effort labeled “community development” benefited the companies directly via infrastructure development, food supplies to the mine cafeteria, and worker health. We argue that, if Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) projects are to be the primary way local people directly benefit from mine development, the relationship between the value of those projects and the wealth taken from the location should be considered, community projects should be well defined and differentiated from company-oriented projects, and community representatives should participate in monitoring the success and impact of community development projects.
Keywords: corporate social responsibility; community development; gold mining; Tanzania
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [473 KB, uploaded 20 February 2012 14:47 CET]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Emel, J.; Makene, M.H.; Wangari, E. Problems with Reporting and Evaluating Mining Industry Community Development Projects: A Case Study from Tanzania. Sustainability 2012, 4, 257-277.

AMA Style

Emel J, Makene MH, Wangari E. Problems with Reporting and Evaluating Mining Industry Community Development Projects: A Case Study from Tanzania. Sustainability. 2012; 4(2):257-277.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Emel, Jody; Makene, Madoshi H.; Wangari, Esther. 2012. "Problems with Reporting and Evaluating Mining Industry Community Development Projects: A Case Study from Tanzania." Sustainability 4, no. 2: 257-277.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert