Sustainability 2011, 3(12), 2413-2432; doi:10.3390/su3122413
Review

Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels

1 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, NY 13210, USA 2 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 3 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 July 2011; in revised form: 17 November 2011 / Accepted: 24 November 2011 / Published: 13 December 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment))
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [262 KB, uploaded 13 December 2011 14:39 CET]
Abstract: The authors of this paper have been involved in contentious discussion of the EROI of biomass-based ethanol. This contention has undermined, in the minds of some, the utility of EROI for assessing fuels. This paper seeks to understand the reasons for the divergent results.
Keywords: Ethanol; EROI; corn-based; cellulosic

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hall, C.A.; Dale, B.E.; Pimentel, D. Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels. Sustainability 2011, 3, 2413-2432.

AMA Style

Hall CA, Dale BE, Pimentel D. Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels. Sustainability. 2011; 3(12):2413-2432.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hall, Charles A.S.; Dale, Bruce E.; Pimentel, David. 2011. "Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels." Sustainability 3, no. 12: 2413-2432.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert