Next Article in Journal
Promoting Cultural Sustainability in the Context of Public Health: A Thai Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Designing a Sustainable Future through Creation of North America’s only International Wildlife Refuge
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal and Sustainable Groundwater Extraction
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Century Ahead: Searching for Sustainability
Sustainability 2010, 2(8), 2686-2706; doi:10.3390/su2082686

Using Scenario Visioning and Participatory System Dynamics Modeling to Investigate the Future: Lessons from Minnesota 2050

1,* , 2
1 Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation, and Resource Studies, Michigan State University, 151 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 2 Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA 3 Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, 325 VoTech Building, 1954 Buford Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 4 Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 115 Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Avenue N, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 5 Meeting Challenges, 1022 West Country Road D, St. Paul, MN 55126, USA 6 University of Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 July 2010 / Revised: 17 August 2010 / Accepted: 18 August 2010 / Published: 24 August 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Futures)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [734 KB, 24 February 2015; original version 24 February 2015]   |  


Both scenario visioning and participatory system dynamics modeling emphasize the dynamic and uncontrollable nature of complex socio-ecological systems, and the significance of multiple feedback mechanisms. These two methodologies complement one another, but are rarely used together. We partnered with regional organizations in Minnesota to design a future visioning process that incorporated both scenarios and participatory system dynamics modeling. The three purposes of this exercise were: first, to assist regional leaders in making strategic decisions that would make their communities sustainable; second, to identify research gaps that could impede the ability of regional and state groups to plan for the future; and finally, to introduce more systems thinking into planning and policy-making around environmental issues. We found that scenarios and modeling complemented one another, and that both techniques allowed regional groups to focus on the sustainability of fundamental support systems (energy, food, and water supply). The process introduced some creative tensions between imaginative scenario visioning and quantitative system dynamics modeling, and between creating desired futures (a strong cultural norm) and inhabiting the future (a premise of the Minnesota 2050 exercise). We suggest that these tensions can stimulate more agile, strategic thinking about the future.
Keywords: scenarios; participatory modeling; multiple futures; energy; water scenarios; participatory modeling; multiple futures; energy; water
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
EndNote |
MDPI and ACS Style

Schmitt Olabisi, L.K.; Kapuscinski, A.R.; Johnson, K.A.; Reich, P.B.; Stenquist, B.; Draeger, K.J. Using Scenario Visioning and Participatory System Dynamics Modeling to Investigate the Future: Lessons from Minnesota 2050. Sustainability 2010, 2, 2686-2706.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here


[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert