Next Article in Journal
Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Impacts of Experimental Production of Lactic Acid for Bioplastics from Ulva spp.
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(7), 2463; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072463

Strategies for Dealing with Uncertainties in Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Analytical Framework Illustrated with Case Studies from The Netherlands

1
Arcadis Netherlands, Beaulieustraat 22, 6814 DV Arnhem, The Netherlands
2
Environmental Governance Group, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
3
Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 18 June 2018 / Revised: 2 July 2018 / Accepted: 3 July 2018 / Published: 13 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fostering Sustainability through Strategic Environmental Assessment)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3111 KB, uploaded 13 July 2018]   |  

Abstract

Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a widely applied policy tool that aims to aid decision-makers in making informed, higher-quality decisions that minimize negative environmental impacts. However, different types of uncertainties complicate the ex ante assessment of environmental impacts. Literature suggests uncertainties are often not well addressed, resulting in inaccurate and even unreliable SEAs. At the same time, SEA literature offers limited guidance in how to systematically identify and deal with uncertainties. Therefore, in this paper, we present an analytical framework for characterizing and classifying different forms of uncertainty in SEA, and for identifying strategies for dealing with these uncertainties. The framework is based on literature on uncertainties in other subdomains of the environmental sciences. The framework is applied to five case studies of SEAs for spatial planning in The Netherlands in order to illustrate and critically reflect on our framework, and to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Based on these case studies we concluded the following: (1) The framework is useful for identifying uncertainties in SEA in a systematic way; (2) There is a discrepancy between how uncertainties are dealt with in theory and in practice; (3) In practice, uncertainties seem to be dealt with in a rather implicit way. The framework may help dealing with uncertainties more systematically and more proactively; (4) The most successful way of coping with uncertainties seems to be the application of multiple strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: environmental assessment; uncertainty; effectiveness; governance environmental assessment; uncertainty; effectiveness; governance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bodde, M.; van der Wel, K.; Driessen, P.; Wardekker, A.; Runhaar, H. Strategies for Dealing with Uncertainties in Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Analytical Framework Illustrated with Case Studies from The Netherlands. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2463.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top