Next Article in Journal
Effect of Local Community’s Environmental Perception on Trust in a Mining Company: A Case Study in Mongolia
Next Article in Special Issue
Inter-Basin Water Transfer Green Supply Chain Equilibrium and Coordination under Social Welfare Maximization
Previous Article in Journal
Discourses across Scales on Forest Landscape Restoration
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(3), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030615

A Method of Evaluating Ecological Compensation Under Different Property Rights and Stages: A Case Study of the Xiaoqing River Basin, China

College of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 January 2018 / Revised: 18 February 2018 / Accepted: 18 February 2018 / Published: 27 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conflict Analysis and Sustainable Management of Water Resources)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [839 KB, uploaded 27 February 2018]   |  

Abstract

To solve the problem of unitary ecological compensation standards in river basins by scientifically clarifying the compensation for ecological protection investments and for pollution, this research divided ecological environment property relations between the upstream and downstream into three types: downstream ecological compensation for the upstream, upstream ecological compensation for the downstream and sharing the rights of the ecological environment. The various compensation standards were divided into three stages according to the location quotient and pollutant concentration. Calculation and analysis were performed for the ecological compensation of the Xiaoqing River Basin at the junction of Jinan City and Binzhou City of Shandong Province as an example. The results showed that: (1) the downstream compensations for the three stages were 2.139 billion yuan, 2.349 billion yuan and 2.489 billion yuan when only the downstream ecological compensation for the upstream was considered; (2) the compensations for the three stages were 88 million yuan, 107 million yuan, 124 million yuan when only the upstream ecological compensation for the downstream was considered; and (3) the compensations in the three stages were 2.051 billion yuan, 2.242 billion yuan, 2.365 billion yuan when ecological environment rights were shared. Under this property relation, the ecological compensation standard considering water quality and water yield and the goal of ecological environmental protection are clear and the content of compensation is complete, which is easily accepted by all parties. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecological environment property relation; ecological compensation; location quotient; pollutant concentration; Xiaoqing River Basin ecological environment property relation; ecological compensation; location quotient; pollutant concentration; Xiaoqing River Basin
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Cao, S. A Method of Evaluating Ecological Compensation Under Different Property Rights and Stages: A Case Study of the Xiaoqing River Basin, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 615.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top