Next Article in Journal
Clinical Implications of Antiviral Resistance in Influenza
Next Article in Special Issue
Exposure to West Nile Virus Increases Bacterial Diversity and Immune Gene Expression in Culex pipiens
Previous Article in Journal
Honokiol, a Lignan Biphenol Derived from the Magnolia Tree, Inhibits Dengue Virus Type 2 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wolbachia Do Not Induce Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Immune Pathway Activation in Aedes albopictus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 7
Issue 9
10.3390/v7092851
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insect-Specific Virus Discovery: Significance for the Arbovirus Community

by
Bethany G. Bolling
*,†,
Scott C. Weaver
,
Robert B. Tesh
and
Nikos Vasilakis
Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, Center for Tropical Diseases, and Department of Pathology,University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Present address: Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX 78756, USA
Viruses 2015, 7(9), 4911-4928; https://doi.org/10.3390/v7092851
Submission received: 9 May 2015 / Revised: 31 July 2015 / Accepted: 31 July 2015 / Published: 10 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of the Insect Microbiome on Arbovirus Transmission)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses), especially those transmitted by mosquitoes, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in humans and animals worldwide. Recent discoveries indicate that mosquitoes are naturally infected with a wide range of other viruses, many within taxa occupied by arboviruses that are considered insect-specific. Over the past ten years there has been a dramatic increase in the literature describing novel insect-specific virus detection in mosquitoes, which has provided new insights about viral diversity and evolution, including that of arboviruses. It has also raised questions about what effects the mosquito virome has on arbovirus transmission. Additionally, the discovery of these new viruses has generated interest in their potential use as biological control agents as well as novel vaccine platforms. The arbovirus community will benefit from the growing database of knowledge concerning these newly described viral endosymbionts, as their impacts will likely be far reaching.

1. Introduction

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) are vertebrate-infectious viruses transmitted biologically (requiring replication in the vector) by mosquitoes, ticks, and other arthropod vectors. They are responsible for significant public health, social, and economic burden throughout the world, causing sporadic disease outbreaks and epidemics affecting human and animal populations. Some of the major contributors to this burden are mosquito-borne viruses like dengue (DEN), chikungunya (CHIK), yellow fever (YF), Japanese encephalitis (JE), West Nile (WN), and Rift Valley fever (RVF) viruses. Vaccines and antiviral drugs are lacking for most arboviral diseases and vector control efforts can be logistically and financially difficult to implement. Novel approaches are needed for vector control in order to reduce or prevent pathogen transmission.
Understanding microbial diversity in vector mosquitoes is important for control strategies. The growing interest and discovery of the diverse nature of the mosquito microbiome has given us new insights into the complex nature of vector-borne disease systems. In vitro and in vivo studies of newly described insect-specific viruses have revealed a novel group of viruses that are host-restricted to replication in invertebrate cells, in contrast to arboviruses, sensu strictu, which are able to replicate in both vertebrate and invertebrate cells. Phylogenetic analyses and experimental studies demonstrate that many of these insect-specific viruses isolated from mosquitoes are closely related to human pathogenic arboviruses, which raises questions about the potential role they may play in modulating arbovirus transmission. Ongoing studies characterizing these viruses indicate potential applications for biological control as well as novel vaccine strategies.

2. Detection of Insect-Specific Viruses

The term “insect-specific” refers to viruses that naturally infect mosquitoes and replicate in mosquito cells in vitro, but do not appear to replicate in vertebrate cells or to infect humans or other vertebrates. Insect-specific viruses were first described within the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae. Cell fusing agent virus (CFAV), isolated 40 years ago, was the first insect-specific flavivirus characterized [1]. CFAV was isolated from culture fluid of an Aedes aegypti cell line, which produced massive syncytia when inoculated into a culture of Aedes albopictus cells, but it failed to replicate in three vertebrate cell lines (BHK-21, KB, and Vero) tested [1]. The complete nucleotide sequence for CFAV was determined approximately 15 years later and was found to be distantly related to other flaviviruses based on deduced amino acid sequences [2]. Sequence identities between CFAV and other flaviviruses were highest for the NS5 and NS3 genes, with 45% and 34% amino acid similarities, respectively. More recently, CFAV has been detected in field-caught Aedes and Culex spp. mosquitoes from Puerto Rico [3], Indonesia [4], Thailand [5], Mexico [6], and the United States (R. Tesh and N. Vasilakis, unpublished data). Phylogenetic analyses of the genus Flavivirus suggest that CFAV may represent a basal, possibly ancestral, lineage [2,7].
More than 25 years after the initial description of CFAV, a second virus, Kamiti River virus (KRV), was isolated from immature stages of Aedes macintoshi mosquitoes collected from flooded dambos in Kenya and was found to be related to CFAV [8,9]. Kamiti River virus also caused cytopathic effects (CPE) in A. albopictus (C6/36) cells, but not cell fusion, a hallmark of CFAV [8]. Similar to CFAV, KRV failed to replicate in vertebrate cells. Interestingly, sequences closely related to CFAV and KRV were found integrated into the genomes of laboratory-bred and field-caught Aedes spp. mosquitoes, generating questions about possible integration mechanisms involved and how these affect genetic diversity [10,11]. A third insect-specific flavivirus, Culex flavivirus (CxFV), was detected in 2007 in Culex spp. mosquitoes collected in Japan [12]. Isolates were made from C. pipiens, C. tritaeniorhynchus, and C. quinquefasciatus mosquito pools. Phylogenetic analysis of E protein amino acid sequences of CxFV and other flaviviruses revealed that CxFV clustered with CFAV and KRV in the insect-specific virus clade. Similar to previously described insect-specific viruses, CxFV did not infect vertebrate cells, but it also did not cause severe CPE in C6/36 cells, as seen with CFAV and KRV [12]. CxFV has since been isolated from numerous Culex species mosquitoes collected in many different parts of the world [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and appears to be ubiquitous in nature.
With advances in molecular tools for viral detection and also the growing interest into the mosquito microbiome, there has been a recent explosion in the detection and description of new insect-specific viruses (Figure 1). Most have been tentatively placed within the family Flaviviridae based on phylogenetic analyses but there have also been insect-specific viruses preliminarily classified in the families Togaviridae, Rhabdoviridae, Bunyaviridae, Reoviridae, Mesoniviridae, Tymoviridae, Birnaviridae, as well as other novel taxa (Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Insect-specific viruses described in the literature.
Table 1. Insect-specific viruses described in the literature.
TaxaVirusIsolationSequenceReference
BirnaviridaeCulex Y virus
Espirito Santo virus		Yes
Yes		Full genome
Full genome		[21]
[22]
Mosquito X virusNoFull genome[23]
BunyaviridaeCumuto virusYesFull genome[24]
GouléakoYesFull genome[25]
Herbert virusYesFull genome[26]
Kibale virusYesFull genome[26]
Phasi Charoen virusYesPartial[27]
Tai virusYesFull genome[26]
FlaviviridaeAedes cinereus flavivirusNoPartial[28]
Aedes galloisi flavivirusYesPartial[29]
Aedes flavivirusYesFull genome[4]
Aedes vexans flavivirusNoPartial [28]
Barkedji virusYesPartial[30]
Calbertado virusYesPartial[16]
Cell fusing agent virusYesFull genome[1,2]
Chaoyang virusYesFull genome[31]
Culex flavivirusYesFull genome[12]
Culex theileri flavivirusYesFull genome[32]
Czech Aedes vexans flavivirusNoPartial[28]
Donggang virusYesFull genomeGenbank accession #JQ086551 (2012)
Hanko virusYesFull genome[33]
Kamiti River virusYesFull genome[8,9]
TaxaVirusIsolationSequenceReference
FlaviviridaeLammi virusYesPartial[34]
Mercadeo virusYesFull genome[35]
Marisma mosquito virusYesPartial[36]
Nakiwogo virusYesPartial[14]
Nanay virusYesPartial[37]
Nhumirim virusYesFull genome[38]
Nounane virusYesFull genome[39]
Ochlerotatus flavivirusNoPartial[28]
Ochlerotatus caspius flavivirusYesFull genome[40]
Palm Creek virusYesPartial[41]
Quang Binh virusYesFull genome[42]
Spanish Culex flavivirusYesPartial[36]
Spanish Ochlerotatus flavivirusYesPartial[36]
Yunan Culex flavivirusYesFull genome[43]
MesoniviridaeBontag Baru virusYesFull genome[44]
Casuarina virusYesFull genome[45]
Cavally virusYesFull genome[46]
Dak Nong virusYesFull genome[47]
Hana virusYesFull genome[48]
Kamphaeng Phet virusYesFull genome[44]
Méno virusYesFull genome[48]
Moumo virusYesFull genome[48]
Nam Dinh virusYesFull genome[49]
Nsé virusYesFull genome[48]
NegevirusesDezidougou virusYesFull genome[50]
Goutanap virusYesFull genome[51]
Loreto virusYesFull genome[50]
Negev virusYesFull genome[50]
Ngewotan virusYesFull genome[50]
Piura virusYesFull genome[50]
Santana virusYesFull genome[50]
Tanay virusYesFull genome[52]
Wallerfield virusYesFull genome[23]
NodaviridaeMosinovirusYesFull genome[53]
ReoviridaeAedes pseudoscutellaris reovirusYesFull genome[54]
Cimodo virusYesFull genome[55]
Fako virusYesFull genome[56]
RhabdoviridaeArboretum virusYesFull genome[57]
Culex tritaeniorhynchus rhabdovirusYesFull genome[58]
Moussa virusYesFull genome[59]
Puerto Almendras virusYesFull genome[57]
TogaviridaeEilat virusYesFull genome[60]
TymoviridaeCulex tymovirus-like virusYesFull genome[61]
Viruses 07 02851 g001 1024
Figure 1. Timeline demonstrating dramatic increase in insect-specific virus discovery.
Figure 1. Timeline demonstrating dramatic increase in insect-specific virus discovery.
Viruses 07 02851 g001

3. Viral Maintenance in Nature

Arbovirus transmission cycles have three essential components: the virus, the hematophagous arthropod vector, and the vertebrate host [62]. Arboviruses sensu strictu are maintained in nature by propagative biological transmission, where the virus replicates in two disparate systems: the invertebrate vector and the vertebrate host [63]. In contrast, insect-specific viruses lack the ability to replicate in vertebrate cells. To date, most insect-specific viruses have been isolated using C6/36 (A. albopictus) cells, with some studies attempting propagation in several different vertebrate cell lines in order to confirm this host-restriction characteristic [12,16,34]. Recent studies with an insect-specific alphavirus, Eilat virus (EILV), suggest that the basis for host-restriction is multigenic and viral replication is limited at multiple levels [64].
Data are lacking on the transmission dynamics of most insect-specific viruses in nature and the potential effects of these viral infections on mosquito life-history traits. Discovering how these viruses are maintained in nature and how they affect their mosquito hosts is important for understanding how they could potentially modulate arbovirus transmission. Several experimental studies have shown that insect-specific viruses can be transmitted vertically (from adult female to progeny) [65,66,67]; in addition, mosquito-specific viruses have been detected in immature stages and adult males from field collections [3,9,16,68] suggesting vertical maintenance in nature. Tissue tropisms of CxFV observed in C. pipiens [66] along with a recent study showing CxFV transmission from naturally infected males to naïve females [67] together indicate that venereal transmission may also play a role. These observations have been made with insect-specific flaviviruses and may not be representative of insect-specific viruses belonging to other virus families.

4. Viral Diversity and Evolution

In addition to the classical arboviral pathogens such as dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya, Rift Valley fever and Japanese encephalitis viruses, mosquitoes are also infected with a wide variety of insect-specific viruses. This latter group is comprised of a growing number of largely RNA viruses, belonging to many different taxa including Flaviviridae (Figure 2), Rhabdoviridae (Figure 3), Mesoniviridae (Figure 4), negeviruses (Figure 5), and Togaviridae (Figure 6). Although insect-specific viruses do not infect vertebrates, they are nonetheless an important part of the mosquito microbiome. The recent development and wide availability of methods for full genome sequencing and metagenomics have revealed many novel insect-specific viruses [6,69,70,71,72]; yet little is known about their ecology or their effect on the mosquito host.
Viruses 07 02851 g002 1024
Figure 2. Flaviviruses: Maximum-likelihood analysis of select members of the genus flavivirus. Scale bars indicate amino acid substitutions/site. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file.
Figure 2. Flaviviruses: Maximum-likelihood analysis of select members of the genus flavivirus. Scale bars indicate amino acid substitutions/site. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file.
Viruses 07 02851 g002
Viruses 07 02851 g003 1024
Figure 3. Rhabdovirus: Maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis of rhabdovirus L protein sequences. Horizontal branch lengths are drawn to a scale of amino acid substitutions/site, and all bootstrap support values ≥85% are indicated by an asterisk. Cytorhabdovirus, novirhabdovirus and nucleorhabdovirus outgroup sequences were excluded from the tree as they were too divergent to establish a reliable rooting. The tree is therefore rooted arbitrarily on one of two basal clades (genera Almendravirus and Bahiavirus) that comprise viruses isolated from mosquitoes. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file. (Adapted from [73]).
Figure 3. Rhabdovirus: Maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis of rhabdovirus L protein sequences. Horizontal branch lengths are drawn to a scale of amino acid substitutions/site, and all bootstrap support values ≥85% are indicated by an asterisk. Cytorhabdovirus, novirhabdovirus and nucleorhabdovirus outgroup sequences were excluded from the tree as they were too divergent to establish a reliable rooting. The tree is therefore rooted arbitrarily on one of two basal clades (genera Almendravirus and Bahiavirus) that comprise viruses isolated from mosquitoes. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file. (Adapted from [73]).
Viruses 07 02851 g003
Recent phylogenetic studies [69,72,73] indicate that many of the RNA insect-associated viruses in the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae and Rhabdoviridae are ancient with highly diverse lineages and that they probably evolved and diversified with their insect hosts [74,75]. The fact that many of these viral agents appear to be vertically transmitted is further evidence that they have been in contact with their insect hosts for a long period of time. Some appear to have become integrated with the genomes of their insect or arthropod hosts [10,76,77]. Others probably evolved from being insect-specific viruses to dual host viruses, capable of also infecting the animals or plants on which their insect hosts fed. Many arthropod-borne viruses of vertebrates and plants probably originated in this way [69,78]. Some viruses in this latter group may have completely adapted to animals or plants and lost the need for an insect host [62,69,78]. In view of their evolutionary history and plasticity, it seems likely that in the future other insect-specific will develop the ability to infect vertebrates or plants and become new emerging pathogens.
Viruses 07 02851 g004 1024
Figure 4. Mesoniviruses: Maximum-likelihood analysis of conserved protein domains of ORF1ab (3CLpro, RdRp, HEL1). Scale bars indicate amino acid substitutions/site. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation/strain. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file. (Adapted from [44]).
Figure 4. Mesoniviruses: Maximum-likelihood analysis of conserved protein domains of ORF1ab (3CLpro, RdRp, HEL1). Scale bars indicate amino acid substitutions/site. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation/strain. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file. (Adapted from [44]).
Viruses 07 02851 g004
Viruses 07 02851 g005 1024
Figure 5. Negeviruses: Maximum likelihood analysis of select negeviruses. The region of the genome corresponds to the nt 4316–7309 (Negev E0239), which corresponds to the RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase of the genome. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation/strain. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file.
Figure 5. Negeviruses: Maximum likelihood analysis of select negeviruses. The region of the genome corresponds to the nt 4316–7309 (Negev E0239), which corresponds to the RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase of the genome. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation/strain. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file.
Viruses 07 02851 g005
The concept that arboviruses originated in arthropods is not new. More than 50 years ago, Andrewes [79], Mattingly [80] and Maramorosch [78] all suggested that arboviruses originated from precursor viruses in arthropod vectors and that their introduction into vertebrates was a secondary or later development. Recent phylogenetic studies [69,72,73,74,75,76] demonstrate the high abundance and diversity of arthropod-associated RNA viruses, which supports the idea that arthropods may have played an important role in viral evolution, potentially serving as a hotspot where insect-specific viruses have evolved into dual-host viruses.
Viruses 07 02851 g006 1024
Figure 6. Togaviruses: Maximum likelihood analysis of select togaviruses. Phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the alphavirus structural ORF. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation/strain. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file.
Figure 6. Togaviruses: Maximum likelihood analysis of select togaviruses. Phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the alphavirus structural ORF. Branch labels indicate virus abbreviation/strain. Additional virus isolate information is contained in a supplemental file.
Viruses 07 02851 g006

5. Effects on Vector Competence for Arboviruses

Much has been written about the replication of arboviruses in insects and insect cells, as well as descriptions of the innate and adaptive immune responses of insect cells to arbovirus infection [81,82]. In contrast, little is known about the response of insects or insect cells to infection with most of the newly discovered RNA insect-specific viruses. However, based on recent findings that bacterial symbionts of mosquitoes can alter the insects’ vector competence for certain arboviruses [83,84,85], some of the insect-specific viral symbionts of mosquitoes may have a similar effect (Figure 7), either as a result of superinfection exclusion [86,87,88] or alteration of the vector’s immune system [81,82].
Viruses 07 02851 g007 1024
Figure 7. Mosquito vector competence for arboviruses can be affected by external and internal factors.
Figure 7. Mosquito vector competence for arboviruses can be affected by external and internal factors.
Viruses 07 02851 g007
Most of the reported studies of dual infection have examined the susceptibility of mosquitoes or mosquito cells that were infected with an insect-specific flavivirus, like CxFV, to superinfection with a flavivirus pathogen such as WNV or DENV. Results of these studies have been contradictory and inconclusive. For example, a retrospective study of C. pipiens mosquitoes collected in Chicago in 2006, found that WNV-positive mosquito pools had a four-fold increased likelihood of also containing CxFV compared to WNV-negative pools [89]. In contrast, Crockett and colleagues [90] found no evidence to support an association between WNV and CxFV prevalence rates in C. quinquefasciatus populations in the southeastern United States. In vitro and in vivo studies examining the potential interaction of WNV with insect-specific flaviviruses in mosquito cells and in mosquitoes have also produced conflicting results, highlighting the need for additional studies to clarify these interactions. Studies evaluating sequential infections of C6/36 (A. albopictus) cells, first with CxFV and followed by WNV 48 h later, resulted in significantly reduced WNV titers in co-infected cells, compared to controls [67]. A similar study looking at WNV replication kinetics in C6/36 cells co-infected with CxFV demonstrated slightly reduced WNV titers, but these differences were not significant [91]. Recent studies with a newly described insect-specific flavivirus, Palm Creek virus (PCV), isolated from Coquillettidia xanthogaster mosquitoes collected in Australia, showed suppression of WNV (Kunjin) and Murray Valley encephalitis virus replication in C6/36 cells that were persistently infected with PCV [41].
Nhumirim virus, another newly characterized insect-specific flavivirus, was found to reduce replication of WNV, Japanese encephalitis, and St. Louis encephalitis viruses in dually infected C6/36 cell cultures [92]. The in vitro experiments described above were all conducted using C6/36 cells, which, unlike live mosquitoes, do not have a functional antiviral RNAi response [93], so the biological relevance of these results is uncertain. In another series of experiments using a C. tritaeniorhynchus cell line chronically infected with CxFV, no evidence was found of superinfection exclusion upon infection with JEV or DENV [94]. The growth of DENV was similar in both CxFV-infected and non-infected C. tritaeniorhynchus cells; replication of JEV was also similar in the CxFV-infected and control cells for four days, although the cells superinfected with JEV eventually developed marked cytopathic effects (CPE) and the JEV titers declined. No CPE were observed in the JEV-infected control cells.
Only two published studies have looked at the effects of insect-specific virus infection on vector competence for arboviruses using live mosquitoes. The first study investigated vector competence of Florida C. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes for WNV, comparing females experimentally infected with CxFV to uninfected mosquitoes [91]. No significant effect on WNV replication were observed; however, a Honduran strain of C. quinquefasciatus inoculated simultaneously with CxFV and WNV demonstrated enhanced WNV transmission at 14 days post-infection [91]. Another study compared the vector competence for WNV of a Colorado strain of C. pipiens that was naturally infected with CxFV, to the vector competence of an Iowan strain of C. pipiens that was CxFV-free [67]. The dually infected mosquitoes showed significantly reduced WNV dissemination rates at seven days post-infection. The results of these studies are inconclusive and perhaps suggest that experiments investigating interactions between insect-specific viruses and arboviruses may vary depending on the mosquito and virus strains used. However, all of these experiments were done using insect-specific flaviviruses and there are many more insect-specific viruses belonging to other virus families and taxa that should be tested. Superinfection exclusion or homologous interference [86,87,88] is just one mechanism by which a viral symbiont might alter the vector competence of a mosquito vector for an arboviral pathogen.

6. Potential Novel Applications of Insect-Specific Viruses

6.1. Use of Insect-Specific Viruses as Biological Control Agents

Biological control measures involve the use of natural predators or pathogens to reduce mosquito abundance or vector competence. Examples of biological control used for mosquitoes include the larvivorous fish, Gambusia affinis [95], Bacillus thuringiensis, as a bacterial larvicide [96], and Wolbachia, maternally inherited bacterial endosymbionts present in many arthropod species which have been used to reduce some insect populations by way of cytoplasmic incompatibility [97]. Recent studies have shown the potential of certain Wolbachia strains to reduce the vector competence of mosquitoes by rendering them refractory to some human pathogens [98,99,100]. This finding represents one of the most promising new methods of biological control for mosquito-borne diseases. Other naturally occurring bacterial symbionts have also been shown to alter the ability of mosquitoes to become infected and to vector arboviral pathogens [83]. It is thought that the insect’s innate immune response is upregulated by the bacterial infection, and this immune activation results in protection against subsequent arboviral infection [84,85]. If a bacterial symbiont can alter the vector competence of a mosquito for arboviruses, then it seems likely that certain viral symbionts may have a similar effect [50]. Preliminary evidence suggests that some insect-specific viruses may alter the mosquito’s susceptibility to certain pathogenic arboviruses [41,67,91]. This interaction is not yet fully characterized and additional studies are needed to elucidate the dynamics of co-infection in mosquitoes. Since many insect-specific viruses are vertically transmitted, it may be possible to create a population of mosquitoes that is infected with an insect-specific virus, rendering them unable to transmit certain human pathogenic arboviruses. Further studies are warranted to investigate the potential for using insect-specific viruses as an innovative method for vector-borne disease prevention.

6.2. Use of Insect-Specific Viruses as Vaccine and Diagnostic Platforms

In addition to their potential use in disrupting arbovirus transmission, insect-specific viruses show potential as platforms for vaccine or diagnostic development. The insect-specific alphavirus, EILV [60], is defective for vertebrate cell infection at both the entry and RNA replication levels [64]. This inherent safety characteristic has been exploited to use recombinant DNA technology to generate EILV chimeras, where the structural polyprotein open reading frame is swapped with that of a vertebrate-pathogenic alphavirus to generate a chimera that is structurally indistinguishable from the latter virus. Although these chimeras enter vertebrate cells, they retain EILV’s restriction on RNA replication and thus are non-infectious for vertebrates. Chimeras between EILV and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) have been shown to serve as high quality antigens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), where they have many advantages including safety due to lack of vertebrate cell replication, which negates the need for inactivation, thereby preserving antigenic authenticity. They can therefore be produced cheaply and efficiently at biosafety level 1 containment in mosquito cells with titers generally exceeding 108 infectious units/mL. An ELISA for CHIKV using an EILV/CHIKV chimera was shown superior to a commercial assay as well as to an ELISA using traditional antigens extracted from cell cultures (J. Erasmus and S. Weaver unpublished).
Eilat-based alphavirus chimeras have also been developed as vaccines for CHIKV and Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE). Single doses of 108 infectious units have been shown to protect completely against lethal challenge with both CHIKV and VEEV in murine models, in some cases outperforming live-attenuated vaccines in immunogenicity. This remarkable efficacy appears to be mediated by the ability of the chimeric viruses to enter vertebrate cells by virtue of their structural proteins derived from CHIKV or VEEV, along with their packaging of subgenomic RNA that is translated into the structural proteins and presented on the surface of cells [101]. The ability of these chimeric genomes to encode an additional subgenomic promoter and efficiently express foreign genes [64], also suggests that they can be developed as highly safe yet rapidly immunogenic platforms for the development of vaccines against a wide range of infectious and even noninfectious diseases.

7. Conclusions

Vector-borne disease systems are ecologically complex, involving dynamic interactions between the pathogen, vertebrate host, and the vector, with the environment also playing an important role. Recent studies describing the presence of viral endosymbionts in mosquito populations give us new insight into the mosquito microbiome and how this “internal” environment may play an important role in regulating the transmission of important pathogens. Our growing understanding about the diverse nature of these insect-specific viruses has thus far generated more questions than answers. Further studies are warranted to continue to elucidate the role that these viral endosymbionts play in nature and also investigate how we can take advantage of their unique properties for arbovirus control efforts.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by contract HHSN272201000040I/HHSN27200004/D04 (NV, RBT) from the National Institutes of Health, and by a grant by the Brown Foundation of Houston (SW, NV).

Author Contributions

B.B., S.W., R.T., and N.V. contributed to the writing of this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stollar, V.; Thomas, L. An Agent in the Aedes aegypti Cell Line (Peleg) which Causes Fusion of Aedes albopictus Cells. Virology 1975, 64, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cammisa-Parks, H.; Cisar, L.A.; Kane, A.; Stollar, V. The complete nucleotide sequence of cell fusing agent (CFA): Homology between the nonstructural proteins encoded by CFA and the nonstructural proteins encoded by arthropod-borne flaviviruses. Virology 1992, 189, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cook, S.; Bennett, S.N.; Holmes, E.C.; De Chesse, R.; Moureau, G.; de Lamballerie, X. Isolation of a new strain of the flavivirus cell fusing agent virus in a natural mosquito population from Puerto Rico. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hoshino, K.; Isawa, H.; Tsuda, Y.; Sawabe, K.; Kobayashi, M. Isolation and characterization of a new insect flavivirus from Aedes albopictus and Aedes flavopictus mosquitoes in Japan. Virology 2009, 391, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yamanaka, A.; Thongrungkiat, S.; Ramasoota, P.; Konishi, E. Genetic and evolutionary analysis of cell-fusing agent virus based on Thai strains isolated in 2008 and 2012. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 19, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Espinoza-Gómez, F.; López-Lemus, A.U.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, I.P.; Martinez-Fierro, M.L.; Newton-Sánchez, O.A.; Chávez-Flores, E.; Delgado-Enciso, I. Detection of sequences from a potentially novel strain of cell fusing agent virus in Mexican Stegomyia (Aedes) aegypti mosquitoes. Arch. Virol. 2011, 156, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marin, M.S.; Zanotto, P.M.; Gritsun, T.S.; Gould, E. a Phylogeny of TYU, SRE, and CFA virus: Different evolutionary rates in the genus Flavivirus. Virology 1995, 206, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Crabtree, M.B.; Sang, R.C.; Stollar, V.; Dunster, L.M.; Miller, B.R. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the newly described insect flavivirus, Kamiti River virus. Arch. Virol. 2003, 148, 1095–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sang, R.C.; Gichogo, A.; Gachoya, J.; Dunster, M.D.; Ofula, V.; Hunt, A.R.; Crabtree, M.B.; Miller, B.R.; Dunster, L.M. Isolation of a new flavivirus related to cell fusing agent virus (CFAV) from field-collected flood-water Aedes mosquitoes sampled from a dambo in central Kenya. Arch. Virol. 2003, 148, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Crochu, S.; Cook, S.; Attoui, H.; Charrel, R.N.; De Chesse, R.; Belhouchet, M.; Lemasson, J.J.; de Micco, P.; de Lamballerie, X. Sequences of flavivirus-related RNA viruses persist in DNA form integrated in the genome of Aedes spp. mosquitoes. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 1971–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Roiz, D.; Vázquez, A.; Seco, M.P.S.; Tenorio, A.; Rizzoli, A. Detection of novel insect flavivirus sequences integrated in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Northern Italy. Virol. J. 2009, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hoshino, K.; Isawa, H.; Tsuda, Y.; Yano, K.; Sasaki, T.; Yuda, M.; Takasaki, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Sawabe, K. Genetic characterization of a new insect flavivirus isolated from Culex pipiens mosquito in Japan. Virology 2007, 359, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morales-Betoulle, M.E.; Monzón Pineda, M.L.; Sosa, S.M.; Panella, N.; López, M.R.B.; Cordón-Rosales, C.; Komar, N.; Powers, A.; Johnson, B.W. Culex flavivirus isolates from mosquitoes in Guatemala. J. Med. Entomol. 2008, 45, 1187–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cook, S.; Moureau, G.; Harbach, R.E.; Mukwaya, L.; Goodger, K.; Ssenfuka, F.; Gould, E.; Holmes, E.C.; de Lamballerie, X. Isolation of a novel species of flavivirus and a new strain of Culex flavivirus (Flaviviridae) from a natural mosquito population in Uganda. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 2669–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Farfan-Ale, J.A.; Loroño-Pino, M.A.; Garcia-Rejon, J.E.; Hovav, E.; Powers, A.M.; Lin, M.; Dorman, K.S.; Platt, K.B.; Bartholomay, L.C.; Soto, V.; et al. Detection of RNA from a novel West Nile-like virus and high prevalence of an insect-specific flavivirus in mosquitoes in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 80, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Bolling, B.G.; Eisen, L.; Moore, C.G.; Blair, C.D. Insect-specific flaviviruses from Culex mosquitoes in Colorado, with evidence of vertical transmission. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, D.Y.; Guzman, H.; Bueno, R.; Dennett, J.A.; Auguste, A.J.; Carrington, C.V.F.; Popov, V.L.; Weaver, S.C.; Beasley, D.W.C.; Tesh, R.B. Characterization of Culex Flavivirus (Flaviviridae) strains isolated from mosquitoes in the United States and Trinidad. Virology 2009, 386, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huanyu, W.; Haiyan, W.; Shihong, F.; Guifang, L.; Hong, L.; Xiaoyan, G.; Lizhi, S.; Rayner, S.; Aiqiang, X.; Guodong, L. Isolation and identification of a distinct strain of Culex Flavivirus from mosquitoes collected in Mainland China. Virol. J. 2012, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Machado, D.C.; Mondini, A.; dos Santos Santana, V.; Yonamine, P.T.K.; Chiaravalloti Neto, F.; Zanotto, P.M.D.A.; Nogueira, M.L. First identification of Culex flavivirus (Flaviviridae) in Brazil. Intervirology 2012, 55, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chen, Y.Y.; Lin, J.W.; Fan, Y.C.; Tu, W.C.; Chang, G.J.J.; Chiou, S.S. First detection of the Africa/Caribbean/Latin American subtype of Culex flavivirus in Asian country, Taiwan. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 36, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Marklewitz, M.; Gloza-Rausch, F.; Kurth, A.; Kümmerer, B.M.; Drosten, C.; Junglen, S. First isolation of an Entomobirnavirus from free-living insects. J. Gen. Virol. 2012, 93, 2431–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vancini, R.; Paredes, A.; Ribeiro, M.; Blackburn, K.; Ferreira, D.; Kononchik, J.P.; Hernandez, R.; Brown, D. Espirito Santo virus: A new birnavirus that replicates in insect cells. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 2390–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, Y.; Mi, Z.; Zhuang, L.; Ma, M.; An, X.; Liu, W.; Cao, W.; Tong, Y. Presence of entomobirnaviruses in Chinese mosquitoes in the absence of Dengue virus co-infection. J. Gen. Virol. 2013, 94, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Auguste, A.J.; Carrington, C.V.F.; Forrester, N.L.; Popov, V.L.; Guzman, H.; Widen, S.G.; Wood, T.G.; Weaver, S.C.; Tesh, R.B. Characterization of a novel Negevirus and a novel Bunyavirus isolated from Culex (Culex) declarator mosquitoes in Trinidad. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Marklewitz, M.; Handrick, S.; Grasse, W.; Kurth, A.; Lukashev, A.; Drosten, C.; Ellerbrok, H.; Leendertz, F.H.; Pauli, G.; Junglen, S. Gouleako virus isolated from West African mosquitoes constitutes a proposed novel genus in the family Bunyaviridae. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 9227–9234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Marklewitz, M.; Zirkel, F.; Rwego, I.B.; Heidemann, H.; Trippner, P.; Kurth, A.; Kallies, R.; Briese, T.; Lipkin, W.I.; Drosten, C.; et al. Discovery of a unique novel clade of mosquito-associated bunyaviruses. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 12850–12865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yamao, T.; Eshita, Y.; Kihara, Y.; Satho, T.; Kuroda, M.; Sekizuka, T.; Nishimura, M.; Sakai, K.; Watanabe, S.; Akashi, H.; et al. Novel virus discovery in field-collected mosquito larvae using an improved system for rapid determination of viral RNA sequences (RDV ver4.0). Arch. Virol. 2009, 154, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Calzolari, M.; Zé-Zé, L.; Růžek, D.; Vázquez, A.; Jeffries, C.; Defilippo, F.; Osório, H.C.; Kilian, P.; Ruíz, S.; Fooks, A.R.; et al. Detection of mosquito-only flaviviruses in Europe. J. Gen. Virol. 2012, 93, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Hoshino, K.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi, A.; Isawa, H.; Sasaki, T.; Higa, Y.; Kasai, S.; Tsuda, Y.; Sawabe, K.; Kobayashi, M. Entomological surveillance for flaviviruses at migratory bird stopover sites in Hokkaido, Japan, and a new insect flavivirus detected in Aedes galloisi (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2012, 49, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kolodziejek, J.; Pachler, K.; Bin, H.; Mendelson, E.; Shulman, L.; Orshan, L.; Nowotny, N. Barkedji virus, a novel mosquito-borne flavivirus identified in Culex perexiguus mosquitoes, Israel, 2011. J. Gen. Virol. 2013, 94, 2449–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lee, J.S.; Grubaugh, N.D.; Kondig, J.P.; Turell, M.J.; Kim, H.C.; Klein, T.A.; O’Guinn, M.L. Isolation and genomic characterization of Chaoyang virus strain ROK144 from Aedes vexans nipponii from the Republic of Korea. Virology 2013, 435, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Parreira, R.; Cook, S.; Lopes, Â.; de Matos, A.P.; de Almeida, A.P.G.; Piedade, J.; Esteves, A. Genetic characterization of an insect-specific flavivirus isolated from Culex theileri mosquitoes collected in southern Portugal. Virus Res. 2012, 167, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huhtamo, E.; Moureau, G.; Cook, S.; Julkunen, O.; Putkuri, N.; Kurkela, S.; Uzcátegui, N.Y.; Harbach, R.E.; Gould, E.A.; Vapalahti, O.; et al. Novel insect-specific flavivirus isolated from northern Europe. Virology 2012, 433, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huhtamo, E.; Putkuri, N.; Kurkela, S.; Manni, T.; Vaheri, A.; Vapalahti, O.; Uzcátegui, N.Y. Characterization of a novel flavivirus from mosquitoes in northern europe that is related to mosquito-borne flaviviruses of the tropics. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 9532–9540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Carrera, J.; Guzman, H.; Beltran, D.; Diaz, Y.; Lopez-Verges, S.; Torres, R.; Popov, V.; Widen, S.; Wood, T.; Weaver, S.; et al. Mercadeo Virus: A Novel Mosquito-Specific Flavivirus from Panama. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vázquez, A.; Sánchez-Seco, M.P.; Palacios, G.; Molero, F.; Reyes, N.; Ruiz, S.; Aranda, C.; Marqués, E.; Escosa, R.; Moreno, J.; et al. Novel Flaviviruses Detected in Different Species of Mosquitoes in Spain. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Evangelista, J.; Cruz, C.; Guevara, C.; Astete, H.; Carey, C.; Kochel, T.J.; Morrison, A.C.; Williams, M.; Halsey, E.S.; Forshey, B.M. Characterization of a novel flavivirus isolated from Culex (Melanoconion) ocossa mosquitoes from Iquitos, Peru. J. Gen. Virol. 2013, 94, 1266–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pauvolid-Corrêa, A.; Solberg, O.; Couto-Lima, D.; Kenney, J.; Serra-Freire, N.; Brault, A.; Nogueira, R.; Langevin, S.; Komar, N. Nhumirim virus, a novel flavivirus isolated from mosquitoes from the Pantanal, Brazil. Arch. Virol. 2014, 160, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Junglen, S.; Kopp, A.; Kurth, A.; Pauli, G.; Ellerbrok, H.; Leendertz, F.H. A new flavivirus and a new vector: Characterization of a novel flavivirus isolated from uranotaenia mosquitoes from a tropical rain forest. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 4462–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ferreira, D.D.; Cook, S.; Lopes, A.; de Matos, A.P.; Esteves, A.; Abecasis, A.; de Almeida, A.P.G.; Piedade, J.; Parreira, R. Characterization of an insect-specific flavivirus (OCFVPT) co-isolated from Ochlerotatus caspius collected in southern Portugal along with a putative new Negev-like virus. Virus Genes 2013, 47, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hobson-Peters, J.; Yam, A.W.Y.; Lu, J.W.F.; Setoh, Y.X.; May, F.J.; Kurucz, N.; Walsh, S.; Prow, N.A.; Davis, S.S.; Weir, R.; et al. A new insect-specific flavivirus from northern Australia suppresses replication of West Nile virus and Murray Valley encephalitis virus in co-infected mosquito cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Crabtree, M.B.; Nga, P.T.; Miller, B.R. Isolation and characterization of a new mosquito flavivirus, Quang Binh virus, from Vietnam. Arch. Virol. 2009, 154, 857–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zuo, S.; Zhao, Q.; Guo, X.; Zhou, H.; Cao, W.; Zhang, J. Detection of Quang Binh virus from mosquitoes in China. Virus Res. 2014, 180, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vasilakis, N.; Guzman, H.; Firth, C.; Forrester, N.L.; Widen, S.G.; Wood, T.G.; Rossi, S.L.; Ghedin, E.; Popov, V.; Blasdell, K.R.; et al. Mesoniviruses are mosquito-specific viruses with extensive geographic distribution and host range. Virol. J. 2014, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Warrilow, D.; Watterson, D.; Hall, R.A.; Davis, S.S.; Weir, R.; Kurucz, N.; Whelan, P.; Allcock, R.; Hall-Mendelin, S.; O’Brien, C.A.; et al. A New Species of Mesonivirus from the Northern Territory, Australia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zirkel, F.; Kurth, A.; Quan, P.; Briese, T.; Ellerbrok, H.; Pauli, G.; Leendertz, F.H. An Insect Nidovirus Emerging from a Primary Tropical Rainforest. mBio 2011, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kuwata, R.; Satho, T.; Isawa, H.; Yen, N.T.; Phong, T.V.; Nga, P.T.; Kurashige, T.; Hiramatsu, Y.; Fukumitsu, Y.; Hoshino, K.; et al. Characterization of Dak Nong virus, an insect nidovirus isolated from Culex mosquitoes in Vietnam. Arch. Virol. 2013, 158, 2273–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zirkel, F.; Roth, H.; Kurth, A.; Drosten, C.; Ziebuhr, J.; Junglen, S. Identification and characterization of genetically divergent members of the newly established family Mesoniviridae. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 6346–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nga, P.T.; Parquet, M.D.C.; Lauber, C.; Parida, M.; Nabeshima, T.; Yu, F.; Thuy, N.T.; Inoue, S.; Ito, T.; Okamoto, K.; et al. Discovery of the first insect nidovirus, a missing evolutionary link in the emergence of the largest RNA virus genomes. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vasilakis, N.; Forrester, N.L.; Palacios, G.; Nasar, F.; Savji, N.; Rossi, S.L.; Guzman, H.; Wood, T.G.; Popov, V.; Gorchakov, R.; et al. Negevirus: A proposed new taxon of insect-specific viruses with wide geographic distribution. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 2475–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kallies, R.; Kopp, A.; Zirkel, F.; Estrada, A.; Gillespie, T.; Drosten, C.; Junglen, S. Genetic Characterization of Goutanap Virus, a Novel Virus Related to Negeviruses, Cileviruses and Higreviruses. Viruses 2014, 6, 4346–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nabeshima, T.; Inoue, S.; Okamoto, K.; Posadas-Herrera, G.; Yu, F.; Uchida, L.; Ichinose, A.; Sakaguchi, M.; Sunahara, T.; Buerano, C.; et al. Tanay virus, a new species of virus isolated from mosquitoes in the Philippines. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 1390–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Schuster, S.; Zirkel, F.; Kurth, A.; van Cleef, K.W.R.; Drosten, C.; van Rij, R.P.; Junglen, S. A Unique Nodavirus with Novel Features: Mosinovirus Expresses Two Subgenomic RNAs, a Capsid Gene of Unknown Origin, and a Suppressor of the Antiviral RNA Interference Pathway. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 13447–13459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Attoui, H.; Mohd Jaafar, F.; Belhouchet, M.; Biagini, P.; Cantaloube, J.F.; de Micco, P.; de Lamballerie, X. Expansion of family Reoviridae to include nine-segmented dsRNA viruses: Isolation and characterization of a new virus designated Aedes pseudoscutellaris reovirus assigned to a proposed genus (Dinovernavirus). Virology 2005, 343, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hermanns, K.; Zirkel, F.; Kurth, A.; Drosten, C.; Junglen, S. Cimodo virus belongs to a novel lineage of reoviruses isolated from African mosquitoes. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Auguste, A.J.; Kaelber, J.; Fokam, E.; Guzman, H.; Carrington, C.; Erasmus, J.; Kamgang, B.; Popov, V.; Jakana, J.; Liu, X.; et al. A newly isolated reovirus has the simplest genomic and structural organization of any reovirus. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vasilakis, N.; Castro-Llanos, F.; Widen, S.G.; Aguilar, P.V.; Guzman, H.; Guevara, C.; Fernandez, R.; Auguste, A.J.; Wood, T.G.; Popov, V.; et al. Arboretum and Puerto Almendras viruses: Two novel rhabdoviruses isolated from mosquitoes in Peru. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kuwata, R.; Isawa, H.; Hoshino, K.; Tsuda, Y.; Yanase, T.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Sawabe, K. RNA splicing in a new rhabdovirus from Culex mosquitoes. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 6185–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Quan, P.L.; Junglen, S.; Tashmukhamedova, A.; Conlan, S.; Hutchison, S.K.; Kurth, A.; Ellerbrok, H.; Egholm, M.; Briese, T.; Leendertz, F.H.; et al. Moussa virus: A new member of the Rhabdoviridae family isolated from Culex decens mosquitoes in Côte d’Ivoire. Virus Res. 2010, 147, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Nasar, F.; Palacios, G.; Gorchakov, R.V.; Guzman, H.; Da Rosa, A.P.T.; Savji, N.; Popov, V.L.; Sherman, M.B.; Lipkin, W.I.; Tesh, R.B.; et al. Eilat virus, a unique alphavirus with host range restricted to insects by RNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14622–14627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, L.; Lv, X.; Zhai, Y.; Fu, S.; Wang, D.; Rayner, S.; Tang, Q.; Liang, G. Genomic characterization of a novel virus of the family Tymoviridae isolated from mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kuno, G.; Chang, G.J.J. Biological transmission of arboviruses: Reexamination of and new insights into components, mechanisms, and unique traits as well as their evolutionary trends. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 608–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Higgs, S.; Beaty, B.J. Natural cycles of vector-borne pathogens. In Biology of Disease Vectors; Marquardt, W., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nasar, F.; Gorchakov, R.V.; Tesh, R.B.; Weaver, S.C. Eilat Virus Host Range Restriction Is Present at Multiple Levels of the Virus Life Cycle. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 1404–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lutomiah, J.J.L.; Mwandawiro, C.; Magambo, J.; Sang, R.C. Infection and vertical transmission of Kamiti river virus in laboratory bred Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J. Insect Sci. 2007, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Saiyasombat, R.; Bolling, B.G.; Brault, A.C.; Bartholomay, L.C.; Blitvich, B.J. Evidence of Efficient Transovarial Transmission of Culex Flavivirus by Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2011, 48, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bolling, B.G.; Olea-Popelka, F.J.; Eisen, L.; Moore, C.G.; Blair, C.D. Transmission dynamics of an insect-specific flavivirus in a naturally infected Culex pipiens laboratory colony and effects of co-infection on vector competence for West Nile virus. Virology 2012, 427, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Haddow, A.D.; Guzman, H.; Popov, V.L.; Wood, T.G.; Widen, S.G.; Haddow, A.D.; Tesh, R.B.; Weaver, S.C. First isolation of Aedes flavivirus in the Western Hemisphere and evidence of vertical transmission in the mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Virology 2013, 440, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Li, C.; Shi, M.; Tian, J.; Lin, X.; Kang, Y.; Chen, L.; Qin, X.; Xu, J.; Holmes, E.C.; Zhang, Y.Z. Unprecedented genomic diversity of RNA viruses in arthropods reveals the ancestry of negative-sense RNA viruses. Elife 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Junglen, S.; Drosten, C. Virus discovery and recent insights into virus diversity in arthropods. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2013, 16, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bolling, B.G.; Vasilakis, N.; Guzman, H.; Widen, S.G.; Wood, T.G.; Popov, V.L.; Thangamani, S.; Tesh, R.B. Insect-Specific Viruses Detected in Laboratory Mosquito Colonies and Their Potential Implications for Experiments Evaluating Arbovirus Vector Competence. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 92, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cook, S.; Chung, B.Y.W.; Bass, D.; Moureau, G.; Tang, S.; McAlister, E.; Culverwell, C.L.; Glücksman, E.; Wang, H.; Brown, T.D.K.; et al. Novel Virus Discovery and Genome Reconstruction from Field RNA Samples Reveals Highly Divergent Viruses in Dipteran Hosts. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Walker, P.J.; Firth, C.; Widen, S.G.; Blasdell, K.R.; Guzman, H.; Wood, T.G.; Paradkar, P.N.; Holmes, E.C.; Tesh, R.B.; Vasilakis, N. Evolution of Genome Size and Complexity in the Rhabdoviridae. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Marklewitz, M.; Zirkel, F.; Kurth, A.; Drosten, C.; Junglen, S. Evolutionary and phenotypic analysis of live virus isolates suggests arthropod origin of a pathogenic RNA virus family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 7536–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dudas, G.; Obbard, D.J. Are arthropods at the heart of virus evolution? Elife 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fort, P.; Albertini, A.; Van-Hua, A.; Berthomieu, A.; Roche, S.; Delsuc, F.; Pasteur, N.; Capy, P.; Gaudin, Y.; Weill, M. Fossil rhabdoviral sequences integrated into arthropod genomes: Ontogeny, evolution, and potential functionality. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ballinger, M.J.; Bruenn, J.A.; Kotov, A.A.; Taylor, D.J. Selectively maintained paleoviruses in Holarctic water fleas reveal an ancient origin for phleboviruses. Virology 2013, 446, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Maramorosch, K. Multiplication of plant viruses in insect vectors. Adv. Virus Res. 1955, 3, 221–249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Andrewes, C. Factors in virus evolution. Adv. Virus Res. 1957, 4, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Mattingly, P. Ecological aspects of the evolution of mosquito-borne virus diseases. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1960, 54, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. O’Neal, S.; Samuel, G.; Adelman, Z.; Myles, K. Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Suppressors of Invertebrate Antiviral RNA Silencing. Viruses 2014, 6, 4314–4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Xu, J.; Cherry, S. Viruses and antiviral immunity in Drosophila. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2014, 42, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ramirez, J.L.; Souza-Neto, J.; Torres Cosme, R.; Rovira, J.; Ortiz, A.; Pascale, J.M.; Dimopoulos, G. Reciprocal tripartite interactions between the Aedes aegypti midgut microbiota, innate immune system and dengue virus influences vector competence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pan, X.; Zhou, G.; Wu, J.; Bian, G.; Lu, P.; Raikhel, A.S.; Xi, Z. PNAS Plus: Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to control dengue virus in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109, E23–E31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, G.; Hussain, M.; O’Neill, S.L.; Asgari, S. Wolbachia uses a host microRNA to regulate transcripts of a methyltransferase, contributing to dengue virus inhibition in Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 10276–10281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Karpf, A.R.; Lenches, E.; Strauss, E.G.; Strauss, J.H.; Brown, D.T. Superinfection exclusion of alphaviruses in three mosquito cell lines persistently infected with Sindbis virus. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 7119–7123. [Google Scholar]
  87. Burivong, P.; Pattanakitsakul, S.N.; Thongrungkiat, S.; Malasit, P.; Flegel, T.W. Markedly reduced severity of Dengue virus infection in mosquito cell cultures persistently infected with Aedes albopictus densovirus (AalDNV). Virology 2004, 329, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Pepin, K.M.; Lambeth, K.; Hanley, K. a Asymmetric competitive suppression between strains of dengue virus. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Newman, C.M.; Cerutti, F.; Anderson, T.K.; Hamer, G.L.; Walker, E.D.; Kitron, U.D.; Ruiz, M.O.; Brawn, J.D.; Goldberg, T.L. Culex flavivirus and West Nile virus mosquito coinfection and positive ecological association in Chicago, United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Crockett, R.K.; Burkhalter, K.; Mead, D.; Kelly, R.; Brown, J.; Varnado, W.; Roy, A.; Horiuchi, K.; Biggerstaff, B.J.; Miller, B.; Nasci, R. Culex flavivirus and West Nile virus in Culex quinquefasciatus populations in the southeastern United States. J. Med. Entomol. 2012, 49, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kent, R.J.; Crabtree, M.B.; Miller, B.R. Transmission of West Nile virus by Culex quinquefasciatus say infected with Culex Flavivirus Izabal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kenney, J.L.; Solberg, O.D.; Langevin, S.A.; Brault, A.C. Characterization of a novel insect-specific flavivirus from Brazil: potential for inhibition of infection of arthropod cells with medically important flaviviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 2796–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Brackney, D.E.; Scott, J.C.; Sagawa, F.; Woodward, J.E.; Miller, N.A.; Schilkey, F.D.; Mudge, J.; Wilusz, J.; Olson, K.E.; Blair, C.D.; Ebel, G.D. C6/36 Aedes albopictus cells have a dysfunctional antiviral RNA interference response. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kuwata, R.; Isawa, H.; Hoshino, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Maeda, K.; Sawabe, K. Analysis of Mosquito-Borne Flavivirus Superinfection in Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) Cells Persistently Infected with Culex Flavivirus (Flaviviridae). J. Med. Entomol. 2015, 52, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Walton, W.E. Larvivorous fish including Gambusia. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2007, 23, 184–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bravo, A.; Likitvivatanavong, S.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M. Bacillus thuringiensis : A story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Laven, H. Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 1967, 216, 383–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hedges, L.M.; Brownlie, J.C.; O’Neill, S.L.; Johnson, K.N. Wolbachia and virus protection in insects. Science 2008, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Glaser, R.L.; Meola, M.A. The native Wolbachia endosymbionts of Drosophila melanogaster and Culex quinquefasciatus increase host resistance to West Nile virus infection. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kambris, Z.; Blagborough, A.M.; Pinto, S.B.; Blagrove, M.S.C.; Godfray, H.C.J.; Sinden, R.E.; Sinkins, S.P. Wolbachia stimulates immune gene expression and inhibits plasmodium development in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Reynaud, J.M.; Kim, D.Y.; Atasheva, S.; Rasalouskaya, A.; White, J.P.; Diamond, M.S.; Weaver, S.C.; Frolova, E.I.; Frolov, I. IFIT1 Differentially Interferes with Translation and Replication of Alphavirus Genomes and Promotes Induction of Type I Interferon. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bolling, B.G.; Weaver, S.C.; Tesh, R.B.; Vasilakis, N. Insect-Specific Virus Discovery: Significance for the Arbovirus Community. Viruses 2015, 7, 4911-4928. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7092851

AMA Style

Bolling BG, Weaver SC, Tesh RB, Vasilakis N. Insect-Specific Virus Discovery: Significance for the Arbovirus Community. Viruses. 2015; 7(9):4911-4928. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7092851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bolling, Bethany G., Scott C. Weaver, Robert B. Tesh, and Nikos Vasilakis. 2015. "Insect-Specific Virus Discovery: Significance for the Arbovirus Community" Viruses 7, no. 9: 4911-4928. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7092851

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop