Eight macaques from previous studies (Table 1) were used in these experiments to conserve animals and for their prior immunizations with FG-Ad5 vectors. These animals had originally been immunized with various formulations of a synthetic peptide vaccine consisting of six conserved epitopes in the envelope (env) protein that have previously been shown to be effective at priming HIV-specific cellular immune responses in multiple animal models and humans [11,40-44]. These six peptides shown aligned to env in Figure 1 generate CD4 and CD8 responses without generating antibody responses. These peptides in various formulations mediate protection in macaques vs. SHIV-KU2 and SHIV-89.6P [43,44]. Prior to the HD-Ad study, macaques Rh51, Rh55, Rh62, and Rh63 had been vaccinated with the six synthetic peptides adjuvanted with FLT-3 ligand, CpG and by loading on dendritic cells (Table 1). Macaques Rh52, Rh61, Rh66, and Rh67 received a similar course with the exception of receiving an inactivated cholera toxin adjuvant (CT2*) rather than FLT-3 ligand and CpG (Table 1).

These animals were selected for study with HD-Ad, since they had all previously been vaccinated twice by the nasal route with 10¹¹ virus particles (v.p.) of FG-Ad5 expressing a fusion protein of the six peptides (vector described in [45]). Therefore, these animals represented an Ad5 pre-immune population on which to test the utility of HD-Ad serotype-switching. While this was advantageous, prior immunizations with the six env peptides could affect T cell responses against these six epitopes that might be generated by the HD-Ad vaccines, but should not affect T cell responses outside these regions (Figure 1). Likewise, since the peptide vaccines do not generate antibodies against env, they would not be expected to confuse antibody effects of the HD-Ad vaccines.

The macaques in this study were only vaccinated with env immunogens. No gag, pol, or other SHIV sequences were used. The JRFL gp140 env antigen in the Ad vaccines was generated by deletion of the furin cleavage site between gp120 and gp41 and deletion of the transmembrane domain. This immunogen therefore does not immunize against epitopes that are present in the cleavage and transmembrane domains in the SHIV-SF162P3 challenge virus. Alignment of the JRFL immunogen with the SF162P3 antigen shows 545 identical amino acids and 47 divergent amino acids within the common peptide sequences (Figure 1). Therefore, JRFL immunogen has 89% identity with the challenge virus.

Macaques Rh51 and Rh55 from the FLT group and animals Rh52 and Rh61 from the CT2* group were utilized for HD-Ad5 vaccination (Table 1). Monkeys Rh62 and Rh63 from the FLT group and macaques Rh66 and Rh67 from the CT2* group were used for HD-Ad6, 1, and 2 vaccination. Each group of four macaques were immunized at days 0, 24, and 67 with 10¹¹ vp of the indicated HD-Ads expressing the JRFL gp140 form of env (Figure 1) by i.m. injection. Group 1 received HD-Ad5 three times. Group 2 received HD-Ad6, then HD-Ad1, then HD-Ad2 at the same time points.

We previously reported on the antibody responses against env by ELISA [33]. This work revealed that FG-Ad5-immune animals that were immunized with only HD-Ad5-Env generated only minimal responses. In contrast, immunization with HD-Ad6-Env, HD-Ad1-Env, and HD-Ad2-Env generated detectable anti-env antibodies at each immunization with final antibody levels being 10-fold higher than in the HD-Ad5 group (p < 0.01) [33]. Given the high ELISA antibody responses, the samples were sent to the Immune Monitoring Core supervised by Dr. David Montefiori at Duke University to assess if these antibodies could neutralize SHIV or HIV viruses in vitro (Table 2). By this assay, only slight neutralization titers were observed when the samples were tested against SHIV-SF162P4 viruses and 89.6P.18, but not against other test viruses. Other field isolates tested were: SHIV-SF162P3.5, JRFL/293T, 6535.3, QH0692.42, SC422661.8 and PVO.4.

Ad5 neutralizing antibody levels were monitored in the animals after each immunization (Figure 2). Before first HD-Ad immunization, Ad5 neutralizing titers were 28 for the HD-Ad5 group and 52 for the serotype-switch group. This demonstrated that the prior intranasal FG-Ad5 immunizations had produced anti-Ad5 immunity in the animals. After first HD-Ad immunization, HD-Ad5 and HD-Ad6 boosted Ad5 neutralization titers to 500 in both groups. Two more immunizations with HD-Ad5 increased final titers to 800. One immunization with HD-Ad1 and then one with HD-Ad2 produced declining anti-Ad5 antibody levels that were three-fold lower than those generated by three HD-Ad5 immunizations. These data indicate that other viruses in species C can boost common neutralizing antibody levels (i.e. HD-Ad6), but that serotype-switching ultimately reduces the level of neutralizing antibodies after three immunizations.

PBMCs were harvested before and after each vaccination to monitor T cell responses against the env antigen by ELISPOT. PBMCs were stimulated either with the six epitopes of the peptide vaccine that was delivered prior to Ad vaccination or with overlapping 15-mer peptide pools from HIV-1 SF162P3 env covering the gp140 region in the HD-Ad vectors. Alignment of the JRFL gp140 immunogen with SF162P3 peptide pools shows 89% identity with the peptides used for ELISPOT. Alignment with of JRFL with the peptide vaccine shows amino acid mismatches in four of the six peptides (Figure 1).

ELISPOT testing before HD-Ad vaccination revealed responses below background for two macaques in the HD-Ad6/1/2 group and three in the HD-Ad5 group (Figure 3). The three other macaques had weak ELISPOT signals of 200 or less SFCs per 10⁶ cells (Figure 3). With each HD-Ad immunization, CD8-IFN-γ SFCs generally increased in both groups when after stimulation with the SF162P3 env overlapping peptide pools. Responses were higher against the SF162P3 peptides in all of the serotype-switched animals and were less variable than in the HD-Ad5 group. T cell responses peaked after one or two immunizations in the HD-Ad5 group with peaks from 200 to 800 SFCs per 10⁶ cells. In contrast, T cell responses peaked in most serotype-switched animals after third immunization with highest SFCs ranging from 700 to 2,000 SFCs (Table 3). When the six peptides of the peptide vaccine were used to stimulate the PBMCs, SFC responses in both groups were substantially lower and less frequent (Figure 3), suggesting that most of the T cell responses were directed at epitopes outside those covered by the peptide vaccine (Figure 1). Stimulation of the PBMCs with Ad5 or Ad6 produced largely undetectable T cell responses suggesting responses were predominantly against the env immunogen rather than against the Ad vectors.

To mimic sexual transmission of HIV, macaques were challenged by atraumatic administration of 1,000 TCID₅₀ of the CCR5-tropic virus SHIV-SF162P3 (Figure 4). Challenge of three control macaques produced peak viremia within 2 weeks with viral loads above 2x10⁷ viral genomes per ml of plasma (Figure 4B). Viral loads remained above 10⁶ copies/ml for 6 months at which time two of the animals were sacrificed due to weight loss and AIDS-like symptoms.

The HD-Ad-immunized animals were challenged 4 months after first immunization. This SHIV-SF162P3 challenge produced lower peak viremia and viral set points (Figure 4). At peak, viral loads were 2 to 10-fold lower in the HD-Ad vaccinated group than in control animals. One animal Rh51 in the HD-Ad5 group had viral RNA levels below detection and so appeared to have not had a "take" of the challenge virus. When Rh51 was censored, peak viremia at 2 weeks for both vaccine groups was significantly lower than controls (p = 0.04, Figure 4B). Notably, peak viremia for the HD-Ad6/1/2 group was significantly lower than the HD-Ad5/5/5 group (p < 0.05). By 18 weeks, viral set points were below 3,000 copies for all of the immunized macaques. This was notable, since all of these animals were only vaccinated with env antigens. No gag or other SHIV antigens were used. While the HD-Ad5/5/5 and HD-Ad6/1/2 groups were not significantly different from each other at this time, it was interesting that that the viral RNA levels for Rh55 from the HD-Ad5 group and Rh63 and Rh67 from the HD-Ad6/1/2 group were down to 30-60 eq./ml or 4 orders of magnitude down from their peak viremia.

We previously reported the use of HD-Ad vectors for HIV vaccination [33]. In this earlier work, we were able to utilize eight macaques that had previously been immunized nasally with FG-Ad5 to test our ability to vaccinate in Ad5-immune macaques. We demonstrated that serotype-switching did indeed provide robust circumvention of pre-existing immunity in these non-human primates and allowed the production of anti-env antibody responses that were 9 times higher than those generated by HD-Ad5 vectors [33].

In this work, we have analyzed the production of neutralizing antibodies against the env transgene protein and against Ad5 itself. This work shows that the strong anti-env ELISA titers that we observed after serotype-switching unfortunately did not translate into the production of robust neutralizing antibodies against HIV or SHIV. These data suggest that protection was mediated by T cell responses or by other antibody mechanisms (i.e. antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [46], etc.). This is consistent with previous observations that SHIV-SF162P3 is notoriously hard to neutralize with antibodies [47,48].

While these Ad5 pre-immune animals provided a good model to test for antibody production alone, they had also been previously been vaccinated with the six env peptides in various formats (Table 1). Since these peptide vaccines do not generate antibody responses, this did not affect comparison of env antibody production by the HD-Ad vaccines, but could affect the production of T cell responses by acting as priming vaccines for the HD-Ad vaccines. To test this, we compared PBMC ELISPOT responses against the cognate six epitopes used in the previous vaccinations and against overlapping 15-mer peptides from SF162P3 env spanning the vaccine's gp140 region. This comparison revealed that there was little cross-reactivity generated by the HD-Ad vaccines against the six peptides, but stronger T cell responses were generated against the peptide pools. These data suggest that the HD-Ad vaccines are generating much of the detectable T cell responses observed in the macaques.

While prior immunization with the peptides complicated data analysis, in the interest of the strong responses we observed and to minimize future animal use, we opted to challenge these animals with SHIV. We performed mucosal challenge by the rectal route with the CCR5-tropic virus SHIV-SF162P3 to mimic sexual transmission of the virus. While SIV is arguably a more suitable mucosal challenge virus than SHIV, our challenge virus had to express an HIV-1 env to assess the HIV-1 env-directed immunity that the HD-Ad vaccines had established. This challenge demonstrated that control animals had severe peak viremia after mucosal challenge and that this viremia persisted for six months until AIDS-like symptoms necessitated euthanasia of two of the animals. In contrast to controls, the HD-Ad vaccinated animals had 2 to 10-fold lower peak viremia and viral loads generally trended downward over the next 4 months. For three of the animals, viral loads approached the limits of detection by 18 weeks. These data suggest that the peptide vaccines, the HD-Ad vaccines, or both lead to lower viral loads in the animals after mucosal challenge. Given the observed ELISPOT responses, we speculate that much of this protection was mediated by the Ad vaccines.

Comparison of the HD-Ad5/5/5-immunized animals and the serotype-switched HD-Ad6/1/2 group demonstrated that animals vaccinated with the different serotypes had statistically lower peak viremia than those immunized with only HD-Ad5. This confirms the utility of serotype-switching that has previously been observed using FG-Ad vectors [28-32]. This also suggests that some level of the protection against SHIV challenge was actually mediated by the Ad vectors rather than the earlier peptide vaccines, since the serotype-switched vaccine generated more robust immune responses that may have resulted in the lower peak and set point viral loads. Peak cellular responses in the HD-Ad6/1/2 serotype-switched group were observed after the third immunization for three of the four immunized animals. This indicates that serotype-switching was driving anamnestic responses while the HD-Ad5/5/5 group immune responses may have become senescent due to increasing anti-Ad5 neutralizing antibodies (Figure 2 and Table 3). This comparison is based on censoring Rh51 from the analysis, since it had undetectable viral loads throughout the study. Censoring this animal is based on the assumption that the undetectable viral loads in HD-Ad5/5/5 group monkey Rh51 were due to poor "take" of the challenge virus. If Rh51 is included, the two groups are equal to each other by statistical comparison. While it is formally possible that the vaccine fully protected Rh51, we are unaware of an example of sterilizing immunity being generated by any vaccine in this model. In addition, T cell and antibody responses in Rh51 were comparable to those in other macaques. Therefore, the most likely explanation is that Rh51 merely was not robustly infected by the challenge virus.

HD-Ad1, 2, 5, and 6 viruses expressing the gp140 form of HIV-1 JRFL were produced as previously described [33]. HD-Ad5-env vector was transfected into a 60-mm dish of Cre-expressing 116 cells expressing Cre recombinase as in [49]. The transfected cells were infected a day later with the E1-deleted Ad5 helper virus AdNG163 whose packaging signal is flanked by loxP sites [49] for deletion in the Cre cells. Lysates were subsequently amplified by serial infections with AdNG163 in 116 cells. CsCl-banded HD-Ad were then produced from 3 liters of 116 cells producing HD-Ad preps with E1 -deleted helper contamination less than 0.02% [49]. HD-Ad1, 2, and 6 vectors were generated with helper viruses Ad1LC8cCEVS-1, Ad2LC8cCARP [26], and Ad6LC8cCEVS-6, respectively that were generously provided by Carole Evelegh and Frank L. Graham (McMaster University).

All animal experiments were carried out according to the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act, PHS Animal Welfare Policy, and the principles of the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the policies and procedures of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Eleven adult male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) of Indian origin were maintained in the specific pathogen-free breeding colony at the Michael Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop TX. The animals were anesthetized during procedures to minimize discomfort. The animals were not screened for Mamu genotype prior to study, but were randomized into the two HD-Ad vaccine groups based to equally segregate animals previously treated into both groups.

Eight macaques from previous studies (Table 1) were used in these experiments. These animals had originally been immunized with various adjuvanted synthetic peptide vaccines consisting of six conserved env epitopes [11,40-44].

These peptide and FG-Ad5-immunized macaques were immunized at days 0, 24, and 67 with 10¹¹ vp of the indicated HD-Ads by i.m. injection (Table 1).

Samples were collected at each time point indicated before any immunization or procedure. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected in EDTA or sodium heparin. Before the separation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from the blood samples, plasma was separated and stored immediately at -80°C. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) were prepared from the blood on Ficoll-Hypaque density-gradients.

Neutralization was measured as a reduction in luciferase reporter gene expression after a single round of infection in TZM-bl cells as described [50,51]. TZM-bl cells were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, as contributed by John Kappes and Xiaoyun Wu. Briefly, 200 TCID₅₀ of virus was incubated with serial 3-fold dilutions of test sample in duplicate in a total volume of 150 μl for 1 hr at 37^oC in 96-well flat-bottom culture plates. Freshly trypsinized cells (10,000 cells in 100 μl of growth medium containing 75 μg/ml DEAE dextran) were added to each well. One set of control wells received cells + virus (virus control) and another set received cells only (background control). After a 48 hour incubation, 100 μl of cells was transferred to a 96-well black solid plates (Costar) for measurements of luminescence using the Britelite Luminescence Reporter Gene Assay System (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Neutralization titers are the dilution at which relative luminescence units (RLU) were reduced by 50% compared to virus control wells after subtraction of background RLUs. Assay stocks of molecularly cloned Env-pseudotyped viruses were prepared by transfection in 293T cells and were titrated in TZM-bl cells as described [50]. The clade B reference Env clones were described previously [50].

Ad5 neutralization was performed as described previously [45]. Briefly, serial dilutions of plasma were incubated in triplicate for 1 hour at 37°C with Ad5 vector expressing luciferase. The resulting solution was added to A549 cells for 24 hours and luciferase activity was measured. Data is expressed as geometric mean titers that reduced Ad luciferase activity 50%.

Freshly prepared PBMC were used for the IFN- γ ELISPOT assay as described previously [52]. PBMCs were either stimulated with synthetic peptides pools, with Ad expressing env, or with Con A (5 μg/ml) as positive control reagent. For the six peptide vaccine cocktail, the six epitopes (Figure 1) were mixed as a pool. For overlapping envelope peptides, the SF162P3 env 15-mer peptide set (NIH AIDS Reagent Program) was used as 3 pools of 50 to 70 peptides spanning the gp140 region. Alignment of the JRFL immunogen encoded in the Ad vectors with SF162P3 peptide pool shows 89% identity with the peptide pool used for ELISPOT. PBMCs (1 x 10⁵) were seeded in duplicate wells of 96-well plates (polyvinylidene difluoride backed plates, MAIP S 45, Millipore, Bedford, MA) coated with anti-IFN-γ. °The cells were incubated in the presence of the various antigens for 36 h at 37°C. The cells were then removed, the wells washed , and then incubated with 100 μl of biotinylated anti-IFN-γ for 3 h at 37°C followed by avidin-HRP for another 30 minutes. Spots representing individual cells secreting IFN-γ were developed using 0.3 mg/ml of 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer, containing 0.015% hydrogen peroxide. The plates were washed to stop development and the spots were counted by an independent agency (Zellnet Consulting, New Jersey, NJ). The responses in terms of IFN-γ spot forming cells (SFC) for 10⁵ total input CD8⁺ T cells were determined for individual monkeys after subtracting background values of cells cultured in the medium. The cut off value for determining the positive response in the assay is defined as a minimum of 10 spots that is twice the number observed in cells cultured in the medium. Data is represented as SFCs per 10⁶ PBMCs for comparison to previous reports in the literature.

Macaques were challenged macaques by intrarectal inoculation of 1,000 TCID₅₀ of SHIV-SF162P3 from the NIH AIDS Reagent Program.

SHIV viral loads from the blood were determined by determining viral RNA copy numbers by real-time RT-PCR analyses. These assays were performed at the NIH Core Facility by Dr. Jeff Lifson's group. The threshold sensitivity of the assay is 30 viral RNA copy-equivalents/ml of plasma, and the inter-assay variation is <25% (coefficient of variation).

Data was evaluated using GraphPad Prism 4 software. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.