Next Article in Journal
Innovation Strategy in Slovak Forest Contractor Firms—A SWOT Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
How Do Urban Forests Compare? Tree Diversity in Urban and Periurban Forests of the Southeastern US
Previous Article in Journal
Fertilization Response, Light Use, and Growth Efficiency in Eucalyptus Plantations across Soil and Climate Gradients in Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surface Soil Carbon Storage in Urban Green Spaces in Three Major South Korean Cities
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2016, 7(6), 119; doi:10.3390/f7060119

Managing Tree Diversity: A Comparison of Suburban Development in Two Canadian Cities

School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
Originally presented as a conference paper at the 2nd International Conference on Urban Tree Diversity.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Francisco Escobedo, Stephen John Livesley and Justin Morgenroth
Received: 2 April 2016 / Revised: 25 May 2016 / Accepted: 30 May 2016 / Published: 31 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban and Periurban Forest Diversity and Ecosystem Services)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [9710 KB, uploaded 31 May 2016]   |  

Abstract

Is (sub)urban forest diversity shaped by previous land use? This study was designed to quantitatively assess the impacts of subdivision development on urban tree-species composition in two Canadian cities: Halifax, Nova Scotia, and London, Ontario. The main goal was to determine whether cities with contrasting pre-urbanized or pre-settlement landscapes—woodlands in Halifax and agricultural fields in London—also revealed differences in urban tree diversity losses and/or gains due to urbanization. In each city, four residential neighbourhoods representing two age categories, older and newer (40–50 years, <15 years), were examined and trees on three land types were sampled: public (street), private (residential), and remnant (woodland). All public street trees within the chosen neighbourhoods were inventoried and approximately 10% of the residential property lots were sampled randomly. Plots were examined in remnant forests in or near each city, representing the original forest habitats prior to agricultural and/or urban landscape transformations. Diameter at breast height, species richness and evenness, and proportions of native and non-native trees were measured. In both cities, streetscapes in newer neighbourhoods exhibit greater species richness and evenness, and are characterized by substantially more native trees. Despite this trend, developers and home owners continue to intensively plant non-native species on newer and smaller property lots. Older neighbourhoods in Halifax containing remnant forest stands hold the greatest number of native trees on private property, alluding to the importance of residual forest buffers and patches in promoting naturalness in the private urban forest. These results suggest that identifying and quantifying flows of species between green spaces during and after development is valuable in order to effectively promote native species establishment and enhance overall urban forest diversity. View Full-Text
Keywords: tree diversity; subdivision development; suburb; native; non-native; biodiversity tree diversity; subdivision development; suburb; native; non-native; biodiversity
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nitoslawski, S.A.; Duinker, P.N. Managing Tree Diversity: A Comparison of Suburban Development in Two Canadian Cities. Forests 2016, 7, 119.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top