Next Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution and Volume of Dead Wood in Unmanaged Caspian Beech (Fagus orientalis) Forests from Northern Iran
Previous Article in Journal
Indicators and Determinants of Small-Scale Bamboo Commercialization in Ethiopia
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2013, 4(4), 730-750; doi:10.3390/f4040730

Ambiguity in Timber Trade Regarding Efforts to Combat Illegal Logging: Potential Impacts on Trade between South-East Asia and Europe

North European Regional Office, European Forest Institute (EFINORD), Rolighedsvej 23, Fredriksberg C, Copenhagen, DK-1958, Denmark
Joint Research Centre, European Commission (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra, Italy
Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. BOX 49, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 July 2013 / Revised: 3 September 2013 / Accepted: 12 September 2013 / Published: 25 September 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [419 KB, uploaded 25 September 2013]   |  


Raised public concern in the European Union (EU) about the legality of its timber imports has pushed the European Commission to raise its standards and legality demands for wood imports. Combining literature reviews, structured interviews and trade data analyses, this study assesses the potential influence from Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) (with its Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPA) system and new legislation EU Timber Regulation (EUTR)), and third party verification schemes on the timber trade between tropical countries and Europe. These instruments have the potential to reduce the amount of illegally sourced timber being placed on the market, and they seem to have resulted in both increasing support of legality verification and certification uptake. However, there are signs of increased ambiguity in trade that could originate as a side effect of the transition towards a stricter regulation for tropical timber. Such ambiguity is explicitly taken into account here. Possible consequences from increased ambiguity are substitution of oak lumber for tropical hardwood lumber, and a diversion of exports of tropical timber to destinations with a less stringent regulatory framework than the EU. Evidence of these trade patterns in the literature reviews, interviews, and trade data analyses seems to confirm that ambiguity in international trade markets has actually increased since the introduction of these instruments. View Full-Text
Keywords: FLEGT; EUTR; certification; illegal logging; ambiguity; timber trade FLEGT; EUTR; certification; illegal logging; ambiguity; timber trade

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Giurca, A.; Jonsson, R.; Rinaldi, F.; Priyadi, H. Ambiguity in Timber Trade Regarding Efforts to Combat Illegal Logging: Potential Impacts on Trade between South-East Asia and Europe. Forests 2013, 4, 730-750.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top