- freely available
Forests 2012, 3(4), 997-1016; doi:10.3390/f3040997
Abstract: The impact of invasive plant species in national parks and forests in Vietnam is undocumented and management plans have yet to be developed. Ten national parks, ranging from uncut to degraded forests located throughout Vietnam, were surveyed for invasive plant species. Transects were set up along roads, trails where local people access park areas, and also tracks through natural forest. Of 134 exotic weeds, 25 were classified as invasive species and the number of invasive species ranged from 8 to 15 per park. An assessment of the risk of invasive species was made for three national parks based on an invasive species assessment protocol. Examples of highly invasive species were Chromolaena odorata and Mimosa diplotricha in Cat Ba National Park (island evergreen secondary forest over limestone); Mimosa pigra, Panicum repens and Eichhornia crassipes in Tram Chim National Park (lowland wetland forest dominated by melaleuca); and C. odorata, Mikania micrantha and M. diplotricha in Son Tra Nature Conservation area (peninsula evergreen secondary forest). Strategies to monitor and manage invasive weeds in forests and national parks in Vietnam are outlined.
Vietnam is a tropical country with a rich biodiversity, including 2393 non-vascular plants and 11,373 vascular plants . However, of the 448 plant species listed in the Vietnam red data book, 44 species are critically endangered, 186 species are endangered and a further 213 species are vulnerable . Forests provide important refugia for threatened habitats and species. The total forest area in Vietnam is nearly 13.3 million ha (39.5% cover) , of which natural forest constitutes 10.3 million ha. Approximately 2.2 million ha of this is classified as special-use forest comprising 30 national parks (NP), 58 natural conservation areas (NCA), 11 species conservation areas (SCA), 45 historical forest areas (HFA) and 20 scientific forest areas (SFA). These are distributed as follows: the north-east region has 5 NPs, 19 NCAs, 14 HFAs and 4 SCAs; the north-west region has 10 NCAs, 1 HFA and 2 SFA; the Red river Delta region has 4 NPs, 3 NCAs, 5 HFAs and 2 SFAs; the northern central region has 5 NPs, 10 NCAs, 4 HFAs and 1 SFA; the southern central and high-land regions have 5 NPs, 15 NCAs, 8 HFAs and 5 SFAs; the south-east region has 6 NPs, 5 NCAs, 4 HFAs and 4 SFAs; and the Mekong Delta region has 5 NPs, 5 NCAs, 11 HFAs and 1 SFA .
According to Canh and Hai  the forests are under increasing pressure from disturbance. Except for some weeds of agricultural lands and waterways, for example Mimosa pigra in the Mekong delta [4,5], alien invasive plant species have received little attention in Vietnam. In the forest sector, research in this field is almost absent. In a country report on forest invasive species, Thu  recorded 6 invasive plant species in Vietnam. In the region, by comparison, knowledge of invasive plant species is mixed, ranging from first reports  to documentation and assessment of their invasive capacity [8,9]. In contrast, there are numerous studies on invasive plant species elsewhere in the world [10,11,12].
The terms “invasive species” was defined in the executive order 13112 of the United States in 1999  and in Vietnam Biodiversity Law in 2008 , as “Invasive species means an alien species whose introduction does or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health”. Other terms, such as likely invasive, potential invasive and introduction were also clarified [15,16,17].
Invasion by aggressive alien species causes serious problems for biodiversity, the environment, ecosystem structure and function and can impact on human health [18,19]. It is estimated that US$1.4 trillion is the annual management cost for invasive species worldwide States [20,21,22]. According to Rejmanek , effective management of weed invasion should follow three main steps from prevention, early detection to control or eradication. This paper reports for the first time on the alien plant species that are invasive in national parks in Vietnam and thus adds to previous studies in the wider region . This information is essential for foresters so they can recognize the presence of alien and invasive plant species at their park, for committees of each national park to focus their priority in protecting biodiversity, and to inform managers or policy makers within the Department of Natural Conservation (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) with responsibility for producing national response strategies for invasive plants.
Representative conservation forests, ranging from mountain forests to wetland forests throughout Vietnam, were selected for surveillance. The areas investigated were: Hoang Lien NP, Cat Ba NP, Cuc Phuong NP, Vu Quang NP, Phong Nha-Ke Bang NP, Son Tra NCA, Chu Mom Ray NP, Cat Tien NP, U Minh Thuong NP and Tram Chim NP (in order from the north to the south of Vietnam in Figure 1).
The methodology of surveillance of alien plant species was based on a protocol developed by the National Parks Service, USA . Transects (3 to 12 m in width) were set up from April to September 2011 through forests and also along roads where local people usually access disturbed areas, and along channels and ditch sides for wetland parks. A comprehensive list of 956 non-indigenous species in Vietnam was documented based on references such as Flora of Vietnam [26,27,28], Vietnam Forest Trees [29,30], and Plant Species in Vietnam [31,32,33] as background data for field observers. For unknown weed species, herbarium specimens were collected to indentify in the laboratory. Data on habitat type, site conditions, abundance, distribution, percentage cover, and reproduction, were recorded in IPANE survey forms . Species were determined to be Invasive Alien Species (IAS), Likely Invasive (L.IAS) or Potentially Invasive (P.IAS) based on criteria described by the Massachusetts Invasive Plant Advisory Group  and Decision #22/2011/TT-BTNMT of the Ministry of Nature Resource and Environment, Vietnam .
Species listed as IAS meet the following criteria: (1) non-native in Vietnam; (2) having biological potential for rapid and widespread dispersal and establishment in minimally managed habitats, for dispersing over spatial gaps, and for existing in high number; (3) be naturalized in the parks; (4) be common in a region of habitat types or widespread in Vietnam; (5) have high number of individual forming stands in minimal managed habitats; (6) be able to out-compete other species; and (7) have the potential for rapid growth, high seed or propagule production and dissemination, and establishment in natural plant communities. Likely invasive species (L.IAS) meet first three criteria plus at least one occurrence in parks that has high individual numbers and is known to be invasive elsewhere. Potentially invasive species (P.IAS) meet first two criteria above plus pose an imminent threat to biodiversity and naturalization is anticipated.
Three study areas, Cat Ba NP, Tram Chim NP and Son Tra NCA were then chosen to assess the risk of invasive species based on published protocols [37,38]. The risks (I-Rank) were categorized into 4 classes, namely High (H), Medium (M), Low (L) and Insignificant (I).
The vegetation type for the 10 parks that were surveyed is given in Table 1. In the North of Vietnam, of 38 alien plant species at Hoang Lien NP, 6 species were invasive alien plant species (IAS) and 3 were identified as potential invasive plant species (P.IAS). At Cat Ba NP, 38 alien plant species were discovered, including 8 IAS and 7 P.IAS. In Central Vietnam, the four study areas (Cuc Phuong, Vu Quang, and Phong Nha Ke Bang national parks and Son Tra natural conservation area) had 49, 49, 45 and 53 alien plant species, respectively. The corresponding number of invasive plant and potential invasive plant species were 8 IAS and 2 P.IAS, 5 IAS and 4 P.IAS, 6 IAS and 4 P.IAS, and 5 IAS and 5P.IAS, respectively. The number of alien plant species was 52 and 65 species for Chu Mom Ray and Cat Tien NPs in the Highland region, of which there were 7 and 6 IAS, and 3 and 6 P.IAS, respectively. There was one likely invasive plant species in Cat Tien NP. For the wetland national parks in the South-western region, there were 5 IAS, 1 L.IAS and 5 P.IAS of a total of 44 alien plant species were found at Tram Chim NP whilst U Minh Thuong NP had 5 IAS and 6 P.IAS of 47 alien plant species. From this initial surveillance of invasive plant species in 10 parks in Vietnam, 134 alien plant species were recorded (Appendix 1), of which 25 species were invasive, likely invasive and potential invasive species (Table 1).
|Site||Type of vegetation||Alien plant species||Invasive plant species|
|Hoang Lien NP||The topography is divided into high mountain (95.7% area) and valley (4.3% area). There are 4 forest types: broadleaf evergreen seasonal submontane tropical forest; evergreen wet tropical forest at <1800 m; mixed coniferous and broadleaf evergreen forest at 1800–2200 m; and sub-tropical forest at 2200–2600 m. There are ca. 2000 plant species in 200 families, including valuable and rare species, such as Abies delavayi, Alnus nepalensis, Calocedrus macrolepis and Taxus wallichiana.||38||9|
|Cat Ba NP||The main vegetation is evergreen tropical forest on limestone hills and mountains, but it had been extensively exploited. Some areas have secondary forest where shrubs are dominant. There are 1561 plant species in 149 families, of which 69 are valuable and rare species such as Annamocarya sinensis, Chukrasia tabularis, Pelthophorum tonkinensis and Podocarpus fleurii.||38||15|
|Cuc Phuong NP||The main type of vegetation is evergreen rain forest on limestone mountains. There are 1983 plant species in 229 families, mainly Acanthaceae, Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Lauraceae, Moraceae and Rubiaceae. The park is one of the seven richest biodiversity areas in Vietnam.||49||10|
|Vu Quang NP||The park contains 1612 plant species in 191 families. The vegetation is divided into forest types according to altitude: evergreen submontane forest at 100–300 m; evergreen forest at 300–1000 m; evergreen forest at 1000–1400 m with dominant species in the Cupressaceae and Podocarpaceae; evergreen forest at 1400–1900 m dominated by the Elaeocarpaceae, Fabaceae, Lauraceae and Magnoliaceae; and evergreen forest at 1900–2200 m dominated by Rhododendron and species in the Elaeocarpaceae, Fagaceae and Lauraceae.||49||8|
|Phong Nha Ke Bang NP||There are 4 main types of forest: closed moist evergreen forest on limestone mountains dominated by Chukrasia tabularis, Dendrocnide sinuata, Excentrodendron tonkinense and Fagraea fragrans; secondary forest on limestone mountains dominated by Litsea cubeba, Mallotus paniculatus and Rhapis cochinchinesis; stands of shrub and scattered trees on limestone with dominant species such as Aporosa villosa, Sapium discolor, Sterculia alata and Syzygium bonii; and closed tropical moist evergreen forest on hills with Anogeissus acuminata, Dillenia scabrella, Diptercarpus obtusifolius and Pometia pinnata. There are 2651 plant species in 193 families.||45||12|
|Son Tra NCA||There are four main vegetation types: broadleaf evergreen tropical rain forest dominated by species in the Dipterocarpaceae, Fagaceae, Magnoliaceae, Meliaceae and Rubiaceae; secondary forest where plants regenerate with the Bambusoideae; pasture land and shrub dominated by Melastoma candidum, Phragmites maximus and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa; and acacia and eucalypt plantations. There are 985 plant species in 143 families.||53||12|
|Chu Mom Ray NP||The forest is typical of the High Land region. There are 7 vegetation types: closed evergreen tropical rain forest; closed evergreen subtropical rain forest; dry semi-evergreen tropical forest; broadleaf woodlands of dry tropical forest; secondary forest dominated by Bambusa procea and Pseudoxytenanthera albo-ciliata; and grassland. There are 1895 plant species in 184 families. Key families include the Dipterocarpaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lythraceae, Meliaceae, Sterculiaceae and Theaceae.||52||12|
|Cat Tien NP||The park contains flora typical of south-eastern Vietnam, and species in the Dipterocarpaceae and Fabaceae are common. There are 1615 plant species in 125 families, of which some are valuable and rare species such as Afzelia xylocarpa, Dalbergia bariensis, D. mammos and D. cochichinensis. There are 4 vegetation types: evergreen broadleaf forest; semi-deciduous forest; mixed tree and bamboo forest; bamboo forest; and wetland areas.||65||12|
|Tram Chim NP||The vegetation comprises a mixture of seasonally inundated grassland, regenerating melaleuca forest and open swamp. Melaleuca species are distributed throughout the park, both in plantations and in scattered patches in areas of grassland or open swamp. There are 130 species in 50 families. There are five grassland communities dominated by Eleocharis dulcis, E. ochrostachys, Ischaemum rugosum, Panicum repens or Vossia cuspidata.||44||12|
|U Minh Thuong NP||The park contains 243 plant species in 84 families. Melaleuca forest is distributed throughout the park. There are 6 habitat types: melaleuca forest on waterlogged peat-land; melaleuca forest on clay soils; mixed forest on peat swamp; Phragmites vallatoria grassland; open swamp; Nymphaea nouchali swamp; and channels.||47||12|
|Total number of species||134||25|
For each of the three parks where weed risks were assessed in detail, the threats of invasive species were different (Table 2 and Table 3). Chromolaena odorata and Mimosa diplotricha were placed in the highest risk category at Cat Ba NP. Chromolaena odorata was widely distributed over ca. 1000 ha, occurring along roads, on barren land where trees had been felled, under disturbed forest cover, near the beach, and also on some small islands. Mimosa diplotricha was present in high numbers, sometimes climbing over other species leading to their death. At Son Tra NCA, in addition to the above twospecies, Mikania micrantha was also of high risk. Hundreds of hectares were invaded including sides of hills and forest edges. In places, M. micrantha together with a local creeper species, Operculina turpethum, smothered vegetation causing tree death.
|Family||Scientific name||Region of origin||I-Rank|
|CB 1||ST 2||TC 3|
|Asteraceae||Ageratum conyzoides L.||Central America||L||L||L|
|Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & H. E. Robins||Central America||H||H||I|
|Mikania micrantha Kunth.||Central and South America||H|
|Parthenium hysterophorus L.||Central America||M|
|Fabaceae||Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit||Tropical America||L|
|Mimosa diplotricha C. Wight ex Sauvalle||Central America||H||H||M|
|Mimosa pigra L.||Mexico, Central and South America||L||M||H|
|Mimosa pudica L.||Central America||L||M||L|
|Poaceae||Eupatorium odoratum L.||Central America|
|Pontedriaceae||Eichhornia crassipes (Maret.) Solms||Brazil||H|
|Verbenaceae||Lantana camara L.||Central America||L||L|
1 Cat Ba national park; 2 Son Tra natural conservation area; 3 Tram Chim national park.
Mimosa pigra (Figure 2), Panicum repens and Eichhornia crassipes significantly impacted Tram Chim NP. According to a file at the Scientific Research and Environment Division of Tram Chim NP, a few small clumps appeared in 1984–1985. Ten years later M. pigra had invaded 150 ha , reaching 490 ha in 2000, 960 ha in 2001 and 1845 ha in 2002 (Triet pers. comm.), and ca. 2000 ha in 2009 . Mimosa pigra can co-occur with other invasive species  including E. crassipes and P. repens, and they have invaded ca. 40 ha of Eleocharis dulci grassland. Panicum repens has now invaded ca. 8 ha of natural inundated grasslands and about 300 ha of Oryza rufipogon grassland. Eichhornia crassipes was present in all park channels, and along with M. pigra and P. repens, has invaded 5 natural inundated grassland communities.
|Family||Scientific name||Region of origin||Group||I-Rank|
|CB 1||ST 2||TC 3|
|Amaranthaceae||Amaranthus spinosus L.||Central America||P.IAS||L|
|Araceae||Pistia stratiotes L.||Unknown||P.IAS||M|
|Asteraceae||Bidens pilosa L.||Central America||P.IAS||I||M|
|Xanthium strumarium DC. (strumarium Auct. non L.)||Europe and America||P.IAS||L|
|Cactaceae||Opuntia stricta Willem||America||P.IAS||I|
|Convolvulaceae||Cuscuta chinenis Lamk.||China||P.IAS||M||L|
|Papaveraceae||Argemone mexicana L.||Mexico and West Indies||P.IAS|
|Passifloraceae||Passiflora foetida L.||Tropical America||P.IAS||I||M|
|Poaceae||Panicum repens L.||Tropical and North Africa, Mediterranean||L.IAS||M|
|Pennisetum polystachyon (L.) Schult||Africa||L.IAS||M|
|Phragmites australis americanus (Saltonstall, Peterson and Soreng)||North America||P.IAS||L|
|Salviniaceae||Salvinia cucullata Roxb.||India to SEA, not native in Vietnam||P.IAS||M|
|Verbenaceae||Stachytarpheta jamaicensis (L.) Vahl||Tropical and sub-tropical America||P.IAS||I|
|Zingiberaceae||Hedychium gardnerianum Sheppard ex Ker Gawl||Himalaya, India, Nepal, and Bhutan||P.IAS||I|
1 Cat Ba national park; 2 Son Tra natural conservation area; 3 Tram Chim national park.
Invasive plant species such as Chromolaena odorata, Ageratum conyzoides, Amaranthus spinosus, Bidens pilosa, Mikania micrantha and Mimosa diplotricha mainly infested disturbed areas such as in secondary forests and along walk trails in primary forests. Clearly, people as well as the biological attributes of the weeds are aiding dispersion. The numbers of alien and invasive plant species were higher in the more disturbed parks such as those in the central and high-land regions of Vietnam where over-exploitation was evident. These observations suggest that there should be restricted access to infested areas during forest rehabilitation. They further indicate the need for careful planning of tourist access ways when developing management plans for national parks. Allen et al.  identified a close correlation between the number of visitors and the alien weed population. It is planned that this preliminary study will lead to in depth investigation into the correlation of non-native plant species with other aspects, such as native, rare, threatened and endangered plant species; park area; elevation; roads, trials, and rivers distances; temperature; longitude; latitude; and other attributes along the lines with discussed by Allen et al. .
Alien and invasive plant species not only directly cause a decline in indigenous species, but they can alter ecosystems to such an extent that environmental harm ensues . Various models have been used to described the dynamics of weed invasions . For example, Macdougall and Turkington  used “driver” and “passenger” models to examine whether native plant richness and relative abundance affected by two dominant grasses, Poa pratensis and Dactylis glomerata, in Cowichan Garry Oak reverve, Canada. However, Didham et al.  pointed out three limitations of this approach because of experiment manipulation, small scale experimentation, and indirect linkage among factors. It would be useful to explore the driver, back-seat driver and passenger models for future studies in Vietnam to categorize species for priority attention and management by those authorities responsible for the forest estate.
This first list of invasive alien plant species for Vietnam highlights the need for in-country monitoring of forest weeds. In the global status of invasive forest tree species, Hayson and Murphy  reported on just 29 species in Asia and Vietnam was not featured. Similarly, there is little published knowledge on invasive weeds for nearby countries such as Cambodia  and Lao PDC . Sharing of knowledge within the region will be important for managing invasive weeds, especially for those species that are widely distributed [48,49,50].
The invasion by two Mimosa species is causing great concern in many parts of Vietnam. In particular, M. pigra not only invades wetland areas on the sides of rivers and canals, it can infest undisturbed swamps as well as disturbed lands such as industrial tree plantations and rice fields. In addition to impacts on biota, M. pigra can prevent people accessing rice fields, reduces water flow in irrigation channels and keeps animals from feeding areas. For example, in Quang Nam province, in Central Vietnam, it grows spontaneously along roads and in rice fields , and in Thuan Bac district, Ninh Thuan province, it has invaded bare lands planned for industrial parks . Warnings have been posted in Da Nang province [53,54], Hue city , Thac Ba lake (Yen Bai province) , and in the South-western region . In Tri An lake, Dong Nai province, M. pigra is called the “silent killer” , as it now occupies some 1300 ha of the lake.
Not only is M. pigra now widespread in Vietnam, it is rapidly dispersed over spatial gaps away from introduction points, hence its occurrence in Cat Tien national park and Vinh Cuu nature reserve. One of the habitats in Cat Tien national park is the 3370 ha wetland that includes Bau Sau swamp (crocodile swamp), Bau Ca swamp (fish swamp), and Bau Chim swamp (bird swamp) which are connected to the Dong Nai river in the wet season. This is a Ramsar site and provides an important feeding area for migratory birds. In addition, Bau Sau is a key habitat for 50 rare IUCN-listed species including reptiles, birds, mammals and plants. The park also has significance because it is a transition zone to the last remaining lowland semi-evergreen forest in the region. Though there has been much effort to eradicate invasive weeds since 2007, they still dominate. Consequently, the feeding area for birds continues to narrow and the number of birds is decreasing (Minh Personal Communication).
A similar issue occurs at the Ramsar site in Tram Chim national park. This is one of the last remnants of the Plain of Reeds wetland ecosystems in the Mekong delta and is an important habitat for the threatened Easter Sarus Crane (Grus antigone) as well as 9 other globally threatened migratory birds. According to the Director of Tram Chim national park, the number of Easter Sarus Crane has declined with the increase in Mimosa pigra over time (Hung Personal Communication). Some pessimistically state that the Mekong delta will become a calamity due to invasion by M. pigra . There is an urgent need to develop efficient methods to control and eradicate this alien species.
These numerous reports on invasions of M. pigra species are examples of the considerably negative impacts of invasive plant species, and they could rise warm attention on other species which may have similar problematic. Studies on the impacts of other invasive plant species on biodiversity, ecosystem, and event human health are also required. They will essential for foresters and committees of each national park to focus their priority in protecting biodiversity, and managers or policy makers within the Department of Natural Conservation (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) with responsibility for producing national response strategies for invasive plants.
Chromolaena odorata has invaded many secondary forests from North to South-east Vietnam, and was particularly evident in Cat Ba national park and Son Tra natural conservation area. This invasive species is easily dispersed and forms dense stands. It is not known when this species was introduced to Vietnam. It appears to be having a major impact similar to that described elsewhere  including preventing the establishment of native species. However, a detailed assessment of the impact of this species on biodiversity and ecosystem function has yet to be carried out in Vietnam. A case study such as that undertaken in South Africa  should be applied in Vietnam.
A range of initiatives should be implemented to better monitor and manage invasive weeds in forests and national parks in Vietnam. Firstly, field and reference guides on the 25 invasive plant species should be produced as soon as possible using existing publications [62,63] as a guide. This will encourage forest protection and national park staff to recognize and report on invading weeds. Secondly, to minimise the introduction of new invasive species, a coordinated framework should be developed across the range of authorities responsible for the forest estate. Early detection and rapid response plans can then be developed . A key aspect will be to predict the future distribution and impact of the major invasive plant species . In this first project, it was not possible to survey all the different topographies and vegetation types and detailed information on populations could not be obtained. The work needs to be extended using approaches defined by Rejmánek .
In the national action plan on biodiversity orientation towards 2020 , two main tasks were identified for the control and management of alien invasive species. These are: to investigate and collect data; and to adopt and carry out strategies to prevent and control alien invasive species. The initial results of the current project provide the beginning for this plan. Much more needs to be done as the threat from invasive species for biodiversity, the environment and human health is paramount. Therefore, a national invasive weed plan for their early detection and rapid response should be implemented as has been achieved in many countries [64,67].
We are grateful to the Department of Natural Conservation, Vietnam Administration of Forest (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) for project funds to allow the work to proceed. We thank our park colleagues for their kind cooperation, especially Tu (Hoang Lien NP), Hanh (Cat Ba NP), Tuan (Cuc Phuong NP), Anh (Vu Quang NP), Mui (Son Tra NCA), Dai and Tien (Chu Mom Ray NP), Hai and Minh (Cat Tien NP), Thang (U Minh Thuong Park) and Long (Tram Chim NP) who assisted with field surveys and provided documents on the park flora and vegetation. Thanh (RCFEE–VAFS) kindly supplied the mapping survey locations.
Conflict of Interest
We declare that this is our original piece of work and does not conflict with the interests of other individuals except where acknowledged. Contributions including professional advice and help from others are detailed in the acknowledgments.
- Canh, L.X.; Hai, H.T. Status and Changes of Biodiversity in Vietnam (in Vietnamese). In The Workshop on Biodiversity; National Convention Centre: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ban, N.T.; Ly, T.D.; Khoi, N.K. Vietnam Red Data Book,Part II. Plants (in Vietnamese); Natural Science and Technology Publishing: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007; p. 611. [Google Scholar]
- Nhi, H.D. Decision #1828/QĐ-BNN-TCLN: Publicized Forest Status in 2010; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Triet, T.; Kiet, L.C.; Thi, N.T.L.; Dan, P.Q. The Invasion of Mimosa pigra in Wetlands of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Management of Mimosa pigra, Darwin, Australia, 22-25 September 2002; Julien, M., Flanagan, G., Heard, T., Hennecke, B., Paynter, Q., Wilson, C., Eds.; CSIRO: Canberra, Australia, 2004; pp. 45–51. [Google Scholar]
- Triet, T.; Thi, N.T.L.; Storrs, M.J.; Kiet, L.C. The Value of Awareness and Early Intervention in the Management of Invasive Alien Species: A Case-Study on the Eradication of Mimosa pigraat the Tram Chim National Park; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal, Canada, 2001; pp. 37–38. [Google Scholar]
- Thu, P.Q. Forest Invasive Species and Their Impacts on Afforestation in Vietnam, The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 137–141. [Google Scholar]
- Vanna, S.; Nang, K. Cambodia-The Mimosa pigra report,The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 78–79. [Google Scholar]
- Baguinon, N.T.; Quimado, M.O.; Francisco, G.J. Country Report on Forest Invasive Species in the Philippines,The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 108–113. [Google Scholar]
- Kiapranis, R.; Nimiago, P. A Status Report on Some Invasive Forest Species in Papua New Guinea,The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 102–107. [Google Scholar]
- Handerson, L. Invasive, natrualized and causal alien plants in southern Africa: A summary based on the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas (SAPIA). Bothalia 2007, 37, 215–248. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, D.M.; Pysek, P.; Elton, C.S. 1958: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2007, 31, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foxcroft, L.C.; Richardson, D.M.; Rejmánek, M.; Pysek, P. Alien plant invasions in tropical and sub-tropical savannas: Patterns, processes and prospects. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 3913–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clinton, W.J. Executive Order 13112: Invasive Species; Presidental Documents; The White House: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, P.T. Law on Biodiversity No. 20/2008/QH12, Parliament Documents; The National Assembly, Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- NISC, Invasive Species Definition Clarification and Guidance White Paper; Invasive Species Advisory Committee (ISAC): Washington, DC, USA, 2006 April.
- MIPAG. Final Report: The Evaluation of Non-Native Plant Species for Invasiveness in Massachusetts; Massachusetts Invasive Plant Advisory Group: Conway, MA, USA, 28 February 2005.
- Richardson, D.M.; Pysek, P.; Rejmánek, M.; Barbour, M.G.; Panetta, F.D.; West, C.J. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 2000, 6, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IUCN. Alien Invasive Species: Silent Invasion (in Vietnamese); IUCN: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2003.
- Moore, B.A. Alien Invasive Species: Impacts on Forests and Forestry; Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Paper FBS/8E; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2005; p. 62. [Google Scholar]
- Shimura, J. Invasive Alien Species-A Threat to Forest Diversity. In Proceedings of Asia and the Pacific Forest Health Workshop—Forest Health in a Changing World, Kuala Lumpur, 2008; HeokChoh, S., Ed.; IUFRO: Vienna, Austria, 2008; pp. 14–16. [Google Scholar]
- Pimentel, D.; Zuniga, R.; Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 52, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, D.F. Invasive Species of Forest in the United States-2003,The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; McKenzie, P., Brown, C., Jianghua, S., Jian, W., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy; pp. 121–129.
- Rejmánek, M. Invasive plants: Approaches and predictions. Austral Ecol. 2005, 25, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peh, K.S.-H. Invasive species in Southeast Asia: The knowledge so far. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 1083–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Youang, C.C.; Haack, J.L.; Morrison, L.W.; DeBacker, M.D. Invasive Exotic Plant Monitoring Protocol for Hearland Network Inventory and Monitoring Program; National Park Service: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Ho, P.H. An Illustated Flora of Vietnam (in Vietnamese), 2nd ed; Youth Publishing: Hanoi, Vietnam, 1999; Volume 1, p. 991. [Google Scholar]
- Ho, P.H. An Illustated Flora of Vietnam (in Vietnamese), 2nd ed; Youth Publishing: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2003; Volume 2, p. 951. [Google Scholar]
- Ho, P.H. An Illustated Flora of Vietnam (in Vietnamese), 2nd ed; Youth Publishing: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2003; Volume 3, p. 1020. [Google Scholar]
- Ban, N.T.; Can, V.V.; Dung, V.V.; Khoi, N.K. Vietnam Forest Trees (in Vietnamese); Agricultural Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2000; p. 460. [Google Scholar]
- Chinh, N.N.; Chung, C.T.; Can, V.V.; Dung, N.X.; Dung, V.V.; Dao, N.K.; Hop, T.; Anh, T.T.; Quynh, N.B.; Thin, N.N. Vietnam Forest Trees; Forest Inventory and Planning Institute: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2009; p. 795. [Google Scholar]
- Ban, N.T. Checklist of Plant Species in Vietnam(in Vietnamese); Agricultural Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2001; Volume 1, p. 1181. [Google Scholar]
- Ban, N.T. Checklist of Plant Species in Vietnam (in Vietnamese); Agricultural Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 1203; Volume 2, p. 1203. [Google Scholar]
- Ban, N.T. Checklist of Plant Species in Vietnam (in Vietnamese); Agricultural Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam; Volume 3, p. 1248.
- IPANE. Invasive Plant Atlas of New England (IPANE) Survey Form. Available online: http://www.eddmaps.org/ipane/volunteers/TerrestrialForm.pdf (accessed on 29 February 2011).
- MIAPG, Final Report: The Evaluation of Non-Native Plant Species for Invasiveness in Massachusetts; Massachusetts Invasive Plant Advisory Group: Conway, MA, USA, 2005.
- MONRE, Dicision # 22/2011/TT-BTNMT. In To Assign Criteria of Invasive Species and List of Invasive Species (in Vietnamese); Ministry of Nature Resource and Environment: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011.
- Morse, L.E.; Randall, J.M.; Benton, N.; Hieber, R.; Lu, S. An Invasive Species Assessment Protocol: Evaluating Non-Native Plants for Their Impact on Biodiversity; Version 1; NatureServe: Arlington, VA, USA, 2004; p. 40. [Google Scholar]
- Randall, J.M.; Morse, L.E.; Benton, N.; Hiebert, R.; Lu, S.; Killeffer, T. The invasive species assessment protocol: A tool for creating regional and national lists of invasive nonnative plants that negatively impact biodiversity. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2008, 1, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, C. Tram Chim national park: An alert named “Mimosa pigra”! (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://news.socbay.com/vuon_quoc_gia_tram_chim_bao_dong_mang_ten_mai_duong_-600718496-268435456.html (accessed on 21 August 2011).
- Tri, N.V. Potential control Mimosa pigra at Tram Chim National Park by 5 Chemicals (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://www.baocantho.com.vn/index.php?mod=detnews&catid=63&p=&id=44962 (accessed on 21 August 2011).
- Quoi, L.P. Report on Vegetation Mapping of Tram Trim National Park, Dong Thap Province, Vietnam; Department of Science and Technology of Long An Province: Long An, Vietnam, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, J.A.; Brown, C.S.; Stohlgen, T.T. Non-native plant invasions of United States National Parks. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 2195–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, J.T. Invasive species: “Back-seat driver” of ecosystem change? Biol. Invasions 2012, 14, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macdougall, A.S.; Turkington, R. Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 2005, 81, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Didham, R.K.; Tylianakis, J.M.; Hutchison, M.A.; Ewers, R.M.; Gemmell, N.J. Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 471–474. [Google Scholar]
- Haysom, K.A.; Murphy, S.T. The Status of Invasiveness of Forest Tree Species Outside Their Natural Habitat: A Global Review and Discussion Paper; Forest Health and Biosecurity Working Paper FBS/3E; Forestry Department, FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; p. 76. [Google Scholar]
- Leuangkhamma, T.; Vongsiharath, V. Forest Invasive Species in Lao PDR, The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; McKenzie, P., Brown, C., Jianghua, S., Jian, W., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 98–99. [Google Scholar]
- Bista, M.; Chaudhary, M. Forest Invasive Species Country Paper-Nepal, The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; McKenzie, P., Brown, C., Jianghua, S., Jian, W., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 100–101. [Google Scholar]
- Weerawardane, N.D.R.; Dissanayake, J. Status of Forest Invasive Species in Sri Lanka, The Unwelcome Guests. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, Kunning, China, 17-23 August 2003; McKenzie, P., Brown, C., Jianghua, S., Jian, W., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy; pp. 114–120.
- Murphy, S.T. Alien Weeds in Moist Forest Zones of India: Population Characteristics,Ecology and Implications for Impact and Management. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ailen Weeds in Moist Tropical Zones, Peechi, India, 2-4 November 1999; Sankaran, K.V., Murphy, S.T., Evans, H.C., Eds.; Kerala Forest Research Insititute: Kerala, India, 2001; pp. 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- Hoang, T. Eradication Mimosa pigra (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://www.tienphong.vn/tuong-tac/ban-doc/513046/tan-diet-ngay-cay-mai-duong.html (accessed on 21 August 2011).
- Hoang, P.C. Eradication Mimosa pigra-A species invaded agricultural lands of Ninh Thuan province (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://www.ninhthuan.gov.vn/chinhquyen/sonnnt/Pages/Tieu-diet-Mai-duong---loai-thuc-vat-ngoai-lai-dang-xam-chiem-vung-dat-nong-nghiep-tinh-Ninh-Thuan.aspx (accessed on 21 August 2011).
- NhanDan, E.O. Da Nang: A critical warming of hugely apprearing Mimosa pigra at villages (in Vietnamsese). Available online: http://www.xaluan.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=188941 (accessed on 25 August 2011).
- DaNang, E.O. Worries of Mimosa pigra threats (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://hn.24h.com.vn/tin-da-nang/noi-lo-tu-cay-mai-duong-c498a303806.html (accessed on 25 August 2011).
- Toan, D. Mimosa pigra attacked Hue sity (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://tuoitre.vn/Chinh-tri-Xa-hoi/377767/Cay-mai-duong-tan-cong-thanh-pho-Hue.html (accessed on 25 August 2011).
- Cuong, H. Mimosa pigra species-a high risk invasive plant species (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://www.baoyenbai.com.vn/12/67251/Cay_Mai_Duong_Ke_xam_lan_nguy_hai.htm (accessed on 25 August 2011).
- Hung, D.T.; Vinh, D. South-western region: Felt “dizzy” because of Mimosa pigra species (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://vietbao.vn/Phong-su/Mien-Tay-Nam-Bo-chong-mat-vi-cay-mai-duong/40036524/263/ (accessed on 25 April 2011).
- DongNai, E.O. Mimosa pigra: “Silent killer” of Tri An Lake (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://www.dongnai.gov.vn/cong-dan/tin_khoahoc-congnghe/mlnews.2007-09-28.0245464441 (accessed on 21 August 2011).
- Agency, V.N. Mekong delta: Mimosa pigra became crushing calamity (in Vietnamese). Available online: http://www.dichvuthuyloi.com.vn/vn/Tin-Tuc/thong-tin-ve-linh-vuc-nong-nghiep/dong-bang-song-cuu-long-mai-duong-da-thanh-dai-hoa/ (accessed on 16 April 2011).
- Luwum, P. Control of Invasive Chromolaena odorata. An Evaluation in Some Land Use Types in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa; Internatinal Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation: Enschede, The Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Wilgen, B.W.V.; Richardson, D.M.; Maitre, D.C.L.; Marais, C.; Magadlela, D. The economic consequencee of alien plant invasions: Examples of impacts and approches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2001, 3, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huebner, C.D.; Olson, C.; Smith, H.C. Invasive Plants Field and Reference Guide: An Ecological Perpective of Plant Invaders of Forests and Woodlands; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2006; Volume 1, p. 84. [Google Scholar]
- Huebner, C.D.; Olson, C.; Smith, H.C. Invasive Plants Field and Reference Guide: An Ecological Perpective of Plant Invaders of Forests and Woodlands; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Moncrieff, A. Invasive Plant Early Detection and Rapid Response in British Columbia: An Initial Farmework. In Western Australia, Working draft Verstion 4; Department of Environment and Conservation: Perth, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, T. Predicting the geograohy of species’ invasion via ecological niche modeling. Q. Rev. Biol. 2003, 78, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dung, N.T. The National Action Plan on Biodiversity up to 2010 and Orientations Towards 2020 for Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartegena Protocal on Biosafety; Prime Minister Documents: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- FICMNEW, A National Early Detection and Rapid Response System for Invasive Plants in the United States; Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; Volume Conceptual Design, p. 24.
|Family||Scientific name||Region of origin||Family||Scientific name||Region of origin|
|Acanthaceae||Ruellia tuberosa L.||Central America||Asteraceae||Sphaeranthus africanus L.||Africa|
|Thunbergia grandiflora (Rottl.) Roxb.||Northern India||Sphaeranthus indicus L.||India|
|Amaranthaceae||Alternanthera paronichyoides A. St.-Hil.||Central America||Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn.||Tropical America|
|Alternanthera sessilis (L.) A. DC.||Southern Aisa or Tropical America||Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray.||Eastern Mexico and Central America|
|Amaranthus spinosus L.||Tropical America||Tridax procumbens L.||Tropical America|
|Celosia argentea L.||Africa||Xanthium inaequilaterum DC.||South Eatern America, Western Mexio and West Indies|
|Gomphrena celosioides Mart.||Tropical America||Bixaceae||Bixa orellana L.||Tropical America|
|Annonaceae||Annona muricata L.||Caribbean and Central America||Boraginaceae||Heliotropium indicum L.||Tropical America|
|Annona reticulata L.||Tropical America||Campanulaceae||Sphenoclea zeylanica Gaertn.||Tropical Africa|
|Araceae||Pistia stratiotes L.||Unknown||Capparaceae||Cleome rutidosperma DC.||Tropical Africa|
|Asteraceae||Ageratum conyzoides L.||Central America||Cleome spinosa Jacq.||Tropical America|
|Bidens pilosa L.||Central America||Casuarinaceae||Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq.||Australia|
|Centratherum punctatum Cass.||Tropical America||Convolvulaceae||Aniseia martinicensis (Jacq.) Choisy||Tropical America|
|Chromolaena odorata (L.) R. M. King & H. Rob.||Central America||Cuscuta chinensis Lamk.||China|
|Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S. Moore||Tropical Africa||Evolvulus nummularius (L.) L.||North & South America|
|Asteraceae||Elephantopus mollis Kunth.||West Indies and Tropical America||Ipomoea hederifolia L.||Americas|
|Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng.||Mexico||Ipomoea quamoclit L.||Tropical America|
|Eupatorium odoratum L.||Central America||Ipomoea triloba L.||Tropical America|
|Galinsoga parviflora Cav.||South America||Cyperaceae||Cyperus rotundus L.||Eurasia|
|Grangea maderaspatana (L.)Poir.||Africa, Asia||Cyperus sphacelatus Rottb.||Africa and Southern America|
|Mikania micrantha Kunth.||Central and Southern America||Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) Vahl.||Tropical America|
|Parthenium hysterophorus L.||Central America|
|Euphorbiaceae||Euphobia heterophylla L.||Southern US to Argentina and West Indies||Fabaceae||Sesbania herbacea (Mill.) MacVaugh||Central America|
|Euphorbia hirta L.||Central America||Lamiaceae||Hyptis brevipes Poit.||Central America|
|Euphorbia tithymaloides L.||Florida to northern South America||Hyptis rhomboidea Mart.& Gal.||Mexico|
|Ricinus communis L.||Africa||Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.||Tropical America|
|Fabaceae||Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Ex Benth||Australia||Leonotis nepetifolia (L.) R. Br.||Tropical Africa|
|Acacia longiflora (Andr.) Willd.||Australia||Mentha arvensis L.||Europe, Western Asia, India and Nepal|
|Acacia mangium Willd.||Australia||Mentha piperita L.||Europe|
|Acacia saligna (Labill.) Wendl||Australia||Liliaceae||Asparagus plumosus Bak.||Southern Africa|
|Aeschvnomene americana L.||Central and South America||Lythraceae||Largerstroemia indica (l.) Pers.||China, Korea and Japan|
|Fabaceae||Malvaceae||Hibiscus cananbinus L.||Africa|
|Crotalaria micans Link.||Tropical America||Hibiscus sabdariffa L.||Tropical Africa|
|Delonix regia (Hook.) Raf.||Madagascar||Sida acula Burm. f.||Central America|
|Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC||Tropical Africa and South America||Sida rhombifolia L.||New World tropics and subtropics|
|Glycyrrhiza glabra L.||Europe - Mediterranean||Marsileaceae||Marsilea quadrifolia L.||Azores and Europe|
|Leucoena leucocephala (Lam.) deWit||Tropical America||Melastomataceae||Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don||Tropical America|
|Macroptilum atropurpureum (DC.) Urb.||From Texas to Peru, Brazil and to Carribbean||Muntigiaceae||Muntigia calabura L.||Tropical America|
|Mimosa diplotricha C. Wight ex Sau valle||Tropical America||Myrtaceae||Eucalyptus camendulensis Dehnh||Australia|
|Mimosa pigra L.||Mexico, Central and South America||Eucalyptus globolus Labill||Australia|
|Mimosa pudica L.||Central America||Eucalyptus grandis Hill. Ex Maiden||Australia|
|Pachyrhizus erosus (L.) Urb.||Mexico||Eucalyptus robusta Sm.||Eastern Australia|
|Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth.||Mexico, Central and South America||Nyctaginaceae||Boerhavia erecta L.||Central and South America|
|Senna alata (L.) Roxb.||Mexico||Numphaeaceae||Victorica amazonica (Poepp.) J.C. Sowerby||Tropical South America|
|Senna hirsuta (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby||Tropical America||Onagraceae||Ludwigia octovalis Jacq.||Tropical America|
|Senna occidentalis (L.) Link.||Tropical America||Oxalidaceae||Oxalis corymbosa DC||Central and Southern America|
|Papaveraceae||Argemone mecicana L.||Mexico and West Indies||Poaceae||Melinis repens (Willd.) Zizka||Africa|
|Passifloraceae||Passiflora foetida L.||Southern America||Panicum repens L.||Tropical and North Africa, Mediterranean|
|Pinaceae||Pinus caribaea Morelet||West Indies and Central America||Paspalum conjugatum P. J. Bergius||Tropical America|
|Piperaceae||Peperomia pellucida (L.)Kunth||Tropical America||Pennisetum polystachion (L.) Schult.||Tropical Africa to India|
|Plantaginaceae||Scoparia dulcis L.||Tropical America||Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.||Tropical Africa|
|Poaceae||Axonopus compressus (Sw.) Beauv.||South America||Phragmites australis americanus (Saltonstall, Peterson and Soreng)||Northern America|
|Brachiaria mutica (Firsk) Stapf.||Tropical Africa and America|
|Cenchrus ciliaris L.||India, Mediterranean, Tropical and Southern Africa||Polygalaceae||Polygala paniculata L.||From Mexico and West Indies to Brazil|
|Chloris barbata Sw.||Central and South America||Pontedriaceae||Eichhornia crassipes (Maret.) Solms||Brazil|
|Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers||Southern Europe||Portulacaceae||Portulaca pilosa L.||Americas|
|Dactyloctenium aegyptiacum (L.) Willd||Africa||Portulaca oleracea L.||Europe|
|Digitaria longiflora (Retz.) Pers.||India||Rubiaceae||Hedyotis corymbosa (L.) Lamk.||Tropical Africa, Madagascar and India|
|Poaceae||Echinochloa colona (L.) Link||India||Spermacoce exilis (L.O. Williams) C. D. Adams||Africa and Malesia|
|Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv||Subtropical and temperate areas||Salviniaceae||Salvinia cucullata Roxb.||India to SEA, not native in Vietnam|
|Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn||Africa||Sapindaceae||Cardiospermum halicacabum L.||North and Tropical America|
|Eriochloa polystachya Kunth||Tropical America||Sapidus saponaria L.||Mexico and South America|
|Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Rudge) Nees||Central and South America||Solanaceae||Physalis angulata L.||Tropical America|
|Leersia hexandra Sw.||Tropical America||Solanum americanum Mill.||North and South America|
|Verbenaceae||Lantana camara L.||Central America|
|Panicum maximum Jacq.||Africa||Stachutarpheta jamaicensis(L). Vahl||Caribbean|
© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).