Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Total Alkaloids, Peimisine, Peimine and Peiminine from the Bulb of Fritillaria thunbergii Miq, and Evaluation of Antioxidant Activities of the Extracts
Next Article in Special Issue
Acid-Alkali Resistance of New Reclaimed Tiles Containing Sewage Sludge Ash and Waste Glass
Previous Article in Journal
Photoresist Design for Elastomeric Light Tunable Photonic Devices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of an Amorphous Titanium Oxide Film Deposited onto a Nano-Textured Fluorination Surface
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/ma9070526
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copper-Zinc-Tin-Sulfur Thin Film Using Spin-Coating Technology

by
Min-Yen Yeh
1,
Po-Hsun Lei
2,*,
Shao-Hsein Lin
2 and
Chyi-Da Yang
1
1
Department of Microelectronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung Marine University, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
2
Institute of Electro-Optical and Materials Science, National Formosa University, 64 Wen-Hwa Rd, Hu-Wei, Yun-Lin 632, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(7), 526; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070526
Submission received: 22 May 2016 / Revised: 24 June 2016 / Accepted: 27 June 2016 / Published: 29 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from ICASI 2016)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films were deposited on glass substrates by using spin-coating and an annealing process, which can improve the crystallinity and morphology of the thin films. The grain size, optical gap, and atomic contents of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), tin (Sn), and sulfur (S) in a CZTS thin film absorber relate to the concentrations of aqueous precursor solutions containing copper chloride (CuCl2), zinc chloride (ZnCl2), tin chloride (SnCl2), and thiourea (SC(NH2)2), whereas the electrical properties of CZTS thin films depend on the annealing temperature and the atomic content ratios of Cu/(Zn + Sn) and Zn/Sn. All of the CZTS films were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), Raman spectroscopy, and Hall measurements. Furthermore, CZTS thin film was deposited on an n-type silicon substrate by using spin-coating to form an Mo/p-CZTS/n-Si/Al heterostructured solar cell. The p-CZTS/n-Si heterostructured solar cell showed a conversion efficiency of 1.13% with Voc = 520 mV, Jsc = 3.28 mA/cm2, and fill-factor (FF) = 66%.

1. Introduction

Semiconductor solar cells incorporating thin-film absorbers are an attractive option for replacing classical silicon-based solar cells. In recent years, several thin-film absorbers such as III–V compound material (GaInP/GaAs) [1,2,3], I–III–VI compound material (Cu(In, Ga)Se2, CIGS) [4,5,6], and I–II–VI compound material (Cu2ZnSnS4, CZTS) [7,8,9] have been investigated for semiconductor thin-film solar cells. Among these studied materials, direct band gap chalcopyrite-structured CIGS and kesterite-structured CZTS are potential absorber materials for the next generation of thin-film solar cells because of their large optical absorption coefficients over the visual light range. A record conversion efficiency of 20.3% was reported for a CIGS thin-film solar cell [4]. However, use of toxic Se and scarce or expensive elements, such as gallium (Ga) and indium (In), may limit the production development of CIGS thin-film solar cells. Researchers strongly desire to identify a nontoxic inexpensive thin-film absorber with high conversion efficiency to replace CIGS. CZTS has been considered as an alternative to CIGS because of its majority carrier type (p-type), direct band gap of 1.4–1.5 eV, and large optical absorption coefficient (>104 cm−1) over the visible light range [10]. In addition, CZTS thin films are composed of elements that are nontoxic, abundant, and inexpensive, namely copper, zinc, tin, and sulfur.
CZTS thin films are generally fabricated using vacuum-based techniques such as thermal evaporation [11], sputtering [12], and pulsed laser deposition [13]. These methods can deposit high-quality CZTS thin films on molybdenum (Mo)-coated glass substrates. However, these techniques require complicated equipment to maintain a vacuum and high process temperatures. In addition to high conversion efficiency, film content and composition as well as large-scale rather than small-area cell structural uniformity are challenges in developing CZTS thin-film solar cells for industrial use. Many nonvacuum methods of reducing production costs and satisfying the large-area requirements have been studied, including electrodeposition [14], spray pyrolysis techniques [15], sol-gel processing [16], spin-coating methods [17], and chemical bath methods [18]. Among these, the spin-coating method has the advantages of simple construction, low cost, ecological safety, and the large-scale deposition of different semiconductor thin films. However, few studies have reported the preparation of spin-coated CZTS thin films without toxic precursors such as hydrazine [19] or ethanolamine (MEA) [17]. Researchers do not completely and clearly understand the relationships of the deposition parameters to the atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S, surface morphology, and electrical properties of spin-coated CZTS thin films.
In this study, we developed spin-coating Cu-poor and Zn-rich CZTS thin films with optimal atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S onto glass and silicon (Si) substrates. The atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S, crystalline morphology, and surface morphology of these CZTS thin films were characterized using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images, and Raman measurements. The optical band gap and electrical properties were measured using absorption spectra and Hall measurements. Finally, an optimal CZTS thin was spun on an n-type Si substrate to form a Mo/p-CZTS/n-Si/Al solar cell.

2. Results and Discussion

The crystallinity, morphology, electrical properties, and band gap energy of CZTS thin films show a strong dependence on the stoichiometry of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S in those CZTS thin films [9,16,20,21,22]. Well-controlled atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S in CZTS thin films has become a crucial issue for fabricating high-performance kesterite CZTS solar cells. To determine the optimal atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S in CZTS thin films, the chemical concentrations of CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea aqueous precursor solution should be analyzed. Figure 1a–d show the atomic content ratios of Cu/(Zn + Sn), Cu/Zn, Zn/Sn, and S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) for CZTS thin films as functions of the concentrations of CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea aqueous precursor solution, respectively, for an annealing temperature of 350 °C. As shown in Figure 1a–c, the atomic contents of Cu, Zn, and Sn increase with raising the concentration of CuCl2, ZnCl2, and SnCl2 aqueous precursor solution, respectively, implying that the atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S in CZTS thin films can be modulated by changing the concentrations of aqueous precursor solution. Cu-rich CZTS thin films can facilitate the formation of passivated defect clusters such as CuZn + SnZn and 2CuZn + SnZn. The former produces a deep donor level in the band gap of CZTS, whereas the latter can significantly reduce the band gap of CZTS [20]. However, a high Zn/Sn ratio or high Zn atomic content is necessary to form the ZnSn acceptors and reduce the SnZn donors to increase the conductivity of the CZTS thin film [23]. However, high Zn atomic content, which results in a low Cu/Zn ratio, can bring about a p/n conduction type [22]. To avoid defect clusters and increase the conductivity of p-type CZTS thin films, the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio should be less than 1, the Zn/Sn atomic content ratio should be more than 1, and the Cu/Zn atomic content ratio should not be too low. In Figure 1a, the atomic content ratio of Cu/(Zn + Sn) is lower than 1 for the CuCl2 concentration below 0.14 M and approaches 1 at the CuCl2 concentration of 0.16 M. When the ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea concentrations increase with a CuCl2 concentration of 0.14 M, the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio remains below 1, as seen in Figure 1b–d. These results indicate that Cu-poor and Zn-rich CZTS thin films can be produced from properly controlled concentrations of aqueous precursor solutions. The atomic content ratio of S/Cu + Zn + Sn in CZTS thin films can approach 1 for the concentrations of CuCl2, ZnCl2, and SnCl2, as shown in Figure 1a–c, respectively. In addition, in Figure 1d, the atomic content of S increases slightly as the thiourea concentration rises from 0.6 to 0.8 M, and saturates at a thiourea concentration above 0.8 M, possibly because of the solubility of S in the CZT thin film.
Figure 2a–c represent the XRD patterns for films with various concentrations of CuCl2, ZnCl2, and SnCl2 aqueous precursor solutions that were annealed at a temperature of 350 °C. The XRD peaks were indexed using JADE software (Jade 5.0, Christchurch, New Zealand) as the CZTS kesterite structure; and they closely matched the standard data (PDF#26-5075). All of the spin-coated CZTS thin films exhibited a polycrystalline kesterite crystal structure with six broad peaks along the (101), (112), (200), (220), (312) and (224) planes as shown in Figure 2a–c. The secondary phases including Cu2SnS3, CuS, SnS and ZnS would form during growth of CZTS thin films. They will degrade the performance of CZTS solar cells. It is important to avoid the formation of secondary phases in CZTS thin films. Among these secondary phases, tetragonal-structured Cu2SnS3 (PDF#33-0501) and cubic-structured ZnS (PDF#05-0566) show the similar XRD patterns to kesterite-structured CZTS between diffraction angles of 20 and 80 degrees because of the same lattice constants [15]. As a result, the measured XRD patterns of CZTS thin film might be related to either CZTS or Cu2SnS3 or ZnS pahse. The weak peak at 18.2° attributed to (101) plane indicates a kesterite-structured CZTS thin film because it is not found in the XRD patterns of tetragonal-structured Cu2SnS3 and cubic-structured ZnS. Consequently, a CZTS thin film without secondary phase, which leads to a degraded performance of CZTS solar cells, can be obtained using properly controlled concentrations of aqueous precursor solutions and a proper annealing process. To further confirm the XRD characteristics of this spin-coated CZTS thin film, which differ from similar XRD patterns such as those of ZnS and Cu2SnS3, Raman spectroscopy was performed. Figure 2e shows the Raman spectrum for a spin-coated CZTS thin film prepared from 0.14 M CuCl2, 0.07 M ZnCl2, 0.07 M SnCl2, and 0.8 M thiourea aqueous precursor solutions and annealed at 350 °C. The characteristic CZTS peak in Figure 2e is at 336.2 cm−1, which is different from the Raman peaks of Cu2–xS at 475 cm−1, ZnS at 273 and 351 cm−1, Cu2SnS3 at 290 and 352 cm−1, and of Sn2S3 at 234 and 307 cm−1, indicating a spin-coated CZTS thin film deposited on glass substrate [24,25].
The mean crystallite grain size (D) of CZTS thin film can be estimated by the Scherrer formula [26]:
D = c 0.9 λ β cos θ
where β, λ, and θB are the line width at full width at half the maximum of the film diffraction peak at 2θ, X-ray wavelength (0.15406 nm), and Bragg diffraction angle, respectively. Figure 3a–c show the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of (112) peak and calculated mean crystallite grain size of CZTS thin films as a function of the varied concentration of CuCl2, ZnCl2, and SnCl2 aqueous precursor solutions that were annealed at a temperature of 350 °C. The grain size enlarges with increasing CuCl2 concentration, as shown in Figure 3a because of the increase of Cu atomic content in the CZTS thin films [27,28]. This increase in the grain size might be due to agglomeration of grains. In addition, the grain size of CZTS thin films represents a slight change as ZnCl2, and SnCl2 concentrations increase or decrease while CuCl2 concentration is maintained at 0.14 M, as shown in Figure 3b,c. This is attributed to the fairly constant Cu atomic content in these CZTS thin films. Consequently, the grain size of CZTS thin films with the same annealing temperature is determined by the Cu atomic content.
The conversion efficiency of a CZTS thin-film solar cell is strongly associated with the grain size because an absorber layer with a large grain size maximizes the minority carrier diffusion length and the inherent potential of a polycrystalline solar cell [16,24]. Figure 4 shows the FE–SEM images of the CZTS thin film. Figure 4a–c show plane views of CZTS thin films with CuCl2 concentrations of 0.1, 0.14, and 0.16 M with concentrations of ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea at 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M, respectively. The thickness of all the CZTS thin films was approximately 2.4 μm, and Figure 4d represents the FE-SEM cross section image of CZTS thin film with concentrations of CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea at 0.14, 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M. As shown in Figure 4a–c, large numbers of voids were observed in the Cu-rich CZTS thin films. Voids of Cu-rich CZTS absorbers in thin-film solar cells cause low conversion efficiencies for photovoltaic applications [16,29]. Well-controlled Cu atomic content is important to obtain a large grain size and less number of voids in CZTS thin films. Figure 4e shows the plane view of a CZTS thin film with a high ZnCl2 concentration of 0.1 M and CuCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.14, 0.07, and 0.8 M. The surface of Zn-rich CZTS thin film is smoother than that of Zn-poor CZTS thin films because of the large columnar grains at the bottom [30].
Figure 5 shows the graph of optical band gap energy as a function of the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio. The optical band gaps of these CZTS thin films range from 1.39 to 1.69, whereas the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratios range from 0.58 to 0.76. This shift is attributed to the change in the p-d hybridization between Cu d-levels and S p-levels [16]. In addition, the relation of the extended optical band gap to the decrease in grain size is attributed to the fact that the band gap energy of a material is dependent on the particle size of that material according to the quantum size effect [15]. As shown in Figure 3a–c, the grain size of a Cu-poor CZTS thin film is smaller than that of a Cu-rich CZTS thin film, resulting in a wide optical band gap. The inset of Figure 5 shows a plot of (αhν)2 against the photon energy of a Cu-poor and Zn-rich (Cu/Zn = 1.12) CZTS thin film where α is the absorption coefficient and hν is the photon energy. The optical band gap energy is estimated by extrapolating the linear region in the (αhν)2 plot and determining the intercept with the photon energy axis. The optical band gap for an optimal CZTS absorber is approximately 1.5 eV.
Figure 6a,b show the carrier concentration and resistivity of CZTS thin films as a function of CuCl2 and ZnCl2 concentration, respectively. The carrier concentration shown in Figure 6a increases with CuCl2 concentration. The formation of a CuZn + SnZn deep level depends on the Cu/(Zn + Sn) and Zn/Sn atomic content ratio, and an optimal condition occurs at Cu/(Zn + Sn) ≈ 0.8 and Zn/Sn ≈ 1.2 [20]. As the CuCl2 concentration increases from 0.1 to 0.14 M, the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio approaches the optimal value because of the suppression of the formation of a CuZn + SnZn deep donor level in the CZTS band gap, leading to a significant increase in hole concentration. Nevertheless, the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio increases with CuCl2 concentration to 1.6 M, causing the generation of a CuZn + SnZn deep donor defect and a reduction of the CuZn antisite acceptor defects, resulting in a decrease of carrier concentration. Under the optimal Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio of 0.714, the CZTS thin film has a high carrier concentration of 1.07 × 1019 cm−3 and a resistivity of 1.19 Ωcm. The atomic content ratio of Zn/Sn is also a crucial factor determining the electrical properties of a CZTS thin film. The ZnSn antisite defect with an inherent p-type conduction type in a CZTS thin film can easily form under a high Zn/Sn atomic content ratio. However, further increases in Zn/Sn atomic content ratio would generate a large population of intrinsic defects, causing a detrimental influence relative to a CZTS thin film with a atomic content ratio of Cu/(Zn + Sn) = 1 and Zn/Sn = 1. In Figure 6b, the hole concentration decreases as the ZnCl2 concentration rises from 0.7 to 0.9 M because of the population of donor defect clusters [20]. Further increases in ZnCl2 concentration would move the Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio away from 0.8 (see Figure 1b), leading to a translation of conduction types.
The sulfer vacancy (VS) is also a dominant donor-like defect in a CZTS thin film because of its low formation energy. The conduction type would change from p-type to n-type and the hole concentration might decrease in an S-poor CZTS thin film due to a high concentration of VS. High S content or S-rich in CZTS thin film is crucial to reduce the concentration of VS. Kosyak et al. [31] have calculated the concentration of ZnSn antisite and VS in CZTS thin films with different Cu, Zn, and Sn content, and represented that the concentration of acceptor-like ZnSn antisite is higher than that of donor-like VS in a Zn-rich and Sn-poor CZTS thin film. Based on this result, we measure the electrical properties of CZTS thin films with various thiourea concentration under optimal Cu/(Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio of 0.714. Table 1 lists the measured results of S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio and electrical characteristics of CZTS thin films depending on various thiourea concentration. The S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio increases with rising thiourea concentration, implying that the a high S content or S-rich CZTS thin film can be obtained by changing the concentration thiourea aqueous solution. As thiourea concentration rises from 0.6 to 0.8 M, the hole concentration and conductivity of the p-type CZTS thin film increase because of reduction of VS concentration. However, further increase in thiourea concentration would reduce the hole concentration and conductivity possible due to the formation of ZnS [32].
Table 2 shows the relation between annealing temperature and conduction type, carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity of CZTS thin films with concentrations of CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea aqueous precursor solution at 0.14, 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M, respectively. The hole concentration for annealing temperatures of 300 °C, 350 °C, 400 °C, and 450 °C are 2.02 × 1014, 1.07 × 1019, 2.80 × 1015, and 1.24 × 1016 cm−3. The varied carrier concentrations of CZTS thin films with increasing annealing temperatures is attributed to the changes of Cu/(Zn + Sn) and Zn/Sn content ratios, which cause the formation of CuZn + SnZn deep donor defects by reducing the CuZn antisite acceptor defects [20,25]. The mobility of CZTS thin films shows a counterclockwise dependence on the carrier concentration because of the impurity scattering. In conclusion, with an annealing temperature of 350 °C, CZTS thin films have a stable p-type conduction type with a high hole concentration of 1.07 × 1019 cm−3 and a low resistivity of 1.19 Ωcm. To realize the optimal CZTS absorber for photovoltaic solar cell applications, a CZTS thin film was spin-coated onto an Si substrate to fabricate a Mo/p-CZTS/n-Si/Al heterostructured solar cell.
Figure 7 shows the (current-voltage) I–V characteristics of this Mo/CZTS/Si/Al solar cell under (air mass) AM 1.5 G. The open circuit voltage, short current density, fill factor, and efficiency were 520 mV, 3.28 mA/cm2, 66%, and 1.13%, respectively. The Mo/CZTS/Si/Al heterostructured solar cell prepared in this work was simple and the characteristics of the CZTS thin film used as the absorber in this solar cell should be investigated as soon as possible. Compared with the techniques of preparing CZTS thin films reported by other authors, our CZTS thin film preparation method of using spin-coating exhibits superior performance for photovoltaic solar cell applications.

3. Experimental Details

3.1. Preparation of CZTS Thin Film

Because the solubility levels of CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea powder in deionized (DI) water differ, these powders were dissolved in DI water individually to form aqueous precursor solutions with varied molar concentrations. If the aqueous precursor solutions do not contain toxic organic materials, such as MEA, spin-coating them uniformly onto glass substrates can be difficult. To spread precursor solutions uniformly without using toxic materials, the surfaces of the glass substrates were modified by using plasma cleaning to generate hydrophilic surfaces. To increase the S content of the CZTS thin film and prevent the mixed aqueous solution from becoming turbid, two separate spin-coating steps were applied to deposit CZTS thin films. For the first step, CuCl2, ZnCl2, and SnCl2 aqueous precursor solutions were mixed and stirred uniformly to form a metallic aqueous solution that was spin-coated onto soda lime glass substrates. The glass substrates, coated with uniformly distributed metallic aqueous solution, were treated using thermal processes, namely baking on a hot plate at 100 °C for 3 min to dewater and annealing in a furnace at 350 °C for 5 min to tailor the crystallinity and morphology of the CZT layer. In the second step, aqueous thiourea solution was spun onto the CZT layers, and then the samples were treated by being baked on a hot plate for 3 min at 100 °C. Then, thermal annealed in a furnace for 180 min at 350 °C to form CZTS thin films. The surface morphologies of the CZTS thin films were characterized using FE-SEM and XRD patterns by using a Bruker D8 advanced diffractometer (XRD: Bruker AXS-DS Discov, Taichung Taiwan) equipped with a CuKá (λ = 0.154 nm). The atomic contents of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S in these CZTS thin films were measured using EDX with the same diffractometer. The absorption of CZTS thin films in the visual range was measured using a UV–Vis–NIR spectrophotometer (UVD-350, Yunlin Taiwan). The electrical properties of CZTS thin films, including carrier concentration, carrier mobility, and resistivity, were measured using Hall measurements (HMS-5000) at room temperature.

3.2. Fabrication of the Mo/CZTS/n-Si/Al Heterostructured Solar Cell

The preparation of the Mo/p-CZTS/n-Si/Al heterostructured solar cell can be described as follows. First, aluminum (Al) metal was deposited on the back of an n–Si substrate using a thermal evaporation process and then a thermal annealing treatment was applied to the sample to form an ohmic contact between Si and Al. Second, the optimal CZTS absorber layer was deposited on the surface of the n-Si substrate through spin-coating, followed by a thermal annealing procedure. Third, the Mo metal was sputtered onto the CZTS absorber contact region to serve as ohmic contact metal. The sample was then annealed in N2 atmosphere for 5 min at 400 °C.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we spin-coated CZTS thin films onto glass substrates and annealed them to improve the crystallinity and morphology of the thin films. The amounts of Cu, Zn, Sn, and S in these CZTS thin films depend on the CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and SC(NH2)2 concentrations of the precursor solutions. The surface morphology and optical band gap properties of these CZTS thin films relate to the Cu content and the electrical properties of these CZTS thin films depend on the annealing temperature and the Cu/(Zn + Sn) and Zn/Sn ratios. All of the CZTS thin films exhibited a polycrystalline kesterite crystal structure with three major broad peaks along the (112), (220), and (312) planes in XRD patterns. The optimal CZTS thin film can be deposited on a glass and Si substrate with proportions of [CuCl2] = 0.14 M, [ZnCl2] = 0.07 M, [SnCl2] = 0.07 M, and [SC(NH2)2] = 0.8 M and an annealing temperature of 350 °C. Finally, an optimal CZTS thin film was deposited on an n-type silicon substrate to produce a Mo/p-CZTS/n-Si/Al heterostructured solar cell with a conversion efficiency of 1.13% and with Voc = 520 mV, Jsc = 3.28 mA/cm2, and fill-factor (FF) = 66%.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C. (101-2622-E-150-013-CC3).

Author Contributions

Min-Yen Yeh and Po-Hsu Lei organized and designed the experiment procedure, and wrote the paper. Shao-Hsein Lin execute the deposition of CZTS thin films. Chyi-Da Yang performed the measurement of CZTS thin films. All of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be submitted.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Nelson, J. The Physics of Solar Cells; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2003; p. 211. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shahrjerdi, D.; Bedell, S.W.; Ebert, C.; Bayram, C.; Hekmatshoar, B.; Fogel, K.; Lauro, P.; Gaynes, M.; Gokmen, T.; Ott, J.A.; et al. High-efficiency thin-film InGaP/InGaAs/Ge tandem solar cells enabled by controlled spalling technology. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lei, P.H.; Lin, C.T.; Ye, S.J. Improved efficiency of GaInP/(In)GaAs/Ge solar cells using textured liquid-phase-deposited (LPD) ZnO. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jackson, P.; Hariskos, D.; Lotter, E.; Paetel, S.; Wuerz, R.; Menner, R.; Wischmann, W.; Powalla, M. New world record efficiency for Cu (InGa)Se2. Prog. Photovol. Res. Appl. 2012, 19, 894–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wada, T.; Nakamura, S.; Maeda, T. Ternary and multinary Cu-chalcogenide photovoltaic materials from CuInSe2 to Cu2ZnSeS4 and other compounds. Prog. Photovol. Res. Appl. 2012, 20, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, D.; Zhu, H.; Liang, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Mai, Y. Sputtered molybdenum thin films and the application in CIGS solar cell. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 362, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yoo, H.S.; Kim, J.H. Comparative study of Cu2ZnSnS4 film growth. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 95, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, F.; Shen, H.L. Fabrication and photovoltaic properties of Cu2ZnSnS4/i-a-Si/n-a-Si thin film solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 280, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, C.Y.; Dhakal, T.P.; Garner, S.; Cimo, P.; Lu, S.; Westgate, C.R. Fabrication of Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cell on a flexible glass substrate. Thin Solid Films 2014, 562, 574–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katagiri, H.; Jimbo, K.; Maw, W.S.; Oishi, K.; Yamazaki, M.; Araki, H.; Takeuchi, A. Development of CZTS-based thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 2455–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, K.; Gunawan, O.; Todorov, T.; Shin, B.; Chey, S.J.; Bojarczuk, N.A.; Mitzi, D.; Guha, S. Thermally evaporated Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pawar, S.M.; Inamdar, A.I.; Pawar, B.S.; Gurav, K.V.; Shin, S.W.; Xiao, Y.J.; Kolekar, S.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Im, H.S. Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) absorber by rapid thermal processing (RTP) sulfurization of stacked metallic precursor films for solar cell applications. Mater. Lett. 2014, 118, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vanalakar, S.A.; Agawane, G.L.; Shin, S.W.; Suryawanshi, M.P.; Gurav, K.V.; Jeon, K.S.; Patil, P.S.; Jeong, C.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J.H. A review on pulsed laser deposited CZTS thin films for solar cell applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 619, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, S.G.; Kim, J.M.; Woo, H.S.; Jo, Y.C.; Inamdar, A.I.; Pawar, S.M.; Kim, H.S.; Jung, W.; Im, H.S. Structural, morphological, compositional, and optical properties of single step electrodeposited Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films for solar cell application. Cur. Appl. Phys. 2014, 14, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bhosale, S.M.; Suryawanshi, M.P.; Gaikwad, M.A.; Bhosale, P.N.; Kim, J.H. Influence of growth temperatures on the properties of photoactive CZTS thin films using a spray pyrolysis technique. Mater. Lett. 2014, 129, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tanaka, K.; Fukui, Y.; Moritake, N.; Uchiki, H. Chemical composition dependence of morphological and optical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films deposited by sol-gel sulfurization and Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cell efficiency. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 95, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Swami, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Dutta, V. Deposition of kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films by spin coating technique for solar cell application. Energy Proc. 2013, 33, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, C.; Schnabel, T.; Abzieher, T.; Krammer, C.; Powalla, M.; Kalt, H.; Hetterich, M. Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells based on chemical bath deposited precursors. Thin Solid Films 2014, 562, 621–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Todorov, T.K.; Tang, J.; Bag, S.; Gunawan, O.; Gokmen, T.; Zhu, Y.; Mitzi, D.B. Beyond 11% efficiency: Characteristics of state-of-the-art Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2013, 3, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, S.Y.; Wang, L.W.; Walsh, A.; Gong, X.G.; Wei, S.H. Abundance of CuZn + SnZn and 2CuZn + SnZn defect clusters in kesterite solar cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Malerba, C.; Biccary, F.; Ricardo, C.L.A.; Valentini, M.; Chierchia, R.; Muller, M.; Santoni, A.; Esposito, E.; Mangiapane, P.; Scardi, P.; et al. CZTS stoichiometry effects on the band gap energy. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 582, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruan, C.H.; Huang, C.C.; Lin, Y.J.; He, G.R.; Chang, H.C.; Chen, Y.H. Electrical properties of CuxZnySnS4 films with different Cu/Zn ratios. Thin Solid Films 2014, 550, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kosyak, V.; Karmarkar, M.A.; Scarpulla, M.A. Temperature dependent conductivity of polycrystalline Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shin, S.W.; Pawar, S.M.; Park, C.Y.; Yun, J.H.; Moon, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.Y. Studies on Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) absorber layer using different stacking orders in precursor thin films. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 95, 3202–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fairbrother, A.; Fontane, X.; Roca, V.I.; Rodriguez, M.E.; Marino, S.L.; Placidi, M.; Barrio, L.C.; Rodriguez, A.P.; Saucedo, E. On the formation mechanisms of Zn-rich Cu2ZnSnS4 films prepared by sulfurization of metallic stacks. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 112, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Birkholz, M. Thin Film Analysis by X-ray Scattering; Addison-Wesley: New York, NY, USA, 2006; p. 110. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bhosale, S.M.; Suryawanshi, M.P.; Kim, J.H.; Moholkar, A.V. Influence of copper concentration on sprayed CZTS thin films deposited at high temperature. Cream. Int. 2015, 41, 8299–8304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shinde, N.M.; Deokate, R.J.; Lokhande, C.D. Properties of spray deposited Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2013, 100, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Todorov, T.; Kita, M.; Garda, J.; Escribano, P. Cu2ZnSnS4 films deposited by a soft-chemistry method. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 2541–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inamdar, A.I.; Lee, S.G.; Jeon, K.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Pawar, S.M.; Kalubarme, R.S.; Park, C.J.; Im, H.S.; Jung, W.; Kim, H.S. Optimized fabrication of sputter deposited Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin films. Sol. Energy 2013, 91, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kosyok, V.; Mortazavi Amiri, N.B.; Postnikov, A.V.; Scarpulla, M.A. Model of native point defect equilibrium in Cu2ZnSnS4 application to one-zone annealing. J. Appl. Phys. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Long, B.; Cheng, S.Y.; Zheng, Q.; Yu, J.L.; Jai, H.J. Effects of sulfurization time and H2S concentration on electrical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 films prepared by sol-gel method. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 73, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 09 00526 g001 1024
Figure 1. Atomic content ratios of Cu/(Zn + Sn), Cu/Zn, Zn/Sn, and S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) for copper-zinc-tin-sulfur (CZTS) thin films with (a) CuCl2; (b) ZnCl2; (c) SnCl2; and (d) thiourea concentrations, respectively.
Figure 1. Atomic content ratios of Cu/(Zn + Sn), Cu/Zn, Zn/Sn, and S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) for copper-zinc-tin-sulfur (CZTS) thin films with (a) CuCl2; (b) ZnCl2; (c) SnCl2; and (d) thiourea concentrations, respectively.
Materials 09 00526 g001
Materials 09 00526 g002 1024
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for CZTS thin film with varied concentration of (a) CuCl2; (b) ZnCl2; and (c) SnCl2 aqueous precursor solution under an annealing temperature of 350 °C. The Raman spectrum for a CZTS thin film with CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea aqueous precursor solution concentration of 0.14, 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M, respectively, after annealing at 350 °C is shown in (d).
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for CZTS thin film with varied concentration of (a) CuCl2; (b) ZnCl2; and (c) SnCl2 aqueous precursor solution under an annealing temperature of 350 °C. The Raman spectrum for a CZTS thin film with CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea aqueous precursor solution concentration of 0.14, 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M, respectively, after annealing at 350 °C is shown in (d).
Materials 09 00526 g002
Materials 09 00526 g003 1024
Figure 3. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of (112) peak and calculated grain size for CZTS thin films with varied concentration of (a) CuCl2; (b) ZnCl2; and (c) SnCl2 aqueous precursor solution under an annealing temperature of 350 °C.
Figure 3. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of (112) peak and calculated grain size for CZTS thin films with varied concentration of (a) CuCl2; (b) ZnCl2; and (c) SnCl2 aqueous precursor solution under an annealing temperature of 350 °C.
Materials 09 00526 g003
Materials 09 00526 g004 1024
Figure 4. Plane-view field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE–SEM) images of CZTS thin films deposited with ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M, respectively, and CuCl2 concentrations of (a) 0.1 M; (b) 0.14 M; and (c) 0.16 M, respectively. The cross section image of a CZTS thin film with CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.14, 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M is represented in (d). A CZTS thin film fabricated with ZnCl2, SnCl2, CuCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.1, 0.07, 0.14, and 0.8 M, respectively, is shown in (e).
Figure 4. Plane-view field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE–SEM) images of CZTS thin films deposited with ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M, respectively, and CuCl2 concentrations of (a) 0.1 M; (b) 0.14 M; and (c) 0.16 M, respectively. The cross section image of a CZTS thin film with CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.14, 0.07, 0.07, and 0.8 M is represented in (d). A CZTS thin film fabricated with ZnCl2, SnCl2, CuCl2, and thiourea concentrations of 0.1, 0.07, 0.14, and 0.8 M, respectively, is shown in (e).
Materials 09 00526 g004
Materials 09 00526 g005 1024
Figure 5. Optical band gap as a function of the Cu/(Zn + Sn) ratio, and the inset shows the plot of (αhν)2 against the photon energy of a Cu-poor and Zn-rich (Cu/Zn = 1.12) CZTS thin film.
Figure 5. Optical band gap as a function of the Cu/(Zn + Sn) ratio, and the inset shows the plot of (αhν)2 against the photon energy of a Cu-poor and Zn-rich (Cu/Zn = 1.12) CZTS thin film.
Materials 09 00526 g005
Materials 09 00526 g006 1024
Figure 6. Carrier concentration and resistivity of the CZTS thin film as a function of the (a) CuCl2; and (b) ZnCl2 concentrations.
Figure 6. Carrier concentration and resistivity of the CZTS thin film as a function of the (a) CuCl2; and (b) ZnCl2 concentrations.
Materials 09 00526 g006
Materials 09 00526 g007 1024
Figure 7. Current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of a Mo/CZTS/Si/Al heterostructured solar cell under (air mass) AM 1.5 G.
Figure 7. Current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of a Mo/CZTS/Si/Al heterostructured solar cell under (air mass) AM 1.5 G.
Materials 09 00526 g007
Table
Table 1. The S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio and electrical characteristics of copper-zinc-tin-sulfur (CZTS) thin films with different thiourea concentration.
Table 1. The S/(Cu + Zn + Sn) atomic content ratio and electrical characteristics of copper-zinc-tin-sulfur (CZTS) thin films with different thiourea concentration.
Thiourea Concentration (M)S/(Cu + Zn + Sn)Conduction TypeCarrier Concentration (cm−3)Mobility (cm2/Vs)Resistivity (Ùcm)
0.61.04p/n9.13 × 10170.3420.7
0.71.07p/n1.32 × 10180.2219.2
0.81.09p1.07 × 10190.491.19
0.91.19p8.87 × 10180.551.23
Table
Table 2. Temperature dependence of conduction type, carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity of the CZTS thin film measured using Hall measurements.
Table 2. Temperature dependence of conduction type, carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity of the CZTS thin film measured using Hall measurements.
Annealing Temperature (°C)Conduction TypeCarrier Concentration (cm−3)Mobility (cm2/Vs)Resistivity (Ùcm)
300p/n2.02 × 1014126245
350p1.07 × 10190.491.19
400p/n2.80 × 10157.95280
450p/n1.24 × 10160.0945310

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yeh, M.-Y.; Lei, P.-H.; Lin, S.-H.; Yang, C.-D. Copper-Zinc-Tin-Sulfur Thin Film Using Spin-Coating Technology. Materials 2016, 9, 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070526

AMA Style

Yeh M-Y, Lei P-H, Lin S-H, Yang C-D. Copper-Zinc-Tin-Sulfur Thin Film Using Spin-Coating Technology. Materials. 2016; 9(7):526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yeh, Min-Yen, Po-Hsun Lei, Shao-Hsein Lin, and Chyi-Da Yang. 2016. "Copper-Zinc-Tin-Sulfur Thin Film Using Spin-Coating Technology" Materials 9, no. 7: 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070526

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop