Next Article in Journal
Formation of Micro- and Nanostructures on the Nanotitanium Surface by Chemical Etching and Deposition of Titania Films by Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)
Previous Article in Journal
Very High Cycle Fatigue Failure Analysis and Life Prediction of Cr-Ni-W Gear Steel Based on Crack Initiation and Growth Behaviors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/ma8125462
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polar Order Evolutions near the Rhombohedral to Pseudocubic and Tetragonal to Pseudocubic Phase Boundaries of the BiFeO3-BaTiO3 System

by
Yongxing Wei
1,*,
Changqing Jin
1,
Yiming Zeng
2,
Xiaotao Wang
3,
Gang Xu
1 and
Xiaoli Wang
3
1
School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, China
2
Sate Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals, Kunming Institute of Precious Metals, Kunming 650106, China
3
MOE Key Laboratory for Non-equilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2015, 8(12), 8355-8365; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8125462
Submission received: 31 July 2015 / Revised: 23 October 2015 / Accepted: 27 October 2015 / Published: 2 December 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Solid solutions of (1-x)BiFeO3-xBaTiO3 (BF-BT, 0.05 ≤ x ≤ 0.98) were prepared and characterized. It was found that the dielectric constant εm, remnant polarization Pr and piezoelectric coefficient d33 reach their maximum values near the rhombohedral–pseudocubic phase boundary. In particular, the 0.7BF-0.3BT composition shows large polarization (Pr > 20 μC/cm2) and a temperature-stable piezoelectric property (d33 > 100 pC/N when the annealing temperature is lower than ~400 °C). Near the tetragonal–pseudocubic phase boundary, εm and Pr decrease, and the piezoelectric property vanishes when the BF content reaches 4 mol %.

1. Introduction

Bi-based perovskite materials, BiMeO3 (BM), in which Me can be a single trivalent cation or a mixture of two cations, have been studied because of their high polarization and Tc values. However, synthesis of a single-phase BM perovskite ceramic material by conventional synthesized methods is challenging; this may be due to the small radius of the Bi cation [1,2,3,4]. The addition of PbTiO3 (PT) or BaTiO3 (BT) with large A-site ions into BM ceramics to form solid solutions can effectively stabilize the perovskite structure. Some BM-PT systems exhibit a large d33 piezoelectric coefficient with a high Tc near the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) [5,6,7,8]. In particular, the piezoelectric activity in 0.36BiScO3-0.64PbTiO3 (d33 > 460 PC/N, Tc = 450 °C) is comparable to that in the Pb(Zr1-xTix)O3 (PZT) material [5]. On the other hand, for BM-BT systems, even the end members are both ferroelectrics with low symmetry structures (Bi(Ti1/2Zn1/2)O3-BaTiO3, BiAlO3-BaTiO3, etc.), and the decrease in BT content leads to the appearance of the undesired pseudo-cubic phase. The composition-driven ferroelectric-relaxor transition is usually found near the phase boundary between the tetragonal (T) and pseudocubic (PC) phases [9,10,11]. On the BM side of the phase diagram, limited solubility gives rise to difficulty in studying the structures and electrical properties of these materials.
BiFeO3-BaTiO3 (BF-BT) was first investigated for its multiferroic properties [12,13,14]. A small amount of BT can effectively stabilize the perovskite phase [14]. Earlier investigations of the BF-BT system have shown that the system undergoes structural transitions, from the rhombohedral (R) to the cubic (C) and to the T phase, with the addition of BT [12]. The observation of ferroelectric behavior in compositions with a BT content of 33 to 50 mol % suggests that the intermediate phases might be considered to have PC symmetry [15,16,17]. Recently, good piezoelectric properties near the rhombohedral–pseudocubic (R–PC) phase boundary have been found in unmodified 0.7BF-0.3BT ceramics (d33 = 134 pC/N) and Mn-modified 0.725BF-0.275BT ceramics (d33 = 136 pC/N) [18,19,20]. Near the tetragonal–pseudocubic (T–PC) phase boundary, a smeared dielectric anomaly has been found in 0.04BF-0.96BT ceramics, with a maximum dielectric constant εm of ~800, but the related ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties have rarely been reported [21,22].
To understand the polar order mechanism of BF-BT, systematic investigations of electrical properties in the BF-BT system should be carried out. In this work, (1-x)BF-xBT (0.05 ≤ x ≤ 0.98) solid solution ceramics were prepared. The different polarization behaviors near the R-PC and T-PC phase boundaries were reported and discussed.

2. Experimental Methods

The (1-x)BF-xBT (0.05 ≤ x ≤ 0.98) solid solution ceramics were prepared using the mixed oxide method. The starting reagents of Bi2O3 (>99%) (Sinapharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China), Fe2O3 (>99%) (Sinapharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), BaCO3 (>99%) (Sinapharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) and TiO2 (>99%)(Sinapharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) were carefully weighed in stoichiometric ratios and wet mixed thoroughly by ball-milling for 10 h. The mixture was then dried and calcined at 750–1140 °C (Table 1) for 2 h in a cove red corundum crucible. The calcined powder was ball-milled and dried. Pellets with a diameter and thickness of 12 and 1–2 mm, respectively, were pressed using a 10% polyvinyl alcohol binder. The pellets were sintered in a covered corundum crucible at 930–1340 °C (Table 1) for 3 h. To reduce the volatilization of bismuth oxide during sintering, the pellets were buried with the mixture of Bi2O3 and calcined ZrO2. For X-ray diffraction measurements, the ceramics were crushed into fine powders. For electric measurements, silver paste was painted onto both sides of the ground ceramic pellets and fired at 810 °C for 10 min. Prior to the piezoelectric measurements, the ceramics were poled under 35–70 kV/cm in silicone oil for 10 min at room temperature.
Table
Table 1. Calcination and sintering temperatures of (1-x)BiFeO3-BaTiO3 ((1-x)BF-xBT) system.
Table 1. Calcination and sintering temperatures of (1-x)BiFeO3-BaTiO3 ((1-x)BF-xBT) system.
CompositionsTemperature (°C)
CalcinationSintering
0.95BF-0.05BT750930
0.9BF-0.1BT750960
0.8BF-0.2BT750980
0.75BF-0.25BT800990
0.7BF-0.3BT8001000
0.65BF-0.35BT8001050
0.6BF-0.4BT8001050
0.55BF-0.45BT8501090
0.5BF-0.5BT9001100
0.4BF-0.6BT9501140
0.2BF-0.8BT10001220
0.1BF-0.9BT10801260
0.04BF-0.96BT11401340
0.02BF-0.98BT11401340
Crystal structures of (1-x)BF-xBT ceramics were detected using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker AXS D8 ADVAMDMCE, Karlsruhe, German). The lattice parameters were refined based on XRD patterns using the Rietveld method, as implemented in the Topas 4.2 software. The space groups for compositions with 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.3, 0.3 < x ≤ 0.9 and 0.9 < x ≤ 0.98 were chosen as rhombohedral R3c, cubic Pm 3 ¯ m, and tetragonal P4mm, respectively. The dielectric measurements were performed using an automated system, with a temperature-controlled sample chamber and an Agilent 4284A LCR meter controlled by a personal computer. The ferroelectric hysteresis loop was measured using an automatic ferroelectric test system [23]. The applied electric field signal is sinusoidal with the frequency of 10 Hz. The d33 values were measured using a piezo-d33meter (ZJ-3AN; Institute of Acoustics, Beijing, China).
Structural and dielectric measurements of unpoled and poled ceramics for 0.7BF-0.3BT, 0.65BF-0.35BT and 0.6BF-0.4BT were performed. The ceramics were poled for 10 min at room temperature. Structural and dielectric measurements of poled ceramics were carried out after 24 h. Both the unpoled and poled ceramics were polished for structural measurements.

3. Results and Discussion

The diffraction peaks of all of the compositions could be indexed as a single perovskite structure, with no observed impure phase (see the Supplementary Information).

3.1. Structural and Electrical Properties near the R-PC Phase Boundary

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns, temperature dependences of the dielectric constant ε, and polarization hysteresis loops for 0.8BF-0.2BT, 0.7BF-0.3BT and 0.55BF-0.45BT ceramics. According to the splitting of {110}c and {111}c reflections (Figure 1a), the 0.8BF-0.2BT ceramic most likely exhibits a highly distorted rhombohedral structure, while the 0.7BF-0.3BT ceramic shows a weak rhombohedral distortion. No clear splitting of {110}c and {111} reflections was found in the compositions with a BT content larger than 30 mol %.
Materials 08 05462 g001 1024
Figure 1. Structural and electrical properties of the BF-BT system near the BF side. (a) X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns; (b) temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ɛ (1 MHz); and (c) polarization hysteresis curves of 0.8BF-0.2BT, 0.7BF-0.3BT and 0.55BF-0.35BT ceramics.
Figure 1. Structural and electrical properties of the BF-BT system near the BF side. (a) X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns; (b) temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ɛ (1 MHz); and (c) polarization hysteresis curves of 0.8BF-0.2BT, 0.7BF-0.3BT and 0.55BF-0.35BT ceramics.
Materials 08 05462 g001
Figure 1b shows that the 0.8BF-0.2BT ceramic exhibits a sharp dielectric peak at ~657 °C. The temperature Tm for the dielectric peak is frequency-independent. However, no endothermic or exothermic peak could be found near Tm (Figure 2). Furthermore, the temperature dependence of the structures also indicates the coexistence of the rhombohedral and cubic structures over a 100 °C range around Tm [35]. It may therefore be reasonable to suggest that 0.8BF-0.2BT is ferroelectric with the diffuse phase transition. The dielectric constant of 0.7BF-0.3BT increases abruptly for temperature higher than 400 °C. The dielectric anomaly is broad, with a maximum value εm > 20,000. The corresponding Tm is frequency-dependent. This suggests that the high-temperature dielectric behavior of 0.7BF-0.3BT may be relaxor-like. The 0.55BF-0.45BT ceramic displays a frequency-dependent and very diffuse dielectric anomaly, with a εm of 7780 at 1MHz, and the dielectric constant above Tm decreases slowly with increasing temperature. Accordingly, the increasing level of BT substitution leads to a tendency to increase the structural disorder and increase the diffuseness of the dielectric anomaly.
Materials 08 05462 g002 1024
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of 0.8BF-0.2BT.
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of 0.8BF-0.2BT.
Materials 08 05462 g002
The 0.8BF-0.2BT and 0.7BF-0.3BT ceramics show normal polarization switching behavior at room temperature (Figure 1c). Considering the dielectric and ferroelectric data, it is possible that 0.7BF-0.3BT displays a temperature-driven ferroelectric-relaxor transition. A slim ferroelectric hysteresis loop was found for the 0.55BF-0.45BT ceramic, possibly indicating the presence of the relaxor state.
The composition dependences of the dielectric, ferroelectric, and piezoelectric properties for the BF-BT system are shown in Figure 3. For compositions with rhombohedral distortions, the values of room-temperature ε and εm increase with increasing BT content (Figure 3a,b). The largest εm is found for the composition near the phase boundary. Due to the large Ec, 0.8BF-0.2BT and 0.75BF-0.25BT ceramics were not poled to saturation. This means that the measured Pr may be lower than the intrinsic values. The addition of BT induces decreases in Ec, confirming the transition from hard ferroelectrics to soft ferroelectrics (Figure 3c) [18,19]. The 0.7BF-0.3BT ceramic exhibits optimum ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties (Figure 3d,e). For compositions with a pseudo-cubic structure, the values of εm, Pr and d33 all decrease with the increasing BT content.
Table 2 lists the ferroelectric and piezoelectric parameters for the 0.7BF-0.3BT system, pure BF ceramic, and other BF-based systems [1,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The pure BF ceramic exhibits a very high Tc and d33 of 44 pC/N [1,25]. Introducing rare earth ions with the same valence at the BF A-site does not result in an enhancement of the piezoelectric property [25,26,27,28,29]. This may be caused by the large Ec. Solid solution systems of BF-BT, BF-PT and BiFeO3-(Bi0.5K0.5)TiO3 contain two cations with different valences on both the A-site and B-site. However, the value of d33 for the BiFeO3-PbTiO3 and BiFeO3-(Bi0.5K0.5)TiO3 systems is not higher than 100 pC/N [30,31]. Excellent piezoelectric performance is found for compositions of the modified BF-PT systems [32,34]. Interestingly, the compositions of the modified BF-PT systems and 0.7BF-0.3BT all have weak ferroelectric distortion, with a relatively low Ec.
Materials 08 05462 g003 1024
Figure 3. (a) Room-temperature ɛ; (b) maximum dielectric constant ɛm; (c) coercive field Ec; (d) remnantpolarization Pr; and (e) piezoelectric coefficient d33 as a function of the BT content for the BF-BT system.
Figure 3. (a) Room-temperature ɛ; (b) maximum dielectric constant ɛm; (c) coercive field Ec; (d) remnantpolarization Pr; and (e) piezoelectric coefficient d33 as a function of the BT content for the BF-BT system.
Materials 08 05462 g003
Table
Table 2. Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of 0.7BF-0.3BT, BiFeO3 (BF) and other BF-based ceramics.
Table 2. Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of 0.7BF-0.3BT, BiFeO3 (BF) and other BF-based ceramics.
CompositionsPr (μC/cm2)Ec (kV/cm)d33 (pC/N)Tc/Tm (°C)References
0.7BF-0.3BT26.034.6134511-
BF~13>5044830~850[1,24]
Bi0.92Dy0.08FeO325.2>10037-[25]
Bi0.875Sm0.125FeO315.1>8029-[26]
Bi0.91La0.05Tb0.04FeO3--9-[27]
Bi0.85La0.15FeO312.1>6028-[28]
(Bi1-xNdx)FeO3(x = 0–0.15)--26~28-[29]
0.675BiFeO3-0.325PbTiO362>4085642[30]
0.6BiFeO3-0.4(Bi0.5K0.5)TiO3~15~4037441[31]
0.57(Bi0.8La0.2)(Ga0.05Fe0.95)O3-0.43PbTiO3~30~20295264[32]
0.511BiFeO3-0.326PbZrO3-0.163PbTiO3~12~40101431[33]
0.33BiFeO3-0.2BaZrO3-0.47PbTiO3~30~20~270270[34]
The annealing temperature dependence of d33 for 0.7BF-0.3BT is shown in Figure 4. The d33 was measured after the sample was annealed at selected temperatures for one hour. The value of d33 is stable with respect to temperatures below ~400 °C (>100 pC/N) and then drops noticeably around the depolarization temperature Td. The Td of 0.7BF-0.3BT is ~420 °C, which is much higher than that of the lead-free (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-based ceramics [36].
Materials 08 05462 g004 1024
Figure 4. Annealing temperature dependence of room-temperature d33 for 0.7BF-0.3BT.
Figure 4. Annealing temperature dependence of room-temperature d33 for 0.7BF-0.3BT.
Materials 08 05462 g004
Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns and the temperature dependence of ε for unpoled and poled BF-BT ceramics near the R-PC phase boundary. Clear splits of {111}c reflection were found in 0.7BF-0.3BT after poling. This suggests that the electric field triggers an obvious modification of the lattice parameters in 0.7BF-0.3BT. However, the crystal symmetry does not change after poling. This shows that the electric-field-induced phenomenon in 0.7BF-0.3BT may be different from that in MPB-based system [37,38]. The possible polarization directions (<111>c directions) could be only related to the rhombohedral distortion. Furthermore, the value of εm for the poled 0.7BF-0.3BT is much larger than that for the unpoled sample (Figure 5b). On the other hand, for 0.65BF-0.35BT and 0.6BF-0.4BT, there are no obvious differences in the structure and εm before and after poling. The detailed structure data are shown in the Supplemental Information.
Materials 08 05462 g005 1024
Figure 5. (a) XRD patterns; (b) Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ɛ of unpoled and poled samples for BF-BT compositions across the rhombohedral-pseudocubic phase boundary.
Figure 5. (a) XRD patterns; (b) Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ɛ of unpoled and poled samples for BF-BT compositions across the rhombohedral-pseudocubic phase boundary.
Materials 08 05462 g005

3.2. Structural and Electrical Properties near the T-PC Phase Boundary

The XRD patterns, temperature dependences of dielectric properties, and polarization hysteresis loops of 0.02BF-0.98BT and 0.04BF-0.96BT ceramics are shown in Figure 6. Clear splitting of the {200}c peak reflections for the 0.02BF-0.98BT ceramic reveals the presence of a tetragonal distortion (Figure 6a). However, for the 0.04BF-0.96BT ceramic, the splitting of {200}c reflections is much weaker. This suggests that the tetragonal distortions are effectively suppressed when BF content reaches 4 mol %.
Materials 08 05462 g006 1024
Figure 6. Structural and electrical properties of the BF-BT system near the BT side. (a) XRD patterns; (b) temperature dependence of dielectric constant ɛ; (c) temperature dependence of dielectric loss tanδ; and (d) polarization hysteresis curves of 0.02BF-0.98BT and 0.04BF-0.96BT ceramics.
Figure 6. Structural and electrical properties of the BF-BT system near the BT side. (a) XRD patterns; (b) temperature dependence of dielectric constant ɛ; (c) temperature dependence of dielectric loss tanδ; and (d) polarization hysteresis curves of 0.02BF-0.98BT and 0.04BF-0.96BT ceramics.
Materials 08 05462 g006
The 0.02BF-0.98BT ceramic exhibits a sharp dielectric peak near 123 °C, with a εm of 4300 (Figure 6b). The corresponding Tm is frequency-independent. The sharp dielectric peak can be related to the transition from the ferroelectric T phase to the paraelectric C phase. Additionally, 0.02BF-0.98BT displays another weak and broad dielectric anomaly around −130 °C. As is known, pure BT ceramic has two dielectric anomalies below room temperature that are related to the tetragonal-orthorhombic and orthorhombic-rhombohedral phase transitions. The low temperature dielectric behavior of 0.02BF-0.98BT suggests that a small amount of BF content weakens the low-temperature phase transitions of BT. The dielectric anomaly of 0.04BF-0.96BT is smeared (εm = 1170), with a frequency-independent Tm. The tanδ value for 0.02BF-0.98BT decreases abruptly near Tm (Figure 6c). On the other hand, the decrease in tanδ near Tm for 0.04BF-0.96BT is gradual. The dielectric data of 0.04BF-0.96BT may suggest the diffused phase transition [21].
The ferroelectric behaviors of 0.02BF-0.98BT and 0.04BF-0.96BT ceramics are also different (Figure 6d). A normal ferroelectric hysteresis loop is observed in the former, with a Pr of 5.3 μC/cm2, while a slim hysteresis loop is found in the latter, with a Pr of 2.2 μC/cm2. The value of d33 for 0.02BF-0.98BT is 14 pC/N. However, d33 vanishes for 0.04BF-0.96BT. The evolutions of the dielectric, ferroelectric, and piezoelectric properties near the BT end member reveal that long-range ferroelectric order is destroyed when the BF content is 4 mol %.

3.3. Composition Dependence of Lattice Parameters

Figure 7 shows the lattice parameters of BF-BT ceramics as a function of the BT content. The ferroelectric distortion near the BT side is much more easily disrupted than that near the BF side. In the tetragonal region, the cT value for 0.04BF-0.96BT (4.009 Å) decreased significantly relative to that for 0.02BF-0.98BT (4.034 Å), while the aT values of the two compositions are similar. The reduction of the c axis leads to the suppression of the tetragonal distortion. The calculated lattice parameters for the rhombohedral BF-BT compositions are described in the hexagonal unit cell with the R3c space group. To clearly observe the rhombohedral distortion, the lattice parameters in the perovskite-type unit cell are used. The transformation relation could be expressed as:
a r = 1 3 3 a H 2 + ( c H 2 ) 2
sin α 2 = 3 2 1 3 + ( c H 2 a H ) 2
where aH and cH are the lattice parameters in the hexagonal unit cell and ar and α are the lattice parameter and rhombohedral angle in the perovskite-type unit cell, respectively. The values of α and aR both increase gradually with the addition of BT. When the BT content is 25 mol %, the composition still shows a large rhombohedral distortion (α = 89.68°).
Materials 08 05462 g007 1024
Figure 7. Lattice parameters of the BF-BT system as a function of the BT content.
Figure 7. Lattice parameters of the BF-BT system as a function of the BT content.
Materials 08 05462 g007

3.4. Possible Reasons for the Different Behaviors near the Two Phase Boundaries

It is known that both temperature-driven polymorphic structure transitions (e.g., BT-based ceramics, (KxNa1-x)NbO3 based ceramics) and composition-driven MPB (e.g., Pb(ZrxTi1-x)O3, Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3) can improve the piezoelectric activity [36,39,40,41,42]. Although most MPBs are related to the transitions between the R phase and T phase, the composition-driven R-C or T-C transition may also lead to the enhancement in electrical properties [39]. The phase boundary (separation of the R phase and PC phase) for the BF-BT system could be regarded as MPB. Near the MPB, the BF-BT system shows a temperature-driven and composition-driven ferroelectric-relaxor transition, which is similar to that in Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 [41]. However, no clear ferroelectric distortions could be found in the unpoled compositions that show the enhanced electrical properties.
Near the T-PC phase boundary, when the content of BF is only 4 mol %, the tetragonal distortions and long-range ferroelectric order are effectively suppressed. The electrical behaviors near the two phase boundaries in the BF-BT system are quite different. The mixtures of atoms with different electronegativities, valences, and radii both on the A-site and B-site, coupled with the structural inhomogeneity, increase the complexity of the structure-property relation. However, two important factors should be considered.
First, the Bi(6s)–O(2p) covalent bonds are much stronger than the Ti(4d)-O(2p) covalent bonds. The Ti cation displacement in BT along the [001]c direction from the central of ideal cubic perovskite is ~0.14 Å [43]. For BF, the Bi cation displacement along the [111]c direction is ~0.676 Å [44]. This may suggest that the Ti–O covalent bond is more easily weakened than the Bi–O covalent bond.
In addition, the effects of the structure parameters near the BF and BT sides are also different. Near the BF side, the addition of Ba2+ ions with a large radius expands the unit cell, as shown by the compositional dependence of the lattice parameters (Figure 7). The displacement space of the Bi3+ ions is enlarged. Large off-center displacements could be present in Bi-rich regions. As a result, large polarization is possible near the R-PC phase boundary of the BF-BT system. A similar effect has been reported in the Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3 system, in that the radii of the Sn4+ ions are much larger than those of the Ti4+ ions [45]. Although there are no reports on the electrical properties near the BM side in other BM-BT systems, a polarization enhancement is expected. Near the BT side, the addition of BF leads to the decrease in the length of c axis parameter. The displacement along the [001]c direction for the Ti4+ ions is reduced, as also shown by neutron diffraction data [21]. The similar phenomenon was observed in other BM-BT systems [9,10,11]. The reason for this is still unclear. Nevertheless, the types of A-site ions should be considered. For BM-PT systems that contain ferroelectric active Bi3+ and Pb2+ cations on the A-site, the behavior is different. The length of the c axis and the tetragonal distortion for BiScO3-PbTiO3 and Bi(Ti1/2Mg1/2)O3-PbTiO3 systems near the PT side decrease slowly with the decreasing PT content [5,7]. In contrast, the addition of BF or Bi(Ti0.5Zn0.5)O3 leads to the increase in the c axis and the tetragonal distortion near the PT region [46,47]. A first-principles theoretical calculation should be carried out to further understand the two phase boundaries for BF-BT.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the polar order evolutions near the R-PC and T-PC phase boundaries in the BF-BT system are different. Near the R-PC phase boundary, 0.7BF-0.3BT exhibits a large polarization and a temperature-stable piezoelectric property (Td = ~420 °C). The increase of BF content leads to the decrease of the electrical parameters near the BT side. The long-ranged ferroelectric order is disrupted when the BF content is only 4 mol %. An understanding of the electrical behaviors in the BF-BT system may help in the search for high-performance Pb-free piezoelectric ceramics based on similar phase boundaries.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/8/12/5462/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project No. 50772087 and 11404251) and the President’s Fund of Xi’an Technological University (project No. XAGDXJJ1111).

Author Contributions

Xiaoli Wang and Yongxing Wei designed the experiments. Yongxing Wei and Xiaotao Wang performed the experiments. Xiaoli Wang, Changqing Jin, Yiming Zeng and Gang Xu supplied the theoretical guidance. Yongxing Wei wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Catalan, G.; Scott, J.F. Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Belik, A.A.; Likubo, S.; Kodama, K.; Igawa, N.; Shamoto, S.; Maie, M.; Nagai, T.; Matsui, Y.; Stefanovich, S.Y.; Lazoryak, B.I.; et al. BiScO3: Centrosymmetric BiMnO3-type oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 706–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Suchomel, M.R.; Fogg, A.M.; Allix, M.; Niu, H.J.; Claridge, J.B.; Rosseinsky, M.J. Bi2ZnTiO6: A lead-free closed-shell polar perovskite with a calculated ionic polarization of 150 μC/cm2. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 4987–4989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khalyavin, D.D.; Salak, A.N.; Vyshatko, N.P.; Lopes, A.B.; Olekhnovich, N.M.; Pushkarev, A.V.; Maroz, I.I.; Radyush, Y.V. Crystal structure of metastable perovskite Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3:Bi-based structural analogue of antiferroelectric PbZrO3. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 5104–5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eitel, R.E.; Randall, C.A.; Shrout, T.R.; Park, S.E. Preparation and characterization of high temperature perovskite ferroelectrics in the solid-solution (1-x)BiScO3-xPbTiO3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 41, 2099–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alguero, M.; Ramos, P.; Jimenez, R.; Amorin, H.; Vila, E.; Castro, A. High temperature piezoelectric BiScO3-PbTiO3 synthesized by mechanochemical methods. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 1174–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Randall, C.A.; Eitel, R.E.; Jones, B.; Shrout, T.R.; Woodward, D.I.; Reaney, I.M. Investigation of a high Tc piezoelectric system: (1-x)Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3-xPbTiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 95, 3633–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.F.; Chen, X.X.; Xu, G.S.; Yang, D.F.; Tian, Y.F.; Zhu, X. Novel high temperature ferroelectric single crystals 0.38Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3-0.62PbTiO3 with good and temperature-stable piezoelectric properties. CystEngComm 2015, 10, 5605–5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ogihara, H.; Randall, C.A.; Trolier-McKinstry, S. Weakly coupled relaxor behavior of BaTiO3-BiScO3 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, H.C.; Ye, Z.G. Dielectric properties and relaxor behavior of a new (1-x)BaTiO3-xBiAlO3 solid solution. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, C.C.; Cann, D.P. Phase transitions and dielectric properties in Bi(Zn1/2Ti1/2)O3-BaTiO3 perovskite solid solutions. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, M.M.; Srinivas, A.; Suryanarayana, S.V. Structure property relations in BiFeO3/BaTiO3 solid solutions. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singh, A.; Pandey, V.; Kotnala, R.K.; Pandey, D. Direct evidence for multiferroic magnetoelectric coupling in 0.9BiFeO3-0.1BaTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gheorghiu, F.P.; Ianculescu, A.; Postolache, P.; Lupu, N.; Dobromir, M.; Luca, D.; Mitoseriu, L. Preparation and properties of (1-x)BiFeO3-xBaTiO3 multiferroic ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 506, 862–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ozaki, T.; Kitagawa, S.; Nishihara, S.; Hosokoshi, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Noguchi, Y.; Miyayama, M.; Mori, S. Ferroelectric properties and nano-scaled domain structures in (1-x)BiFeO3–xBaTiO3 (0.33 < x < 0.50). Ferroelectrics 2009, 385, 6155–6161. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wei, Y.X.; Wang, X.T.; Jia, J.J.; Wang, X.L. Multiferroic and piezoelectric properties of 0.65BiFeO3-0.35BaTiO3 ceramic with pseudo-cubic symmetry. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 3499–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Futakuchi, T.; KaKuda, T.; Sakai, Y. Multiferroic properties of BiFeO3-BaTiO3 based ceramics. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 122, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leontsev, S.O.; Eitel, R.E. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties in Mn-modified (1-x)BiFeO3-xBaTiO3 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 2957–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, H.B.; Zhou, C.R.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, G.H.; Wang, H.; Li, W.Z. Structural, microstructural and electrical properties of BiFeO3-BaTiO3 ceramics with high thermal stability. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47, 4233–4239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, Y.X.; Wang, X.T.; Zhu, J.T.; Wang, X.L.; Jia, J.J. Dielectric, ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of BiFeO3-BaTiO3 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 3163–3168. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh, A.; Moriyoshi, C.; Kuroiwa, Y.; Pandey, D. Evidence for diffuse ferroelectric phase transition and cooperative tricritical freezing of random-site dipoles due to off-centered Bi3+ ions in the average cubic lattice of (Ba1-xBix)(Fe1-xTix)O3. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, M.M.; Suresh, M.B.; Suryanarayana, S.V.; Kumar, G.S.; Bhimasankaram, T. Dielectric relaxation in Ba0.96Bi0.04Ti0.96Fe0.04O3. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 84, 6811–6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, L.; Wang, X.L.; Shi, J. Measurement and estimation of ferroelectric hysteresis loops. Ferroelectrics 2010, 411, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rojac, T.; Kosec, M.; Budic, B.; Setter, N.; Damjanovic, D. Strong ferroelectric domain-wall pinning in BiFeO3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 074107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, C.; Chen, X.M.; Wang, J.L.; Yuan, G.L.; Yin, J.; Liu, Z.G. Structure and piezoelectric properties of BiFeO3 and Bi0.92Dy0.08FeO3 multiferroics at high temperature. Solid State Commun. 2012, 152, 1194–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, G.L.; Or, S.W. Multiferroicity in polarized single-phase Bi0.875Sm0.125FeO3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, Q.H.; Liu, F.T.; Nan, C.W.; Lin, Y.H.; Reece, M.J.; Yan, H.X.; Ning, H.P.; Shen, Z.J. High-temperature ferroelectric phase transition observed in multiferroic Bi0.91La0.05Tb0.04FeO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuan, G.L.; Baba-Kishi, K.Z.; Liu, J.M.; Or, S.W.; Wang, Y.P.; Liu, Z.G. Multiferroic properties of single-phase Bi0.85La0.15FeO3 lead-free ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 3136–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, G.L.; Or, S.W. Enhanced piezoelectric and pyroelectric effects in single-phase multiferroic Bi1−xNdxFeO3 (x = 0–0.15) ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amorín, H.; Correas, C.; Ramos, P.; Hungría, T.; Castro, A.; Algueró, M. Very high remnant polarization and phase-change electromechanical response of BiFeO3-PbTiO3 at the multiferroic morphotropic phase boundary. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bennett, J.; Bell, A.J.; Stevenson, T.J.; Smith, R.I.; Sterianou, I.; Reaney, I.M.; Comyn, T.P. Multiferroic properties of BiFeO3-(K0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 ceramics. Mater. Lett. 2013, 94, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, J.R.; Eitel, R.E.; Cross, L.E. Lanthanum-modified (1-x)(Bi0.8La0.2)(Ga0.05Fe0.95)O3-xPbTiO3 crystalline solutions: Novel morphotropic phase-boundary lead-reduced piezoelectrics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 86, 2111–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, W.; Tan, X.L.; Rajan, K. Piezoelectric ceramics with compositions at the morphotropic phase boundary in the BiFeO3-PbZrO3-PbTiO3 ternary system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 4358–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fan, L.L.; Chen, J.; Li, S.; Kang, H.J.; Liu, L.J.; Fang, L.; Xing, X.R. Enhanced piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties in the BaZrO3 substituted BiFeO3-PbTiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Singh, A.; Senyshyn, A.; Fuess, H.; Pandey, D. Ferroelectric and antiferrodistortive phase transition in the multiferroic (Bi0.8Ba0.2)(Fe0.8Ti0.2)O3: A high temperature neutron powder diffraction study. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shrout, T.R.; Zhang, S.J. Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics: Alternatives for PZT? J. Electroceram. 2007, 19, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Craciun, F.; Galassi, C.; Birjega, R. Electric-field-induced and spontaneous relaxor-ferroelectric phase transitions in (Na1/2Bi1/2)1-xBaTiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 124106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lalitha, K.V.; Kalyani, A.K.; Ranjan, R. Analogous stress and electric field driven structural transformation and decrease in polarization coherence on poling around the morphotropic phase boundary in BiScO3-PbTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 224107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Damjanovic, D. A morphotrophic phase boundary system based on polarization rotation and polarization extension. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 062906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, J.G.; Xiao, D.Q.; Zhu, J.G. Potassium-sodium niobate lead-free piezoelectric materials: Past, present, and future of phase boundaries. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2559–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Noblanc, O.; Gaucher, P.; Calvarin, G. Structural and dielectric studies of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 ferroelectric solid solutions around the morphotropic boundary. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 4291–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Muhtar, A.; Somayazulu, M.; Cohen, R.E.; Ganesh, P.; Dera, P.; Mao, H.-K.; Hemley, R.J.; Ren, Y.; Liermann, P.; Wu, Z.G. Origin of morphotropic phase boundaries inferroelectrics. Nature 2008, 451, 545–549. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cohen, R.E. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides. Nature 1992, 358, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Selbach, S.M.; Tybell, T.; Einarsrud, M.A.; Grande, T. The ferroic phase transitions of BiFeO3. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3692–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shi, T.; Xie, L.; Gu, L.; Zhu, J. Why Sn doping significantly enhances the dielectric properties of Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhu, W.M.; Guo, H.Y.; Ye, Z.G. Structural and magnetic characterization of multiferroic (BiFeO3)1-x(PbTiO3)x solid solutions. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 014401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Suchomel, M.R.; Davies, P.K. Enhanced tetragonality in (x)PbTiO3-(1-x)Bi(Zn1/2Ti1/2)O3 and related solid solution systems. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 262905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, Y.; Jin, C.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, G.; Wang, X. Polar Order Evolutions near the Rhombohedral to Pseudocubic and Tetragonal to Pseudocubic Phase Boundaries of the BiFeO3-BaTiO3 System. Materials 2015, 8, 8355-8365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8125462

AMA Style

Wei Y, Jin C, Zeng Y, Wang X, Xu G, Wang X. Polar Order Evolutions near the Rhombohedral to Pseudocubic and Tetragonal to Pseudocubic Phase Boundaries of the BiFeO3-BaTiO3 System. Materials. 2015; 8(12):8355-8365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8125462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Yongxing, Changqing Jin, Yiming Zeng, Xiaotao Wang, Gang Xu, and Xiaoli Wang. 2015. "Polar Order Evolutions near the Rhombohedral to Pseudocubic and Tetragonal to Pseudocubic Phase Boundaries of the BiFeO3-BaTiO3 System" Materials 8, no. 12: 8355-8365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8125462

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop