Next Article in Journal
Investigation on Using SBS and Active Carbon Filler to Reduce the VOC Emission from Bituminous Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Anthracene Fibers Grown in a Microstructured Optical Fiber for X-ray Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Native Cellulose: Structure, Characterization and Thermal Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modified Powder-in-Tube Technique Based on the Consolidation Processing of Powder Materials for Fabricating Specialty Optical Fibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photonic Bandgap Propagation in All-Solid Chalcogenide Microstructured Optical Fibers

1
Glasses and Ceramics Group, Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, University of Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
2
Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel UMR 7249, 13013 Marseille, France
3
PERFOS, Platform of Photonics Bretagne, 22300 Lannion, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2014, 7(9), 6120-6129; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096120
Submission received: 23 June 2014 / Revised: 18 July 2014 / Accepted: 4 August 2014 / Published: 26 August 2014

Abstract

:
An original way to obtain fibers with special chromatic dispersion and single-mode behavior is to consider microstructured optical fibers (MOFs). These fibers present unique optical properties thanks to the high degree of freedom in the design of their geometrical structure. In this study, the first all-solid all-chalcogenide MOFs exhibiting photonic bandgap transmission have been achieved and optically characterized. The fibers are made of an As38Se62 matrix, with inclusions of Te20As30Se50 glass that shows a higher refractive index (n = 2.9). In those fibers, several transmission bands have been observed in mid infrared depending on the geometry. In addition, for the first time, propagation by photonic bandgap effect in an all-chalcogenide MOF has been observed at 3.39 µm, 9.3 µm, and 10.6 µm. The numerical simulations based on the optogeometric properties of the fibers agree well with the experimental characterizations.

1. Introduction

Bandgap microstructured optical fibers (MOFs) also called photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) are often seen as the paradigm of MOFs [1]. The capability to guide light in a low index core surrounded by a higher average index microstructure exhibiting a forbidden propagation bandgap [2] is with no doubt the most intriguing properties of MOFs together with the endlessly single mode behavior of solid core conventional MOFs [3,4]. Numerous works both theoretical and experimental have already been dedicated to these low index core hollow core PCFs [5]. Nevertheless, only very few of them deals with high-index glasses like chalcogenide ones due to the difficulty of drawing such kind of vitreous materials [6,7,8].
Concerning bandgap guidance in chalcogenide MOFs, theoretical works have already been published but the associated experimental realization did not reach the targeted parameters preventing guiding in the hollow core [9].
In this article, we choose another route to reach bandgap guidance in chalcogenide MOFs: an all-solid MOF. All-solid chalcogenide MOFs have already been fabricated: in a first report, a multimode single ring AsSe/GeAsSe MOF was obtained [10]. In a second and more recent report, an all-chalcogenide MOF has been drawn using As38Se62 glass composition for the matrix and three rings of As40S60 (As2S3) inclusions [11]. It is worth mentioning that hybrid As2S3/tellurite and As2S3/As3Se3 MOF have also been obtained but in this case the fibers are not all-solid fibers [12,13].
To obtain bandgap guidance in an all-chalcogenide MOF, one must consider high index inclusions embedded in a low-index matrix (see [1] and references within). Such configuration is also known under the acronym ARROW for Anti Resonant Reflecting Optical Waveguides [14] even if, in this case, the emphasis is given to the property of the individual scatterers with high refractive index and not to the collective effect building the bandgap [15,16]. One can notice that bandgap guidance in near infrared has been obtained in a silica/chalcogenide configuration. In this case, the light propagation is still in the silica core [17].
Using numerical simulations, we have designed an all-solid bandgap MOFs made of an As38Se62 matrix with high-index Te-As-Se glass (TAS) inclusions. Then, the designed MOFs have been fabricated, and characterized in terms of their transmission spectra in the near and mid infrared. Core guidance was investigated at several wavelengths up to 9.3 µm.

2. Fabrication of the Fibers

2.1. Glass Synthesis and Characteristics

Before the elaboration of MOFs, two glass compositions have to be elaborated: As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50. The glass rods were synthesized by melting, in a rocking furnace, high purity arsenic, selenium and tellurium at 850 °C in a silica ampoule under vacuum (1 × 10−4 mbar). The melts are then quenched under water and annealed around the glass transition temperature Tg (Tg = 165 °C and 137 °C for As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50, respectively). Other specific treatments using oxygen and hydrogen getters (aluminum metal and tellurium tetrachloride, respectively) associated with successive distillations are necessary to remove impurities such as water, oxygen, hydrogen and carbon [18,19]. The attenuation curves of the two glasses used for the elaboration of the MOFs are given in Figure 1. The lowest attenuation is less than 2 dB/m in the 5–9 µm spectral range for As-Se glass and less than 0.5 dB/m in the 4–6 µm and 7–8 µm spectral domains for Te-As-Se based glass. The low refractive index glass matrix is As38Se62, with indices varying between 2.82 and 2.75 in the mid-infrared. The high-index inclusions are made with Te20As30Se50 glass, whose refractive index is in the range of 2.96–2.90, depending on the infrared wavelength. Wavelength-dependence of the refractive indices is given in Figure 1b for the two glass compositions.
Figure 1. (a) As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 glasses attenuation curves; and (b) refractive indices of As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 glasses.
Figure 1. (a) As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 glasses attenuation curves; and (b) refractive indices of As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 glasses.
Materials 07 06120 g001

2.2. Microstructured Fiber Fabrication

The As38Se62/Te20As30Se50 microstructured fiber was obtained by using a three-step process. First, an As38Se62 microstructured preform was elaborated by the molding technique, as described in [20]. The mold contains silica capillaries threaded into silica hexagonal guides in a silica ampoule [20]. An As38Se62 glass rod is placed at the top of the mold and is then heated to become almost liquid. It must be soft enough to flow down in the silica mold. Once the glass is in the mold, the tube is quenched in air and annealed at Tg. Finally, the silica capillaries embedded in the preform are removed by applying a hydrofluoridric acid solution. The outer diameter of the preform is 20 mm and the holes diameters are around 500 µm. Then, a Te20As30Se50 rod with an outer diameter of 12 mm was drawn into a 470-µm diameter fiber. The hybrid preform is then obtained by the insertion of Te-As-Se fibers into the 36 holes of the As-Se molded preform, as shown in Figure 2a. Finally, the composite preform was drawn into fibers with three different outer diameters (230, 200 and 165 µm) in order to obtain different final geometries and different propagation properties. Figure 2b shows an example of the geometry obtained for Fiber 1.
Figure 2. (a) As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 preform; and (b) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of Fiber 1 cross section (backscattering electrons image).
Figure 2. (a) As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 preform; and (b) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of Fiber 1 cross section (backscattering electrons image).
Materials 07 06120 g002
The geometrical parameters of the different fibers (Fibers 1, 2 and 3) are given in Table 1. The three fibers present nearly the same d/Λ ratio (between 0.364 and 0.377). However, a higher variation is observed for Fiber 3, which could be due to the drawing process and/or the low resolution of the backscattering scanning electron microscope (SEM) pictures.
Table 1. Geometrical parameters of the fibers.
Table 1. Geometrical parameters of the fibers.
FiberOuter diameterd (µm) ± 0.1 µmΛ (µm) ± 0.1 µmd/Λ ± 0.01Core diameter
1230 µm5.514.70.37423.9
2200 µm4.913.00.37722.3
3165 µm4.311.80.36419.4

3. Results

3.1. Experimental Transmission of the Fibers

Optical transmission of the fibers was measured with a Bruker Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) (Billerica, MA, USA). The black body light of the FTIR is injected into a 40 cm-long fiber and the signal is detected with a nitrogen-cooled mercury, cadmium, tellurium (MCT) detector. Due to the large size of the injected spot, the light is not injected only in the core of the fiber. Indeed, part of the infrared spectroscopy (IR) light is injected in the clad of the fibers and propagates in the clad. In order to detect only the light that propagates in the core, a high-refractive-index Ga-Sn alloy is applied on the surface of the fiber in order to remove the cladding modes. Indeed, the Ga-Sn alloy presents a very weak reflection coefficient together with high loss which leads to an absorption of the cladding light after only few centimeters (see Figure 3a,b).
Figure 3. Near field observation at 3.39 µm of the Fiber 1: (a) without Ga-Sn coating; (b) with Ga-Sn coating in order to remove the cladding mode; and (c) Gaussian profile of the photonic bandgap fiber core.
Figure 3. Near field observation at 3.39 µm of the Fiber 1: (a) without Ga-Sn coating; (b) with Ga-Sn coating in order to remove the cladding mode; and (c) Gaussian profile of the photonic bandgap fiber core.
Materials 07 06120 g003
Figure 4 shows the transmission bands of the three fibers recorded after removing the contribution of the cladding mode. In all the fibers, transmission bands have been brought out in the 1.5–10 µm infrared range. It is worth noting that transmission curves are given in arbitrary units, so intensity of transmission bands cannot be compared. However, reliable information can be obtained by examination of the position of transmission bands (Figure 4), in accordance with the calculations presented in Section 3.3 that predict the position of transmitting and non-transmitting spectral domains.
Figure 4. Infrared transmission bands of the Fibers 1, 2 and 3.
Figure 4. Infrared transmission bands of the Fibers 1, 2 and 3.
Materials 07 06120 g004

3.2. Near-Field Measurements

Light propagation was demonstrated for monochromatic light at 3.39 µm from a He-Ne laser injected, as an example, in Fiber 1 (larger core). The near-field image at the output of the fiber was visualized on an infrared camera (FLIR PM 390, FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, OR, USA). Due to the low power of the laser and significant optical losses of the core of the fiber, near-field measurements have been carried out for a 4 cm-long fiber. Indeed, the experimental optical losses of the core were estimated to be in the 20–50 dB/m range. Figure 3 shows the near-field image obtained in a 4 cm-long sample of Fiber 1. The first near-field capture (Figure 3a) is observed when the light propagates in the core and the clad of the fiber. The second near-field image (Figure 3b) is obtained when a Ga-Sn alloy is applied at the surface of the fiber in order to remove the cladding modes. In this case, a Gaussian profile is observed in the core localized mode of the fiber (Figure 3c).
In a second step, near-field measurements were performed on the same fiber by using a tunable CO2 laser. Figure 5 shows the intensity profile at the output of Fiber 1 at 9.3 µm and 10.6 µm. For those wavelengths, intensity profiles were recorded with a FLIR E320 infrared camera (FLIR Systems).
Figure 5. Near field observation of the Fiber 1 at: (a) 9.3 µm; and (b) 10.6 µm.
Figure 5. Near field observation of the Fiber 1 at: (a) 9.3 µm; and (b) 10.6 µm.
Materials 07 06120 g005

3.3. Modeling

The theoretical guiding properties of the fabricated microstructured fibers have been obtained using the multipole method [21]. In the simulations, the fiber geometrical parameters and the material dispersion properties are taken into account [7].
The fiber geometrical parameters are given in Table 1. Fibers are made of Nr = 3 rings of high-index Te20As30Se50 inclusions embedded in the low-index As38Se62 glass. In Figure 6, the material dispersion curve for the As38Se62 glass is shown. Due to the ARROW guiding mechanism, a bandgap-like effective index dispersion is observed for the effective index of the fundamental core-localized mode of modelized Fibers 1 and 2. This behavior is characterized by successive effective index dispersion curves with small slope terminated at both low and high wavelength extremities by high slope regions associated to the delocalization of the fundamental mode in the high index inclusions of the optical cladding microstructure ([1] and see references inside). The high-slope regions are associated to the high guiding loss region. As expected for core localized mode, the effective index of the small slope regions is below the refractive index of the As38Se62 glass.
As it can be seen in Figure 7a, where both the computed guiding losses for Fiber 1 and the sign-reverse of the measured relative transmission for the same fiber versus the wavelength are provided, the computed results for both the low-loss and high-loss regions fit nicely with the experimental data. All the bandgaps are recovered in all the studied wavelength range. The non-monotonous behavior of the loss minima as a function of bandgap order, as seen in the computed results in Figure 7a, is a known property of ARROW MOF [1,16].
Figure 6. Material dispersion for the matrix As38Se62 used in the numerical simulations and computed effective index of the fundamental core localized mode for Fibers 1 and 2 as a function of the wavelength.
Figure 6. Material dispersion for the matrix As38Se62 used in the numerical simulations and computed effective index of the fundamental core localized mode for Fibers 1 and 2 as a function of the wavelength.
Materials 07 06120 g006
In Figure 7b, similar results as the one shown in Figure 7a are given but for Fiber 2. Once again, positions of the computed bandgaps agree nicely with the measurements. Comparing the results for Fiber 2 with the ones computed for Fiber 1 shows that, as expected, for a fixed d/pitch ratio, the wavelengths of the transmission bands scale nearly linearly with the pitch since Maxwell equations are scale invariant and since the material dispersions of the two glasses are not huge. Similar results are also obtained for Fiber 3 (data not shown). This confirms that the guiding mechanism occurring in the fabricated fibers is really the ARROW type one.
Figure 7. Computed guiding losses (without taking into account any material losses) in dB/m with a log-scale (left y-axis) and sign-reverse of the measured relative transmission in arbitrary unit (right y-axis) vs. the wavelength: for the (a) Fiber 1; and (b) Fiber 2.
Figure 7. Computed guiding losses (without taking into account any material losses) in dB/m with a log-scale (left y-axis) and sign-reverse of the measured relative transmission in arbitrary unit (right y-axis) vs. the wavelength: for the (a) Fiber 1; and (b) Fiber 2.
Materials 07 06120 g007

4. Discussion

A hybrid preform made with an As-Se matrix and high-index inclusions of TAS has been drawn. Three microstructured fibers with three different outer diameters were obtained. The transmissions of those three fibers are compared in Figure 2. Several transmission bands have been brought out in the mid-IR which is a typical signature of a photonic bandgap behavior. The positions of the bands vary in an expected way with the geometry of the fiber.
The agreement between the numerical simulations and the experimental data related to bandgap positions and core guidance observations are fairly good. Nevertheless, this is not the case for the loss values. Measured losses are in the 20–50 dB/m range at 3.39 µm while, according to the guiding losses computed without taking into account any material losses, they should be below 0.01 dB/m at this wavelength. Even if the material losses of the two raw glasses As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 as described in Section 2 are taken into account in the simulations, the computed loss level does not reach the measured one. Consequently, other types of losses must be taken into account. One highly probable possibility is the existence of defects at the glass interface region between the As38Se62 matrix and the Te20As30Se50 inclusions. The defects can be crystals and/or small bubbles, as already demonstrated by Brilland et al. [22]. Such loss increase have already been observed in the first fabricated complex all-solid all-chalcogenide MOF [11] even if the loss gap (approximately 7 dB/m) between the computed losses and the measured ones was smaller than in the present case. As already observed in chalcogenide fibers, crystallization can occur during the drawing step, more particularly when several drawings are needed [19]. Such crystallization can induce strong additional optical losses by scattering. For the demonstration of the first photonic bandgap propagation in a chalcogenide fiber, the hybrid preform (As38Se62 and Te20As30Se50 glasses) was built neither under neutral atmosphere nor with controlled concentration of ambient dust. Consequently, in order to avoid the presence of additional losses due to the imperfect interfaces qualities or/and crystallization during the drawing, the glasses purification, the preform elaboration and the drawing operation have to be improved. This is a task for future work.

5. Conclusions

A hybrid preform made with As-Se matrix and high-index inclusions of TAS was drawn. Three microstructured fibers with three different outer diameters were obtained. Optical transmissions of those fibers have been measured from 1.85 µm up to 11 µm. Several transmission bands have been brought out, notably in the mid-IR, which is a typical signature of a photonic band gap behavior. The positions of the bands vary with the geometry of the fiber as expected from theoretical scaling argument. Guidance in the core was observed at 3.39 µm, 9.3 µm, and 10.6 µm. Numerical simulations taking into account the geometry and the material properties confirm the existence and the positions of the bandgaps, and also core guidance at the wavelengths utilized for the experiments. The next step is to reduce the overall losses of the fabricated MOFs by using improved drawing techniques.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the French Délégation Générale pour l’Armement (DGA) and the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) for its financial support.

Author Contributions

Celine Caillaud has made the high purity glasses, and the refractive indices in mid-IR have been measured by Laurent Calvez. Then the glasses have been drawn by Laurent Brilland and Celine Caillaud. The experimental characterizations have been performed by Johann Troles and Celine Caillaud. All the numerical simulation has been done by Gilles Renversez. Jean-Luc Adam and David Mechin contributed to the discussion on the experimental results. Finally, the paper has been written by Johann Troles with the help of all the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zolla, F.; Renversez, G.; Nicolet, A.; Kuhlmey, B.; Guenneau, S.; Felbacq, D.; Argyros, A.; Leon-Saval, S. Foundations of Photonic Crystal Fibres, 2nd ed.; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Smith, C.M.; Venkataraman, N.; Gallagher, M.T.; Muller, D.; West, J.A.; Borrelli, N.F.; Allan, D.C.; Koch, K.W. Low-loss hollow-core silica/air photonic bandgap fibre. Nature 2003, 424, 657–659. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kuhlmey, B.T.; McPhedran, R.C.; de Sterke, C.M.; Robinson, P.A.; Renversez, G.; Maystre, D. Microstructured optical fibers: Where’s the edge? Opt. Express 2002, 10, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Renversez, G.; Bordas, F.; Kuhlmey, B.T. Second mode transition in microstructured optical fibers: Determination of the critical geometrical parameter and study of the matrix refractive index and effects of cladding size. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 1264–1266. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benabid, F. Hollow-core photonic bandgap fibre: New light guidance for new science and technology. Philoso. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2006, 364, 3439–3462. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brilland, L.; Smektala, F.; Renversez, G.; Chartier, T.; Troles, J.; Nguyen, T.N.; Traynor, N.; Monteville, A. Fabrication of complex structures of holey Fibers in chalcogenide glass. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 1280–1285. [Google Scholar]
  7. Troles, J.; Brilland, L.; Smektala, F.; Houizot, P.; Desevedavy, F.; Coulombier, Q.; Traynor, N.; Chartier, T.; Nguyen, T.N.; Adam, J.L.; et al. Chalcogenide microstructured fibers for infrared systems, elaboration modelization, and characterization. Fiber Integr. Opt. 2009, 28, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Troles, J.; Coulombier, Q.; Canat, G.; Duhant, M.; Renard, W.; Toupin, P.; Calvez, L.; Renversez, G.; Smektala, F.; El Amraoui, M.; et al. Low loss microstructured chalcogenide fibers for large non linear effects at 1995 nm. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 26647–26654. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  9. Desevedavy, F.; Renversez, G.; Troles, J.; Houizot, P.; Brilland, L.; Vasilief, I.; Coulombier, Q.; Traynor, N.; Smektala, F.; Adam, J.-L. Chalcogenide glass hollow core photonic crystal fibers. Opt. Mater. 2010, 32, 1532–1539. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lian, Z.G.; Li, Q.Q.; Furniss, D.; Benson, T.M.; Seddon, A.B. Solid microstructured chalcogenide glass optical fibers for the near- and mid-infrared spectral regions. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2009, 21, 1804–1806. [Google Scholar]
  11. Toupin, P.; Brilland, L.; Renversez, G.; Troles, J. All-solid all-chalcogenide microstructured optical fiber. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 14643–14648. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liao, M.; Chaudhari, C.; Qin, G.; Yan, X.; Kito, C.; Suzuki, T.; Ohishi, Y.; Matsumoto, M.; Misumi, T. Fabrication and characterization of a chalcogenide-tellurite composite microstructure fiber with high nonlinearity. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 21608–21614. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, T.; Kanou, Y.; Deng, D.; Xue, X.; Matsumoto, M.; Misumi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ohishi, Y. Fabrication and characterization of a hybrid four-hole AsSe2-As2S5 microstructured optical fiber with a large refractive index difference. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 13322–13329. [Google Scholar]
  14. Duguay, M.A.; Kokubun, Y.; Koch, T.L.; Pfeiffer, L. Antiresonant reflecting optical waveguides in SiO2-Si multilayer structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1986, 49, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Renversez, G.; Boyer, P.; Sagrini, A. Antiresonant reflecting optical waveguide microstructuredfibers revisited: A new analysis based on leaky mode coupling. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 5682–5687. [Google Scholar]
  16. Perrin, M.; Quiquempois, Y.; Bouwmans, G.; Douay, M. Coexistence of total internal reflexion and bandgap modes in solid core photonic bandgap fibre with intersticial air holes. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 13783–13795. [Google Scholar]
  17. Granzow, N.; Uebel, P.; Schmidt, M.A.; Tverjanovich, A.S.; Wondraczek, L.; Russell, P.S.J. Bandgap guidance in hybrid chalcogenide-silica photonic crystal fibers. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 2432–2434. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lezal, D.; Pedlikova, J.; Gurovic, J.; Vogt, R. The preparation of chalcogenide glasses in chlorine reactive atmosphere. Ceramics 1996, 40, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  19. Toupin, P.; Brilland, L.; Trolès, J.; Adam, J.-L. Small core Ge-As-Se microstructured optical fiber with single-mode propagation and low optical losses. Opt. Mater. Express 2012, 2, 1359–1366. [Google Scholar]
  20. Coulombier, Q.; Brilland, L.; Houizot, P.; Chartier, T.; Nguyen, T.N.; Smektala, F.; Renversez, G.; Monteville, A.; Méchin, D.; Pain, T.; et al. Casting method for producing low-loss chalcogenide microstructured optical fibers. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 9107–9112. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuhlmey, B.T.; White, T.P.; Renversez, G.; Maystre, D.; Botten, L.C.; Martijn de Sterke, C.; McPhedran, R.C. Multipole method for microstructured optical fibers. II. Implementation and results. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B Opt. Phys. 2002, 19, 2331–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brilland, L.; Troles, J.; Houizot, P.; Desevedavy, F.; Coulombier, Q.; Renversez, G.; Chartier, T.; Nguyen, T.N.; Adam, J.L.; Traynor, N. Interfaces impact on the transmission of chalcogenide photonic crystal fibres. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 116, 1024–1027. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caillaud, C.; Renversez, G.; Brilland, L.; Mechin, D.; Calvez, L.; Adam, J.-L.; Troles, J. Photonic Bandgap Propagation in All-Solid Chalcogenide Microstructured Optical Fibers. Materials 2014, 7, 6120-6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096120

AMA Style

Caillaud C, Renversez G, Brilland L, Mechin D, Calvez L, Adam J-L, Troles J. Photonic Bandgap Propagation in All-Solid Chalcogenide Microstructured Optical Fibers. Materials. 2014; 7(9):6120-6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caillaud, Celine, Gilles Renversez, Laurent Brilland, David Mechin, Laurent Calvez, Jean-Luc Adam, and Johann Troles. 2014. "Photonic Bandgap Propagation in All-Solid Chalcogenide Microstructured Optical Fibers" Materials 7, no. 9: 6120-6129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096120

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop