Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Comparison of Fatigue Properties and Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Various Implantable Metals
Advanced Biomaterials Group, Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
Received: 24 October 2012; in revised form: 3 December 2012 / Accepted: 14 December 2012 / Published: 19 December 2012
Abstract: The fatigue strength, effects of a notch on the fatigue strength, and fatigue crack growth rate of Ti-15Zr-4Nb-4Ta alloy were compared with those of other implantable metals. Zr, Nb, and Ta are important alloying elements for Ti alloys for attaining superior long-term corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. The highly biocompatible Ti-15Zr-4Nb-4Ta alloy exhibited an excellent balance between strength and ductility. Its notched tensile strength was much higher than that of a smooth specimen. The strength of 20% cold-worked commercially pure (C.P.) grade 4 Ti was close to that of Ti alloy. The tension-to-tension fatigue strength of an annealed Ti-15Zr-4Nb-4Ta rod at 107 cycles was approximately 740 MPa. The fatigue strength of this alloy was much improved by aging treatment after solution treatment. The fatigue strengths of C.P. grade 4 Ti and stainless steel were markedly improved by 20% cold working. The fatigue strength of Co-Cr-Mo alloy was markedly increased by hot forging. The notch fatigue strengths of 20% cold-worked C.P. grade 4 Ti, and annealed and aged Ti-15Zr-4Nb-4Ta, and annealed Ti-6Al-4V alloys were less than those of the smooth specimens. The fatigue crack growth rate of Ti-15Zr-4Nb-4Ta was the same as that of Ti-6Al-4V. The fatigue crack growth rate in 0.9% NaCl was the same as that in air. Stainless steel and Co-Cr-Mo-Ni-Fe alloy had a larger stress-intensity factor range (ΔK) than Ti alloy.
Keywords: implantable metal; mechanical property; fatigue property; notch effect; heat treatment; stress intensity factor; fatigue crack growth rate
Citations to this Article
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Okazaki, Y. Comparison of Fatigue Properties and Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Various Implantable Metals. Materials 2012, 5, 2981-3005.
Okazaki Y. Comparison of Fatigue Properties and Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Various Implantable Metals. Materials. 2012; 5(12):2981-3005.
Okazaki, Yoshimitsu. 2012. "Comparison of Fatigue Properties and Fatigue Crack Growth Rates of Various Implantable Metals." Materials 5, no. 12: 2981-3005.