Next Article in Journal
α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles/Vermiculite Clay Material: Structural, Optical and Photocatalytic Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Multidimensional Phononic Bandgaps in Three-Dimensional Lattices for Additive Manufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composite by Two-Step Ball Milling Method and Its Application in Solid Propellant

School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(11), 1879; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111879
Submission received: 18 May 2019 / Revised: 3 June 2019 / Accepted: 4 June 2019 / Published: 11 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
In this article, Bi2O3/Al high-density energetic composites with a core-shell structure were prepared by a two-step ball milling method using a common planetary ball milling instrument, and their morphology, structure, and properties were characterized in detail. Through a reasonable ratio design and optimization of the ball milling conditions, the density of the Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite is increased by about 11.3% compared to that of the physical mixed sample under the same conditions. The DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) test also showed that the exothermic quantity of the thermite reaction of the energetic composite reached 2112.21 J/g, which is very close to the theoretical exothermic quantity. The effect of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite on the energy performance of insensitive HTPE propellant was further studied. The theoretical calculation results showed that replacing the partial Al with Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite can make the density of propellant reach 2.056 g/cm3, and the density specific impulse reach 502.3 s·g/cm3, which is significantly higher than the density and density specific impulse of the conventional composite solid propellant. The thermal test showed that the explosive heat of the HTPE (Hydroxyl terminated polyether) propellant also increased with the increase of the content of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The development of modern weapons and space transportation has placed increasing demands on the energy performance of solid propellants. High energy performance is the eternal target of the development of solid propellants technology [1]. The density specific impulse is an important performance parameter that directly reflects the energy performance of the propellants. For fixed volume loading requirements, the greater the density specific impulse is, the higher the total impulse of the propellants will be. Therefore, the application of high-density energetic components in solid propellants can significantly increase the thrust of solid rocket engines [2].
Aluminum (Al) is the most commonly used metal burning agent in high-energy solid propellants, which can increase the density and combustion heat of the propellants. Bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) is a kind of typical heavy metal oxide which can react with Al violently and produce heat by redox reaction, called the thermite reaction [3,4]. Thus, if Bi2O3 can be used as the oxidant component in the solid propellant, it is expected to impart high density specific impulse characteristics to the solid propellant. However, Bi2O3 is energy-free. How to give full play to the efficiency of the thermite reaction becomes the key technology of a high energy density propellant containing Bi2O3 [5,6]. In addition, when the polyurethane system is used as a solid propellant binder, the bismuth element can catalyze the reaction between isocyanate groups and hydroxyl groups, resulting in a sharp increase in the viscosity of the propellant slurry, which cannot be poured [7]. Therefore, the preparation of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composites to effectively coat Bi2O3 with Al is a possible way to solve the above problems.
High-energy ball milling, also known as mechanochemistry, has become an important method to prepare ultra-fine materials. As a new technology, it can significantly reduce the activation energy of the reaction, refine the grains, and increase the powder activity and the uniformity of particle distribution. In addition, the technology can promote solid state ion diffusion, induce a low temperature chemical reaction, thereby improving the material’s compactness, electricity, thermal properties, etc. It is an energy-saving and efficient technology of material preparations [8,9]. The preparations of energetic composites by high-energy ball milling method have been reported [10,11]. How to effectively control the morphology and structure of the new energetic composite has not been reported.
In this article, Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composites (hereinafter referred to as Bi2O3/Al composites) were prepared by means of planetary ball milling in order to introduce Bi2O3 into the propellant. Based on insensitive HTPE solid propellant (HTPE propellant), the effect of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composites on the performances of HTPE propellant were investigated as well, which laid a foundation for the application of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composites in the high energy density solid propellant.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aluminum (Al) powder with particle size of 2.7 μm was purchased from Liaoning Angang Industrial Micro Aluminum Powder Co. Ltd. (Anshan, China). Bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) with a particle size of 6 μm was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Both Al and Bi2O3 were dried at 60 °C for 48 h before use. Hexane of analytical purity was used as a coolant in the ball milling process, which was purchased from Beijing Tongguang Fine Chemical Company (Beijing, China).

2.2. Two-Step Ball Milling Process

2.2.1. Ball Milling Process

In the first step, a mixture was made by Bi2O3 powder and hexane in a certain proportion. Then the mixture was put it into the ball milling chamber and ball milled for a certain period of time under certain ball milling conditions. In the second step, Al powder was then added into the ball milling chamber according to the design ratio, and the samples of Bi2O3/Al composites were obtained after ball milling for a certain period of time. The ball-milled samples were dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 2 h for next testing or using.

2.2.2. Calculation of the Ratio of Al and Bi2O3

The equation of thermite reaction between Al and Bi2O3 is as follows:
2Al + Bi2O3 = Al2O3 + 2Bi
According to the equation and the molecular weight of Al (26.98) and Bi2O3 (465.96), the ideal material ratio between Al and Bi2O3 for ball milling should be:
m Bi 2 O 3 = 8.64 m A l
In Equation (2), mBi2O3 represents the mass of Bi2O3 and mAl represents the mass of Al. In order to facilitate the theoretical calculation, we can assume that the thermite reaction and other chemical reactions do not occur during the ball milling process, but the physical fracture and extrusion deformation of the particles does. The particle size of Bi2O3 after ball milling in the first step is recorded as d, and the particle size of the Bi2O3/Al composites obtained after ball milling in the second step is recorded as dtotal, and the volume of which is recorded as Vtotal. Thus, we can obtain:
Vtotal = VAl + VBi2O3
V Bi 2 O 3 = 4 3 π d 3
From Equations (2)–(4), combining the density of Al and Bi2O3, we can obtain:
d t o t a l = 1.114 d
Therefore, the theoretical thickness of the Al coating in the Bi2O3/Al composite particles is 0.057d.
However, in the actual ball milling process, considering the adhesion of a small amount of Al powder on the inner surface of ball milling chamber and the surface of grinding balls [12], not all added Al powder can participate in the preparation of the Bi2O3/Al composites. According to the surface areas of the inner chamber and the grinding balls, it is assumed that only one layer of Al powder adheres to the inner surface of the chamber and the surface of grinding balls. The utilization rate of the added Al powder can be set to 0.8. Thus, the particle size of the composite particles is:
dtotal = 1.139d
The actual ratio of Bi2O3 and Al can be obtained as:
mBi2O3 = 6.906mAl
The theoretical thickness of the Al coating is 0.069d.

2.3. Instruments and Conditions

A single tank QM-ISP 6planetary ball milling machine, produced by Beijing Feichi Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China), was used to fulfill the sample preparation by ball milling. The maximum preparation volume of the ball mill machine is 500 mL.
The morphology characterization and elemental composition analysis of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite was performed by an S-4800field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), produced by Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan. Nano Measure image processing software (Nano Measure 1.2) was used to count the particle size. The number of statistical particles was more than 600.
An X’Pert PRO MPD X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) was used to analyze the structure and microstructure of energetic composite samples. The test conditions included copper target, KA wavelength of 0.15406 nm, operating voltage of 40 kV, operating current of 40 mA, step size of 0.03°, scanning speed of 2°/min, and test temperature of 25 °C.
The thermal performances analysis of the energetic composite samples were operated by a Swiss METTLER TOLEDO TGA/DSC thermal analyzer (Columbus, OH, USA). Al2O3 ceramic crucible was used and the sample quality is between 1 and 3 mg. The heating temperature range was 25–800 °C with the heating rate of 10 K·min−1. A nitrogen environment was chosen with the nitrogen flow rate of 40 mL·min−1.
The density of the samples was analyzed with a densitometer (Dataphysics, Filderstadt, Germany). A Parr 6200 automatic oxygen bomb calorimeter, produced by Anton Paar Co. (Graz, Austria), was used to determine the explosive heat of the HTPE propellant samples containing the Bi2O3/Al composite.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of Two-Step Ball Milling Parameters

For the solid particles that undergo thermite reactions, the smaller the particle is, the shorter distances of mass and heat transfer between components will be. In addition, reducing the particle size can increase the surface area of the particles, then lower the ignition temperature and improve the heat release efficiency [13]. Therefore, minimizing particle sizes of the energetic composite particles as much as possible was used as a basis for optimizing ball milling parameters. Since Al is a typical metal material with good ductility, when it is subjected to extrusion and impact, it is easily deformed and combined between particles [14,15]. Bi2O3 is a typical metal oxide that exhibits significant brittleness and is highly susceptible to particle breakage under the effect of extrusion and impact [16,17]. Therefore, in order to reduce the particle size of the Bi2O3/Al composite particles, on one hand, the particle size of Bi2O3 should be minimized firstly. On the other hand, the ball milling parameters should be controlled to obtain uniform Bi2O3/Al composite particles with minimal sizes. Therefore, a two-step ball milling method was used to prepare the Bi2O3/Al composites. In the first step, the Bi2O3 powder was ball-milled with the purpose of reducing the particle size of Bi2O3. This can avoid the incomplete and uneven refinement of the Bi2O3 particles due to the energy absorption, which is caused by continuous deformation of Al particles during the one-step ball milling process of the Bi2O3/Al mixture. Next, in the second step, the blending of Al and ball-milled Bi2O3 was ball milled again under the optimized conditions. Then, the Bi2O3/Al core-shell composites were prepared under the effect of the rigidity of the ball-milled Bi2O3 particles and the extension of Al particles, which can ensure the Bi2O3 particles are effectively coated by Al.

3.1.1. Ball Milling of Bi2O3

For the particle samples prepared by the ball milling method, the main factors affecting the particle size are ball milling time, ball milling speed, and ball-to-material ratio. In the first step of the ball milling process, the particle sizes of different Bi2O3 particles after ball milling under different conditions were investigated. Table 1 shows the statistical results of the particle size of different Bi2O3 particles at different conditions.
From the results in Table 1, it can be found that the effects of the ball milling parameters on the particle sizes of the samples were different. The degree of the effects of different parameters is as follows: ball milling time > ball-to-material ratio > ball milling speed. The ball milling process mainly produces extrusion, friction, and impact on the samples. Since Bi2O3 is a brittle material, the pulverization of Bi2O3 is mainly achieved by impact. Increasing the ball milling time, the ball-to-material ratio, and the ball-milling speed will enhance the effect of the impact. Under the experimental conditions of this study, the ball milling time had the most obvious effect, followed by the ball-to-material ratio and, finally, the ball milling speed. It can also be seen from Table 1 that, under the condition that the ball milling speed and the ball-to-material ratio were constant, the size of the Bi2O3 particles reaches a minimum of 1.51 μm when the ball milling time was 3 h. Identically, we can determine that the best ball milling parameters include a ball milling speed of 350 r/min, ball-to-material ratio of 15:1, with a ball milling time of 3 h. Under the optimal conditions, the particle size of Bi2O3 after ball milling is 1.21 μm.

3.1.2. The Preparation of Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composites

According to the designed material ratio of Al and Bi2O3, under ideal conditions, Al was finally coated on the surface of Bi2O3 particles to form a coating with a certain thickness, and the theoretical thickness of this coating was only 0.0685d. That is to say, after the two components were evenly dispersed, the distribution state of the Bi2O3/Al composites particles was slightly changed compared with that of the single Bi2O3 particles. Therefore, in the second step of ball milling, we still choose the ball-material ratio and ball milling speed in step one. The particle size statistics of the Bi2O3/Al composite after ball milling for 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h were counted separately, as shown in Table 2.
It can be seen from Table 2 that, for the Bi2O3/Al composite obtained by the two-step ball milling method, when the ball milling time reaches 2 h, the average particle diameter was about 0.40 μm. When the mixing ball milling time was extended to 3 h, the change of particle size was not obvious. We characterized the XRD of the Bi2O3/Al composite with ball milling time of 75, 90, 105, 120, and 180 min, as shown in Figure 1.
It can be found from Figure 1 that when t ≥ 2 h, the Bi peak appears at 2θ around 37.9°, and the difference of other peaks is not obvious. This indicated that the thermite reaction occurred at some points inside the Bi2O3/Al composites during the two-step ball milling process when the ball milling time exceeds 2 h. Therefore, when the ball milling time was set to 105 min, the sizes of the particles could be ensured, and the thermite reaction between Al and Bi2O3 could be avoided.

3.2. Morphology and Structure Characterization of Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composites

3.2.1. Ball Milling Effect and Sample Morphology

Figure 2 showed the SEM images of the raw material of Al and Bi2O3 without ball milling, the simple physical blending of the two, and the Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite after two-step ball milling. From which it can be seen that Al particles was spherical, and the shape of Bi2O3 was irregular. Figure 2c,d shows that, due to the differences in the morphology and atomic number of Al and Bi2O3, the contrast of the two materials is different, leading to the different brightness of Al and Bi2O3 in the images. As we can see, Bi2O3 is brighter than Al. Figure 2c showed that after physical mixing, the morphology of the two had not changed significantly. However, the observed Bi2O3 in Figure 2d was significantly reduced, indicating that a large amount of Bi2O3 had entered into the interior of Al to form a core-shell composite. In addition, both crystal forms had undergone significant changes.
In order to further determine the structural characteristics and effects of the two-step ball milling method, the EDS spectrum of the points 1, 2, and 3 in Figure 3 were analyzed. It can be seen from Figure 3a,b that the particles were irregular in shape and completely different from the raw materials Al and Bi2O3. The particles in the figures could be divided into two layers, and the inner layer was brighter and covered with a layer of gray matter. Theoretically, due to the small atomic number of Al and the influence of its composition contrast, the brightness of Al in scanning electron microscopy should be weaker. This inferred that the outer gray material was Al and the inner bright material was Bi2O3. In Figure 3b, points 1 and 3 have a large gray scale, and the EDS spectrum shows that the elements at the two locations were mainly Al. The brightness at point 2 in Figure 3b is greater, and the EDS spectrum shows that there were a large number of Bi elements in addition to Al. Therefore, the results of the EDS spectrum verify the correctness of the above inference. Combined with the properties of Al and Bi2O3 and relevant morphology analysis, it can be initially determined that most of the Bi2O3 particles were entered into the interior of the Al block during the ball milling process, which realizes the final coating of Bi2O3 with Al, while the thickness of the coating is not uniform. After ball milling, fine Bi2O3 particles had been extruded into the interior of cold-welded Al particles to form a coated product of Bi2O3/Al composite particles with core-shell structures. An analysis similar to the related literature can be obtained [18].

3.2.2. Changes in Lattice Structure

It can be found from the SEM image in Section 3.2.1 that after the two-step ball milling, the morphology of the sample changes greatly, and the lattice structure of the raw material may change greatly or even cease to exist. In order to study the changes in lattice structure, XRD characterization of samples after two-step ball milling was performed and was compared with the XRD of the raw materials, as shown in Figure 4.
XRD can be used to characterize the size of crystals and the degree of crystallization. It can be found in Figure 4 that the characteristic peak of the composite material after ball milling was significantly lower than the characteristic peak of the raw material, indicating that the ball milling had a great influence on the crystal structure of the raw materials. This reason is that during the ball milling processes of the raw materials, the grinding balls had a strong mechanical collision, friction and extrusion on the raw materials, leading to the refinement of the raw material particles and the occurrence of lattice defects, which, in turn, changed the atomic position in the lattice of the materials, and any change in the position of the atom could change the intensity of the diffraction peak [19]. In addition, the decrease in the peak strength of Bi2O3 was also related to the coating of Bi2O3 by Al particles.
Combined with the above characterization of the Bi2O3/Al composite prepared by the two-step ball milling method and the physical properties of the raw materials, we can infer a series of changes that occurred during the ball milling process, which is shown in Figure 5. This description is primarily directed to physical changes during ball milling, assuming that thermite reaction [20,21,22] did not occur. Studies have shown that [23,24,25], under the ball milling conditions, such as longer ball milling time, the thermite reactions could theoretically occur and, indeed, did in practice. In the early stage of ball milling process, the lattice of Al and Bi2O3 materials was destroyed. Bi2O3 is a brittle component. Under the action of mechanical force, Bi2O3 was first broken and dispersed. When Al was added, the hard Al2O3 shell of Al particles first ruptured and exposed the inner Al after rupture. Since Al itself is a ductile component and the extensibility [26,27] is good, the Al particles undergoes ductile plastic deformation during the ball milling process. Under the action of which, during the process of deformation and calendering, the dispersed Bi2O3 particles were coated gradually by deformed and extended Al particles, which finally leading to the formation of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composites. However, since the Bi2O3 particles have an irregular shape, the coating was not uniform, which can also be found from the SEM images of the samples. We can only theoretically calculate the thickness of the coating under ideal conditions. After ball milling, Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composites had an average diameter of 0.4 μm. Combined with Equation (2.5), we could obtain that the average diameter of Bi2O3 was 0.351 μm, and the theoretical average thickness of the Al coating was 0.024 μm.

3.3. Properties of Solid Propellant Contained Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composite

3.3.1. Density and Density Specific Impulse of the Propellants

Table 3 shows the density of Bi2O3/Al energetic composite prepared by two-step ball milling and the physical blending samples of Al and Bi2O3 in the same mixing ratio.
From Table 3, it can be found that the density of the composite after ball milling is higher than that of the physically blended sample, which is caused by repeated impact, grinding, and stirring during the ball milling process. Due to the continuous compression, some of the particles produced lattice distortion and, at the same time, formed a large number of new active metal surface, then the microscopic particles agglomerated, forming an alloy, resulting in increase of density [28].
Based on the new insensitive HTPE (hydroxyl-terminated polyether) propellant [29], the effects of the application of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite on the density and specific impulse of the propellant were calculated and studied. The basic formulation of insensitive HTPE propellant is as follows: the solid content is 80% and the content of Al is 18%, AP (ammonium perchlorate) is 62%, HTPE is 10% and Bu-NENA is 10%. Since the oxidation of Al in the propellant is mainly done by AP, when the Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite was added to the propellant, the relative content of Bi2O3 and AP was adjusted accordingly.
It can be seen from Table 4 that for the HTPE propellant systems containing Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite, with the increase of Bi2O3 content, the oxygen balance and the theoretical specific impulse decreases linearly, and the density and density specific impulse increase linearly accordingly. Since Bi2O3/Al is a negative oxygen component, the reduction of AP content inevitably leads to a decrease in oxygen balance. However, since Bi2O3 is a high-density oxide, an increase in the content of Bi2O3/Al composite and a decrease in the content of AP led to an increase in the density of the propellant systems. In addition, the theoretical density specific impulse of the propellant systems increases rapidly although the theoretical specific impulse of the propellant systems is reduced with the addition of a large amount of high-density Bi2O3/Al composite.

3.3.2. Explosion Heat of the Propellant

Firstly, the thermite reactions of the Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite and the sample of physical mixing at the same material ratio were studied and compared, as shown in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 6 that, for the sample of physical mixing, the exothermic peak of the sample appeared at 595 °C, and the calculated exotherm was 93.76 J/g. The exothermic peak of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite prepared by two-step ball milling was about 422 °C, and the heat release was as high as 2112.21 J/g, which was very close to the theoretical value of 2118.46 J/g. It is shown that the thermite reaction efficiency of the composite was significantly higher than that of the physically blended sample. This is because, compared with the physically mixed sample, there is a shorter distance of mass and heat transfer and a larger contact area between Bi2O3 and Al in the composite sample. The core-shell structure makes the contact surface between Bi2O3 and Al not easy to form a thin layer of Al2O3, which does not affect the thermite reaction between Bi2O3 and Al even after long-term storage.
It is worth noting that, comparing the DSC curves of the two samples, the melting peak of Al (660 °C) in the physically mixed sample was sharp and obvious, while the melting peak of Al in the composite was not obvious. This also fully indicated that, in the Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite, Al and Bi2O3 underwent a sufficient thermite reaction, and a large amount of Al participated in the reaction and was converted into Al2O3.
The explosion heat of HTPE propellant systems with different content of ball-milled Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite were tested and the results were shown in Table 5.
From the data in Table 5, it can be obtained that the explosive heat of the propellant increases with the addition of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite. On one hand, the particle size of the Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite after ball milling is reduced and the mass transfer and heat transfer rate between the components of the system are correspondingly increased, which led to a higher energy release rate. The final performance is that the reaction temperature is lowered and the reaction heat value is increased. On the other hand, the ball milling method itself is a process of energy input, and the energy is released by the explosive reaction of the propellants. Under the combined action of the above factors, when the content of Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite increases, the explosive heat of the propellants increases.

4. Conclusions

In this study, Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite was prepared by two-step planetary ball milling methods and applied in a HTPE solid propellant. The density of the Bi2O3/Al composite was increased by about 11.3% compared to the physical mixed sample under the same conditions. The DSC test also showed that the exothermic heat of the thermite reaction of the Bi2O3/Al composite reached 2112.21 J/g, which was very close to the theoretical exotherm. When the Bi2O3 content in the system was 19%, the theoretical calculation results showed that replacing the AP with Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite could make the density of propellant reach 2.056 g/cm3 and the density specific impulse reach 502.3 s·g/cm3, which was significantly higher than those of the conventional composite solid propellant. The thermal test showed that the explosive heat of the HTPE propellants containing the Bi2O3/Al composite also increased with increase of the content of the Bi2O3/Al composite. In addition, we hope to explore the preparation process of spherical or nano-scale Bi2O3/Al core-shell energetic composite in subsequent research in order to bring better process and mechanical properties to the solid propellants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.X., G.L., and Y.L.; data curation: M.X. and Q.Y.; formal analysis: M.X. and Q.Y.; investigation: X.D.; methodology: M.X., Q.Y., and H.Y.; project administration: M.X., G.L., and Y.L.; writing—original draft: M.X., Q.Y., T.G., and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing: M.X.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3052017010).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fan, X.; Li, J.; Liu, X. Research Status and Development Trend of High-energy Chemical Propellant. Available online: http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=conference&id=6554186 (accessed on 18 May 2019).
  2. Wang, S.; Tan, H.; Jin, Y. Energy Level Analysis of NEPE Solid Propellant Containing Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane. Fly. Missile 2002, 2, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  3. Simpson, R.L.; Lee, R.S.; Tillotson, T.M.; Hrubesh, L.W.; Swansiger, R.W.; Foxet, G.A. Sol-Gel Manufactured Energetic Material. U.S. Patent 20,030,697,477, 5 May 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abraham, A.; Obamedo, J.; Schoenitz, M.; Dreizin, E.L. Effect of composition on properties of reactive Al·Bi powders preparedby mechanical milling. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2015, 83, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, L.; Luss, D.; Martirosyan, K.S. The behavior of nanothermite reaction based on Bi2O3/Al. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 074311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valliappan, S.; Swiatkiewicz, J.; Puszynski, J.A. Reactivity of aluminum nanopowers with metal oxides. Power Technol. 2005, 156, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, W. Preparation and Properties of High Density HTPE Propellant; Beijing Institute of Technology: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yermakov, A.Y.; Yurchikov, Y.Y.; Barinov, V.A. Magnetic properties of amorphous powders of y-co alloys produced by grinding. Phys. Metal. Metallogr. 1981, 52, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  9. Koch, C.C.; Cavin, O.B.; McKamey, C.G.; Scarbrough, J.O. Preparation of amorphous Ni60-Nb40 by mechanical alloying. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 43, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.; An, C.; Luo, J.; Wang, J.Y. Preparation and Characterization of Nano-CL-20/AP Energetic Composite Particles. Energy Mater. 2018, 29, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tao, J.; Wang, X.; Han, Z.; Feng, B. Preparation and Microscopic Properties of Aluminum Powder/Teflon Mechanically Activated Energetic Materials. Meter. Rep. 2018, 32, 894–898. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ma, Y.; Ma, M.; Zhang, W. Adhesion Characteristics of Metal Powder in High Energy Ball Milling Process. Therm. Process. Technol. 2002, 1, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun, G. Research on Heat and Mass Transfer Process of Multiscale Brown Coal; Northeastern University: Boston, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sutton, M.A.; Yan, J.H.; Deng, X.; Cheng, C.S.; Zavattieri, P. Three-dimensional digital image correlation to quantify deformation and crack-opening displacement in ductile aluminum under mixed-mode I/III loading. Opt. Eng. 2007, 46, 051003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mae, H.; Teng, X.; Bai, Y.; Wierzbicki, T. Comparison of ductile fracture properties of aluminum castings: Sand mold vs. metal mold. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2008, 45, 1430–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fredenburg, D.A.; Thadhani, N.N. Predicting the shock compression response of heterogeneous powder mixtures. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 223513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aoki, M.; Chiang, Y.M.; Kosacki, I.; Lee, L.J.; Tuller, H.; Liu, Y. Solute Segregation and Grain-Boundary Impedance in High-Purity Stabilized Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 79, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gong, H.; Lu, D.; Jiang, Y. Study on the preparation of SiC/Al composite powder by high energy ball milling. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloys 2011, 8, 749–753. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, Z.; Wang, D.; Jiang, H.; Liu, J. Diffraction Abnormal Fine Structure (DAFS) Spectra and Its Application. Adv. Phys. 1997, 3, 250–264. [Google Scholar]
  20. Watson, K.W.; Pantoya, M.L.; Levitas, V.I. Fast reactions with nanometre and micrometre aluminum:A study on oxidation versus fluorination. Combust. Flame 2008, 155, 619–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Levitas, V.I.; Pantoya, M.L.; Watson, K.W. Melt-dispersion mechanism for fast reaction of aluminum particles: Extension for micron scale particles and fluorination. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 201917–201919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rai, A.; Lee, D.; Park, K.; Zachariah, M.R. Importance of Phase Change of Aluminum in Oxidation of Aluminum Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 14793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Udhayabanu, V.; Singh, N.; Murty, B.S. Mechanical activation of aluminothermic reduction of NiO by high energy ball milling. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 497, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dilip, J.J.; Reddy, B.S.; Das, S.; Das, K. In-situ Al-based bulk nanocomposites by solid-state aluminothermic reaction in Al-Ti-O system. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 475, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, W.; Dong, S.; Luo, P.; Yangli, A.; Liu, Q.; Xie, Z. Effect of Ni addition on the preparation of Al2O3-TiB2 composites using high-energy ball milling. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2014, 2, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van Slycken, J.; Verleysen, P.; Degrieck, J.; Samek, L.; De Cooman, B.C. High-strain-rate behavior of low-alloy multiphase aluminumand silicon-based transformation-induced plasticity steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2006, 37, 1527–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yue, H.Y.; Fei, W.D.; Wang, L.D.; Li, Z.J. An aluminum borate whisker-reinforced aluminum matrix composite with high plasticity. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 430, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, M.; Liu, W.; Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Hu, W. Effect of High Energy Ball Milling Process Parameters on Properties of Titanium Hydroxide Powder and Magnesium Powder. Powder Metall. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 21, 626–631. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, F.; Wang, C.; Zhu, H.; Yi, J. Energy performance and characteristic signal analysis of low-characteristic fuel-rich propellant containing 3,4-diaminofurazan. Solid State Rocket Technol. 2008, 31, 621–624. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. XRD pattern of ball milled samples at different times.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of ball milled samples at different times.
Materials 12 01879 g001
Figure 2. SEM image of sample morphology: (a) Al; (b) Bi2O3; (c) physical mixing of Bi2O3 and Al; and (d) samples after two-step milling.
Figure 2. SEM image of sample morphology: (a) Al; (b) Bi2O3; (c) physical mixing of Bi2O3 and Al; and (d) samples after two-step milling.
Materials 12 01879 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) are backscattered scanning electron micrographs; 1, 2, and 3 are, respectively, the EDS spectra of the corresponding positions in Figure 3b.
Figure 3. (a,b) are backscattered scanning electron micrographs; 1, 2, and 3 are, respectively, the EDS spectra of the corresponding positions in Figure 3b.
Materials 12 01879 g003
Figure 4. XRD comparison of raw materials and ball-milled samples.
Figure 4. XRD comparison of raw materials and ball-milled samples.
Materials 12 01879 g004
Figure 5. Ball milling process and mechanism diagram.
Figure 5. Ball milling process and mechanism diagram.
Materials 12 01879 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of DSC curves for different samples.
Figure 6. Comparison of DSC curves for different samples.
Materials 12 01879 g006
Table 1. Statistical results of particle sizes of Bi2O3 particles at different ball milling time.
Table 1. Statistical results of particle sizes of Bi2O3 particles at different ball milling time.
Ball Milling Time/hBall Milling Speed/r·min−1Ball-to-Material RatioDmax/μmDmin/μmDaverage/μmStandard
Deviation
135010:17.640.452.460.34
235010:16.840.371.96
335010:13.790.261.51
535010:14.400.321.54
735010:15.060.321.56
935010:16.240.331.94
325010:16.660.331.670.06
330010:16.310.281.55
335010:13.790.261.51
340010:15.040.201.52
345010:16.380.221.63
33505:16.660.301.640.14
335010:13.790.261.51
335015:13.280.221.21
335020:13.650.221.39
335025:14.380.231.45
Table 2. Statistical results of particle size.
Table 2. Statistical results of particle size.
Ball Milling Time/hDmax/μmDmin/μmDaverage/μm
14.830.340.99
23.520.130.40
33.430.100.35
Table 3. Density of different simples.
Table 3. Density of different simples.
SampleDensity/g·cm−3
Al2.5587 ± 0.0132
Bi2O38.7963 ± 0.0161
Physical mixing7.1880 ± 0.0147
Step ball mill8.0030 ± 0.0129
Table 4. Effect of Bi2O3 content on energy performances of the HTPE propellant systems with the same solid content.
Table 4. Effect of Bi2O3 content on energy performances of the HTPE propellant systems with the same solid content.
Bi2O (%)AP (%)OBρ (g/cm3)ISP (s)ISR (g·s/cm3)
0620.5961.778269.2478.6
2600.5851.804266.7481.1
4580.5751.830264.2483.5
6560.5641.857261.7486.0
8540.5531.885259.1488.5
10520.5421.914256.5491.0
12500.5311.944253.9493.5
15470.5141.991249.8497.3
17450.5032.023247.1499.8
19430.4912.056244.3502.3
20420.4852.073242.9503.5
21410.4802.091241.4504.7
23390.4682.126238.5507.0
25370.4562.163235.2508.8
2636 0.4502.182233.4509.3
ISP is the theoretical specific impulse. ISR is the theoretical density specific impulse.
Table 5. Explosion heat of HTPE propellants containing different contents of Bi2O3/Al composite.
Table 5. Explosion heat of HTPE propellants containing different contents of Bi2O3/Al composite.
Content of Bi2O3/Al Composite in HTPE Propellant/wt%Explosive Heat/MJ·kg−1
04.29
54.39
7.54.45
104.91
185.03
215.20

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, M.; Yao, Q.; Yang, H.; Guo, T.; Du, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Luo, Y. Preparation of Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composite by Two-Step Ball Milling Method and Its Application in Solid Propellant. Materials 2019, 12, 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111879

AMA Style

Xia M, Yao Q, Yang H, Guo T, Du X, Zhang Y, Li G, Luo Y. Preparation of Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composite by Two-Step Ball Milling Method and Its Application in Solid Propellant. Materials. 2019; 12(11):1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111879

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Min, Qifa Yao, Huilian Yang, Tao Guo, Xiuxin Du, Yanjie Zhang, Guoping Li, and Yunjun Luo. 2019. "Preparation of Bi2O3/Al Core-Shell Energetic Composite by Two-Step Ball Milling Method and Its Application in Solid Propellant" Materials 12, no. 11: 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111879

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop