Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Heat-Treated Ti6Al4V Alloy on the Fibroblastic Cell Response
Previous Article in Journal
Control of Silver Diffusion in Low-Temperature Co-Fired Diopside Glass-Ceramic Microwave Dielectrics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Graphene/Ruthenium Active Species Aerogel as Electrode for Supercapacitor Applications

1
Center for Sustainable Future Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 10129 Torino, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010057
Submission received: 20 November 2017 / Revised: 17 December 2017 / Accepted: 26 December 2017 / Published: 30 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
Ruthenium active species containing Ruthenium Sulphide (RuS2) is synthesized together with a self-assembled reduced graphene oxide (RGO) aerogel by a one-pot hydrothermal synthesis. Ruthenium Chloride and L-Cysteine are used as reactants. The hydrothermal synthesis of the innovative hybrid material occurs at 180 °C for 12 h, by using water as solvent. The structure and morphology of the hybrid material are fully characterized by Raman, XRD, XPS, FESEM and TEM. The XRD and diffraction pattern obtained by TEM display an amorphous nanostructure of RuS2 on RGO crystallized flakes. The specific capacitance measured in planar configuration in 1 M NaCl electrolyte at 5 mV s−1 is 238 F g−1. This supercapacitor electrode also exhibits perfect cyclic stability without loss of the specific capacitance after 15,000 cycles. In summary, the RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid material demonstrates remarkable properties for use as active material for supercapacitor applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recently, the need for energy storage systems has become crucial for smart energy management. Supercapacitors are electrochemical power storage devices that can have many practical applications, replacing or working alongside existing battery technology. The main advantages of supercapacitors compared to batteries are their higher power density values, their much longer cycle life, and their fast charge/discharge rate. The fabrication of nanostructured electrodes improves their energy density without affecting their high power density [1,2].
As is well-known, supercapacitors can be divided into two main classes based on different energy storage mechanisms: Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors (EDLCs) and Pseudo-Capacitors (PCs). In EDLCs, the storage is based on the adsorption of both anions and cations at the interface between a high surface area electrode and an electrolyte. Typically, porous carbon materials are investigated as electrodes due to their high specific surface area, electrical conductivity and pore size and distribution, which are the main properties. In particular, a self-assembled graphene-based three-dimensional nanoarchitecture aerogel has already been studied by the scientific community and attracted our attention because of its outstanding performance [3,4,5,6,7,8]. As far as concerns PCs, which store energy through fast surface redox reactions (Faradaic processes), they were examined to obtain higher specific capacitance. Usually, metal oxides such as RuO2 [9,10,11,12,13], MnO2 [14,15,16], Co2O3 [17], NiO [18], SnO2 [19], V2O5 [20,21,22], NiCo2O4 [23] are used as pseudocapacitors. Numerous experiments have established that RuO2 is the material for pseudocapacitors, which offers the best performance due to its highly reversible charge–discharge features, excellent electrical conductivity and ultrahigh pseudocapacitance [24].
In order to increase the energy density of electrodes for supercapacitors, hybrid materials that combine the properties of both EDLCs and PCs have been developed [25]. Basically, a pseudocapacitive material is synthesized together with a graphene-based aerogel [26,27,28,29,30,31]. These hybrid supercapacitors have the advantage of offering an enhancement of the cycling life of the pseudocapacitive material, an increase of the specific capacitance and avoiding the restacking of the graphene flakes due to the presence of the pseudocapacitive material. In particular, a graphene-based aerogel containing RuO2 nanoparticles has already been extensively investigated during the past two decades and has demonstrated good performance [24].
More recently, transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) mono- and multi-layered sheets have generated considerable research interest due to their unusual physical, chemical and electronic properties compared to their bulky counterparts, along with the great affinity with graphene due to their 2D-layered structure [32,33]. Numerous TMDs have been studied in depth in the literature, for instance MoS2 [34,35,36,37,38], TiS2 [39,40], WS2 [36,41], MoSe2 [37,38] and WSe2 [37,42]. In addition, some of these have been reported as outstanding materials in a hybrid configuration for supercapacitor applications, such as MoS2 [43,44,45,46] and WS2 [47,48].
Although hybrid supercapacitors containing TMDs have demonstrated better performance, only a limited number of hybrids is reported in the literature [49]. Furthermore, little work has been done on the synthesis of Ruthenium-based TMD, even though it is the transition metal, when combined in oxides, with the best performance as pseudocapacitive material [9,24]. In practice, Ruthenium-based TMD, and especially RuS2, can be synthesized by energy and time-consuming processes [50,51,52]. More recently, greener routes have been developed based on hydrothermal synthesis. However, these processes are based on thiourea [53,54], as Sulphur precursor, which is suspected of causing cancer in addition to be harmful for the user, as reported in the Safety Data Sheets (SDS). Thus, it is clear that L-cysteine, a natural amino acid which is already reported for the synthesis of MoS2 [55], can be attractive as a green precursor of Sulphur and, for this reason, it has been used in this work. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no work has previously been done on the synthesis of hybrid materials containing RuS2. Thus, the novelty of this work deals with the filling of the gap of literature in this field.
This paper focuses on the synthesis of a new hybrid material for electrodes in supercapacitor applications by hydrothermal synthesis. Starting from an aqueous dispersion of graphene oxide (GO), a precursor of Ruthenium (RuCl3) and L-cysteine as the precursor of Sulphur, we demonstrate an easy way to obtain an aerogel of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) decorated with Ruthenium active species containing Ruthenium Sulfide (RuS2). This TMD is able to enhance the specific capacitance by Faradaic processes thanks to its structural properties. As this hybrid material has never been synthesized before, a full characterization was required. For this purpose, we performed a careful examination by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), Transmission Electron Microcopy (TEM), Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Specteoscopy (XPS) and micro-Raman, in addition to electrochemical characterization in planar configuration carried out by Cyclic Voltammetry and Galvanostatic Charge/Discharge measurements.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Morphology and Structure

The morphology of a typical aerogel sample is presented in Figure 1. It is clear from low magnification images (See Figure 1a) that the sample exhibits a three-dimensional structure of interconnected RGO flakes, which forms during the hydrothermal treatment, in accordance with results previously reported in literature [56]. The slightly wrinkled flakes have lateral size of micrometer order and they are decorated with nanostructures. High resolution images (See Figure 1b) show that these nanostructures are almost spherical (with diameter in the 5–50 nm range) and they are distributed in sub-micrometer agglomerates inside the aerogel. EDX analysis (shown in the Supporting Information) was used as preliminary confirmation of the successful synthesis of Ruthenium active species nanostructures: in fact, the detected elements are C, O, Ru, S and Cl. The presence of Cl is due to the RuCl3 synthesis precursor unreacted and physisorbed on the surface.
The overall morphology of the aerogel is promising for supercapacitor application: in fact, the porous 3D structure leads to facile impregnation with the electrolyte. Moreover, the successful decoration of the RGO flakes with Ruthenium active species, and in particular RuS2 nanoparticles, can in principle boost the capacitance of the electrode through Faradaic reactions at the surface of the nanoparticles. A more refined overview of the chemical composition of the material was obtained by XPS spectroscopy (Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA). It is well known that this spectroscopy technique allows for the investigation of the chemical state of detected elements and therefore it is often performed for chemical phase identification [57]. Moreover, since the sampling depth of XPS is <10 nm, this technique is particularly well-suited for the analysis of materials in view of their application in devices that rely on surface effects.
At first, a survey spectrum (see Supplementary Information) was acquired, confirming the presence of the chemical elements previously outlined by EDX and highlighting traces of N as probable elemental residue in the starting commercial GO flakes, as a consequence of the oxidation process of graphite. High Resolution (HR) scans of the most significant regions of the photoelectron spectrum were acquired and they are shown in Figure 2a,b. Concerning carbon, the dominant contribution to the C1s/Ru3d region of the C–C peak at 284.8 eV with respect to peaks associated to carbon–oxygen bonds proves the successful reduction of GO. Regarding the Ru3d doublet, the positions of the two peaks (280.8 eV, 285.0 eV) are compatible with RuS2 phase, according to the literature [53,58]. Further confirmation of the presence of RuS2 is provided by the Ru3p3/2 peak (462.4 eV, shown in Supporting Information) and by the S2p doublet (162.5 eV, 163.7 eV), which all approximately agree with previous XPS analyses [59]. The S2p region is characterized by two more doublets at higher binding energies, which can be related to elemental Sulphur [60] and sulphites/sulphates [61]. As previously stated, both EDX and XPS survey analysis point to the presence of Chlorine, which was attributed to a residue of the RuCl3 precursor. Further confirmation is given by the deconvolution of the Cl2p region of the photoelectron spectrum (Supporting Information), with binding energies (Cl2p3/2 = 197.9 eV, Cl2p1/2 = 199.5 eV), which, according to the literature [62], can be possibly ascribed to RuCl3, although it has been recently proposed that this doublet can be assigned to HCl [63].
It was possible to calculate relative atomic concentration values for Ru, S and Cl from Ru3p3/2, S2p and Cl2p regions, respectively. The Ru3p3/2 region was chosen for Ru since it does not overlap with other elements. It is interesting to note that the atomic concentration ratio S/Ru is 2.25, while when we consider just the S2p doublet assigned to RuS2 phase, the ratio is SRuS2/Ru ≈ 1.85. These results provide proof that RuS2 phase is obtained in the Ruthenium active species, with acceptable stoichiometry. Finally, it must be stressed that the Cl/Ru ratio is 0.08, therefore making the RuCl3 residue concentration negligible with respect to the dominant RuS2 phase.
Raman spectra, reported in Figure 2c, depicts how the hydrothermal process is efficient in the reduction of the pristine GO to RGO even in the presence of the Ru and S precursors, as demonstrated by the increase of the ID/IG ratio (from 0.78 to 0.98) that suggests the formation of more sp2 domains [64] and the decrease of photoluminescence ascribed in graphene oxide to band-gap emission from electron-confined sp2 islands and to oxygen-related defect states [65]. In addition to the typical Raman peaks of RGO [65], for the RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid aerogel, a slight broadening of the G peak at 1589 cm−1 is observed together with a loss of bands resolution in the 2600–3200 cm−1 range, maybe due to interference phenomena, in sp2 cluster stacking, because of the formation of RuS2 structures. Unfortunately, the related spectrum (red line) does not give evidence of vibrational modes assignable to Ru-S containing species, as expected in the 350–450 cm−1 range [66]. Only when the aerogel is annealed at 800 °C, for 2 h, under inert gas flux, it is possible to single out (purple line) at 504, 615 and 685 cm−1 the three RuO2 main features assigned to Eg, A1g and B2g modes, respectively [67]. This result is in accordance with XRD characterization (discussed in the following), so confirming that the RuS2 contained in the hybrid aerogel is scarcely crystalline, and, only thanks to the annealing process, it is possible to obtain a crystalline, but unstable, material that, in contact with atmospheric oxygen, tends to oxidize. As Raman spectroscopy is a surface investigation technique, the effect of environmental oxidation is more evident than for X-ray Diffraction, which is a bulk investigation technique.
Figure 2d reports the XRD pattern on the RGO/Ruthenium active species (containing RuS2 nanoparticles sample) synthesized by hydrothermal method. The diffraction peaks are very weak, indicating that both RGO and RuS2 arrange in short range ordered structure. This fact was already observed for MoS2 flakes [46,55]. Moreover, the amorphous (quite disordered) structure of the Ruthenium Sulphide is due to the low temperature process. Indeed, the Ruthenium Sulphide starts to crystallize at a temperature of 650 °C as reported previously [54]. Nevertheless, the three peaks with the higher intensity (red line) correspond to the elemental Sulphur (20.47° and 22.97°) and RuS2 (32.73°), respectively. In addition, all of the other peaks match with the ones of the reference spectra of RuS2 (JCPDS card N°00-019-1107); RuO2 (JCPDS card N°00-040-1290); Ru (JCPDS card N°00-006-0663); RuCl3 (JCPDS card N°00-036-1225) and S (JCPDS card N°00-023-0562). In order to increase the crystallinity, an annealing in inert atmosphere for 2 h at 800 °C was carried out. The XRD pattern of the annealed sample (purple line) is reported in Figure 2d. The crystallinity has been increased by the annealing process. All of the typical peaks of the Ruthenium Sulphide are displayed and confirm the presence of the dichalcogenide structures in the as-prepared material synthesized by hydrothermal method. However, peaks corresponding to RuO2 and Ru can also be observed. Furthermore, the disappearance of RuCl3 and S can be attributed to a desorption of the unreacted species on the surface of the hybrid material.
TEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) characterization was conducted on the aerogel in order to reach deeper insight into the morphology and crystalline structure of the sample. Figure 3a shows a low magnification bright field image of a typical RGO flake decorated with RuS2 nanostructures, which are clearly visible as low-intensity features due to mass contrast. A selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of a clear region of the RGO flake (Figure 3b) confirms the characteristic in-plane hexagonal ordering of carbon atoms typical of graphene. This is a further indication that the reduction process under hydrothermal treatment allows for good in-plane arrangement of carbon atoms. This spatial configuration assures a good electrical conductivity between the 3D structures of interconnected RGO. On the other hand, SAED patterns obtained on agglomerates of RuS2 nanoparticles (Figure 3c) suggest amorphicity, or at least low crystalline quality. This is further confirmed by high resolution images (such as Figure 3d), where no lattice fringes are visible.

2.2. Electrochemical Performance

Hybrid materials synthesized by using the hydrothermal method were investigated by Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) in a two-electrode configuration and a potential window of 2 V. Results obtained at different scan rates are shown in Figure 4a. The box-like voltammogram indicates a typical double layer capacitor behavior. The signals due to pseudo-capacitance derived from oxygen-containing functional group are weak, which is in perfect agreement with XPS and Raman analyses. In addition, the pseudo-capacitance effects related to the Ruthenium active species, and in particular RuS2, in addition to nanostructures are not clearly distinguishable probably due to the low concentration in the hybrid. The evolution of the Specific Capacitance as a function of the scan rate is reported on Figure 4b. The storage ability of the hybrid is almost five times higher than the one observed for pure RGO (191 vs. 33 F/g [46], at 10 mV/s). Moreover, the highest RGO/Ruthenium active species Specific Capacitance was obtained at 5 mV/s and corresponds to a value of 238 F/g. This result is remarkable for a green one-pot hydrothermal synthesis.
Galvanostatic Charge/Discharge measurements were performed on the hybrid sample (see Figure 5a). The potential window was reduced to 1 V to avoid the water splitting effects. Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves reveal that all the materials own good capacitive behavior due to the linearity of the chronopotentiograms. The ohmic resistance (depicted by the voltage drop (IR drop) in curves of Figure 5a) is probably due to the presence of sulphites/sulphates (SOx) species. Finally, and very interestingly, RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid materials demonstrate a perfect stability after 15,000 cycles (see Figure 5b). Indeed, it is possible to observe a steady increase in capacitance (about the 5%) for the hybrid. As reported in our previous work, the reference (RGO) has a lower stability with almost 95% of the capacitance retained after the same number of cycles [46]. The higher stability of the hybrid material is the result of a surface activation effect [68] and an increased porosity of the carbonaceous matrix that allows rapid diffusion of the electrolyte through the porous structure [69].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Graphene Oxide (Single Layer, thickness: 0.7–1.2 nm, purity 99 wt %) was purchased from Cheaptubes (Cambridgeport, VT, USA). L-cysteine used as precursor of Sulphur and RuCl3 used as precursor of Ruthenium were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Milano, Italy) and Alfa Aesar (Heysham, UK), respectively. NaCl (anhydrous, ACS reagent, purity ≥ 99.9%, Sigma Aldrich, Milano, Italy) was used as electrolyte. Poly(vinylidene fluoride) was used as binder after dispersion in Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO, purity ≥99.5% (GC), Sigma (Milano, Italy)) Carbon Black (purity ≥ 99.9%, Alfa Aesar (Heysham, UK)) was used as conductive material in the electrode fabrication. All products were used without purification.

3.2. Preparation of RGO, RGO/Ruthenium Active Species Aerogels

Graphene oxide (GO) was dispersed in de-ionized water (2 mg/mL for 17 mL total volume) at room temperature and sonicated for 30 min. After sonication, the brown solution was transferred in a Teflon lined stainless steel autoclave with total volume of 26 mL and heated at a temperature of 180 °C for 12 h, in a muffle furnace. After the hydrothermal reaction, the autoclave was cooled naturally until room temperature. Then, the black hydrogel obtained was rapidly frozen using liquid nitrogen and dried overnight under vacuum to obtain the reduced graphene oxide (RGO) aerogel. For the RGO/Ruthenium active species sample, 132.8 mg of RuCl3 as Ruthenium precursor and 61.5 mg of L-cysteine were added to the GO in order to obtain a Ru/S atomic ratio equal to 1/3. Materials were dispersed in de-ionized water at room temperature and the same procedure used for RGO aerogel was repeated.

3.3. Materials Characterizations

The morphology and composition of the synthesized products were characterized before the tests in supercapacitor configuration.
The morphology of the aerogel samples was characterized by means of Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) with a Zeiss Supra 40 microscope (Zeiss, Milano, Italy) equipped with a Oxford Instruments 10 mm2 Si(Li) Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer (X-MaxN, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK) for elemental analysis.
The crystallinity of the hybrid material was evaluated by X-ray Diffraction by using a PANalytical X’Pert Powder (Cu Kα radiation, Lissone, Italy); 2θ range: 10–80; 2θ step: 0.028; step time: 2 s, with fixed specimen and moving X-ray source and detector simultaneously of a θ angle.
Raman spectroscopy on aerogels were performed in order to study the extent of reduction of GO and the effect of hybrid composition on the samples vibrational features. Hybrid materials were characterized, in backscattering light collection through a microscope objective (50X) by means of a Renishaw InVia Reflex micro-Raman spectrometer (Renishaw plc, Sheffield, UK), equipped with a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera and a 514.5 nm diode laser (selected excitation wavelength). Each spectrum was collected after gently pressing the aerogel powder on a microscope glass slide, with the following parameters: 10 mW laser power, 10 s of exposure time and 1 accumulation.
Further insight into the morphology and crystalline structure of the samples was obtained by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), using an FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN instrument (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operated at 200 kV acceleration voltage. Concerning sample preparation for TEM analysis, a drop of aerogel dispersion in ethanol was deposited on a holey carbon copper grid. Gatan Microscopy Suite software (GMS 3, Gaitan, Abingdon, UK) was used for the processing of high-resolution images and electron diffraction patterns.
The chemical composition was investigated with a PHI 5000 Versaprobe scanning X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Phi, Roma, Italy) (monochromatic Al K-alpha X-ray source with 1486.6 eV energy). Concerning the detection of the photoelectron signal, different pass energy values were employed: 187.85 eV for survey spectra and 23.5 eV for high-resolution peaks. Spectra were analyzed using MultiPak 9.6 (Phi, Roma, Italy) and CasaXPS softwares (Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA). Charge neutralization during measurements was obtained with a combined electron and Ar+ ion gun neutralizer system. All core-level peak energies were referenced to C1s peak at 284.8 eV (C–C/C–H bonds) after fitting the C1s/Ru3d region with suitable synthetic components. The background contribution in HR spectra was subtracted by means of a Shirley function [70].

3.4. Electrodes Preparation

For all the aerogel materials, the electrode slurry was composed by a ratio of active synthesized aerogel/carbon black/PVDF (Polyvinylidene Difluoride) equivalent to 15/1.5/1. PVDF was used as binder and carbon black was used to assure electrical contact between the flakes of RGO in the three-dimensional nanostructure.

3.5. Supercapacitor Device and Electrochemical Measurements

A thin film about 50 nm of Platinum was deposited by Direct Current sputtering on two microscopes slides. These glasses were used as current collectors. The devices were fabricated in symmetric electrodes configuration and were sealed by means of a thermoplastic thin film polymer. Clean room paper was used as separator. Electrolyte, 1 M NaCl, was inserted in the dispositive by means of a depression created by a vacuum pump. The Cyclic voltammetry measurements were performed with a Metrohm Autolab PGSTAT128 potentiostat/galvanostat (Metrohm, Barendrecht, The Netherlands). Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were obtained with an Arbin Instrument Testing System model BT-2000 (Arbin Instruments, College Station, TX, USA). Both kinds of measurements were performed in device configuration (e.g., two symmetric electrodes).

3.6. Calculation of Capacitance

Specific capacitance for the supercapacitors was calculated from the cyclic voltammograms measurements according to the method established by Stoller and Ruoff for one electrode [71]:
In voltammetry, the capacitance is defined as the area under the current transient during one linear scan of the voltammogram normalized with respect to the employed potential window (ΔV), as:
C = t 1 t 2 i   dt Δ V
The specific capacitance of one electrode can be estimated for a two-electrode cell and in device configuration by the following equation:
C S = 4   C m 1 + m 2
where m1 and m2 are the masses of the first and the second electrodes and the multiplier of four adjusts the capacitance of the cell and the combined mass of two electrodes to the capacitance and mass of a single electrode.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we report an easy and green one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of an RGO/Ruthenium active species (containing RuS2 nanoparticles) hybrid for electrodes in supercapacitor applications. The synthesis is carried out in a Teflon lined stainless steel autoclave from Graphene Oxide, Ruthenium Chloride and L-cysteine, an amino acid, as Ruthenium and Sulphur precursor, respectively. The low temperature process (180 °C) allows for synthesizing Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 nanostructures supported on reduced graphene oxide flakes (RGO), for which interconnected porous structure is a key feature for electrodes in supercapacitor applications because of the promotion of electrolyte diffusion throughout the pores and, indeed, the increase of the electrode/electrolyte interface.
FESEM analysis displays a three-dimensional structure of interconnected RGO flakes decorated with nanostructures and XPS characterization confirms the RuS2 composition: the successful reduction of graphene oxide in RGO and the reached RuS2 proper stoichiometry. XRD patterns highlight that both RGO and RuS2 arrange in short range ordered structure, due to the Ru/S precursors low ratio, chosen for the hydrothermal synthesis. After annealing in inert atmosphere, only, the observed diffraction peaks correspond to the Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 crystalline nanostructure. Moreover, Raman analysis confirms that Graphene Oxide is successfully reduced and TEM images display RGO crystalline flakes decorated with Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 amorphous nanostructures. The SAED (Selected Area Electron Diffraction) patterns show the characteristic in-plane hexagonal ordering of carbon atoms typical of graphene and the amorphous state or, at least, a poor crystallinity of RuS2 nanostructures.
Finally, by means of electrochemical characterization, a noticeable Specific Capacitance of 238 F/g, at 5 mV/s, is reached by using the RGO/Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 nanoparticles hybrid as electrode material and a relevant stability, over 15,000 cycles (current density: 1 A/g), is obtained. These two achievements suggest that the hybrid structure exhibits the potentiality for exploitation as electrode component in supercapacitors.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/1/57/s1. Representative EDX spectrum of RGO/Ruthenium active species sample, Figure S2: Survey spectrum of RGO sample decorated with RuS2 nanostructures, Figure S3: High-resolution XPS scans of the Ru3p3/2 (a) and Cl2p (b) regions.

Acknowledgments

All sources of funding of the study should be disclosed. Please clearly indicate grants that you have received in support of your research work. Clearly state if you received funds for covering the costs to publish in open access.

Author Contributions

A.G. and P.R. conceived and designed the experiments; A.G. and M.F. performed the experiments; and all of the authors participated in the data analysis and manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Winter, M.; Brodd, R.J. What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4245–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yu, G.; Xie, X.; Pan, L.; Bao, Z.; Cui, Y. Hybrid nanostructured materials for high-performance electrochemical capacitors. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 213–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gu, W.; Yushin, G. Review of nanostructured carbon materials for electrochemical capacitor applications: Advantages and limitations of activated carbon, carbide-derived carbon, zeolite-templated carbon, carbon aerogels, carbon nanotubes, onion-like carbon, and graphene. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2014, 3, 424–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pekala, R.W.; Farmer, J.C.; Alviso, C.T.; Tran, T.D.; Mayer, S.T.; Miller, J.M.; Dunn, B. Carbon aerogels for electrochemical applications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 225, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahmood, N.; Zhang, C.; Yin, H.; Hou, Y. Graphene-based nanocomposites for energy storage and conversion in lithium batteries, supercapacitors and fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, X.S. Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nardecchia, S.; Carriazo, D.; Ferrer, M.L.; Gutiérrez, M.C.; del Monte, F. Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: Synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 794–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wu, Z.S.; Wang, D.W.; Ren, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, G.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.M. Anchoring hydrous RuO2 on graphene sheets for high-performance electrochemical capacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 3595–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahn, Y.R.; Song, M.Y.; Jo, S.M.; Park, C.R.; Kim, D.Y. Electrochemical capacitors based on electrodeposited ruthenium oxide on nanofibre substrates. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 2865–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patake, V.D.; Lokhande, C.D.; Joo, O.S. Electrodeposited ruthenium oxide thin films for supercapacitor: Effect of surface treatments. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4192–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, I.-H.; Kim, K.-B. Electrochemical Characterization of Hydrous Ruthenium Oxide Thin-Film Electrodes for Electrochemical Capacitor Applications. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arabale, G.; Wagh, D.; Kulkarni, M.; Mulla, I.S.; Vernekar, S.P.; Vijayamohanan, K.; Rao, A.M. Enhanced supercapacitance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes functionalized with ruthenium oxide. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 376, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, J.; Kucernak, A. Electrochemical supercapacitor material based on manganese oxide: Preparation and characterization. Electrochim. Acta 2002, 47, 2381–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, M.-S.; Julia Chiang, P.-C. Fabrication of Nanostructured Manganese Oxide Electrodes for Electrochemical Capacitors. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, A123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Subramanian, V.; Zhu, H.; Wei, B. Nanostructured MnO2: Hydrothermal synthesis and electrochemical properties as a supercapacitor electrode material. J. Power Sources 2006, 159, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kandalkar, S.G.; Gunjakar, J.L.; Lokhande, C.D. Preparation of cobalt oxide thin films and its use in supercapacitor application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 5540–5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patil, U.M.; Salunkhe, R.R.; Gurav, K.V.; Lokhande, C.D. Chemically deposited nanocrystalline NiO thin films for supercapacitor application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 2603–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hwang, S.-W.; Hyun, S.-H. Synthesis and characterization of tin oxide/carbon aerogel composite electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2007, 172, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, Y.; Li, B.; Guo, W.; Pang, H.; Xue, H. Vanadium based materials as electrode materials for high performance supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2016, 329, 148–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da Silva, D.L.; Delatorre, R.G.; Pattanaik, G.; Zangari, G.; Figueiredo, W.; Blum, R.-P.; Niehus, H.; Pasa, A.A. Electrochemical Synthesis of Vanadium Oxide Nanofibers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, E14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, C.C.; Huang, C.M.; Chang, K.H. Anodic deposition of porous vanadium oxide network with high power characteristics for pseudocapacitors. J. Power Sources 2008, 185, 1594–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mitchell, E.; Jimenez, A.; Gupta, R.K.; Gupta, B.K.; Ramasamy, K.; Shahabuddin, M.; Mishra, S.R. Ultrathin porous hierarchically textured NiCo2O4–graphene oxide flexible nanosheets for high-performance supercapacitors. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 2181–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, N.; Tian, J.; Shan, Z.; Chen, K.; Liao, W. Hydrothermal synthesis of hydrous ruthenium oxide/graphene sheets for high-performance supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 99, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mitchell, E.; Candler, J.; de Souza, F.; Gupta, R.K.; Gupta, B.K.; Dong, L.F. High performance supercapacitor based on multilayer of polyaniline and graphene oxide. Synth. Met. 2015, 199, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ye, S.; Feng, J.; Wu, P. Deposition of three-dimensional graphene aerogel on nickel foam as a binder-free supercapacitor electrode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7122–7129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tingting, Y.; Ruiyi, L.; Zaijun, L.; Zhiguo, G.; Guangli, W.; Junkang, L. Hybrid of NiCo2S4 and nitrogen and sulphur-functionalized multiple graphene aerogel for application in supercapacitors and oxygen reduction with significant electrochemical synergy. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 211, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, M.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Wang, Q. A Tough Nanocomposite Aerogel of Manganese Oxide and Polyaniline as an Electrode for a Supercapacitor. Chempluschem 2016, 81, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, K.-J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.-Z.; Xing, K. Synthesis of molybdenum disulfide/carbon aerogel composites for supercapacitors electrode material application. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 752, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, M.; Jeong, J.-M.; Huh, Y.S.; Choi, B.G. High-performance supercapacitor based on three-dimensional MoS2/graphene aerogel composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 121, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hao, P.; Zhao, Z.; Li, L.; Tuan, C.-C.; Li, H.; Sang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wong, C.P.; Liu, H. The hybrid nanostructure of MnCo2O4.5 nanoneedle/carbon aerogel for symmetric supercapacitors with high energy density. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 14401–14412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H.S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K.P.; Zhang, H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tan, C.; Zhang, H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2713–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, G.; Liu, H.; Qu, J.; Li, J. Two-dimensional layered MoS2: Rational design, properties and electrochemical applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1190–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Choudhary, N.; Patel, M.D.; Park, J.; Sirota, B.; Choi, W. Synthesis of large scale MoS2 for electronics and energy applications. J. Mater. Res. 2016, 31, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ramakrishna Matte, H.S.S.; Gomathi, A.; Manna, A.K.; Late, D.J.; Datta, R.; Pati, S.K.; Rao, C.N.R. MoS2 and WS2 Analogues of Graphene. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 4153–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, H.; Kong, D.; Johanes, P.; Cha, J.J.; Zheng, G.; Yan, K.; Liu, N.; Cui, Y. MoSe2 and WSe2 Nanofilms with Vertically Aligned Molecular Layers on Curved and Rough Surfaces. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3426–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kong, D.; Wang, H.; Cha, J.J.; Pasta, M.; Koski, K.J.; Yao, J.; Cui, Y. Synthesis of MoS2 and MoSe2 Films with Vertically Aligned Layers. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, J.; Tao, Z.-L.; Li, S.-L. Lithium Intercalation in Open-Ended TiS2 Nanotubes. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 2197–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tao, Z.-L.; Xu, L.-N.; Gou, X.-L.; Chen, J.; Yuan, H.-T. TiS2 nanotubes as the cathode materials of Mg-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2004, 407, 2080–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Voiry, D.; Yamaguchi, H.; Li, J.; Silva, R.; Alves, D.C.B.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.; Asefa, T.; Shenoy, V.B.; Eda, G.; et al. Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 850–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, H.; Wu, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, H. Preparation and Applications of Mechanically Exfoliated Single-Layer and Multilayer MoS2 and WSe2 Nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Acerce, M.; Voiry, D.; Chhowalla, M. Metallic 1T phase MoS2 nanosheets as supercapacitor electrode materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Thangappan, R.; Kalaiselvam, S.; Elayaperumal, A.; Jayavel, R.; Arivanandhan, M.; Karthikeyan, R.; Hayakawa, Y. Graphene decorated with MoS2 nanosheets: A synergetic energy storage composite electrode for supercapacitor applications. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 2637–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tang, J.; Jin, M.; Yuan, P.; Fu, Y.; Ma, X. Large-Area, Ultrathin Inorganic Network Coverages-Graphene Hierarchical Electrodes for Flexible, Heat-Resistant Energy Storage Application. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gigot, A.; Fontana, M.; Serrapede, M.; Castellino, M.; Bianco, S.; Armandi, M.; Bonelli, B.; Pirri, C.F.; Tresso, E.; Rivolo, P. Mixed 1T-2H phase MoS2/reduced graphene oxide as active electrode for enhanced supercapacitive performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 32842–32852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ratha, S.; Rout, C.S. Supercapacitor electrodes based on layered tungsten disulfide-reduced graphene oxide hybrids synthesized by a facile hydrothermal method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 11427–11433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tu, C.-C.; Lin, L.-Y.; Xiao, B.-C.; Chen, Y.-S. Highly efficient supercapacitor electrode with two-dimensional tungsten disulfide and reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets. J. Power Sources 2016, 320, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, D.; Chen, W.; Ma, L.; Ji, G.; Chang, K.; Lee, J.Y. Graphene-like layered metal dichalcogenide/graphene composites: Synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, C.; Yanagisawa, K.; Tao, H.; Onda, A.; Shou, T.; Kamiya, S. Solvothermal one-step synthesis and effect of carbon on properties of ruthenium sulfide catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2011, 141, 1311–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, C.; Yanagisawa, K.; Tao, H.; Onda, A.; Shou, T.; Kamiya, S. Oxygen reduction activity and methanol resistance of Ru-based catalysts prepared by solvothermal reaction. Catal. Lett. 2012, 142, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ziegelbauer, J.M.; Murthi, V.S.; O’Laoire, C.; Gullá, A.F.; Mukerjee, S.; O’Laoire, C.; Gullá, A.F.; Mukerjee, S. Electrochemical kinetics and X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigations of select chalcogenide electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction applications. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 5587–5596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Li, N.; Yanagisawa, K.; Li, X.; Yan, X. Hydrothermal synthesis of highly crystalline RuS2 nanoparticles as cathodic catalysts in the methanol fuel cell and hydrochloric acid electrolysis. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 65, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jeevanandam, P.; Koltypin, Y.; Gofer, Y.; Diamant, Y.; Gedanken, A. Sonochemical synthesis of nanocrystallites of ruthenium sulfide, RuS1.7. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 2769–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chang, K.; Chen, W. L-Cysteine-Assisted Synthesis of Layered MoS2/Graphene Composites with Excellent Electrochemical Performances for Lithium Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4720–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, Y.; Sheng, K.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Self-Assembled Graphene Hydrogel via a One-Step Hydrothermal Process. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Briggs, D. Surface Analysis by Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; IM Publications: Charlton, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cai, T.; Song, Z.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Hrbek, J. Preparation and structural characterization of RuS2 nanoislands on Au(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8886–8887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jaegermann, W.; Kühne, H.-M. XPS analysis of the oxidation reaction of ruthenium-chalcogenide photoelectrodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1986, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Smart, R.S.C.; Skinner, W.M.; Gerson, A.R. XPS of Sulphide Mineral Surfaces: Metal-deficient, Polysulphides, Defects and Elemental Sulphur. Surf. Interface Anal. 1999, 105, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Benoist, L.; Gonbeau, D.; Pfister-Guillouzo, G.; Schmidt, E.; Meunier, G.; Levasseur, A. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy characterization of amorphous molybdenum oxysulfide thin films. Thin Solid Films 1995, 258, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pollini, I. Photoemission study of the electronic structure of CrCl3 and RuCl3 compunds. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1994, 50, 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morgan, D.J. Resolving ruthenium: XPS studies of common ruthenium materials. Surf. Interface Anal. 2015, 1072–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guo, Y.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Qiu, H.; Gao, J. One pot preparation of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) or Au (Ag) nanoparticle-RGO hybrids using chitosan as a reducing and stabilizing agent and their use in methanol electrooxidation. Carbon N. Y. 2012, 50, 2513–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Roppolo, I.; Chiappone, A.; Bejtka, K.; Celasco, E.; Chiodoni, A.; Giorgis, F.; Sangermano, M.; Porro, S. A powerful tool for graphene functionalization: Benzophenone mediated UV-grafting. Carbon N. Y. 2014, 77, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lin, S.S.; Huang, Y.S.; Huang, C.R.; Lee, M.C. Raman investigation of RuS2. Solid State Commun. 1989, 69, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kim, Y.L.; Choi, H.A.; Lee, N.S.; Son, B.; Kim, H.J.; Baik, J.M.; Lee, Y.; Lee, C.; Kim, M.H. RuO2-ReO3 composite nanofibers for efficient electrocatalytic responses. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 7435–7442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zequine, C.; Ranaweera, C.K.; Wang, Z.; Singh, S.; Tripathi, P.; Srivastava, O.N.; Gupta, B.K.; Ramasamy, K.; Kahol, P.K.; Dvornic, P.R.; et al. High per formance and flexible supercapacitors based on carbonized bamboo fibers for wide temperature applications. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhou, J.; Lian, J.; Hou, L.; Zhang, J.; Gou, H.; Xia, M.; Zhao, Y.; Strobel, T.A.; Tao, L.; Gao, F. Ultrahigh volumetric capacitance and cyclic stability of fluorine and nitrogen co-doped carbon microspheres. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Shirley, D.A. High-Resolution X-ray Photoemission Spectrum of the Valence Bands of Gold. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 5, 4709–4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Stoller, M.D.; Ruoff, R.S. Best practice methods for determining an electrode material’s performance for ultracapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Low-magnification (a) and high magnification (b) FESEM images of RGO aerogel decorated with Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 nanostructures.
Figure 1. Low-magnification (a) and high magnification (b) FESEM images of RGO aerogel decorated with Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 nanostructures.
Materials 11 00057 g001
Figure 2. XPS High resolution scans of (a) C1s/Ru3d and (b) S2p regions of RGO aerogel decorated with Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 nanoparticles; (c) Raman spectra of pristine GO, RGO, RGO/Ruthenium active species (before and after thermal annealing in inert gas) aerogels; (d) XRD of pristine GO, RGO and as-synthesized RGO/RuS2 (before and after thermal annealing in inert gas).
Figure 2. XPS High resolution scans of (a) C1s/Ru3d and (b) S2p regions of RGO aerogel decorated with Ruthenium active species containing RuS2 nanoparticles; (c) Raman spectra of pristine GO, RGO, RGO/Ruthenium active species (before and after thermal annealing in inert gas) aerogels; (d) XRD of pristine GO, RGO and as-synthesized RGO/RuS2 (before and after thermal annealing in inert gas).
Materials 11 00057 g002
Figure 3. (a) low-magnification Bright Field TEM image of RGO flake decorated with Ruthenium active species nanoparticles. SAED pattern of RGO flake (b) and Ruthenium active species nanoparticles (c); High Resolution TEM image of Ruthenium active species nanoparticle (d).
Figure 3. (a) low-magnification Bright Field TEM image of RGO flake decorated with Ruthenium active species nanoparticles. SAED pattern of RGO flake (b) and Ruthenium active species nanoparticles (c); High Resolution TEM image of Ruthenium active species nanoparticle (d).
Materials 11 00057 g003
Figure 4. (a) cyclic Voltammograms of RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid at different scan rate; (b) evolution of the Specific Capacitance with the scan rate.
Figure 4. (a) cyclic Voltammograms of RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid at different scan rate; (b) evolution of the Specific Capacitance with the scan rate.
Materials 11 00057 g004
Figure 5. (a) charge–discharge curves at different current density and (b) evolution of the capacitance retention in function of the cycle number for the RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid.
Figure 5. (a) charge–discharge curves at different current density and (b) evolution of the capacitance retention in function of the cycle number for the RGO/Ruthenium active species hybrid.
Materials 11 00057 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gigot, A.; Fontana, M.; Pirri, C.F.; Rivolo, P. Graphene/Ruthenium Active Species Aerogel as Electrode for Supercapacitor Applications. Materials 2018, 11, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010057

AMA Style

Gigot A, Fontana M, Pirri CF, Rivolo P. Graphene/Ruthenium Active Species Aerogel as Electrode for Supercapacitor Applications. Materials. 2018; 11(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gigot, Arnaud, Marco Fontana, Candido Fabrizio Pirri, and Paola Rivolo. 2018. "Graphene/Ruthenium Active Species Aerogel as Electrode for Supercapacitor Applications" Materials 11, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop