Next Article in Journal
Effect of Graphite Nanoplate Morphology on the Dispersion and Physical Properties of Polycarbonate Based Composites
Previous Article in Journal
New Challenges in Tribology: Wear Assessment Using 3D Optical Scanners
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Materials 2017, 10(5), 543; doi:10.3390/ma10050543

A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation

School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Daolun Chen
Received: 27 March 2017 / Revised: 5 May 2017 / Accepted: 12 May 2017 / Published: 18 May 2017

Abstract

The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate ( d a / d N ) and stress intensity factor range ( Δ K ) are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue crack growth models cannot handle these nonlinearities appropriately. The machine learning method provides a flexible approach to the modeling of fatigue crack growth because of its excellent nonlinear approximation and multivariable learning ability. In this paper, a fatigue crack growth calculation method is proposed based on three different machine learning algorithms (MLAs): extreme learning machine (ELM), radial basis function network (RBFN) and genetic algorithms optimized back propagation network (GABP). The MLA based method is validated using testing data of different materials. The three MLAs are compared with each other as well as the classical two-parameter model ( K * approach). The results show that the predictions of MLAs are superior to those of K * approach in accuracy and effectiveness, and the ELM based algorithms show overall the best agreement with the experimental data out of the three MLAs, for its global optimization and extrapolation ability. View Full-Text
Keywords: fatigue crack growth; machine learning algorithms; fatigue life prediction; extreme learning machine (ELM); stress ratio fatigue crack growth; machine learning algorithms; fatigue life prediction; extreme learning machine (ELM); stress ratio
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Sun, F.; Zhang, W. A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation. Materials 2017, 10, 543.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Materials EISSN 1996-1944 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top