Next Article in Journal
Organic Solid-State Tri-Wavelength Lasing from Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal and a Distributed Feedback Laser with a Doped Laser Dye and a Semiconducting Polymer Film
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Emulsified Asphalt on the Mechanical Property and Microstructure of Cement-Stabilized Gravel under Freezing and Thawing Cycle Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/ma10050503
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Reagentless Amperometric Formaldehyde-Selective Chemosensor Based on Platinized Gold Electrodes

by
Olha Demkiv
1,*,
Oleh Smutok
1,
Mykhailo Gonchar
1,2 and
Marina Nisnevitch
3,*
1
Department of Analytical Biotechnology, Institute of Cell Biology, Drahomanov Street 14/16, 79005 Lviv, Ukraine
2
Institute of Applied Biotechnology and Basic Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Kolbuszowa 36-100, Poland
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Materials, Ariel University, Ariel 4070000, Israel
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(5), 503; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050503
Submission received: 31 March 2017 / Revised: 2 May 2017 / Accepted: 3 May 2017 / Published: 6 May 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fabrication and characterization of a new amperometric chemosensor for accurate formaldehyde analysis based on platinized gold electrodes is described. The platinization process was performed electrochemically on the surface of 4 mm gold planar electrodes by both electrolysis and cyclic voltamperometry. The produced electrodes were characterized using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray spectral analysis. Using a low working potential (0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl) enabled an essential increase in the chemosensor’s selectivity for the target analyte. The sensitivity of the best chemosensor prototype to formaldehyde is uniquely high (28180 A·M−1·m−2) with a detection limit of 0.05 mM. The chemosensor remained stable over a one-year storage period. The formaldehye-selective chemosensor was tested on samples of commercial preparations. A high correlation was demonstrated between the results obtained by the proposed chemosensor, chemical and enzymatic methods (R = 0.998). The developed formaldehyde-selective amperometric chemosensor is very promising for use in industry and research, as well as for environmental control.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Formaldehyde (FA) is a typical indoor air pollutant and is highly toxic to all animals and humans, even at concentrations as low as 0.1 ppm [1,2,3]. According to data of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [2,3], FA is a toxic compound that reacts with macromolecules in different biological systems and has mutagenic, immunogenic, allergenic, and carcinogenic effects [4,5,6,7,8]. FA has recently been described as one of the chemical mediators of apoptosis [9]. FA is an extremely toxic agent which is, nonetheless, found in over 2000 commercial products. It is used as an industrial fungicide, germicide, and disinfectant, and as a preservative in mortuaries and medical laboratories. In 2013, the annual FA production was estimated at over 50 million metric tons [6]. Wastewaters from many different industries contain FA and phenols which, in combination, are especially hazardous to living organisms even at low concentrations. Formaldehyde also occurs naturally in the environment. It is produced in small amounts by most living organisms as part of normal metabolic processes. FA is currently considered to be the main cause for the sick building syndrome, which is defined as a set of symptoms associated with irritation of the upper air passages and eyes caused by harmful compounds (particularly FA) which are found in building materials, tobacco smoke, some medicinal preparations, etc. [3,4,5,6,7].
Several analytical approaches for the determination of FA were reported in the last two decades of the 20th century. These methods include spectrophotometry [10,11,12], gas chromatography [13], high-performance liquid chromatography [14], ion chromatography [15], and polarography [16]. These methods require expensive and bulky instruments that have a high power demand and need well-trained operators. They are, therefore, clearly unable to provide real-time information on exposure to FA.
A number of attempts to develop biosensors for the detection of FA were reported, including amperometric sensors [17,18,19,20] and potentiometric detection schemes [21]. FA-selective biosensors are based on cells [18] or enzymes, such as alcohol oxidase (AOX) or formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FdDH), which are used as biorecognition elements [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Potentiometric biosensors consisting of a pH-sensitive field effect transistor as a transducer, and containing either the enzyme AOX or permeabilized yeast cells, have been described by Korpan et al. [21]. Conductometric biosensors are based on AOX or FdDH [22,23], and the latter enzyme also serves as a biorecognition element in amperometric biosensors [24,25].
Chemosensors have several advantages for FA analysis over enzyme-based biosensors: Asimple preparation procedure that does not entail the use of expensive enzymes, co-factors, electron transfer mediators and any covering paints or permselective membranes. Moreover, chemosensors are much more stable and their stability depends on the properties of chemocatalysts. Use of metal nanoparticles is a perspective approach to improve the sensors’ characteristics due to their high catalytic ability and low price. In general, the catalytic properties of metals are dependent upon the layer size, composition, and structure, as well as on the support materials [26].
Due to its unique physical and chemical characteristics, including high durability and specific activity, platinum (Pt) stands out from other transition metals in its electrocatalytic efficiency [27,28]. However, the high cost and a limited supply of Pt are limiting factors. The use of nano-scale Pt particles by controlling the morphology and surface structure is, therefore, an effective way for reducing the amount of required Pt and enhancing the electrochemical activity [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
FA electrooxidation on metal surfaces, such as Pt, Cu, Rh, and Pd, has been widely reported [27,36,37,38,39,40,41]. However, some serious drawbacks of FA-selective chemosensor systems, such as low sensitivity and poor selectivity, remain unsolved. These limitations increase the need for the development of new chemosensory systems which will be usable for accurate FA analysis in commercial samples. In the present work, we describe the construction and detailed characterization of new Pt-based chemolayers obtained electrochemically on the surface of gold planar electrodes by both electrolysis and cyclic voltamperometry. The Pt-based chemoelectrodes were tested for analysis of commercial disinfectants and compared to analytical devices reported by us earlier [20,33].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Development of Procedures for Chemocatalyst Formation on the Electrode Surface

An additional modification of the electrode surface by Pt layers was used for improving the electrochemical properties of the FA-sensitive chemoelectrodes. For this aim, commercial 4 mm gold planar electrodes DRP-C220AT from DropSens (Llanera, Asturias, Spain) were platinized. Two approaches for this process were applied. The first was based on electrochemical preparation of the surface by electrolysis/H2PtCl6 in HCl solution according to the method described by Kovalyshyn et al. and by us [20,33]. Electrodes prepared using this method are designated as Pt-1. The second approach included electrodeposition of Pt on DRP-C220AT gold planar electrodes from the same solution using cyclic voltamperometry in the range from −0.6 to 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Electrodes prepared by the second method are designated as Pt-2. Figure 1 presents cyclic voltammograms of Pt electrodeposition after a number of cycles. It can be seen that each cycle caused improvement in redox properties of the electrode, and the best results were obtained after sixcycles. It should be mentioned that the change after the fifthcycle was very small and the optimal number of electrodeposition cycles of Pt is considered to be about six. Using more than six electrodeposition cycles may cause the formation of a thick Pt-layer which will have a negative effect on the electrode’s electrocatalytic properties.

2.2. Determination of Structural and Electrical Properties of the Obtained PtLayers

The formation of Pt layers on the surface of commercial electrodes was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy using a REMMA-102-02 SEM microanalyzer (SELMI, Sumy, Ukraine). The SEM images demonstrate differences in the surface structure of the non-modified (bare) planar electrode, and the planar Pt-1 and Pt-2 modified electrodes (Figure 2). The non-modified electrode has a smooth surface with very moderate 0.2–4 μm convexities (Figure 2a). The surface of the Pt-1 modified electrode has highly-developed superficies represented by multiple 3–5 μm cone structures (Figure 2b). The surface of the Pt-2 modified electrode appears smoother than the surface of the Pt-1 electrode and has irregular convex 1–5 μm structures (Figure 2c).
The formation of different types of Ptlayers was further confirmed by X-ray spectral analysis by interpretation of Kα peaks at 2.1 keV which are characteristic for noble metals (Figure 3). The X-ray spectrogram of the gold electrode before modification represents signals of Au0 only, as expected (Figure 3A). However, after modification by the Pt-1 (Figure 3B) and the Pt-2 (Figure 3C) methods, the only registered signal on the surface of the electrodes is related to Pt0.
The detailed analysis of electrochemical characteristics of the non-modified planar electrode and the planar electrodes modified by platinum was performed by cyclic voltamperometry in electrochemical cells with an electrolyte solution of K4Fe(CN)6 in KCl (Figure 4). As can be seen from Figure 4a, modification of the gold planar electrode by platinum significantly increased the electroconductivity of the working electrode (curves b and c) when compared with the non-modified electrode (curve a). Conductivity of the Pt-1-modified electrode increased 2.5-fold and that of the Pt-2-modified electrode increased more than four-fold compared to the non-modified electrode. The observed phenomenon of improving the electrochemical parameters of chemoelectrodes is expected to significantly increase the sensitivity of prototypes of FA-selective chemosensors.

2.3. Characterization of the FA-Sensitive Chemosensors

The Pt-modified electrodes were used for construction of FA-selective chemosensors. For this purpose, chronoamperometric analysis of the Pt-1 and Pt-2 electrodes was performed upon addition of increasing concentrations of FA. The sensor output was measured (Figure 5a) and used for building calibration curves for each of the electrodes (Figure 5b, curves a and b). Both sensors exhibited a linear response up to 2 mM of FA. However, the chemosensor based on the Pt-2 electrode showed much higher sensitivity than the Pt-1 electrode. As can be seen from Figure 5, the Pt-2 sensor generated a current of 704 µA upon the addition of 2 mM FA, whereas the Pt-1 sensor generated a maximal output of only 84 µA under the same conditions (Figure 5a). The sensitivity of both chemosensors can be characterized as a specific response calculated from slopes of the calibration curves presented in Figure 5b. The sensitivity values of the constructed chemosensors were very high: 3400 A·M−1·m−2 for the Pt-1-based chemosensor and 28180 A·M−1·m−2 for the Pt-2-based electrode. It can be assumed that preparation of the chemosensor using the cyclic voltammetry technique enabled a more than eight-fold increase in sensitivity compared to the chemosensor produced electrochemically [20]. The detection limit for the Pt-2-based electrode determined from a chronoamperometric curve is 0.05 mM for FA (Figure 5a).
The most important characteristic of chemosensors is their selectivity to the target analyte. The response of both chemoelectrodes to several additional compounds which were applied at the same molar concentration was therefore tested. These compounds included methanol, ethanol, acetaldehyde, and propylaldehyde. The results presented in Figure 6 show that both chemosensors exhibited a high sensitivity only to FA, whereas responses to the otheranalytes were significantly lower. The sensitivity of the Pt-1 and Pt-2 electrodes for methanol was 20.0% and 16.6% of the response for FA, respectively (Figure 6a). For ethanol, the respective values were 26% and 8.3%, for acetaldehyde the values were 6% and 3%, and for propylaldehyde they were 2% and 1% (Figure 6b). It should be noted that the selectivity of the Pt-2 chemosensor towards FA exceeded that of the Pt-1 electrode in all cases.
The stability of the Pt-based chemosensors over time was examined. Both electrodes were found to remain absolutely stable over one year of storage in the dark at room temperature and can be reused over hundred times without any measurable worsening of electrochemical properties.
The developed chemosensors were used for analysis of the FA content in samples of the commercial preparations “Formalin” and “Sanodez Forte”. According to the manufacturers, the FA content in “Formalin” is 13.0 M and in “Sadonez Forte” it is 2.6 M. These samples were analyzed using the Pt-2-based chemosensor compared to several other chemical and enzymatic methods previously used by us (Table 1).
A standard multiple additions method for FA analysis by the chemosensor showed that the FA concentration in “Formalin” and in “Sanodez Forte” is 13.64 and 2.65 М, respectively. The obtained results correlate well with chemical and enzymatic spectrophotometric approaches (Table 1). A high (0.7 < R < 1) and significant (p-value < 0.001) correlation was found between the results of the FA-analysis using the chemosensor and the FA-content declared by the manufacturers.
The Pt-2 chemosensor shows better characteristics in FA monitoring compared to a majority of sensors constructed by others on the basis of various metals. A number of electrocatalysts have been developed and found appropriate for FA determination. However, in most cases the tests were performed in the presence of individually-taken FA concentrations and without any specification for a range of linear responses to variations in the FA concentration. This relates to platinum-based catalysts, such as polycrystalline platinum alone and containing electrodeposited ruthenium [42], platinum nanoparticles prepared on the surface of glassy carbon electrodes [27], and platinum nanoparticles deposited onto poly(o-methoxyaniline)-multiwalled carbon nanotubes under galvanostatic conditions [34], which were tested in the presence of 0.1 M, 0.32 M, and 1 M concentrations of FA, respectively. Since the experiments were performed at high FA concentrations, nothing can be concluded about the sensitivity of the catalysts and their potential applications as sensors for FA. A similar situation is observed in the case of electrocatalysts built on the basis of palladium: a copper-palladium electrode [43] and hollow porous palladium nanoparticles [44] were found to exhibit catalytic activity for electrochemical oxidation of FA. However, the tests were carried out only at 30 mM and 1 M FA, respectively, and no indication regarding the sensitivity and linear concentration range of the electrodes was reported. It should be mentioned that most of these electrocatalysts showed high stability after multiple uses and maintained an activity close to the initial activity after 50 [44], and even 1800 [34] cycles.
On the other hand, several authors constructed electrodes based on nanoparticles of noble and other metals and proved they could gain linear signals in response to variations in the FA concentration. A carbon paste electrode modified with nanoporous cobalt-nickel phosphate with dispersed nickel ions gained a linear signal at 3–15 mM of FA and showed good stability, retaining 94% of its activity after one month and 87% after three months [45]. A palladium-graphene electrochemical sensor developed by Qiao et al. [46] demonstrated a very low FA detection limit and high sensitivity (3467 A·M−1·m−2), but was characterized by a linear response in a very narrow range of 7.75 to 62 μM of FA. An electrode based on highly-dispersed platinum nanoparticles deposited electrochemically on graphene [31] showed a linear response up to 2 mM of FA, with a detection limit of 0.04 mM and a sensitivity of 0.0162 mA·mM−1 with a working electrode area of 7.07 mm2, which corresponds to 2290 A·M−1·m−2. The electrode retained 90% of its activity after 10 days of daily measurements. An electrochemical sensor on the basis of iron and platinum core-shell nanoparticles prepared on a carbon support was found suitable for determination of hydrogen peroxide, glucose and FA [41], and in the latter case showed a wide linear response range of 12.5 μM to 15.4 mM and a very low sensitivity of 117.5 A·M−1·m−2. Multipurpose applicability of this sensor seems to be advantageous over other types of sensors, but this feature actually constitutes a restriction for practical use due to its low selectivity.
The Pt-2 chemosensor constructed in the present work is characterized by a wide (0.02–2 mM) linear response range, by uniquely high sensitivity (28180 A·M−1·m−2), by good selectivity, and outstanding stability, which is very important for commercialization of the sensor. These characteristics, along with a simple preparation procedure, open prospects for implementation and practical application of this sensor for monitoring and accurate detection of FA in aqueous systems.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Ethanol absolute, acetaldehyde, potassium chloride, and hexacyanidoferrate(III) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemie (Steinheim, Germany); hexachloroplatinum(IV)-acid hexahydrate, methanol, and propionaldehyde were obtained from Merck-Schuchardt (Hohenbrunn, Germany).
All chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and all solutions were prepared using HPLC-grade water. One molar FA solution was prepared by hydrolysis of 300 mg of paraformaldehyde in 10 mL of water by heating the suspension in a sealed ampoule at 105 °C for 6 h.
Tested real samples included the following preparations: “Formalin” (produced by “SferaSim”, Lviv, Ukraine) and “Sanodez Forte” (produced by “DezoMark”, Novoyavorivsk, Ukraine).

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis

A scanning electron microscope (SEM-microanalyser REMMA-102-02, Sumy, Ukraine) was used for morphological characterization of the electrodes’ planar surfaces. A special cover film was formed on the samples with a Butvar solution B-98 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 1.5% chloroform using an ultrasound method. The distance from the last lens of the microscope to the sample (WD) ranged from 17.1 to 21.7 mm. The accelerator voltage was in the range from 20 to 40 kV. Zooms were from 2500× to 10,000×.

3.3. Preparation and Evaluation of the Chemosensors

The properties of the FA-sensitive amperometric chemosensors were evaluated by means of constant-potential amperometry in a three-electrode configuration using commercial 4 mm gold planar electrodes DRP-C220AT for repeated use fromDropSens (Llanera, Asturias, Spain). Amperometric measurements were carried out using a potentiostat CHI 1200A (IJ Cambria Scientific, Burry Port, UK) connected to a personal computer and performed in a batch mode under continuous stirring in a standard 20 mL electrochemical cell at room temperature. After 2 min of stabilizing the background current, the experiments were started by the addition of sample aliquots. During the course of the experiments, the modified electrodes were stored in air at room temperature.
All real samples were diluted using 0.05 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0. The dilution factors for “Sanodez Forte” and “Formalin” were 2500 and 4000, and 6000 and 8000, respectively.
All experiments were carried out independently in triplicate and the reported results are the average of three replicate experiments. Statistical data evaluations were calculated using Origin 7.5 (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA) and Microsoft Excel.

4. Conclusions

A new amperometric chemosensor based on a platinized gold electrode for accurate formaldehyde (FA) analysis was described. The platinization of the surface of 4 mm gold planar electrodes was performed electrochemically by electrolysis (Pt-1) and by cyclic voltamperometry (Pt-2). The structural modification of working electrodes by the two types of Pt layers was characterized using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray spectral analysis. A significant increase in electrochemical conductivity of the Pt-modified working electrodes was demonstrated compared with a non-modified electrode. The sensitivity of the Pt-2-based chemosensor for FA is uniquely high (28180 A·M−1·m−2), and is 79-fold higher than the sensitivity of an earlier FA-selective biosensor which we developed based on using formaldehyde dehydrogenase [25], and 8.1-fold higher compared to the chemosensor described by Qiao et al. [46]. Exploiting a low working potential (0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl) enabled an increase in the selectivity of the chemosensor to the target analyte. The storage and operational stability of the Pt-based chemosensors was a very high, as proven after over one year of storage in the dark at room temperature and reusing them more than one hundred times.
The FA-selective chemosensor was tested on real samples of commercial preparations manufactured in Ukraine: “Formalin” and “Sanodez Forte”. A very high correlation was shown between the results obtained with the chemosensor and by chemical methods and enzymatic approaches (R=0.998–0.999). The developed prototype of a FA-selective amperometric chemosensor can be widely used in industry and research, as well as for environmental control.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by NAS of Ukraine within the framework of the Scientific-Technical Program “Sensor systems for medical, ecological and industrial-technological needs: metrological assurance and research exploitation”, by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (the project “Investigation of new composite materials with ion-synthesized metal nanoparticles for sensor analysis”), by NATO project SfP 984173, and by the Research Authority of the Ariel University, Israel.

Author Contributions

Olha Demkiv and Mykhailo Gonchar conceived and designed the experiments; Olha Demkiv and Oleh Smutok performed the experiments; Mykhailo Gonchar and Marina Nisnevitch analyzed the data; and Olha Demkiv and Marina Nisnevitch wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cogliano, V.J.; Grosse, Y.; Baan, R.A.; Straif, K.; Secretan, M.B.; El Ghissass, F. Formaldehyde. Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-Butoxy-2-Propanol. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; WHO Press: Lyon, France, 2006; Volume 88, pp. 39–93. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blair, A.; Casanova, M.; Comba, P.; Demers, P.; Goldstein, B.D.; Grafström, R.C.; Järvholm, B.; Kaufman, D.G.; Kauppinen, T.; Leclerc, A. Formaldehyde. In IARC Monographs on Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; WHO Press: Lyon, France, 1995; Volume 62, pp. 217–335. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett, J.C.; Bond, J.A.; Beane-Freeman, L.; Carren-Valencia, T.; Elwell, M.R.; Groopman, J.D.; Friesen, M.D.; Gustavsson, P.; Ghanei, M.; Hayes, R.B.; et al. Formaldehyde. In Chemical Agents and Related Occupations; WHO Press: Lyon, France, 2012; Volume 100F, pp. 401–435. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feron, V.J.; Til, H.P.; Vrijer, F.; Woutersen, R.A.; Cassee, F.R.; van Bladeren, P.J. Aldehydes: Occurrence, carcinogenic potential, mechanism of action and risk assessment. Mutat. Res. 1991, 259, 363–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hauptmann, M.; Lubin, J.H.; Stewart, P.A.; Hayes, R.; Blair, A. Mortality from solid cancers among workers in formaldehyde industries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 159, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Magnusson, A. Formox and formaldehyde market update—A turbo in the future? In Proceedings of the 16th IMPCA Asian Methanol Conference, Singapore, 30 October–1 November 2013; Available online: http://www.methanolmsa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Andreas-Magnusson.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2017).
  7. Kim, W.J.; Terada, N.; Nomura, T.; Takahashi, R.; Lee, S.D.; Park, J.H. Effect of formaldehyde on the expression of adhesion molecules in nasal microvascular endothelial cells: The role of formaldehyde in the pathogenesis of sick building syndrome. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2002, 32, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yu, P.H. Deamination of methylamine and angiopathy; toxicity of formaldehyde, oxidative stress and relevance to protein glycoxidation in diabetes. J. Neural Transm. 1998, 52, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zerin, T.; Kim, J.S.; Gil, H.W.; Song, H.Y.; Hong, S.Y. Effects of formaldehyde on mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2015, 31, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sawicki, E.; Hauser, T.R.; McPherson, S. Spectrophotometric determination of formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing compounds with chromotropic acid, 6-amino-1-naphtol-3-sulfonic-acid (J acid), and 6-anilino-1-naphtol-3-sulfonic acid (phenyl J acid). Anal. Chem. 1962, 34, 1460–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. NurIndang, M.; Abdulamir, A.S.; Abu Bakar, A.; Salleh, A.B.; Lee, Y.H.; NorAzah, Y. A review: Methods of determination of health-endangering formaldehyde in diet. Res. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 3, 31–47. [Google Scholar]
  12. Avigad, G. A simple spectrometric determination of formaldehyde and other aldehydes: Application to periodate oxidized glycerol systems. Anal. Biochem. 1983, 134, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dumas, T. Determination of formaldehyde in air by gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1982, 247, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mann, B.; Grajeski, M.L. New chemiluminescentderivatizing agent for the analysis of aldehyde and ketones by high-performance liquid chromatography with peroxioxalatechemiluminescence. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 386, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lorrain, J.M.; Fortune, C.R.; Dellinger, B. Sampling and ion chromatographic determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 1302–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Septon, J.C.; Ku, J.C. Workplace air sampling and polarographic determination of formaldehyde. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1982, 43, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gayda, G.; Demkiv, O.; Klepach, H.; Gonchar, M.; Levy-Halaf, R.; Wolf, D.; Nisnevitch, M. Formaldehyde: Detection and Biodegradation. In Formaldehyde: Synthesis, Applications and Potential Health Effects; Patton, A., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 117–142. [Google Scholar]
  18. Paryzhak, S.; Demkiv, O.; Schuhmann, W.; Gonchar, M. Intact recombinant cells of the yeast Hansenulapolymorpha, over-producing formaldehyde dehydrogenase, as the sensitive bioelements for amperometric assay of formaldehyde. Sens. Electron. Microsyst. Technol. (Ukr.) 2008, 2, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  19. Smutok, O.; Ngounou, B.; Pavlishko, H.; Gayda, G.; Gonchar, M.; Schuhmann, W. A reagentlessbienzymeamperometric biosensor based on alcohol oxidase/peroxidase and an Os-complex modified electrodeposition paint. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 113, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sigawi, S.; Smutok, O.; Demkiv, O.; Gayda, G.; Vus, B.; Nitzan, Y.; Gonchar, M.; Nisnevitch, M. Detection of waterborne and airborne formaldehyde: From amperometricchemosensing to a visual biosensor based on alcohol oxidase. Materials 2014, 7, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Korpan, Y.I.; Gonchar, M.V.; Starodub, N.F.; Shulga, A.A.; Sibirny, A.A.; Elskaya, A.V. A cell biosensor specific for formaldehyde based on pH-sensitive transistors coupled to methylotrophic yeast cells with genetically adjusted metabolism. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 21, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dzyadevych, S.V.; Arkyhypova, V.N.; Korpan, Y.I.; El’skaya, A.V.; Soldatkin, A.P.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Martelet, C. Conductometric formaldehyde sensitive biosensor with specifically adapted analytical characteristics. Anal. Chim. 2001, 445, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vianello, F.; Boscolo-Chio, R.; Signorini, S. On-line detection of atmospheric formaldehyde by a conductometricbiosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 920–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nikitina, O.; Shleev, S.; Gayda, G.; Demkiv, O.; Gonchar, M.; Gorton, L.; Csöregi, E.; Nistor, M. Bi-enzyme biosensor based on NAD(+)- and glutathione-dependent recombinant formaldehyde dehydrogenase and diaphorase for formaldehyde assay. Sens. Actuators B 2007, 125, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Demkiv, O.; Smutok, O.; Paryzhak, S.; Gayda, G.; Sultanov, Y.; Guschin, D.; Shkil, H.; Schuhmann, W.; Gonchar, M. Reagentlessamperometric formaldehyde-selective biosensors based on the recombinant yeast formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Talanta 2008, 76, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ferrin, P.; Mavrikakis, M. Structure Sensitivity of Methanol Electrooxidation on Transition Metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14381–14389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Raoof, J.B.; Hosseini, S.R.; Rezaee, S. A simple and effective route for preparation of platinumnanoparticle and its application for electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol and formaldehyde. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 212, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Zhu, Z.Z.; Shi, J.; Li, H.L. Electrocatalytic oxidation of formaldehyde on platinum well-dispersed into single-wall carbon nanotube/polyaniline composite film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 8811–8817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kuang, Y.; Wu, B.; Cui, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. Preparation of hollow platinum nanospheres/carbon nanotubes nanohybrids and their improved stability for electro-oxidation of methanol. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 8645–8650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tegou, A.; Armyanov, S.; Valova, E.; Steenhaut, O.; Hubin, A.; Kokkinidis, G.; Sotiropoulos, S. Mixed platinum–gold electrocatalysts for borohydride oxidation prepared by the galvanic replacement of nickel deposits. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 634, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Cao, Z.; Wang, H.; Jia, G.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J. Electrocatalytic oxidation of formaldehyde on direct electrodeposited graphene–platinum nanoparticles composites electrode. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 3915–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Özdokur, K.V.; Tatlı, A.Y.; Yılmaz, B.; Koçak, S.; Ertaş, F.N. Development of pulsed deposited manganese and molybdenum oxide surfaces decorated with platinum nanoparticles and their catalytic application for formaldehyde oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 5927–5933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kovalyshyn, Y.; Koval’chuk, E.; Ostapovych, B.; Chervinka, M. Electrochemical oxidation of formaldehyde on the platinized graphite electrode. Visn. Lviv Univ. Ser. Chem. 2010, 51, 342–347. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dong, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ma, T.; Guo, C. Electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol and formaldehyde on platinum-modified poly(o-methoxyaniline)-multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 8191–8200. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mourdikoudis, S.; Chirea, M.; Altantzis, T.; Pastoriza-Santos, I.; Perez-Juste, J.; Silva, F.; Bals, S.; Liz-Marzan, L.M. Dimethylformamide-mediated synthesis ofwater-soluble platinum nanodendrites for ethanoloxidation electrocatalysis. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4776–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hasanzadeh, M.; Khalizadeh, B.; Shadjou, N.; Karim-Nezhad, G.; Saghatforoush, L.; Kazeman, I.; Abnosi, M.H. A new kinetic-mechanistic approach to elucidate formaldehyde electrooxidation on copper electrode. Electroanalysis 2009, 22, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sathe, B.R.; Shinde, D.B.; Pillai, V.K. Preparation and characterization of rhodium nanostructures through the evolution of microgalvanic cells and their enhanced electrocatalytic activity for formaldehyde oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 9616–9622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiu, C.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ma, H.; Cai, Y. Bimetallic Pt–Au thin film electrocatalysts with hierarchical structures for the oxidation of formic acid. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 127, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mohl, M.; Dobo, D.; Kukovecz, A.; Konya, Z.; Kordas, K.; Wei, J.; Ajayan, P.M. Formation of CuPd and CuPt bimetallic nanotubes by galvanic replacement reaction. Phys. Chem. 2011, 115, 9403–9409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, S.; Jin, M.; Tao, J.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Xia, Y. Synthesis and characterization of Pd@MxCu1−x (M = Au, Pd, and Pt) nanocages with porous walls and a yolk–shell structure through galvanic replacement reactions. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 14877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mei, H.; Wu, W.; Yu, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, S.; Xia, Q. Nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor based on Fe@Pt core–shell nanoparticles for hydrogen peroxide, glucose and formaldehyde. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 223, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De Lima, R.B.; Massafera, M.P.; Batista, E.A.; Iwasita, T. Catalysis of formaldehyde oxidation by electrodeposits of PtRu. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2007, 603, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pötzelberger, I.; Mardareb, C.C.; Burgstallerb, W.; Hassela, A.W. Maximum electrocatalytic oxidation performance for formaldehyde in a combinatorial copper-palladium thin film library. Appl.Catal. A Gen. 2016, 525, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, Y.; Xu, Y.T.; Gao, G.H.; Wang, T.; Zhao, B.; Fu, X.Z.; Suna, R.; Wong, C.-P. Electro-oxidation of formaldehyde and methanol over hollow porous palladium nanoparticles with enhanced catalytic activity. Catal. Commun. 2015, 58, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hassaninejad-Darzi, S.K.; Rahimnejad, M.; Gholami-Esfidvajani, M. Electrocatalytic oxidation of formaldehyde onto carbon paste electrode modified with nickel decorated nanoporous cobalt-nickel phosphate molecular sieve for fuel cell. Fuel Cells 2016, 16, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qiao, J.; Guo, Y.; Song, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, T.; Shuang, S.; Dong, C. Synthesis of a palladium-graphene material and its application for formaldehyde determination. Anal. Lett. 2013, 46, 1454–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 10 00503 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of Ptelectrodeposition on the surface of 4 mm DRP-C220AT “DropSens”gold planar electrodes. Conditions: −0.6 to 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl; scan rate 50 mV·s−1.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of Ptelectrodeposition on the surface of 4 mm DRP-C220AT “DropSens”gold planar electrodes. Conditions: −0.6 to 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl; scan rate 50 mV·s−1.
Materials 10 00503 g001
Materials 10 00503 g002a 550Materials 10 00503 g002b 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy of (a) the surface of a non-modified 4 mm DRP-C220AT “DropSens” gold planar electrode; (b) the same surface after modification by Pt using electrolysis (Pt-1); and (c) the Ptlayer obtained by electrodeposition (Pt-2). Abbreviations: WD: distance from the last lens of the microscope to the samples (mm); kV: accelerating voltage; x: fold magnification n; μm: scale unit.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy of (a) the surface of a non-modified 4 mm DRP-C220AT “DropSens” gold planar electrode; (b) the same surface after modification by Pt using electrolysis (Pt-1); and (c) the Ptlayer obtained by electrodeposition (Pt-2). Abbreviations: WD: distance from the last lens of the microscope to the samples (mm); kV: accelerating voltage; x: fold magnification n; μm: scale unit.
Materials 10 00503 g002aMaterials 10 00503 g002b
Materials 10 00503 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray spectral analysis of (A) the surface of a non-modified 4 mm DRP-C220AT “DropSens” gold planar electrode; (B) the same surface after modification by Pt using electrolysis (Pt-1); and (C) the Ptlayer obtained by electrodeposition (Pt-2).
Figure 3. X-ray spectral analysis of (A) the surface of a non-modified 4 mm DRP-C220AT “DropSens” gold planar electrode; (B) the same surface after modification by Pt using electrolysis (Pt-1); and (C) the Ptlayer obtained by electrodeposition (Pt-2).
Materials 10 00503 g003
Materials 10 00503 g004 550
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammograms of the non-modified DRP-C220AT “DropSens” gold planar electrode (a); after modification by Pt-1 (b); andafter modification by Pt-2 (c) layers. Measurement conditions: frame scanned from −0.4 V to 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl; scan rate of 100 mV·s−1 in the electrolyte solution containing 10 mM K4Fe(CN)6 and 100 mM KCl.
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammograms of the non-modified DRP-C220AT “DropSens” gold planar electrode (a); after modification by Pt-1 (b); andafter modification by Pt-2 (c) layers. Measurement conditions: frame scanned from −0.4 V to 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl; scan rate of 100 mV·s−1 in the electrolyte solution containing 10 mM K4Fe(CN)6 and 100 mM KCl.
Materials 10 00503 g004
Materials 10 00503 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Chronoamperometric response and (b) calibration curves in the linear frame upon FA addition of the chemosensors based on Pt-1 (a) and Pt-2 electrodes (b). Conditions: working potential 0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, working area 12.56 mm2, 20 mM PB, pH 7.0 under continuous stirring at room temperature.
Figure 5. (a) Chronoamperometric response and (b) calibration curves in the linear frame upon FA addition of the chemosensors based on Pt-1 (a) and Pt-2 electrodes (b). Conditions: working potential 0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, working area 12.56 mm2, 20 mM PB, pH 7.0 under continuous stirring at room temperature.
Materials 10 00503 g005
Materials 10 00503 g006 550
Figure 6. Analysis of the selectivity of (a) Pt-1 and (b) Pt-2 modified electrodes to various analytes at 1 mM concentration. Conditions: working potential 0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 20 mM PB, PH 7.0 under continuous stirring at room temperature. Abbreviations: FA: formaldehyde; MeOH: methanol; EtOH: ethanol; AA: acetaldehyde; PA: propylaldehyde.
Figure 6. Analysis of the selectivity of (a) Pt-1 and (b) Pt-2 modified electrodes to various analytes at 1 mM concentration. Conditions: working potential 0.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, 20 mM PB, PH 7.0 under continuous stirring at room temperature. Abbreviations: FA: formaldehyde; MeOH: methanol; EtOH: ethanol; AA: acetaldehyde; PA: propylaldehyde.
Materials 10 00503 g006
Table
Table 1. The results of FA analysis of commercial preparations using the Pt-2-modified electrode chemosensor compared with chemical and enzymatic methods.
Table 1. The results of FA analysis of commercial preparations using the Pt-2-modified electrode chemosensor compared with chemical and enzymatic methods.
ProductFA Concentration Determined by Various Methods, M
BiosensorChemical (Spectrophotometric)Declared by ProducerChemosensor
FdDH-Based [25]Chromotropic [10]MBTH [10,11]Purpald [12]-Current Study
“Formalin”13.5 ± 2.114.0 ± 2.412.6 ± 2.112.9 ± 1.913.0 ± 1.513.6 ± 1.8
“Sanodez Forte”3.2 ± 0.63.6 ± 0.93.6 ± 0.83.3 ± 0.52.6 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.48

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demkiv, O.; Smutok, O.; Gonchar, M.; Nisnevitch, M. A Reagentless Amperometric Formaldehyde-Selective Chemosensor Based on Platinized Gold Electrodes. Materials 2017, 10, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050503

AMA Style

Demkiv O, Smutok O, Gonchar M, Nisnevitch M. A Reagentless Amperometric Formaldehyde-Selective Chemosensor Based on Platinized Gold Electrodes. Materials. 2017; 10(5):503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demkiv, Olha, Oleh Smutok, Mykhailo Gonchar, and Marina Nisnevitch. 2017. "A Reagentless Amperometric Formaldehyde-Selective Chemosensor Based on Platinized Gold Electrodes" Materials 10, no. 5: 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop