Next Article in Journal
High Thermal Conductivity of Copper Matrix Composite Coatings with Highly-Aligned Graphite Nanoplatelets
Next Article in Special Issue
Calcium Phosphate Cement with Antimicrobial Properties and Radiopacity as an Endodontic Material
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Modification of Direct-Current and Radio-Frequency Oxygen Plasma Treatments Enhance Cell Biocompatibility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aspects of Solvent Chemistry for Calcium Hydroxide Medicaments
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Materials 2017, 10(11), 1228; doi:10.3390/ma10111228

Sealing Ability of Alkaline Endodontic Cements versus Resin Cements

1
School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
2
Private Dental Practice, Annerley, Brisbane, QLD 4103, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 September 2017 / Revised: 15 October 2017 / Accepted: 20 October 2017 / Published: 25 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Biomaterials 2017)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [853 KB, uploaded 26 October 2017]   |  

Abstract

Penetration of oral bacteria through root fillings leads to their long term failure. Dimensionally stable alkaline cements have been developed. A saliva challenge model was used to compare resistance to bacterial penetration of these alkaline cements to conventional root fillings that combine gutta percha (GP) with epoxy resin sealers. A sample of 140 human roots with single straight canals prepared to standard length and canal size were obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Nex MTA or MTAmix), with an alkaline calcium hydroxide hard setting cement (Supercal), or with GP and a resin cement (either AH-Plus or Zirmix). Negative control roots were sealed with wax, while positive controls were left open. The test assemblies were gamma sterilised, then the coronal root face was exposed daily to fresh stimulated human saliva diluted in broth. Bacterial penetration was determined by assessing growth in sterile brain-heart infusion (BHI) medium in contact with the root apex. Using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, in order of performance from highest to lowest: Negative control, Supercal, Nex MTA, Zirmix, MTAmix, GP + AH-Plus, and the positive control. In addition, statistically significant differences were noted between Supercal and AH-Plus, and between the two MTA cements. It can be concluded that alkaline cements, particularly Supercal, can show considerable resistance to bacterial penetration from constant saliva challenge, and provide superior sealing ability in comparison to resin cements. While this property is due mostly to dimensional stability, the release of hydroxide ions could be a contributing factor to impaired bacterial survival, and this aspect should be explored further. View Full-Text
Keywords: calcium hydroxide; MTA; alkaline cement; bacterial penetration; endodontic sealer calcium hydroxide; MTA; alkaline cement; bacterial penetration; endodontic sealer
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Teoh, Y.-Y.; Athanassiadis, B.; Walsh, L.J. Sealing Ability of Alkaline Endodontic Cements versus Resin Cements. Materials 2017, 10, 1228.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Materials EISSN 1996-1944 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top