Next Article in Journal
Comparison Between Wind Power Prediction Models Based on Wavelet Decomposition with Least-Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)
Next Article in Special Issue
EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China
Previous Article in Journal
Dialectic Form Finding of Passive and Adaptive Shading Enclosures
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2014, 7(8), 5221-5250; doi:10.3390/en7085221

Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective

1
and
1,2,*
1
Low Carbon Technology and Economy Research Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
2
Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 June 2014 / Revised: 8 July 2014 / Accepted: 11 August 2014 / Published: 14 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Bio-Energy vs Fossil Fuels)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [6280 KB, uploaded 17 March 2015]   |  

Abstract

The world’s energy needs have been continually growing over the past decade, yet fossil fuels are limited. Renewable energies are becoming more prevalent, but are still a long way from being commonplace worldwide. Literature mining is applied to review carbon capture and storage (CCS) development trends and to develop and examine a novel carbon capture and storage technological paradigm (CCSTP), which incorporates CCSTP competition, diffusion and shift. This paper first provides an overview of the research and progress in CCS technological development, then applies a techno-paradigm theory to analyze CCSTP development and to provide a guide for future CCS technological trends. CCS could avoid CO2 being released into the atmosphere. Moreover, bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) can make a significant contribution to a net removal of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In this study, we compare the different CCSTP developmental paths and the conventional techno-paradigm by examining the S-curves. The analyses in this paper provide a useful guide for scholars seeking new inspiration in their research and for potential investors who are seeking to invest research funds in more mature technologies. We conclude that political barriers and public acceptance are the major distinctions between the CCSTP and the conventional techno-paradigm. It is expected that policy instruments and economic instruments are going to play a pivotal role in the accomplishment of global carbon reduction scenarios. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate mitigation; bioenergy with CCS; literature mining; carbon capture utilization and storage; techno-paradigm climate mitigation; bioenergy with CCS; literature mining; carbon capture utilization and storage; techno-paradigm
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, B.; Xu, J. Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective. Energies 2014, 7, 5221-5250.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top