Energies 2014, 7(3), 1656-1672; doi:10.3390/en7031656
Article

Comparison between Underground Cable and Overhead Line for a Low-Voltage Direct Current Distribution Network Serving Communication Repeater

1email, 1email, 1email, 1email, 2email, 2email and 3,* email
Received: 6 November 2013; in revised form: 3 March 2014 / Accepted: 4 March 2014 / Published: 20 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Grids: The Electrical Power Network and Communication System)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: This paper compares the differences in economic feasibility and dynamic characteristics between underground (U/G) cable and overhead (O/H) line for low-voltage direct current (LVDC) distribution. Numerous low loaded long-distance distribution networks served by medium-voltage alternative current (MVAC) distribution lines exist in the Korean distribution network. This is an unavoidable choice to compensate voltage drop, therefore, excessive cost is expended for the amount of electrical power load. The Korean Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) is consequently seeking a solution to replace the MVAC distribution line with a LVDC distribution line, reducing costs and providing better quality direct current (DC) electricity. A LVDC distribution network can be installed with U/G cables or O/H lines. In this paper, a realistic MVAC distribution network in a mountainous area was selected as the target model to replace with LVDC. A 30 year net present value (NPV) analysis of the economic feasibility was conducted to compare the cost of the two types of distribution line. A simulation study compared the results of the DC line fault with the power system computer aided design/electro-magnetic transient direct current (PSCAD/EMTDC). The economic feasibility evaluation and simulation study results will be used to select the applicable type of LVDC distribution network.
Keywords: low-voltage direct current (LVDC); distribution network; net present value (NPV) analysis; communication repeater; power converter
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [756 KB, uploaded 20 March 2014 16:13 CET]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-Y.; Cho, J.-T.; Song, I.-K.; Kweon, B.-M.; Chung, I.-Y.; Choi, J.-H. Comparison between Underground Cable and Overhead Line for a Low-Voltage Direct Current Distribution Network Serving Communication Repeater. Energies 2014, 7, 1656-1672.

AMA Style

Kim J-H, Kim J-Y, Cho J-T, Song I-K, Kweon B-M, Chung I-Y, Choi J-H. Comparison between Underground Cable and Overhead Line for a Low-Voltage Direct Current Distribution Network Serving Communication Repeater. Energies. 2014; 7(3):1656-1672.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jae-Han; Kim, Ju-Yong; Cho, Jin-Tae; Song, Il-Keun; Kweon, Bo-Min; Chung, Il-Yop; Choi, Joon-Ho. 2014. "Comparison between Underground Cable and Overhead Line for a Low-Voltage Direct Current Distribution Network Serving Communication Repeater." Energies 7, no. 3: 1656-1672.

Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert