- freely available
Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error
AbstractRemaining useful life (RUL) prediction is central to the prognostics and health management (PHM) of lithium-ion batteries. This paper proposes a novel RUL prediction method for lithium-ion batteries based on the Wiener process with measurement error (WPME). First, we use the truncated normal distribution (TND) based modeling approach for the estimated degradation state and obtain an exact and closed-form RUL distribution by simultaneously considering the measurement uncertainty and the distribution of the estimated drift parameter. Then, the traditional maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method for population based parameters estimation is remedied to improve the estimation efficiency. Additionally, we analyze the relationship between the classic MLE method and the combination of the Bayesian updating algorithm and the expectation maximization algorithm for the real time RUL prediction. Interestingly, it is found that the result of the combination algorithm is equal to the classic MLE method. Inspired by this observation, a heuristic algorithm for the real time parameters updating is presented. Finally, numerical examples and a case study of lithium-ion batteries are provided to substantiate the superiority of the proposed RUL prediction method.
Share & Cite This Article
Export to BibTeX | EndNote
MDPI and ACS Style
Tang, S.; Yu, C.; Wang, X.; Guo, X.; Si, X. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error. Energies 2014, 7, 520-547.View more citation formats
Tang S, Yu C, Wang X, Guo X, Si X. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error. Energies. 2014; 7(2):520-547.Chicago/Turabian Style
Tang, Shengjin; Yu, Chuanqiang; Wang, Xue; Guo, Xiaosong; Si, Xiaosheng. 2014. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error." Energies 7, no. 2: 520-547.